본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Maastricht and the Prospects of Fiscal Integration in the European Union

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류지역학

초록

The Maastricht Treaty of 1992 constitutes a major step in the process of economic and monetary integration of the European Union (EU). With the creation of the common currency, the euro, the member countries gave up their sovereignty in the area of monetary policy; and the ECB gained the sole responsibility in this policy field. Whereas the EU moved forward in the field of monetary policy integration, fiscal policy remained the responsibility of the individual members states. The separation of monetary and fiscal policy became problematic when the euro crisis hit in 2009 and some countries had severe problems refinancing their debt. The EU has reacted to this crisis with the creation of institutions such as the European Stability Mechanism (ESM) and with the Fiscal Compact. After the crisis fiscal integration remained largely off the table. However, recently there has been some movement in this policy field with the European Commission and some key states, especially, Germany showing more readiness to consider deeper fiscal integration in the EU. The Covid-19 crisis has provided the EU with another opportunity to move forward in this policy field. The article looks at the different proposals and initiatives for a common European fiscal policy and reflects on the relationship between common monetary and fiscal policy. This involves the issuance of common euro bonds, the establishment of an investment guarantee scheme and a union-wide unemployment reinsurance system. It also stresses the need to complete the European Banking Union to provide more financial stability for the union. In the debate between the two major positions on fiscal policy integration there are two camps, the stability union camp and the fiscal union camp. It was found that the stability camp has reluctantly yielded to few of the positions of the fiscal union camp. While there has been some movement in these positions, a stability union still is the leading paradigm in the economic and monetary union (EMU).

Abstract

The Maastricht Treaty of 1992 constitutes a major step in the process of economic and monetary integration of the European Union (EU). With the creation of the common currency, the euro, the member countries gave up their sovereignty in the area of monetary policy; and the ECB gained the sole responsibility in this policy field. Whereas the EU moved forward in the field of monetary policy integration, fiscal policy remained the responsibility of the individual members states. The separation of monetary and fiscal policy became problematic when the euro crisis hit in 2009 and some countries had severe problems refinancing their debt. The EU has reacted to this crisis with the creation of institutions such as the European Stability Mechanism (ESM) and with the Fiscal Compact. After the crisis fiscal integration remained largely off the table. However, recently there has been some movement in this policy field with the European Commission and some key states, especially, Germany showing more readiness to consider deeper fiscal integration in the EU. The Covid-19 crisis has provided the EU with another opportunity to move forward in this policy field. The article looks at the different proposals and initiatives for a common European fiscal policy and reflects on the relationship between common monetary and fiscal policy. This involves the issuance of common euro bonds, the establishment of an investment guarantee scheme and a union-wide unemployment reinsurance system. It also stresses the need to complete the European Banking Union to provide more financial stability for the union. In the debate between the two major positions on fiscal policy integration there are two camps, the stability union camp and the fiscal union camp. It was found that the stability camp has reluctantly yielded to few of the positions of the fiscal union camp. While there has been some movement in these positions, a stability union still is the leading paradigm in the economic and monetary union (EMU).

참고문헌 (47)

