본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

OTT 개인화 추천서비스에서의 정보 프라이버시 염려에 영향을 미치는 요인에 관한 연구

Antecedents Affecting the Information Privacy Concerns in Personalized Recommendation Service of OTT

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류컴퓨터학

초록

본 연구는 OTT 개인화된 추천서비스에 대한 프라이버시 염려와 개인정보 제공 의도에 미치는 선행요인들을 분석하였다. 먼저 OTT 개인화 추천시스템의 특성을 정확성, 다양성, 신기성으로 하였고, 성격5요인 모형인 친화성, 정서적 불안정성, 성실성, 외향성, 경험에 대한 개방성을 활용하였다. 또한 지각된투명성을 추출하여 정보 프라이버시 염려, 개인정보 제공 의도 간의 관계를 분석하였다. 그리고 서비스혜택과 개인정보 제공 의도 간의 관계를 살펴본 후 프라이버시 염려와 개인정보 제공 의도에 있어조절 효과가 있는지 분석하였다. 연구 결과에 따르면 개인화 추천시스템 특성들은 유의한 영향을 미치지못하는 것으로 나타났으나, 성격 5요인 중 정서적 불안정성, 외향성, 경험에 대한 개방성은 유의한영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 또한, 지각된 투명성 역시 프라이버시 염려에 유의한 영향을 미치는것으로 나타났다. 프라이버시 염려와 서비스 혜택은 개인정보 제공의도에 유의미한 영향을 미치며프라이버시 염려와 개인정보 제공의도 간에 서비스 혜택이 조절효과를 가지는 것으로 나타났다. 본연구의 결과는 OTT 기업들이 사용자들의 프라이버시 보호 행동을 이해하는데 도움을 줄 것으로 본다.

Abstract

In this paper, we examined the causes of privacy concern and related factors in personalized recommendation service of OTT. On the basis of the ‘Big Five Personality model,’ we established factors such as agreeableness, neuroticism, conscientiousness, extraversion, and openness to experience. Additionally, we established factors such as accuracy, diversity, and novelty of OTT recommendation’s services, and perceived transparency. we analyzed the relationship between privacy concern, service benefit, and intention to give personal information. Finally, we analyzed the mediating effect of service benefits on the relationship between privacy concern and intention to give personal information. The results of this study showed that (1) neuroticism, extraversion and openness to experience had the significant effects on privacy concerns, (2) perceived transparency had the significant effects on privacy concern, 3) privacy concern and service benefit had the significant effect on intention to give personal information, and (4) as a result of multi-group analysis towards low and high groups to verify the moderating effect by service benefits, a significant difference was observed between privacy concern and intention to give personal information. The findings of the study are expected to help the OTT firms’ understanding towards users’ privacy protection behaviors.

참고문헌 (71)

