본문 바로가기
KERD
논문

In vitro evaluation of nano zinc oxide (nZnO) on mitigation of gaseous emissions

2

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류축산학

초록

Background: Enteric methane (CH4) accounts for about 70% of total CH4 emissions from the ruminant animals. Researchers are exploring ways to mitigate enteric CH4 emissions from ruminants. Recently, nano zinc oxide (nZnO) has shown potential in reducing CH4 and hydrogen sulfide (H2S) production from the liquid manure under anaerobic storage conditions. Four different levels of nZnO and two types of feed were mixed with rumen fluid to investigate the efficacy of nZnO in mitigating gaseous production. Methods: All experiments with four replicates were conducted in batches in 250 mL glass bottles paired with the ANKOMRF wireless gas production monitoring system. Gas production was monitored continuously for 72 h at a constant temperature of 39±1 °C in a water bath. Headspace gas samples were collected using gas-tight syringes from the Tedlar bags connected to the glass bottles and analyzed for greenhouse gases (CH4 and carbon dioxide-CO2) and H2S concentrations. CH4 and CO2 gas concentrations were analyzed using an SRI-8610 Gas Chromatograph and H2S concentrations were measured using a Jerome 631X meter. At the same time, substrate (i.e. mixed rumen fluid+ NP treatment+ feed composite) samples were collected from the glass bottles at the beginning and at the end of an experiment for bacterial counts, and volatile fatty acids (VFAs) analysis. Results: Compared to the control treatment the H2S and GHGs concentration reduction after 72 h of the tested nZnO levels varied between 4.89 to 53.65%. Additionally, 0.47 to 22.21% microbial population reduction was observed from the applied nZnO treatments. Application of nZnO at a rate of 1000 μg g− 1 have exhibited the highest amount of concentration reductions for all three gases and microbial population. Conclusion: Results suggest that both 500 and 1000 μg g− 1 nZnO application levels have the potential to reduce GHG and H2S concentrations.

Abstract

Background: Enteric methane (CH4) accounts for about 70% of total CH4 emissions from the ruminant animals. Researchers are exploring ways to mitigate enteric CH4 emissions from ruminants. Recently, nano zinc oxide (nZnO) has shown potential in reducing CH4 and hydrogen sulfide (H2S) production from the liquid manure under anaerobic storage conditions. Four different levels of nZnO and two types of feed were mixed with rumen fluid to investigate the efficacy of nZnO in mitigating gaseous production. Methods: All experiments with four replicates were conducted in batches in 250 mL glass bottles paired with the ANKOMRF wireless gas production monitoring system. Gas production was monitored continuously for 72 h at a constant temperature of 39±1 °C in a water bath. Headspace gas samples were collected using gas-tight syringes from the Tedlar bags connected to the glass bottles and analyzed for greenhouse gases (CH4 and carbon dioxide-CO2) and H2S concentrations. CH4 and CO2 gas concentrations were analyzed using an SRI-8610 Gas Chromatograph and H2S concentrations were measured using a Jerome 631X meter. At the same time, substrate (i.e. mixed rumen fluid+ NP treatment+ feed composite) samples were collected from the glass bottles at the beginning and at the end of an experiment for bacterial counts, and volatile fatty acids (VFAs) analysis. Results: Compared to the control treatment the H2S and GHGs concentration reduction after 72 h of the tested nZnO levels varied between 4.89 to 53.65%. Additionally, 0.47 to 22.21% microbial population reduction was observed from the applied nZnO treatments. Application of nZnO at a rate of 1000 μg g− 1 have exhibited the highest amount of concentration reductions for all three gases and microbial population. Conclusion: Results suggest that both 500 and 1000 μg g− 1 nZnO application levels have the potential to reduce GHG and H2S concentrations.

