시각 정보 제시 여부에 따른 촉각 자극에 대한 정서 반응 비교
Comparison between Affective Responses to Tactile Stimuli Based on the Presence of Visual Information Presentation
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
촉각과 정서에 관해 이루어진 선행 연구들에서는 어떤 촉각 자극이 특정 정서를 유발하는가에 초점을 맞춰 진행되었다. 또한, 시각이 촉각 지각의 과정에서 중요한 역할을 함에도 불구하고 촉각의 단일 양상에만 주목하여 연구가진행되었다. 이에 본 연구에서는 촉각 자극을 활용하여 거칠기, 경도, 시각 차단 여부라는 세 가지 변인이 촉각 지각에 따른 정서 경험에 미치는 영향을 알아보고자 하였다. 실험 자극은 일상생활에서 접할 수 있는 사물을 사용하였으며, 거칠기 2조건(거친, 매끄러운), 경도 2조건(단단한, 부드러운)을 교차하여 ‘거친/단단한’, ‘거친/부드러운’, ‘매끄러운/단단한’, ‘매끄러운/부드러운’이라는 4가지 조건에 맞게 선정하였다. 실험은 시각 차단 여부에 따라 두 세션으로구분되었다. 참가자들은 촉각 자극을 보지 않으면서 만진 뒤에 평정하는 세션을 마치고, 촉각 자극을 보면서 만진뒤에 평정하는 세션을 진행하였다. 반복측정 변량분석 결과, 보면서 자극을 만질 때 더 긍정적으로 느끼며, 보지 않으면서 자극을 만질 때 더 부정적으로 느낌을 확인하였다. 또한 매끄러운 자극과 부드러운 자극을 더 긍정적으로느끼고 거친 자극을 더 부정적으로 느꼈으며, 이 경향이 보지 않고 만졌을 때 더 강했다. 본 연구의 결과는 시각정보가 제공되는 경우와 제공되지 않는 경우 촉각 경험에 대한 정서 반응이 어떻게 다른지를 이해함으로써, 정서와시각 정보 처리 간의 상호작용에 대한 이해를 높일 수 있다는 시사점을 가진다.
Abstract
Previous studies on texture and emotion have focused on identifying precisely which tactile stimuli trigger specific emotions. Despite the significant role of vision in tactile perception, research has so far only focused on the singular aspect of texture. In this study, we used tactile stimuli to investigate the effects of three variables― roughness, hardness, and visual blocking―on the affective responses to tactile perception. The experimental stimuli that can be encountered in daily life were selected based on the four conditions of “rough/hard,” “rough/soft,” “smooth/hard” and “smooth/soft” by crossing two roughness conditions (rough, smooth) and two hardness conditions (hard, soft). The experiment was divided into two sessions depending on whether or not visual blocking existed. Participants completed a session in which they evaluated a tactile stimulus after touching it without seeing it and then proceeded with a session in which they evaluated a stimulus after touching it with sight of it. The results of the repeated-measures ANOVA showed that individuals reported a more positive perception when touching stimuli with visual cues and more negative when touching stimuli without visual cues. Furthermore, the inclination to perceive smooth and soft stimuli more positively and rough stimuli more negatively was stronger when touching without visual cues. The results of this study suggest implications for enhancing the understanding of the interaction between emotion and visual information processing by elucidating how emotions are experienced differently in situations where visual information is provided and where it is not.