  1. E. H. Oh, "A Study on the Main Characteristics of OTT Service that Affects the Continuous Intention to use OTT Service-Based on PAM", Journal of Korea Service Management Society, 23(3), pp.172~189 (2022)[DOI]
  2. Y. S. Oh, "Analysis of Usage Patterns by OTT Service Platform", Kisdi Stat Report, 23(6), pp.1~7 (2023)
  3. J. Yoo, "A Study on the Factors Influencing Continuous Usage Intension based on OTT Service User", Journal of Broadcasting and Telecommunications Research, 102, pp.46~79 (2018)
  4. "Native OTT challenge is ‘survival’... realistic support needed"[URL]
  5. "Native OTT challenge is ‘survival’...Reviewing investments: A strategy for escaping the crisis in the local OTT market amid intense competition and financial losses"[URL]
  6. "Accenture: The future competitiveness of OTT lies in personalized curation"[URL]
  7. D. E. Cho, "A Study of Personalized Contents Recommendation Method Based on User Preference Learning", The Journal of Korea Institute of Information Technology, 9(9), pp.229~235 (2011)
  8. J. S. Lee, "Exploring Factors Affecting the Viewing Intention of Recommended Content of Paid OTT Services", The Journal of Internet Electronic Commerce Research, 21(1), pp.69~88 (2021)[DOI]
  9. J. B. Lee, "The Spread of AI", Data Based Marketing and its Socioeconomic Impact, 2020, pp.14, 1~7
  10. Data Brokers : A Call for Transparency and Accountability, "Federal Trade Commission", 1~57 (2014)
  11. "FTC Says Data Brokers Need to Make Their Information Trove Clearer to Consumers"[URL]
  12. Data 3 Act: The Beginning of the Data Economy, Issue&Analysis, "Y. I. Bae", 1~26 (2020)
  13. J. B. Schafer, "Recommender Systems in E-Commerce", 99:Proceedings of the 1st ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce, pp.158~166 (1999)
  14. K. Kim, "The Influence of Personalized Recommendation on the Millennial’s Evaluation of OTT Services : Focused on the Variety Seeking Tendency", Journal of the HCI Society of Korea, 15(3), pp.43~53 (2020)[DOI]
  15. J. T. Gironda, "iSPY? Tailored versus Invasive Ads and Consumers’ Perceptions of Personalized Advertising", Electronic Commerce Research and Application, 29, pp.64~77 (2018)[DOI]
  16. H. J. Choi, "A Consumer Perception based on the Type of Recommender System : A Privacy Calculus Perspective", The Journal of the Korea Contents Association, 20(3), pp.254~266 (2020)[DOI]
  17. "For Consumers, Data Privacy Has a Fluid Definition"[URL]
  18. H. J. Smith, "Information Privacy : Measuring Individuals’ Concerns about Organizational Practices", MIS Quarterly, 20(2), pp.167~196 (1996)[DOI]
  19. N. K. Malhotra, "Internet Users'Information Privacy Concerns(IUIPC) : The Construct, the scale, and a Causal Model", Information Systems Research, 15(4), pp.336~355 (2004)[DOI]
  20. S. Pape, "Re-Evaluating Internet Users'Information Privacy Concerns : The Case in Japan", AIS Transactions on Replication Research, 6, pp.1~18 (2020)[DOI]
  21. R. K. Chellappa, "Personalization versus privacy : An empirical examination of the Online Consumer’s Dilemma", Information Technology and Management, 6, pp.181~202 (2005)[DOI]
  22. J. Yoon, "The Effect of OTT Platform Characteristics on Continuous Usage Intention and Switching Intention through Use Satisfaction", The Journal of Internet Electronic Commerce Research, 22(3), pp.95~113 (2022)[DOI]
  23. Y. Lee, "The Effect of the Recommendation Quality of Online Video Platforms on the Satisfaction of the Recommender System and Loyalty", Journal of Marketing Studies, 28(4), pp.1~18 (2020)[DOI]
  24. P. Pu, "A User-Centric Evaluation Framework for Recommender Systems", Proceedings of the fifth ACM conference on Recommender systems, pp.14~21 (2011)
  25. M. Nilashi, "Recommendation Quality, Transparency, and Website Quality for Trust-Building in Recommendation Agents", Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 19, pp.70~84 (2016)[DOI]
  26. S. H. Jeong, "The Effects of Perceived Netflix Personalized Recommendation Service on Satisfying User Expectation", The Journal of the Korea Contents Association, 22(7), pp.164~175 (2022)[DOI]
  27. S. H. Lee, "Useful but Shameful-Privacy Concern in YouTube Recommendation System Design", Proceedings of HCI KOREA 2021, pp.386~391 (2021)
  28. Y. Li, "Theories in Online Information Privacy Research : A Critical Review and an Integrated Framework", Decision Support Systems, 54(1), pp.471~481 (2012)[DOI]
  29. B. Yang, "The Relationship between the Personality Traits and Mobile Shopping Intention : Parallel Mediating Effects of Privacy Concern and Perceived Value", Journal of the Korea Convergence Society, 13(2), pp.201~214 (2022)[DOI]
