본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

의미 있는 개체 제시 방식이 선호도에 미치는 영향: 중심 편향 원리와 규범적 관점의 상호작용을 중심으로

The Influence of Presentation Mode on Preference of the Meaningful Entities: The Interaction between Inward Bias and Canonical View Point

홍우평|정혜녕|이현석|윤신애
한국감성과학회 (The Korean Society For Emotion & Sensibility)|2023.06|감성과학 (Science of Emotion & Sensibility)|제26권 제2호|pp. 103-116|DOI 10.14695/KJSOS.2023.26.2.103

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

AestheticFamiliarity친숙도심미감규범적 관점개체 선호 원리내적 편향 원리Object PreferenceInward BiasCanonical Viewpoint
주제분류감성과학

초록

본 연구의 목적은 의미 있는 대상의 선호도 판단에 영향을 미치는 것으로 알려진 원리인 내적 편향 원리와 규범적관점 간의 상호작용 양상을 연구하는 데에 있다. 개별 개체의 친숙도가 규범적 관점에 영향을 미친다는 점 또한 고려하여 친숙도 수준에 따른 두 선호도 원리의 작용 양상을 검증하고자 하였다. 이를 위하여 이중 대안 선택 과제를활용한 행동 반응 실험을 진행하였으며, 친숙도 수준(높음/낮음)에 따라 각 8개의 단일 개체를 실험 재료로 하여 내적 편향 원리 준수 여부와 규범적 관점 준수 여부를 조작하였다. 실험 결과, 내적 편향 원리를 준수한 상태에서 개체가 제시된 경우가 내적 편향 원리가 위배된 상태로 개체가 제시된 경우보다 더 선호되었다. 선호 판단에 걸리는 반응시간 또한 더 짧은 것으로 나타났다. 그러나 규범적 관점 준수 여부는 선택 빈도 및 반응 시간에 영향을 미치지 않는것으로 나타났다. 더불어, 개체의 친숙도는 선호도 판단과 관련된 의사 결정에 간섭 요인으로 작용하는 것으로 나타났다. 이와 같은 결과는 개체 선호도 원리 중 내적 편향의 강도가 규범적 관점에 비해 더 우세하며, 단일 개체가제시될 때 그에 대한 선호 판단에 있어서 그 개체가 가진 속성보다 시각적 문맥과의 상호작용이 중요하게 작용한다는 것을 시사한다.

Abstract

This study aims to investigate the interaction between inward bias and canonical viewpoint, which are factors known to affect preference for meaningful objects. It also considered the familiarity of each entity in terms of their influence on the existence of a canonical viewpoint and demonstrated whether the relative strength of two preferences varies depending on familiarity. To confirm this, we conducted a behavior experiment using a two-alternative forced-choice task. The experimental stimuli were eight single objects for familiarity level (high/low), whereas the entity’s inward bias and canonical viewpoint were observed or violated. Results showed that when inward bias was obeyed, the frequency of being chosen as a preferred option was higher, and the reaction time for preference judgment was shorter. However, the observation of a canonical viewpoint did not affect frequency and reaction time. Moreover, familiarity played an interference role in aesthetic judgment. These results indicate that inward bias is stronger than canonical viewpoint, ultimately implying that a single object’s interaction with the visual context is superior to the entity’s attribute as regards to preference judgment.

참고문헌 (47)