참고문헌 (31)
- Ackerley, R., "Quantifying the sensory and emotional perception of touch : differences between glabrous and hairy skin", Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 8, pp.34~ (2014)[DOI]
- Ballesteros, S., "The perception of ecological textures by touch: does the perceptual space change under bimodal visual and haptic exploration?", First Joint Eurohaptics Conference and Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems. World Haptics Conference, pp.635~638 (2005)
- Baucom, L. B., "Decoding the neural representation of affective states", NeuroImage, 59(1), pp.718~727 (2012)[DOI]
- Chanel, G., "Valence-arousal evaluation using physiological signals in an emotion recall paradigm", 2007 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, pp.2662~2667 (2007)
- Croy, I., "The sensory channel of presentation alters subjective ratings and autonomic responses toward disgusting stimuli—Blood pressure, heart rate and skin conductance in response to visual, auditory, haptic and olfactory presented disgusting stimuli", Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, pp.510~ (2013)[DOI]
- Ekman, G., "Roughness, smoothness, and preference : A study of quantitative relations in individual subjects", Journal of Experimental Psychology, 70(1), pp.18~ (1965)[DOI]
- Ekman, P., "Handbook of cognition and emotion, 98", pp.45~60 (1999)
- Etzi, R., "The arousing power of everyday materials : An analysis of the physiological and behavioral responses to visually and tactually presented textures", Experimental Brain Research, 234, pp.1659~1666 (2016)[DOI]
- Feldman, L. A., "Distinguishing depression and anxiety in self-report : Evidence from confirmatory factor analysis on nonclinical and clinical samples", Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 61(4), pp.631~ (1993)[DOI]
- Gomes, C. F., "Effects of emotional valence and arousal on recollective and nonrecollective recall", Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 39(3), pp.663~ (2013)[DOI]
- Holliins, M., "Perceptual dimensions of tactile surface texture : A multidimensional scaling analysis", Perception &Psychophysics, 54, pp.697~705 (1993)[DOI]
- Hollins, M., "Individual differences in perceptual space for tactile textures : Evidence from multidimensional scaling", Perception & Psychophysics, 62, pp.1534~1544 (2000)[DOI]
- Iosifyan, M., "Emotions associated with different textures during touch", Consciousness and Cognition, 71, pp.79~85 (2019)[DOI]
- Kensinger, E. A., "Two routes to emotional memory : Distinct neural processes for valence and arousal", Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 101(9), pp.3310~3315 (2004)[DOI]
- Kim, H., "Affective responses to ASMR using multidimensional scaling and classification", Science of Emotion and Sensibility, 25(3), pp.71~80 (2022)[DOI]
- Kim, J., "Representation of facial expressions of different ages : A multidimensional scaling study", Science of Emotion and Sensibility, 24(3), pp.71~80 (2021)[DOI]
- Kim, J., "Emotions and EEG Features Evoked by Tactile Stimulation", Science of Emotion and Sensibility, 1(1), pp.153~160 (1998)
- Kim, J., "A study in affect : Predicting valence from fMRI data", Neuropsychologia, 143, pp.107473~ (2020)[DOI]
- Kim, J., "Comparison of physiological responses to affect eliciting pictures and music", International Journal of Psychophysiology, 101, pp.9~17 (2016)[DOI]
- King, P. M., "Sensory function assessment : A pilot comparison study of touch pressure threshold with texture and tactile discrimination", Journal of Hand Therapy, 10(1), pp.24~28 (1997)[DOI]
- Major, D. R., "On the affective tone of simple senseimpressions", The American Journal of Psychology, 7(1), pp.57~77 (1895)[DOI]
- Park, C., "Affective representations of basic tastes and intensity using multivariate analyses", Science of Emotion and Sensibility, 26(2), pp.39~52 (2023)[DOI]
- Picard, D., "Perceptual dimensions of tactile textures", Acta Psychologica, 114(2), pp.165~184 (2003)[DOI]
- Radziun, D., "The perception of affective and discriminative touch in blind individuals", Behavioural Brain Research, 444, pp.114361~ (2023)
- Russell, J. A., "A circumplex model of affect", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39(6), pp.1161~ (1980)[DOI]
- Russell, J. A., "Core affect, prototypical emotional episodes, and other things called emotion : dissecting the elephant", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(5), pp.805~ (1999)[DOI]
- Tiest, W. M. B., "Haptic and visual perception of roughness", Acta Psychologica, 124(2), pp.177~189 (2007)[DOI]
- Tsai, J. L., "Ideal affect : Cultural causes and behavioral consequences", Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2(3), pp.242~259 (2007)[DOI]
- T. Verrillo, R., "Subjective magnitude of tactile roughness", Somatosensory & Motor Research, 16(4), pp.352~360 (1999)[DOI]
- Whitaker, T. A., "Vision and touch : Independent or integrated systems for the perception of texture?", Brain Research, 1242, pp.59~72 (2008)[DOI]
- Yu, J., "Stroking hardness changes the perception of affective touch pleasantness across different skin sites", Heliyon, 5(8) (2019)[DOI]