참고문헌 (48)

  1. Angela R. Moss, "Methane production by ruminants: its contribution to global warming", Annales de Zootechnie, 49(3), pp.231~253 (2000), EDP Sciences[DOI]
  2. "EPA 430-P-18-001. Draft inventory of us greenhouse gas emissions and sinks: 1990-2016" (2009)[URL]
  3. Emissions of greenhouse gases in the U. S. 2009, "EIA", ~, pp.doe (2009), eia-0573
  4. Martin N. Hughes, "Making and working with hydrogen sulfide", Free Radical Biology and Medicine, 47(10), pp.1346~1353 (2009), Elsevier BV[DOI]
  5. Johnson KA, "Methane emissions from cattle", J Anim Sci, 73(8), pp.2483~2492 (1995)
  6. "Anthropogenic methane emissions in the United States, estimates for 1990" (1993)[URL]
  7. Wolin M, "The rumen ecosystem", pp.343~359 (1988)
  8. Bauchop T, "Cellulose fermentation by a rumen anaerobic fungus in both the absence and the presence of rumen methanogens", Appl Environ Microbiol, 42(6), pp.1103~1110 (1981)
  9. K. Ushida, "Methane production associated with rumen-ciliated protozoa and its effect on protozoan activity", Letters in Applied Microbiology, 23(2), pp.129~132 (1996), Wiley[DOI]
  10. Hristov A, "Mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions in livestock production: A review of technical options for non-CO2 emissions", pp.1~206 (2013)
  11. Dehority BA, "Rumen microbiology" (2003), Nottingham University Press
  12. Drewnoski M, "Factors affecting ruminal hydrogen sulfide concentration of cattle", Anim Ind Rep, 657(1), pp.11~ (2011)
  13. S. J. Morine, "Increasing dietary neutral detergent fiber concentration decreases ruminal hydrogen sulfide concentrations in steers fed high-sulfur diets based on ethanol coproducts", Journal of Animal Science, 92(7), pp.3035~3041 (2014), Oxford University Press (OUP)[DOI]
  14. C. Martin, "Methane mitigation in ruminants: from microbe to the farm scale", animal, 4(03), pp.351~365 (2010), Cambridge University Press (CUP)[DOI]
  15. D. Boadi, "Mitigation strategies to reduce enteric methane emissions from dairy cows: Update review", Canadian Journal of Animal Science, 84(3), pp.319~335 (2004), Canadian Science Publishing[DOI]
  16. C. Benchaar, "Evaluation of dietary strategies to reduce methane production in ruminants: A modelling approach", Canadian Journal of Animal Science, 81(4), pp.563~574 (2001), Canadian Science Publishing[DOI]
  17. Robertson L, "Dairy industry perspectives o methane emissions and production from cattle fed pasture or total mixed rations in New Zealand", Proceedings-new zealand society of animal production (2002)
  18. Y. Dong, "Lipid-induced depression of methane production and digestibility in the artificial rumen system (RUSITEC)", Canadian Journal of Animal Science, 77(2), pp.269~278 (1997), Canadian Science Publishing[DOI]
  19. F. Dohme, "Comparative efficiency of various fats rich in medium-chain fatty acids to suppress ruminal methanogenesis as measured with RUSITEC", Canadian Journal of Animal Science, 80(3), pp.473~484 (2000), Canadian Science Publishing[DOI]
  20. A. Machmüller, "Methane suppression by coconut oil and associated effects on nutrient and energy balance in sheep", Canadian Journal of Animal Science, 79(1), pp.65~72 (1999), Canadian Science Publishing[DOI]
  21. A WRIGHT, "Reducing methane emissions in sheep by immunization against rumen methanogens", Vaccine, 22(29-30), pp.3976~3985 (2004), Elsevier BV[DOI]
  22. Kuzma J, "Nanotechnology in agriculture and food production:anticipated applications: project on emerging nanotechnologies", ~ (2006)
  23. E. Bollo, "Nanotechnologies Applied to Veterinary Diagnostics", Veterinary Research Communications, 31(S1), pp.145~147 (2007), Springer Nature[DOI]
  24. Scott N, "Nanotechnology and animal health", Revue Scientifique Et Technique-Office International Des Epizooties, 24(1), pp.425~ (2005)
