본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

사회적 배제, 반려동물 키우기, 그리고 심리적 안녕감: 탐색적 연구

Social exclusion, raising companion animal, and psychological well-being: A exploratory study

이국희
한국감성과학회 (The Korean Society For Emotion & Sensibility)|2019.03|감성과학 (Science of Emotion & Sensibility)|제22권 제1호|pp. 3-14|DOI https://doi.org/10.14695/KJSOS.2018.22.1.3

1

조회

0

다운로드

16

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

행복happinesspsychological well-being심리적 안녕감social exclusion사회적 배제반려동물Companion animal심리사회적 욕구psycho-social needs
주제분류감성과학

초록

본 탐색적 연구는 사회적 배제 경험과 반려동물 키우기의 상호작용이 심리적 안녕감에 미치는 효과를 확인하기 위해 이루어졌다. 이를 위해 참가자들이 공동체로부터 얼마나 존중받고 있는지 (네/아니오), 현재 반려동물을 키우고 있는지 (네/아니오), 키우고 있다면 어떤 동물인지 (복수응답 가능)에 대해 응답하게 하였고, 참가자들의 심리적 안녕감을 측정하였다. 결과적으로 사회적 배제를 경험한 집단은 그렇지 않은 집단보다 심리적 안녕감이 낮았고, 반려동물을 키우는 집단은 키우지 않는 집단보다 심리적 안녕감이 높았다. 아울러 사회적 배제를 경험한 집단은 반려동물을 키울 때가 키우지 않을 때보다 심리적 안녕감이 높았고, 사회적 배제를 경험하지 않은 집단은 반려동물 키울 때와 키우지 않을 때의 심리적 안녕감에 차이가 없었다. 즉 사회적 배제 (없음 vs. 있음)와 반려동물 키우기 (안 키움 vs. 키움)의 이원상호작용이 심리적 안녕감에 미치는 효과가 관찰되었다. 본 연구는 반려동물 키우기가 웰빙을 증진시키는 효과가 있는 조건과 없는 조건을 경험적 데이터를 통해 확인했다는 점에서 이론적 시사점을 가진다.

Abstract

This exploratory study investigated the effect of the interaction between social exclusion experience and raising companion animal on psychological well-being. Participants answered questions on whether they were respected by the community (yes or no); whether they currently have a companion animal(s) (yes or no); if they do, what kind of animal(s) they have (multiple answers allowed). The study assessed the psychological well-being of the participants. The group that experienced social exclusion demonstrated lower levels of psychological well-being than the group that did not, and the group with a companion animal showed higher levels of psychological well-being than the group without. In the group that experienced social exclusion, those with a companion animal demonstrated higher psychological well-being than those without. In the group that did not experience social exclusion, there was no difference in psychological well-being between those with a companion animal and those without. In conclusion, this study observed the effect of the binary interaction between social exclusion (experienced vs. not experienced) and raising companion animal (not raising vs. raising) on psychological well-being. The empirical data offer theoretical implications for the conditions in which companion animals do or do not improve psychological well-being.

참고문헌 (37)

