내현적 주의와 재정향이 탐지과제 수행에 미치는 영향
The effects of endogenous attention and reorienting on performance of detection task
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
내현적 주의와 재정향이 탐지과제 수행에 미치는 영향을 반응촉진과 회귀억제를 통해 탐색하였다. Posner와 Cohen (1980)의 고전적인 탐지패러다임에서는 단서를 제시하고 일정한 자극제시시차 후 그 단서와 같거나 혹은 다른 위치에 나타나는 표적에 대한 탐지수행을 관찰한다. 본 연구에서는 내현적 주의를 유발하기 위해 단서가 표적에 대해 예측력을 가지도록 조작하였고 단서자극과 표적 사이에 새로운 단서(재정향 단서)를 삽 입하여 재정향을 유도하였다. 실험 1에서는 재정향 단서가 제시되는 시기를 초기, 중기, 후기로 구분하여 실험을 실시하였다. 그 결과 재정향이 제시되는 시기별로 자극제시시차(150ms, 400ms, 850ms)에 따라 다른 양상의 반응촉진 및 회귀억제가 발생하였으나 해석 가능한 일정한 패턴을 확인하기는 어려웠다. 하지만 재정향이 초기에 발생한 실험조건을 재분석한 결과 반응촉진과 회귀억제가 자극제시시차에 따라 교차하여 나타나는 단순탐지과제의 전형적인 결과를 얻을 수 있었다. 실험 2에서는 실험 1에서 재정향이 초기에 발생하는 조건에 대한 추가실험을 실시하였다. 실험 결과 자극제시시차가 짧을 때는 반응촉진이 발생하였으며 자극제시시차가 길 때는 회귀억제가 발생하였다. 이 결과는 단서자극이 표적에 대한 예측력을 가질 때 자극제시시차가 긴 조건에서 회귀억제가 사라진다는 기존의 보고(Wright & Richard, 2000)와 반대되는 결과이다. 이 결과는 최초단서가 제시된 후 회귀억제의 효과가 소멸되기 전에 매우 빠르게 제시되는 재정향 단서는 이중 회귀억제를 가져온다는 것을 제안한다. 본 연구는 내현적 주의에 의해 특정한 위치에 주의를 할당할 때에도 반복적으로 빠르게 제시되는 단서자극은 회귀억제를 극대화함으로써 내현적 주의를 상쇄할 수 있음을 시사한다.
Abstract
We tested the effects of endogenous attention and reorienting on the performance of detection task. In the classic detection paradigm of Posner and Cohen (1980), performance on target detection is measured, where target appears either on the same or difference spatial location of cue stimulus after brief period of SOA (stimulus onset asynchrony). In this study, we induced exogenous attention by manipulating predictability of cue for target, and also induced reorientation by inserting additional (reorienting) cue between initial cue and target. Experiment 1 had three conditions of reorienting speed: Early, middle, and late. Facilitation and IOR (inhibition of return) occurred in different forms depending on SOA and reorienting speed, but we were not able to discover interpretable pattern in the results. However, reanalysis of early reorienting condition revealed that facilitation and IOR occurred in a crossed manner where short SOA found facilitation and long SOA did IOR, the typical results of simple detection task. Experiment 2 collected additional data to replicate the results in early reorienting condition of experiment 1. The results obtained that facilitation occurred with short SOA and IOR with long SOA. These results contrast with those of Wright and Richard (2000) where they reported elimination of IOR when cue had predictability of target locations. These results suggest that additional cue (here, orienting cue), which rapidly appears before extinction of IOR by prior cue, brings about double IOR. The present research demonstrates that even when attention is allocated to certain location via endogenous mechanism, rapidly repeating cues in certain location maximizes IOR that offsets the effects of endogenous attention to the same location.
참고문헌 (24)
- Briand, K. A, "Inhibition of return in manual and saccadic response systems", Perception and Psychophysics, 62(8), pp.1512~1524 (2000)
- Cheal, M, "Does attention have different effects on line orientation and line arrangement discrimination?", Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A, 43(4), pp.825~857 (1991)
- Hein, E, "Visual attention and temporal discrimination: Differential effects of automatic and voluntary cueing", Visual Cognition, 13(1), pp.29~50 (2006)
- James, W, "The principles of psychology" (1890), Henry Holt
- Klein, RM, "Inhibition of return", Trends in Cognitive Science, 4, pp.138~147 (2000)
- Ling, S, "Sustained and transient covert attention enhance the signal via different contrast response functions", Vision Research, 46(8), pp.1210~1220 (2006)
- Liu, T, "Comparing the time course and efficacy of spatial and feature-based attention", Vision Research, 47(1), pp.108~113 (2007)
- MacPherson, A, "Cue back or no cue back? Cueing paradigms influencing inhibition of return in children and adolescents", Poster presented at the International Society for the Study of Behavioral Development (2002)
- Marvin M. Chun, "A Taxonomy of External and Internal Attention", The Annual Review of Psychology, 62, pp.73~101 (2011)
- Mazza, V, "How automatic are audiovisual links in exogenous spatial attention?", Neuropsychologia, 45, pp.514~522 (2007)
- Muller, H. J, "Reflexive and voluntary orienting of visual attention: Time course of activation and resistance to interruption", Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15(2), pp.315~330 (1989)
- Nakayama, K, "Sustained and transient components of focal visual attention", Vision Research, 29(11), pp.1631~1647 (1989)
- Posner, M. I, "Attended and unattended processing modes: The role of set for spatial location, In Modes of perceiving and processing information", pp.137~157 (1978), Erlbau
- Posner, M. I, "Orienting of attention", Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32(1), pp.3~25 (1980)
- Posner, M. I, "Components of visual orienting, In Attention and performance X: Control of language processes", pp.551~556 (1984), Erlbaum
- Pratt, J, "Examining the role of the fixation cue in inhibition of return", Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 56, pp.294~301 (2002)
- Rafal, R. D, "Saccade preparation inhibits reorienting to recently attended locations", Human Perception and Performance, 15, pp.673~685 (1989)
- Remington, R. W, "Involuntary attentional capture by abrupt onsets", Perception & Psychophysics, 51(3), pp.279~290 (1992)
- Sanae Okamoto-Barth, "The role of attention in the facilitation effect and another “inhibition of return”", Cogntion, 101, pp.42~50 (2006)
- Santangelo, V, "Is the exogenous orienting of spatial attention truly automatic? Evidence from unimodal and multisensory studies", Consciousness and Cognition, 17, pp.989~1015 (2008)
- 서준호, "단서자극과 표적자극의 표상된 위치의 일치성이 주의기제의 작용에 미치는 영향", 인지과학, 20(4), pp.481~506 (2009), 한국인지과학회
- Spence, C, "Exogenous spatial cuing studies of human crossmodal attention and multisensory integration, In Crossmodal space and crossmodal attention", pp.277~320 (2004), Oxford University Press
- Wright, R. D, "Inhibition of return is not reflexive, In Visual Attention", pp.330~347 (1998), Oxford University Press
- Wright, R. D, "Location cue validity affects inhibition-of-return of visual processing", Vision Research, 40, pp.2351~2358 (2000)