반응시간기반 숨긴정보검사에 대한 실험 패러다임의 효과
Effect of Experimental Paradigms on Reaction Time-based Concealed Information Test
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
대부분의 연구자들은 반응시간기반 숨긴정보검사(RT CIT)의 탐지 효율성을 평가하기 위하여 실험연구를 수행한다. 실험연구에서 거짓말하는 상황을 만들기 위하여 주로 두 가지 실험 패러다임이 사용된다. 한 가지는 모의 범죄패러다임이며, 다른 한 가지는 개인적 항목 패러다임이다. 본 연구의 목적은 실험 패러다임에 관계없이 RT CIT의탐지 효율성이 동일하게 추정되는지 검증하는 것이다. 연구 1에서는 선행 연구들에 대한 메타분석을 통하여 두 가지실험 패러다임 간에 RT CIT의 효과크기가 다른지 검증하였다. 39개 연구에 대한 메타분석 결과, 모의 범죄 패러다임의 효과크기(Hedges의 g=1.330)가 개인적 항목 패러다임의 효과크기(g=1.145) 보다 약간 컸지만, 통계적으로 유의한차이는 아니었다. 연구 2에서는 모의 범죄 패러다임 조건과 개인적 항목 패러다임 조건을 포함하는 실험연구를 수행하여, 실험 패러다임에 따라 RT CIT의 탐지 효율성이 다른지 검증하였다. 변량분석 결과, 관련자극과 무관련자극간의 반응시간 차이가 실험 패러다임에 따라 통계적으로 유의하게 다르지 않은 것으로 나타났다. 실험연구에서 모의범죄 패러다임의 효과크기(Cohen의 d)는 1.638이었으며, 개인적 항목 패러다임의 효과크기는 1.535였다. RT CIT의탐지 효율성이 실험 패러다임에 영향을 받지 않는 이유에 대하여 논의하였다.
Abstract
Most researchers have experimentally evaluated the detection efficiency of reaction time-based concealed information tests (RT CIT). In experimental studies, two experimental paradigms have been mainly used to create a lying situation, mock-crime paradigm and personal-item paradigm. This study is aimed at testing the detection efficiency of RT CIT for the one that could be estimated as the same as the other, regardless of the experimental paradigms. In study 1, it was tested whether the effect size of RT CIT was different in the two experimental paradigms through meta-analysis. As a result of the meta-analysis of 39 studies, the effect size (Hedges’g = 1.330) of the mock-crime paradigm was slightly larger than that (Hedges’g = 1.145) of the personal-item paradigm, but no statistically significant difference was found. Study 2 was an experimental study using both the mock-crime and personal-item paradigms, it was conducted to determine whether the detection efficiency of RT CIT differs in the two experimental paradigms. As a result of ANOVA , it was found that the RT differences between the probe and irrelevant stimuli were not significant in the two experimental paradigms. In the experimental study, the effect size (Cohen’s d) of the mock-crime and personal-item paradigms were 1.638 and 1.535, respectively. In the discussion section, the reason of the detection efficiency of RT CIT not affected by the experimental paradigms was discussed.
참고문헌 (35)
- "References marked with an asterisk indicate studies included in the meta-analysis", ~
- Ben-Shakhar, G., "Handbook of polygraph testing", pp.87~102 (2002)
- Gershon Ben-Shakhar, "The validity of psychophysiological detection of information with the Guilty Knowledge Test: A meta-analytic review.", Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(1), pp.131~151 (2003), American Psychological Association (APA)[DOI]
- Borenstein, M., "Introduction to Meta-analysis" (2011), John Wiley & Sons
- David Carmel, "Estimating the Validity of the Guilty Knowledge Test From Simulated Experiments: The External Validity of Mock Crime Studies.", Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 9(4), pp.261~269 (2003), American Psychological Association (APA)[DOI]
- Cohen, J. E., "Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences" (1988), Lawrence Erlbaum
- Sue Duval, "Trim and Fill: A Simple Funnel-Plot-Based Method of Testing and Adjusting for Publication Bias in Meta-Analysis", Biometrics, 56(2), pp.455~463 (2000), Wiley[DOI]
- Jin-Sup Eom, "Effects of Varying Numbers of Probes on RT-based CIT Accuracy", International Journal of Multimedia and Ubiquitous Engineering, 11(2), pp.229~238 (2016), Global Vision Press[DOI]
- Lawrence A. Farwell, "The Truth Will Out: Interrogative Polygraphy ("Lie Detection") With Event-Related Brain Potentials", Psychophysiology, 28(5), pp.531~547 (1991), Wiley[DOI]
- Xiaoqing Hu, "An interfering dot-probe task facilitates the detection of mock crime memory in a reaction time (RT)-based concealed information test", Acta Psychologica, 142(2), pp.278~285 (2013), Elsevier BV[DOI]
- Bennett Kleinberg, "Memory Detection 2.0: The First Web-Based Memory Detection Test", PLOS ONE, 10(4), pp.e0118715~ (2015), Public Library of Science (PLoS)[DOI]
- Bennett Kleinberg, "The role of motivation to avoid detection in reaction time-based concealed information detection", Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 5(1), pp.43~51 (2016), American Psychological Association (APA)[DOI]
- Kleiner, M. E., "Handbook of polygraph testing" (2002), Academic Press