  1. Katherine Jacobs Bao, "Pets and Happiness: Examining the Association between Pet Ownership and Wellbeing", Anthrozoös, 29(2), pp.283~296 (2016), Informa UK Limited[DOI]
  2. Margaret A. Boldt, "The Impact of Companion Animals in Later Life and Considerations for Practice", Journal of Applied Gerontology, 11(2), pp.228~239 (2016), SAGE Publications[DOI]
  3. A M Beck, "Health Enhancement and Companion Animal Ownership", Annual Review of Public Health, 17(1), pp.247~257 (1996), Annual Reviews[DOI]
  4. Thomas F. Garrity, "Pet Ownership and Attachment as Supportive Factors in the Health of the Elderly", Anthrozoös, 3(1), pp.35~44 (2015), Informa UK Limited[DOI]
  5. Garrity, T. F, "Companion animals in human health", pp.3~22 (1998), Sage Publications, Inc
  6. William B. Davidson, "The relationship between sense of community and subjective well-being: A first look", Journal of Community Psychology, 19(3), pp.246~253 (1991), Wiley[DOI]
  7. Ed Diener, "Wealth and happiness across the world: Material prosperity predicts life evaluation, whereas psychosocial prosperity predicts positive feeling.", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99(1), pp.52~61 (2010), American Psychological Association (APA)[DOI]
  8. Harold Herzog, "The Impact of Pets on Human Health and Psychological Well-Being", Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20(4), pp.236~239 (2011), SAGE Publications[DOI]
  9. Yaniv Kanat-Maymon, "Basic psychological need fulfillment in human–pet relationships and well-being", Personality and Individual Differences, 92, pp.69~73 (2016), Elsevier BV[DOI]
  10. Kim, M, "Analyses on the construct of psychological well-being (PWB) of Korean male and female adults", Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology, 15(2), pp.19~39 (2001)
  11. Dan Lago, "Companion Animals, Attitudes Toward Pets, and Health Outcomes among the Elderly: A Long-Term Follow-Up", Anthrozoös, 3(1), pp.25~34 (2015), Informa UK Limited[DOI]
  12. 이국희, "사회적 배제가 여가의 의도, 의미, 그리고 재미에 미치는 효과", 사회과학연구, 29(4), pp.41~59 (2018), 사회과학연구소[DOI]
  13. 이국희, "사회적 배제가 추천 및 유행 상품 구매의도에 미치는 효과", 마케팅논집(Journal of Marketing Studies), 26(3), pp.1~18 (2018), 한국전략마케팅학회
  14. 이국희, "여가는 사이에 있다: 사회적 배제, 적극적 여가, 그리고 소극적 여가", 한국여가레크리에이션학회지, 42(3), pp.1~11 (2018), 한국여가레크리에이션학회[DOI]
  15. Maller, C, "Healthy nature healthy people : Contact with nature’ as an upstream health promotion intervention for populations", Health Promotion International, 21(1), pp.45~54 (2006)[DOI]
  16. June McNicholas, "Dogs as catalysts for social interactions: Robustness of the effect", British Journal of Psychology, 91(1), pp.61~70 (2000), Wiley[DOI]
  17. Elizabeth K. Nisbet, "Happiness is in our Nature: Exploring Nature Relatedness as a Contributor to Subjective Well-Being", Journal of Happiness Studies, 12(2), pp.303~322 (2011), Springer Science and Business Media LLC[DOI]
  18. OECD, "OECD Guidelines on Measuring Subjective Well-being" (2013), OECD Publishing
  19. Marguerite O'Haire, "Companion animals and human health: Benefits, challenges, and the road ahead", Journal of Veterinary Behavior, 5(5), pp.226~234 (2010), Elsevier BV[DOI]
  20. Parminder Raina, "Influence of Companion Animals on the Physical and Psychological Health of Older People: An Analysis of a One-Year Longitudinal Study", Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 47(3), pp.323~329 (1999), Wiley[DOI]
  21. Harry T. Reis, "Daily Well-Being: The Role of Autonomy, Competence, and Relatedness", Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26(4), pp.419~435 (2016), SAGE Publications[DOI]
  22. Ryan, R. M, "Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being", American Psychologist, 55(1), pp.68~78 (2000)
  23. Ryan, R. M, "Living well: A self-determination theory perspective on eudaimonia", Journal of Happiness Studies, 9(1), pp.139~170 (2008)[DOI]
  24. Carol D. Ryff, "Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being.", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(6), pp.1069~1081 (1989), American Psychological Association (APA)[DOI]
  25. Ryff, C. D, "The structure of psychological well-being revisited", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(4), pp.719~727 (1995)[DOI]
  26. Ryff, C. D, "Psychological wellbeing : Meaning, measurement, and implications for psychotherapy research", Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 65(1), pp.14~23 (1996)[DOI]
  27. Jessica Slatter, "Homelessness and Companion Animals: More than Just a Pet?", British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 75(8), pp.377~383 (2012), SAGE Publications[DOI]
  28. Serpell, J. A, "Handbook on Animal-Assisted Therapy", pp.3~19 (2006), Academic Press
  29. Louis Tay, "Needs and subjective well-being around the world.", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(2), pp.354~365 (2011), American Psychological Association (APA)[DOI]
  30. The good childhood report 2018, "The Children’s Society", The Children’s Society, ~ (2018)
  31. Sarah-Geneviève Trépanier, "Workplace bullying and psychological health at work: The mediating role of satisfaction of needs for autonomy, competence and relatedness", Work & Stress, 27(2), pp.123~140 (2013), Informa UK Limited[DOI]
  32. Wendy G. Turner, "The Role of Companion Animals Throughout the Family Life Cycle", Journal of Family Social Work, 9(4), pp.11~21 (2005), Informa UK Limited[DOI]
  33. FROMA WALSH, "Human-Animal Bonds I: The Relational Significance of Companion Animals", Family Process, 48(4), pp.462~480 (2009), Wiley[DOI]
  34. Alan S. Waterman, "The relevance of Aristotle’s conception of eudaimonia for the psychological study of happiness.", Theoretical & Philosophical Psychology, 10(1), pp.39~44 (1990), American Psychological Association (APA)[DOI]
  35. Watson, D, "Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect : the PANAS scales", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), pp.1063~1070 (1988)[DOI]
  36. Lisa Wood, "The pet connection: Pets as a conduit for social capital?", Social Science & Medicine, 61(6), pp.1159~1173 (2005), Elsevier BV[DOI]
  37. R.Lee Zasloff, "Measuring attachment to companion animals: a dog is not a cat is not a bird", Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 47(1-2), pp.43~48 (1996), Elsevier BV[DOI]