  1. Philip Arestis, "The Design Faults of the Economic and Monetary Union", Journal of Contemporary European Studies, 19(1), pp.21~32 (2011), Informa UK Limited[DOI]
  2. Beck, Thorsten, "Ordoliberalism: A German Oddity?" (2017), CEPR Press
  3. Bonefeld, Werner, "The Strong State and the Free Economy" (2017), Rowman & Littlefield
  4. Boonstra, Wim, "How EMU can be strengthened by central funding of public deficits", ELEC, Cahier Comte Boël, (14) (2010)
  5. "Saving EMU. Central funding of public deficits, combined with a renewed Stability and Growth Pact, can stabilize the eurozone, Rabobank Working Paper Series, No. 2011/02" (2011)[URL]
  6. "Coronavirus crisis prompts German rethink on Eurobonds. Some say country’s traditional resistance to debt mutualisation could crumble" (2020)[URL]
  7. "Viewpoint: Managing euro zone sovereign risk in the face of the pandemic" (2020)[URL]
  8. De Grauwe, Paul, "Gains for All: A Proposal for Common Euro Bonds", Intereconomics, May, 2009
  9. Paul De Grauwe, "Core-Periphery Relations in the Eurozone", The Economists’ Voice, 15(1) (2018), Walter de Gruyter GmbH[DOI]
  10. Paul De Grauwe, "Making the Eurozone Sustainable by Financial Engineering or Political Union?", JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 57(S1), pp.40~48 (2019), Wiley[DOI]
  11. "Merkel Offers Breakthrough Deal to Shield EU From Virus Fallout" (2020)[URL]
  12. "Report on economic and monetary union in the European Community" (1989)[URL]
  13. "The Blue Bond Proposal, Breugel Policy Briefs, Issue 2010 (3)" (2010)[URL]
  14. "The Long Shadow of Ordoliberalism: Germany’s Approach to the Euro Crisis" (2012)[URL]
  15. Completing the Euro. A road map towards fiscal union in Europe, Report of the ‘Tomaso Padoa-Schioppa Group, "Enderlein, Henrik", Notre Europe, ~ (2012)
  16. "Reflection Paper on the Deepening of the Economic and Monetary Union" (2017)[URL]
  17. "Frequently asked questions: Enabling framework for sovereign bond-backed securities" (2018)[URL]
  18. "SURE, The European instrument for temporary Support to mitigate Unemployment Risks in an Emergency (SURE)" (2020)[URL]
  19. "COVID-19: the EU's response to the economic fallout" (2020)[URL]
  20. Feld, Lars P., "Ordoliberalism: A German Oddity?" (2017), CEPR Press
  21. "On the Way to a Fiscal or a Stability Union? The Plans for a ‘Genuine’ Economic and Monetary Union" (2013)[URL]
  22. "The divided Eurozone Mapping Conflicting Interests on the Reform of the Monetary Union" (2017)[URL]
  23. Havertz, Ralf, "Prospects of Common Debt Responsibility in the Euro Area. The Case for Eurobonds", Journal of International Studies, 19 (2013)
  24. Havertz Ralf Arnold, "The Making of the European Periphery : A Critical Analysis of the Discourse on the Euro Crisis", 21세기정치학회보, 24(3), pp.711~736 (2014), 21세기정치학회[DOI]
  25. "Merkel: No eurobonds ‘as long as I live" (2012)[URL]
  26. "Completing Europe’s Economic and Monetary Union" (2015)[URL]
  27. Juncker, Jean-Claude, "E-bonds would end the crisis", Financial Times, December 5, 2010, ~ (2010)
  28. "Creating a Euro Area Safe Asset without Mutualizing Risk (Much)" (2019)[URL]
  29. McKinnon, Ronald I., "Optimum Currency Areas", American Economic Review, 52(4) (1963)
  30. European Economic and Monetary Integration and the Optimum Currency Area Theory, "Mongelli, Francesco Paolo", European Commission, Directorate-General for Economic and Financial Affairs, ~, pp.Economic Papers 302 (2008)
  31. Mundell, Robert A., "A Theory of Optimum Currency Areas", The American Economic Review, 51(4) (1961)
  32. Myrus, Richard, "From Bretton Woods to Brussels : A Legal Analysis of the o Brussels : A Legal Analysis of the Exchange-Rate Arrangements of the International Monetary Fund and the European Community", Fordham Law Review, 62(7) (1994)
  33. "The Influence of Ordoliberalism on European Integration Processes, MPRA Paper 52331" (2013)[URL]
  34. "Update 1 – German minister rejects euro bonds – ‘It's a phantom debate" (2020)[URL]
  35. Nermina Pobrić, "IS THE IDEA OF THE COMMON EUROBONDS ISSUANCE IN THE EUROZONE SUSTAINABLE?", InterEULawEast: Journal for the International and European Law, Economics and Market Integrations, 6(2), pp.1~30 (2019), Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Zagreb[DOI]
  36. Damir Sehovic, "Coordination of Monetary and Fiscal Policy in the European Monetary Union", Management - Journal for theory and practice of management, 19(73), pp.69~83 (2014), Faculty of Organizational Sciences[DOI]
  37. The Sensitive Swings of the European Pendulum: Ordoliberal and Neo-Keynesian Competitive Theories of European Integration, "Skalkos, Dimitris P.", Center for Economic Theories and Policies, Sofia University, ~, pp.Bulgarian Economic Papers No. 06-2018 (2018)
  38. "Will Covid-19 Reduce the Resistance to Eurobonds? ECMI Event Report" (2020)[URL]
  39. "(German Version) Eur-lex" (1957)[URL]
  40. "Council of the European Communities and Commission of the European Communities" (1992)[URL]
  41. "Merkel backs EU bonds to fight coronavirus crisis" (2020)[URL]
  42. "Report to the Council and the Commission on the Realisation by Stages of Economic and Monetary Union in the Community, Supplement to Bulletin 11 (1970) of the European Communities" (1970)[URL]
  43. "Eurobonds: Concepts and Applications" (2011)[URL]
  44. Young, Brigitte, "Ordoliberalism: A German Oddity?" (2017), CEPR Press

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (10건)