  25. Narducci D, "An introduction to nanotechnologies: What’s in it for us?", Vet Res Commun, 31, pp.131~137 (2007)
  26. Partha S. Swain, "Nano zinc, an alternative to conventional zinc as animal feed supplement: A review", Animal Nutrition, 2(3), pp.134~141 (2016), Elsevier BV[DOI]
  27. Hui Mu, "Effects of metal oxide nanoparticles (TiO2, Al2O3, SiO2 and ZnO) on waste activated sludge anaerobic digestion", Bioresource Technology, 102(22), pp.10305~10311 (2011), Elsevier BV[DOI]
  28. Mario Luna-delRisco, "Particle-size effect of CuO and ZnO on biogas and methane production during anaerobic digestion", Journal of Hazardous Materials, 189(1-2), pp.603~608 (2011), Elsevier BV[DOI]
  29. National Academies of Sciences, "Nutrient requirements of beef cattle" (2016), National Academies Press
  30. McDougall E., "Studies on ruminant saliva. The composition and output of sheep's saliva", Biochem J, 43(1), pp.99~ (1948)
  31. Md Saidul Borhan, "Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Ground Level Area Sources in Dairy and Cattle Feedyard Operations", Atmosphere, 2(3), pp.303~329 (2011), MDPI AG[DOI]
  32. Shafiqur Rahman, "Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions from Mechanically Ventilated Deep Pit Swine Gestation Operation", Journal of Civil & Environmental Engineering, 02(01), pp.104~ (2012), OMICS Publishing Group[DOI]
  33. Niloy Chandra Sarker, "Nanoparticles in mitigating gaseous emissions from liquid dairy manure stored under anaerobic condition", Journal of Environmental Sciences, 76, pp.26~36 (2019), Elsevier BV[DOI]
  34. A. L. GOETSCH, "INFLUENCE OF FEEDING FREQUENCY ON PASSAGE OF FLUID AND PARTICULATE MARKERS IN STEERS FED A CONCENTRATE DIET", Canadian Journal of Animal Science, 63(3), pp.727~730 (1983), Canadian Science Publishing[DOI]
  35. Sigg L., "Redox potential measurements in natural waters: significance, concepts and problems", pp.1~12 (2000), Springer
  36. "Target pH levels in silage" (2016)[URL]
  37. S.K. Bhandari, "Effects of Chop Length of Alfalfa and Corn Silage on Milk Production and Rumen Fermentation of Dairy Cows", Journal of Dairy Science, 90(5), pp.2355~2366 (2007), American Dairy Science Association[DOI]
  38. R.H. Grant, "Influence of Buffer pH and Raw Corn Starch Addition on In Vitro Fiber Digestion Kinetics", Journal of Dairy Science, 75(10), pp.2762~2768 (1992), American Dairy Science Association[DOI]
  39. Haiyan Wu, "The effect of pH on anaerobic fermentation of primary sludge at room temperature", Journal of Hazardous Materials, 172(1), pp.196~201 (2009), Elsevier BV[DOI]
  40. Shete S, "Ruminating Over Methane Emissions", pp.31~32 (2010), NISCAIR-CSIR
  41. M.F Colmenarejo, "A pilot-scale study of total volatile fatty acids production by anaerobic fermentation of sewage in fixed-bed and suspended biomass reactors", Process Biochemistry, 39(10), pp.1257~1267 (2004), Elsevier BV[DOI]
  42. "Relationship between oxidation reduction potential (ORP) and volatile fatty acid (VFA) production in the acid-phase anaerobic digestion process" (2008)[URL]
  43. Blanc FC, "Electrode potential monitoring and electrolytic control in anaerobic digestion", J Water Pollut Control Fed, 45(4), pp.655~667 (1973)
  44. "ORP Management in wastewater as an indicator of process efficiency" (2008)[URL]
  45. Moran J., "Tropical dairy farming: feeding management for small holder dairy farmers in the humid tropics" (2005), Csiro publishing
  46. Zhisheng C., "Effect of nano-zinc oxide supplementation on rumen fermentation in vitro", Chinese J Anim Nutr, 8, pp.023~ (2011)[DOI]
  47. Hook SE, "Methanogens: methane producers of the rumen and mitigation strategies", Archaea, 2010 (2010)[DOI]
  48. Pouliquen F, "Ullmann's encyclopedia of industrial chemistry" (1985)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (2건)