  1. Amheim, R., "Art and visual perception" (1974), University of California Press
  2. MARIAN ANNETT, "A CLASSIFICATION OF HAND PREFERENCE BY ASSOCIATION ANALYSIS", British Journal of Psychology, 61(3), pp.303~321 (1970), Wiley[DOI]
  3. R.H. Baayen, "Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items", Journal of Memory and Language, 59(4), pp.390~412 (2008), Elsevier BV[DOI]
  4. Baayen, R. H., "languageR:Analyzing Linguistic Data: A Practical Introduction to Statistics. (R package version 1.5. 0)", ~ (2019)
  5. Douglas Bates, "Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4", Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1) (2015), Foundation for Open Access Statistic[DOI]
  6. Marco Bertamini, "The anterior bias in visual art: The case of images of animals", Laterality: Asymmetries of Body, Brain and Cognition, 16(6), pp.673~689 (2011), Informa UK Limited[DOI]
  7. Volker Blanz, "What Object Attributes Determine Canonical Views?", Perception, 28(5), pp.575~599 (1999), SAGE Publications[DOI]
  8. Carole Bode, "Left–Right Position in Moving Images: An Analysis of Face Orientation, Face Position, and Movement Direction in Eight Action Films", Art and Perception, 4(3), pp.241~263 (2016), Brill[DOI]
  9. Robert F. Bornstein, "The Attribution and Discounting of Perceptual Fluency: Preliminary Tests of a Perceptual Fluency", Attributional Model of the Mere Exposure Effect, 1994, pp.12(2), 103~128[DOI]
  10. Yi-Chia Chen, "Seeing and liking: Biased perception of ambiguous figures consistent with the “inward bias” in aesthetic preferences", Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 21(6), pp.1444~1451 (2014), Springer Science and Business Media LLC[DOI]
  11. Guido Corradi, "A new conception of visual aesthetic sensitivity", British Journal of Psychology, 111(4), pp.630~658 (2019), Wiley[DOI]
  12. Gernot Gerger, "Context effects on emotional and aesthetic evaluations of artworks and IAPS pictures", Acta Psychologica, 151, pp.174~183 (2014), Elsevier BV[DOI]
  13. Hung, W. K., "Effects of novelty and its dimensions on aesthetic preference in product design", International Journal of Design, 6(2), pp.81~90 (2012)
  14. Frank F. Ibarra, "Image Feature Types and Their Predictions of Aesthetic Preference and Naturalness", Frontiers in Psychology, 8 (2017), Frontiers Media SA[DOI]
  15. Larry L. Jacoby, "On the relationship between autobiographical memory and perceptual learning.", Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 110(3), pp.306~340 (1981), American Psychological Association (APA)[DOI]
  16. 김서윤, "인터넷 의류쇼핑몰 상품 사진의 표현형식과 배경이 소비자의 지각에 미치는 영향", 한국의류학회지, 38(4), pp.467~481 (2014), 한국의류학회
  17. Elizabeth Krupinski, "Skin conductance and aesthetic evaluative responses to nonrepresentational works of art varying in symmetry", Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 26(4), pp.355~358 (1988), Springer Science and Business Media LLC[DOI]
  18. Alexandra Kuznetsova, "lmerTest package: Tests in linear mixed effects models", Journal of Statistical Software, 82(13) (2017), Foundation for Open Access Statistic[DOI]
  19. Jason P Leboe, "The Inferential Basis of Familiarity and Recall: Evidence for a Common Underlying Process", Journal of Memory and Language, 46(4), pp.804~829 (2002), Elsevier BV[DOI]
  20. Helmut Leder, "A model of aesthetic appreciation and aesthetic judgments", British Journal of Psychology, 95(4), pp.489~508 (2004), Wiley[DOI]
  21. Mao Li, "Aesthetic assessment of paintings based on visual balance", IET Image Processing, 13(14), pp.2821~2828 (2019), Institution of Engineering and Technology (IET)[DOI]
  22. Birgit Mallon, "Beauty in abstract paintings: perceptual contrast and statistical properties", Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8 (2014), Frontiers Media SA[DOI]
  23. Sérgio M.C. Nascimento, "Naturalness and aesthetics of colors – Preference for color compositions perceived as natural", Vision Research, 185, pp.98~110 (2021), Elsevier BV[DOI]
  24. Palmer, S. E., "The perception of structure:Essays in honor of Wendell R. Garner", pp.23~39 (1991), American Psychological Association
  25. Stephen E Palmer, "Mapping the Perceptual Structure of Rectangles through Goodness-of-Fit Ratings", Perception, 40(12), pp.1428~1446 (2011), SAGE Publications[DOI]
  26. Palmer, S. E., "An ecological valence theory of human color preference", Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(19), pp.8877~8882 (2010)
  27. Thomas Wickens, "Aesthetic issues in spatial composition: effects of position and direction on framing single objects", Spatial Vision, 21(3-5), pp.421~449 (2008), Brill[DOI]
  28. Stephen E. Palmer, "Visual Aesthetics and Human Preference", Annual Review of Psychology, 64(1), pp.77~107 (2013), Annual Reviews[DOI]
  29. Palmer, S., "International Symposium on Attention and Performance (Attention and performance IX)", pp.135~151 (1981), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
  30. Jihye Park, "On-line product presentation: Effects on mood, perceived risk, and purchase intention", Psychology and Marketing, 22(9), pp.695~719 (2005), Wiley[DOI]
  31. Michael I. Posner, "On the genesis of abstract ideas", Journal of Experimental Psychology, 77(3, Pt.1), pp.353~363 (1968), American Psychological Association (APA)[DOI]
  32. "R: A language and environment for statistical computing" (2022)[URL]
  33. Rolf Reber, "Effects of Perceptual Fluency on Affective Judgments", Psychological Science, 9(1), pp.45~48 (1998), SAGE Publications[DOI]
  34. Rolf Reber, "Processing Fluency and Aesthetic Pleasure: Is Beauty in the Perceiver's Processing Experience?", Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8(4), pp.364~382 (2004), SAGE Publications[DOI]
  35. Eleanor Rosch, "Cognitive representations of semantic categories.", Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 104(3), pp.192~233 (1975), American Psychological Association (APA)[DOI]
  36. Jonathan Sammartino, "Aesthetic issues in spatial composition: Effects of vertical position and perspective on framing single objects.", Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38(4), pp.865~879 (2012), American Psychological Association (APA)[DOI]
  37. David H. Silvera, "Bigger is better: the influence of physical size on aesthetic preference judgments", Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 15(3), pp.189~202 (2002), Wiley[DOI]
  38. Paul J. Silvia, "Do People Prefer Curved Objects? Angularity, Expertise, and Aesthetic Preference", Empirical Studies of the Arts, 27(1), pp.25~42 (2008), SAGE Publications[DOI]
  39. Chaehan So, "Measuring Aesthetic Preferences of Neural Style Transfer: More Precision With the Two-Alternative-Forced-Choice Task", International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 39(4), pp.755~775 (2022), Informa UK Limited[DOI]
  40. Jeffrey P. Toth, "Conceptual automaticity in recognition memory: Levels-of-processing effects on familiarity.", Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1996, pp.50(1), 123~138[DOI]
  41. Christopher W. Tyler, "Eye placement principles in portraits and figure studies over the past two millennia", Human Vision and Electronic Imaging III, 3299, pp.431~438 (1998), SPIE[DOI]
  42. Karl Verfaillie, "A corpus of 714 full-color images of depth-rotated objects", Perception & Psychophysics, 57(7), pp.925~961 (1995), Springer Science and Business Media LLC[DOI]
  43. Steve J. Westerman, "Product Design: Preference for Rounded versus Angular Design Elements", Psychology & Marketing, 29(8), pp.595~605 (2012), Wiley[DOI]
  44. Deanne L. Westerman, "The effect of processing fluency on impressions of familiarity and liking.", Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 41(2), pp.426~438 (2015), American Psychological Association (APA)[DOI]
  45. Piotr Winkielman, "Prototypes Are Attractive Because They Are Easy on the Mind", Psychological Science, 17(9), pp.799~806 (2006), SAGE Publications[DOI]
  46. Andrew T Woods, "Canonical Views in Haptic Object Perception", Perception, 37(12), pp.1867~1878 (2008), SAGE Publications[DOI]
  47. Shenghui Zhao, "Biases in Predicting Preferences for the Whole Visual Patterns from Product Fragments", Journal of Consumer Psychology, 17(4), pp.292~304 (2007), Wiley[DOI]