관련 논문AI추천

반려동물 애착과 주관적 안녕감: 기본 심리 욕구의 매개 효과김민희, 우수아한국감성과학회 · 감성과학2023 · 제26권 제1호반려견의 양육이 의사소통 및 정서적 경험에 미치는 영향송근호, 한아람인문사회 21 · 인문사회 212022 · 제13권 제5호반려동물에 대한 반려동물보호자의 심리적 요인 관련 연구동향분석김명희, 천성문한국재활심리학회 · 재활심리연구2022 · 제29권 제4호반려견을 동반한 동물교감활동 프로그램이 보호자의 반려견 애착과 심리적 안녕감에 미치는 효과강원국, 이성진한국정치사회연구소 · 한국과 국제사회2025 · 제9권 제3호반려동물 상호작용이 회복탄력성에 미치는 영향: 지각된 반려동물 사회적 지지의 매개 효과이나라, 최현정한국상담심리학회 · 한국심리학회지: 상담 및 심리치료2021 · 제33권 제4호반려동물 보호자의 인간-동물 상호작용, 공감능력, 자기위로능력, 대인관계스트레스 및 대인관계 간의 구조적 관계분석김명희, 천성문한국재활심리학회 · 재활심리연구2024 · 제31권 제1호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (8건)

그래핀/폴리우레탄 나노웹 기반의 스트레인센서 제작 및 호흡측정이효철, 조현선, 장은지, 이유진, 조길수pp. 15-22U-실버세대를 위한 스마트 웨어러블 및 연동 게임의 서비스 디자인 방안 탐색: 개인 맞춤형 운동처방 실행을 위한 흥미 유도 목적의 U-Hospital 솔루션이주현, 박서연pp. 23-34문제적 과잉 성 행동자의 휴지기 상태 시 집행 통제 회로의 기능적 연결성 변화석지우pp. 35-44심장 반응 동기화를 이용한 공감 인식 방법이동원, 황민철, 문성철, 박상인pp. 45-54산소와 색채 조명 자극의 조합이 스트레스 완화에 미치는 효과: 심리 및 자율신경계 반응을 중심으로장은혜, 장용원, 김보성, 최용복, 김승철, 이상곤, 김승환, 김아영pp. 55-64
원문 보기