  30. J. Tang, "Examining the Intention of Authorization via Apps : Personality Traits and Expanded Privacy Calculus Perspectives", Behavioral Sciences, 12(7), pp.218~ (2022)[DOI]
  31. R. R. McCrae, "Adding Liebe und Arbeit : The Full Five-factor Model and Well-being", Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17(2), pp.227~232 (1991)[DOI]
  32. I. A. Junglas, "Personality Traits and Concern for Privacy : an Empirical Study in the Context of Location-Based Services", European Journal of Information Systems, 17(4), pp.387~402 (2008)[DOI]
  33. Y. Kim, "Privacy Paradox in Providing Personal Information", The Journal of Internet Electronic Commerce Resarch, 16(1), pp.119~151 (2016)
  34. J. P. Yang, "The Influence of Personality Traits on Airline Untact Check-in : Focusing on Mobile Check-in User", Journal of Industrial Distribution & Business, 12(1), pp.15~30 (2021)[DOI]
  35. P. T. Costa Jr, "Facet Scales for Agreeableness and Conscientiousness : A Revision of the NEO Personality Inventory", Personality and Individual Differences, 12(9), pp.887~898 (1991)[DOI]
  36. J. P. Rolland, "The Five-Factor Model of Personality Across Cultures", pp.7~28 (2002)
  37. K. K. Kulkami, "Sharing of Branded Viral Advertisements by Young Consumers : The Interplay between Personality Traits and Ad Appeal", Journal of Consumer Marketing, 36(6), pp.846~857 (2019)[DOI]
  38. E. E. Hollenbaugh, "Facebook Self-Disclosure : Examining the Role of Traits, Social Cohesion, and Motives", Computers in Human Behavior, 30, pp.50~58 (2014)[DOI]
  39. J. Marbach, "Who Are You and What Do You Value? Investigating the Role of Personality Traits and Customer-Perceived Value in Online Customer Engagement", Journal of Marketing Management, pp.502~525 (2016)[DOI]
  40. I. Junglas, "Personality Traits and Privacy Perceptions : An Empirical Study in the Context of Location-Based Services", 2006 International Conference on Mobile Business, pp.36~ (2006)
  41. K. van der Schyff, "Information Privacy Behavior in the Use of Facebook Apps: A Personality-Based Vulnerability Assessment", Heliyon, 6(8), pp.e04714~ (2020)[DOI]
  42. C. H. Yeh, "What Drives Internet Users’ Willingness to Provide Personal Information?", Online Information Review, 42(6), pp.923~939 (2018)[DOI]
  43. B. Skrinjaric, "The Effect of Personality Traits on Online Privacy Concern", Ekonomski Pregled, 69(2), pp.106~130 (2018)[DOI]
  44. K. Zhu, "Information Transparency in Electronic Marketplaces : Why Data Transparency May Hinder the Adoption of B2B Exchanges", Electronic Markets, 12(2), pp.92~99 (2002)[DOI]
  45. P. Pearl, "A User-Centric Evaluation Framework of Recommender Systems", Proceedings of the Fifth ACM Conference on Recommdender Systems, pp.157~164 (2011)
  46. I. Nunes, "A Systematic Review and Taxonomy of Explanation in Decision Support and Recommender Systems", User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 27, pp.393~444 (2017)[DOI]
  47. D. J. Lee, "Privacy Calculus and the Role of Information Transparency in Personal Information Disclosure", Information Policy, 17(2), pp.68~85 (2010)
  48. Y. H. Yoo, "A Study on the Effect of Personalization-Privacy-Transparency on User Trust in the Recommender System : Base on Social Media’s Videos Recommendation", Journal of Digital Contents Society, 21(1), pp.173~184 (2020)[DOI]
  49. AI Algorithm-based Economy Consumer Problem Research, "K. N. Lee", Korea Consumer Agency, 1~135, pp.Policy Research 18-17 (2018)
  50. M. J. Culnan, "Information Privacy Concerns, Procedural Fairness, and Impersonal Trust : An Empirical Investigation", Organization Science, 10(1), pp.104~115 (1999)[DOI]
  51. J. L. Hebrado, "Influences of Transparency and Feedback on Customer Intention to Reuse Online Recommender Systems", The Journal of Society for e-Business Studies, 18(2), pp.279~299 (2013)[DOI]
  52. S. U. Yun, "Study on the Determinant Factors of Intention to Provide Personal Information in the Big Data Era", Journal of Communication Science, 18(1), pp.52~78 (2018)[DOI]
  53. C. W. Park, "An Empirical Research on Information Privacy Risks and Policy Model in the Big Data Era", The Journal of Society for e-Business Studies, 21(1), pp.131~145 (2016)[DOI]
  54. R. Batra, "Measuring the hedonic and Utilitarian Sources of Consumer Attitudes", Marketing Letters, 2(2), pp.159~170 (1991)[DOI]
  55. J. H. Lee, "The Impacts of Perceived Personalization on User Responses toward Facebook", Advertising Research, 124, pp.5~36 (2020)[DOI]
  56. C. H. Lee, "Personalisation-Privacy Paradox : The Effects of Personalisation and Privacy Assurance on Customer Responses to Travel Web Sites", