단서자극과 표적자극의 표상된 위치의 일치성이 주의기제의 작용에 미치는 영향
The Effect of Consistency between Represented Location of the Cue and the Target on Attention Mechanism
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
본 연구의 목적은 단서와 표적의 표상된 위치의 일치성이 주의기제의 작용에 중요한 역할을 하는지 회귀억제 연구방법을 이용하여 규명하는 것이었다. 실험 1에서는 청각단서와 시각표적을, 실험 2에서는 시각단서와 청각표적을 사용하였고, 단서와 표적이 제시되는 표상된 위치와 물리적 위치의 일치성에 따라 일치조건과 불일치조건으로 구분하였다. 실험결과, 실험 1에서 표상된 위치의 일치성에 따라 일치조건과 불일치조건을 구분하였을 경우 일치조건에서 반응촉진이 관찰되었다. 하지만 물리적 위치의 일치성에 따른 일치/불일치조건에서는 반응시간 차이가 관찰되지 않았다. 실험 2에서도 표상된 위치의 일치성에 따라 일치조건과 불일치조건을 구분하였을 경우 일치조건에서 반응촉진이 관찰되었으나 매우 제한적이었다. 이러한 실험결과는 단서와 표적의 표상된 위치의 일치성이 주의기제의 역할 중 반응촉진에 중요한 역할을 하며, 주의 연구에서 물리적 위치와 표상된 위치를 구분해야할 필요성을 시사한다.
Abstract
The purpose of the present research was to examine whether the attention mechanism employs physical or represented location of the cue and target. To achieve this, we have employed the paradigm of facilitation of response as well as inhibition of return. In the experiments, valid and invalid conditions were defined by the position consistency of the cue and the target in the aspect of either physical or represented location. We used auditory cue and visual target in Experiment 1 while visual cue and auditory target in Experiment 2. As a results, in Experiment 1, effect of facilitation of response in valid condition was found when the valid/invalid conditions were defined in the aspect of represented location. In Experiment 2, effect of facilitation of response in valid condition was found when the valid/invalid conditions were defined in the aspect of represented location. In all the other conditions, no effect was found when the conditions were defined in the aspect of physical location. No effects of inhibition of return were found in Experiment 2. These results imply the possibility that attention mechanism operates based on objects' represented location rather than on their physical location. More importantly, the present research suggests that it is necessary to separate represented location from physical location of the target and the cue in the experiment of facilitation of response and inhibition of return in the future.
참고문헌 (33)
- Abrams, R. A, "Inhibition of return: Effects of attentional cuing on eye movement latencies", Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, pp.467~477 (1994)
- Farah, M. J., "Parietal lobe mechanism of spatial attention: modality-specific or supramodal?", Neuropsychologia, 27, pp.461~470 (1989)
- Geissler,L.R, "Sound localization under determined expectation", American Journal of Psychology, 26, pp.268~285 (1915)
- Gregory,R, "Mirrors in mind" (1998), Penguin Books
- Ho, C, "Assessing the effectiveness of various auditory cues in capturing a driver's visual attention", of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 11, pp.157~174 (2005)
- Covert crossmodality orienting of attention in space, "Klein, R. M", Psychonomics Society, ~, pp.Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychonomics Society (1987)
- Klein,R.M, "Inhibition of return", Trends in Cognition Science, 4, pp.138~147 (2000)
- Kwak, H. W, "Consequences of allocating attention to locations and to other attributes", Perception & Psychophysics, 51, pp.455~464 (1992)
- Law, M. B, "Color-based inhibition of return", Perception & Psychophysics, 57, pp.402~408 (1995)
- Mazza, V., "How automatic are audiovisual links in exogenous spatial attention?", Neuropsychologia, 45, pp.514~522 (2007)
- Mondor, T. A, "Facilitative and inhibitory effects of location and frequency cues: Evidence of a modulation in perceptual sensitivity", Perception & Psychopysics, 61, pp.438~444 (1999)
- Mondor, T. A., "Inhibitory processes in auditory selective attention: Evidence of location - based and frequency - based inhibition of return", Perception & Psychopysics, 60, pp.296~302 (1998)
- Mondor, T. A., "On the role of eye movements and saccade preparation in generating auditory inhibition of return", Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54, pp.326~338 (2000)
- Posner, M. I, "Attended and unattended processing modes: The role of set for spatial location. In Modes of perceiving and processing information", pp.137~157 (1978), Erlbaum
- Posner, M. I, "Components of Visual orienting. In Attention and Performance Vol. X", pp.531~556 (1984), Erlbaum
- Posner, M. I, "Inhibition of return: neural basis and function", Neuropsychology, 2, pp.211~228 (1985)
- Rafal, R. D, "Orienting of visual attention in progressive supranuclear palsy", Brain, 111, pp.267~280 (1988)
- Rafal, R. D, "Saccade preparation inhibits reorienting to recently attended locati", Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15, pp.673~685 (1989)
- Ramachandran, V. S, "Mirror agnosia. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B", Biological Sciences, 264, pp.645~647 (1997)
- Reuter-Lorenz, P. A, "What is inhibited in inhibition of return", Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22, pp.367~378 (1996)
- Roder, B, "Assessing the effect of posture change on tactile inhibition-of-return", Experimental Brain Research, 143, pp.453~462 (2002)
- Santangelo, V, "Is the exogenous orienting of spatial attention truly automatic? Evidence from unimodal and multisensory studies", Consciousness and Cognition, 17, pp.989~1015 (2008)
- Sapir, A, "Inhibition of return in spatial attention: direct evidence for collicular generation", Nature Neuroscience, 2, pp.1053~1054 (1999)
- Schmidt,W.C, "Inhibition of return without visual input", Neuropsychologia, 34, pp.943~952 (1996)
- Spence, C, "Audiovisual links in exogenous covert spatial orienting", Perception & Psychophysics, 59, pp.1~22 (1997)
- Spence, C, "Inhibition of return following an auditory cue; the role of central reorienting events", Experimental Brain Research, 118, pp.352~360 (1998)
- Spence, C, "Auditory and audiovisual inhibition of return", Perception & Psychophysics, 60, pp.125~139 (1998)
- Spence, C, "Inhibition of return is supramodal: a demonstration between all possible pairings of vision, touch, and audition", Experimental Brain Research, 134, pp.42~48 (2000)
- Spence, C, "Exogenous spatial cuing studies of human crossmodal attention and multisensory integration. In Crossmodal space and crossmodal attention", pp.277~320 (2004), Oxford University Press.
- Steven, S. S, "The localization of actual sources of sound", American Journal of Psychology, 48, pp.297~306 (1936)
- Taylor, T. L, "On the causes and effects of inhibition of return", Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 5, pp.625~643 (1998)
- Tipper, S. P, "Object-centered inhibition of return of visual attention", Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Secion A: Human Experimental Psychology, 43, pp.289~298 (1991)
- Ward,L.M, "Supramodal and modality-specific mechanisms for stimulus-driven shifts of auditory and visual attention", Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 48, pp.242~259 (1994)