- Gáspár Lukács, "Information leakage in the Response Time‐Based Concealed Information Test", Applied Cognitive Psychology, 33(6), pp.1178~1196 (2019), Wiley[DOI]
- Gáspár Lukács, "Familiarity-related fillers improve the validity of reaction time-based memory detection.", Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 6(3), pp.295~305 (2017), American Psychological Association (APA)[DOI]
- Gáspár Lukács, "Response Time Concealed Information Test on Smartphones", Collabra: Psychology, 6(1) (2020), University of California Press[DOI]
- David T. Lykken, "The GSR in the detection of guilt.", Journal of Applied Psychology, 43(6), pp.385~388 (1959), American Psychological Association (APA)[DOI]
- Ewout H. Meijer, "Memory detection with the Concealed Information Test: A meta analysis of skin conductance, respiration, heart rate, and P300 data", Psychophysiology, 51(9), pp.879~904 (2014), Wiley[DOI]
- Ernst Noordraven, "Predicting the Sensitivity of the Reaction Time-based Concealed Information Test", Applied Cognitive Psychology, 27(3), pp.328~335 (2013), Wiley[DOI]
- Joseph Olson, "The effect of countermeasures against the reaction time based concealed information test on the P300 index of knowledge recognition: A combined RT and P300-based test", International Journal of Psychophysiology, 134, pp.9~14 (2018), Elsevier BV[DOI]
- J. Peter Rosenfeld, "A Modified, Event-Related Potential-Based Guilty Knowledge Test", International Journal of Neuroscience, 42(1-2), pp.157~161 (2009), Informa UK Limited[DOI]
- Travis L. Seymour, "Time and Encoding Effects in the Concealed Knowledge Test", Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback, 34(3), pp.177~187 (2009), Springer Science and Business Media LLC[DOI]
- Travis L. Seymour, "Successful detection of verbal and visual concealed knowledge using an RT-based paradigm", Applied Cognitive Psychology, 22(4), pp.475~490 (2008), Wiley[DOI]
- Travis L. Seymour, "Using response time measures to assess "guilty knowledge".", Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(1), pp.30~37 (2000), American Psychological Association (APA)[DOI]
- Kristina Suchotzki, "Using more different and more familiar targets improves the detection of concealed information", Acta Psychologica, 185, pp.65~71 (2018), Elsevier BV[DOI]
- Kristina Suchotzki, "Validity of the Reaction Time Concealed Information Test in a Prison Sample", Frontiers in Psychiatry, 9, pp.745~ (2019), Frontiers Media SA[DOI]
- Kristina Suchotzki, "Lying takes time: A meta-analysis on reaction time measures of deception.", Psychological Bulletin, 143(4), pp.428~453 (2017), American Psychological Association (APA)[DOI]
- Mihai Varga, "The “Good Cop, Bad Cop” Effect in the RT-Based Concealed Information Test: Exploring the Effect of Emotional Expressions Displayed by a Virtual Investigator", PLOS ONE, 10(2), pp.e0116087~ (2015), Public Library of Science (PLoS)[DOI]
- Bruno Verschuere, "ID-Check: Online Concealed Information Test Reveals True Identity", Journal of Forensic Sciences, 61, pp.S237~S240 (2016), Wiley[DOI]
- Bruno Verschuere, "Detecting concealed information with reaction times: Validity and comparison with the polygraph", Applied Cognitive Psychology, 24(7), pp.991~1002 (2010), Wiley[DOI]
- Bruno Verschuere, "RT-based memory detection: Item saliency effects in the single-probe and the multiple-probe protocol.", Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 4(1), pp.59~65 (2015), American Psychological Association (APA)[DOI]
- Visu-Petra, G., "Which came first, the truth or the lie? effects of order and habituation in the reaction time-based concealed information test", Cognition, Brain, Behavior: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 18(4), pp.283~297 (2014)
- George Visu-Petra, "Reaction Time-based Detection of Concealed Information in Relation to Individual Differences in Executive Functioning", Applied Cognitive Psychology, 26(3), pp.342~351 (2012), Wiley[DOI]
- George Visu-Petra, "Detecting concealed information: The role of individual differences in executive functions and social desirability", Psychology, Crime & Law, 20(1), pp.20~36 (2014), Informa UK Limited[DOI]
- George Visu-Petra, "When Interference Helps: Increasing Executive Load to Facilitate Deception Detection in the Concealed Information Test", Frontiers in Psychology, 4 (2013), Frontiers Media SA[DOI]