소비목적과 광고유형이 규제적합성 및 제품평가에 미치는 영향
Interactive Roles of Consumption Goals and Types of Advertisements on Regulatory Fit and Product Evaluation
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Consumers can have impression goals as well as defense goals. Those with impression goals could use social goals or opinions of others in a social context to determine their attitudes, and those with defense goals could maintain their existing attitudes and beliefs. Since people typically approach pleasure and avoid pain, there are two kinds of goal orientations depending on regulatory focus theory. Therefore, marketers could design advertisements for their products on the basis of two types of focus, promotion-focused and prevention-focused advertisements. This study aims to explore how consumers with different consumption goals evaluate an advertised product. The results of this study demonstrate that consumers with impression goals felt much more “right” about the product in a promotion-focused, rather than prevention-focused, advertisement, and those with defense goals, felt much more “right” about the product in a prevention-focused advertisement. Consumers with impression goals evaluated the product in the promotion-focused advertisement more favorably than in the prevention-focused advertisement, and those with defense goals evaluated the product in the prevention-focused advertisement more favorably.
Abstract
Consumers can have impression goals as well as defense goals. Those with impression goals could use social goals or opinions of others in a social context to determine their attitudes, and those with defense goals could maintain their existing attitudes and beliefs. Since people typically approach pleasure and avoid pain, there are two kinds of goal orientations depending on regulatory focus theory. Therefore, marketers could design advertisements for their products on the basis of two types of focus, promotion-focused and prevention-focused advertisements. This study aims to explore how consumers with different consumption goals evaluate an advertised product. The results of this study demonstrate that consumers with impression goals felt much more “right” about the product in a promotion-focused, rather than prevention-focused, advertisement, and those with defense goals, felt much more “right” about the product in a prevention-focused advertisement. Consumers with impression goals evaluated the product in the promotion-focused advertisement more favorably than in the prevention-focused advertisement, and those with defense goals evaluated the product in the prevention-focused advertisement more favorably.
참고문헌 (20)
- Aaker, Jennifer L, "‘I’ Seek Pleasure and ‘We’Avoid Pains: The Role of Self-Regulatory Goals in Information Processing and Persuasion", Journal of Consumer Research, 28, pp.33~49 (2001)
- Aaker, Jennifer L, "Understanding Regulatory Fit", Journal of Marketing Research, 43, pp.15~19 (2006)
- Agrawal, Nidhi, "Motivated Reasoning in Outcome-Bias Effects", Journal of Consumer Research, 31, pp.798~805 (2005)
- Avnet, Tamar, "Locomotion,Assessment and Regulatory Fit: Value Transfer from How to What", Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39, pp.525~530 (2003)
- Avnet, Tamar, "How Regulatory Fit Affects Value in Consumer Choices and Opinions", Journal of Marketing Research, 43, pp.1~10 (2006)
- Camacho, Christopher J, "Moral Value Transfer from Regulatory Fit: What Feels Right Is Right and What Feels Wrong Is Wrong", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, pp.498~510 (2003)
- Chen, Serena, "Getting at the Truth or Getting Along: Accuracy versus Impression Motivated Heuristic and Systematic Processing", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, pp.262~275 (1996)
- Chernev, Alexander, "Goal–Attribute Compatibility in Consumer Choice", Journal of Consumer Psychology, pp.141~150 (2004)
- Crowe, Ellen, "Regulatory Focus and Strategic Inclinations: Promotion and Prevention in Decision Making", Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 69, pp.117~132 (1997)
- Ditto, Peter H, "Motivated Skepticism: Use of Differential Decision Criteria for Preferred and Non-preferred Conclusions", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, pp.568~584 (1992)
- Floyd, Donna L, "A Meta-Analysis of Research on Protection Motivation Theory", Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 30(2), pp.407~429 (2000)
- Higgins, E. Tory, "Beyond Pleasure and Pain", American Psychologist, 52, pp.1280~1300 (1997)
- Higgins, E. Tory, "Making a Good Decision:Value from Fit", American Psychologist, 55(11), pp.1217~1230 (2000)
- Higgins, E. Tory, "Transfer of Value from Fit", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, pp.1140~1153 (2003)
- Jain, Shailendra P, "Motivated Reasoning: A Depth of Processing Perspective", Journal of Consumer Research, 26, pp.358~371 (2000)
- Johar, J. S, "Value Expressive Versus Utilitarian Advertising Appeals:When and Why to Use Which Appeal", Journal of Advertising, 20, pp.23~34 (1991)
- Keller, Punam A, "Regulatory Focus and Efficacy of Health Messages", Journal of Consumer Research, 33, pp.109~114 (2006)
- Lee, Angela Y, "Value From Regulatory Construal Fit: The Persuasive Impact of Fit between Consumer Goals and Message Concreteness", Journal of Consumer Research, 36, pp.735~747 (2010)
- Rogers, Giner-Sorolla, "Selective Use of Heuristic and Systematic Processing under Defense Motivation", Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, pp.84~97 (1997)
- Snyder, Mark, "Self-Monitoring of Expressive Behavior", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 30(4), pp.526~537 (1974)