본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Voxel-wise Mapping of Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Impression Formation

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류감성과학

초록

Social interactions often involve encountering inconsistent information about social others. We conducted a functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) study to comprehensively investigate voxel-wise temporal dynamics showing how impressions are anchored and/or adjusted in response to inconsistent social information. The participants performed a social impression task inside an fMRI scanner in which they were shown a male face, together with a series of four adjectives that described the depicted person's personality traits, successively presented beneath the image of the face. Participants were asked to rate their impressions of the person at the end of each trial on a scale of 1 to 8 (where 1 is most negative and 8 is most positive). We established two hypothetical models that represented two temporal patterns of voxel activity: Model 1 featured decreasing patterns of activity towards the end of each trial, anchoring impressions to initially presented information, and Model 2 showed increasing patterns of activity toward the end of each trial, where impressions were being adjusted using new and inconsistent information. Our data-driven model fitting analyses showed that the temporal activity patterns of voxels within the ventral anterior cingulate cortex, medial orbitofrontal cortex, posterior cingulate cortex, amygdala, and fusiform gyrus fit Model 1 (i.e., they were more involved in anchoring first impressions) better than they did Model 2 (i.e., showing impression adjustment). Conversely, voxel-wise neural activity within dorsal ACC and lateral OFC fit Model 2 better than it did Model 1, as it was more likely to be involved in processing new, inconsistent information and adjusting impressions in response. Our novel approach to model fitting analysis replicated previous impression-related neuroscientific findings, furthering the understanding of neural and temporal dynamics of impression processing, particularly with reference to functionally segmenting each region of interest based on relative involvement in impression anchoring as opposed to adjustment.

Abstract

Social interactions often involve encountering inconsistent information about social others. We conducted a functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) study to comprehensively investigate voxel-wise temporal dynamics showing how impressions are anchored and/or adjusted in response to inconsistent social information. The participants performed a social impression task inside an fMRI scanner in which they were shown a male face, together with a series of four adjectives that described the depicted person's personality traits, successively presented beneath the image of the face. Participants were asked to rate their impressions of the person at the end of each trial on a scale of 1 to 8 (where 1 is most negative and 8 is most positive). We established two hypothetical models that represented two temporal patterns of voxel activity: Model 1 featured decreasing patterns of activity towards the end of each trial, anchoring impressions to initially presented information, and Model 2 showed increasing patterns of activity toward the end of each trial, where impressions were being adjusted using new and inconsistent information. Our data-driven model fitting analyses showed that the temporal activity patterns of voxels within the ventral anterior cingulate cortex, medial orbitofrontal cortex, posterior cingulate cortex, amygdala, and fusiform gyrus fit Model 1 (i.e., they were more involved in anchoring first impressions) better than they did Model 2 (i.e., showing impression adjustment). Conversely, voxel-wise neural activity within dorsal ACC and lateral OFC fit Model 2 better than it did Model 1, as it was more likely to be involved in processing new, inconsistent information and adjusting impressions in response. Our novel approach to model fitting analysis replicated previous impression-related neuroscientific findings, furthering the understanding of neural and temporal dynamics of impression processing, particularly with reference to functionally segmenting each region of interest based on relative involvement in impression anchoring as opposed to adjustment.

참고문헌 (50)

  1. Ames, D. L, "Outcome dependency alters the neural substrates of impression formation", NeuroImage, 83, pp.599~608 (2013)
  2. Anderson, N. H, "Likableness ratings of 555personality-trait words", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9(3), pp.272~279 (1968)
  3. Baron, S. G, "Amygdala and dorsomedial prefrontal cortex responses to appearance-based and behaviorbased person impressions", Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 6(5), pp.572~581 (2011)[DOI]
  4. Bechara, A, "Emotion, decision making and the orbitofrontal cortex", Cerebral Cortex, 10(3), pp.295~307 (2000)
  5. Chaiken, S, "Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39(5), pp.752~ (1980)
  6. Chaiken, S, "Heuristic and systematic information processing within and beyond the persuasion context", Unintended Thought, 212, pp.212~252 (1989)
  7. DeBruine, L. M, "Face Research Lab London Set", ~ (2017)
  8. Egner, T, "Dissociable neural systems resolve conflict from emotional versus nonemotional distracters", Cerebral Cortex, 18(6), pp.1475~1484 (2008)[DOI]
  9. Elliott, R, "Hedonic and informational functions of the human orbitofrontal cortex", Cerebral Cortex, 20(1), pp.198~204 (2010)[DOI]
  10. Fairhall, S. L, "Effective connectivity within the distributed cortical network for face perception", Cerebral cortex, 17(10), pp.2400~2406 (2007)
  11. Foley, E, "Dynamic facial expressions evoke distinct activation in the face perception network : A connectivity analysis study", Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 24(2), pp.507~520 (2012)
  12. Freeman, J. B, "The neural origins of superficial and individuated judgments about ingroup and outgroup members", Human Brain Mapping, 31(1), pp.150~159 (2010)[DOI]
  13. Gangopadhyay, P, "Prefrontal-amygdala circuits in social decision-making", Nature Neuroscience, 24(1), pp.5~18 (2021)
  14. Gao, J. S, "Pycortex : An interactive surface visualizer for fMRI", Frontiers in Neuroinformation, 9, pp.23~ (2015)[DOI]
  15. Grill-Spector, K, "The fusiform face area subserves face perception, not generic within-category identification", Nature Neuroscience, 7(5), pp.555~562 (2004)[DOI]
  16. Grill-Spector, K, "The functional neuroanatomy of human face perception", Annual Review of Vision Science, 3, pp.167~ (2017)
  17. Hampshire, A, "Dissociable roles for lateralorbitofrontal cortex and lateral prefrontal cortex during preference driven reversal learning", Neuroimage, 59(4), pp.4102~4112 (2012)[DOI]
  18. Herrington, J. D, "Bidirectional communication between amygdala and fusiform gyrus during facial recognition", Neuroimage, 56(4), pp.2348~2355 (2011)
  19. Hogarth, R. M, "Order effects in belief updating : The belief adjustment model", Cognitive Psychology, 24(1), pp.1~55 (1992)
  20. Huth, A. G, "Natural speech reveals the semantic maps that tile human cerebral cortex", Nature, 532(7600), pp.453~458 (2016)[DOI]
  21. Huth, A. G, "A continuous semantic space describes the representation of thousands of object and action categories across the human brain", Neuron, 76(6), pp.1210~1224 (2012)[DOI]
  22. Iidaka, T, "Forming a negative impression of another person correlates with activation in medial prefrontal cortex and amygdala", Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 6(4), pp.516~525 (2011)[DOI]
  23. Kanwisher, N, "The fusiform face area : A module in human extrastriate cortex specialized for face perception", Journal of Neuroscience, 17(11), pp.4302~4311 (1997)
  24. Kim, H, "Lateral OFC activity predicts decision bias due to first impressions during ultimatum games", Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 24(2), pp.428~439 (2012)[DOI]
  25. Kolling, N, "Value, search, persistence and model updating in anterior cingulate cortex", Nature Neuroscience, 19(10), pp.1280~1285 (2016)[DOI]
  26. Liu, X, "Functional dissociation in frontal and striatal areas for processing of positive and negative reward information", Journal of Neuroscience, 27(17), pp.4587~4597 (2007)
  27. Ma, N, "Traits are represented in the medial prefrontal cortex : An fMRI adaptation study", Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 9(8), pp.1185~1192 (2014)[DOI]
  28. Ma, N, "Dissociation of a trait and a valence representation in the mPFC", Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 9(10), pp.1506~1514 (2014)[DOI]
  29. Ma, N, "Inconsistencies in spontaneous and intentional trait inferences", Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 7(8), pp.937~950 (2012)
  30. Mansouri, F. A, "The essential role of primate orbitofrontal cortex in conflict-induced executive control adjustment", Journal of Neuroscience, 34(33), pp.11016~11031 (2014)[DOI]
  31. Mende-Siedlecki, P, "Changing our minds : The neural bases of dynamic impression updating", Current Opinion in Psychology, 24, pp.72~76 (2018)
  32. Mende-Siedlecki, P, "The neural dynamics of updating person impressions", Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 8(6), pp.623~631 (2012)
  33. Mitchell, J. P, "Forming impressions of people versus inanimate objects : social-cognitive processing in the medial prefrontal cortex", Neuroimage, 26(1), pp.251~257 (2005)[DOI]
  34. Mohanty, A, "Differential engagement of anterior cingulate cortex subdivisions for cognitive and emotional function", Psychophysiology, 44(3), pp.343~351 (2007)[DOI]
  35. Mumford, J. A, "Deconvolving BOLD activation in event-related designs for multivoxel pattern classification analyses", Neuroimage, 59(3), pp.2636~2643 (2012)[DOI]
  36. Mussweiler, T, "Hypothesisconsistent testing and semantic priming in the anchoring paradigm : A selective accessibility model", Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35(2), pp.136~164 (1999)
  37. Naselaris, T, "A voxel-wise encoding model for early visual areas decodes mental images of remembered scenes", Neuroimage, 105, pp.215~228 (2015)[DOI]
  38. O’Doherty, J, "Beauty in a smile : The role of medial orbitofrontal cortex in facial attractiveness", Neuropsychologia, 41(2), pp.147~155 (2003)
  39. O'Doherty, J, "Abstract reward and punishment representations in the human orbitofrontal cortex", Nature Neuroscience, 4(1), pp.95~102 (2001)
  40. Pearson, J. M, "Posterior cingulate cortex : Adapting behavior to a changing world", Trends in Cognitive Science, 15(4), pp.143~151 (2011)[DOI]
  41. Schiller, D, "A neural mechanism of first impressions", Nature Neuroscience, 12(4), pp.508~514 (2009)[DOI]
  42. Sergent, J, "Functional neuroanatomy of face and object processing : A positron emission tomography study", Brain, 115(1), pp.15~36 (1992)[DOI]
  43. Shenhav, A, "Dorsal anterior cingulate cortex and the value of control", Nature Neuroscience, 19(10), pp.1286~1291 (2016)[DOI]
  44. Somerville, L. H, "Anterior cingulate cortex responds differentially to expectancy violation and social rejection", Nature Neuroscience, 9(8), pp.1007~1008 (2006)[DOI]
  45. 성영신, "얼굴 매력도와 신뢰성 평가에서 시각적 주의의 차이", 감성과학, 13(3), pp.533~540 (2010), 한국감성과학회
  46. Todorov, A, "Social judgments from faces", Current Opinions in Neurobiology, 23(3), pp.373~380 (2013)[DOI]
  47. Turner, B. M, "The anchor integration model : A descriptive model of anchoring effects", Cognitive Psychology, 90, pp.1~47 (2016)[DOI]
  48. Tversky, A, "Judgment under uncertainty : Heuristics and biases", Science, 185(4157), pp.1124~1131 (1974)[DOI]
  49. Tzourio-Mazoyera, N, "Automated anatomical labeling of activations in SPM using a macroscopic anatomical parcellation of the MNI MRI singlesubject brain", Neuroimage, 15(1), pp.273~289 (2002)[DOI]
  50. Uleman, J. S, "Spontaneous inferences, implicit impressions, and implicit theories", Annual Review in Psychology, 59, pp.329~360 (2008)[DOI]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (12건)