관련 논문AI추천

규범적 표상의 방향성 효과이승복, 정우현, 정효선한국감성과학회 · 감성과학2008 · 제11권 제4호뇌 기능의 편재화와 자극 배치의 선호성손정우, 이승복, 이현주, 정우현한국인지및생물심리학회 · 한국심리학회지: 인지 및 생물2015 · 제27권 제1호물체-배경 맥락 부합성이 물체에 대한 주의 할당과 기억에 미치는 영향김비아, 이윤경한국인지과학회 · 인지과학2013 · 제24권 제2호디자인 요소의 상대적 주목성과 제품 선호 반응의 상관관계허성철한국감성과학회 · 감성과학2005 · 제8권 제3호동물 크기 비교에서 관찰된 마주봄 방향 효과남종호, 홍리정한국인지및생물심리학회 · 한국심리학회지: 인지 및 생물2020 · 제32권 제1호사회적 쌍 자극에서의 형태잔여효과남종호, 박성현한국인지및생물심리학회 · 한국심리학회지: 인지 및 생물2022 · 제34권 제4호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)

Influence of COVID-19 Anxiety on Vigor and Innovative Work Behavior: Mediated Moderation of Flexible Work Arrangement선종헌, 전윤수pp. 3-12행위자 특성과 도덕적 정화방법이 행위자에 대한 도덕적 평가에 미치는 영향진승재, 김신우, 이형철pp. 13-24표상 유사성 분석을 이용한 감각양상에 따른 정서표상 모델과 정서가 모델의 검증김현중, 김종완pp. 25-38다변량분석방법을 이용한 미각 자극의 기본 맛과 강도에 따른 정서표상김인익, 김종완, 박채리pp. 39-52메타버스와 오프라인 스토어의 브랜드 체험 비교 연구김유진, 이광호pp. 53-66
원문 보기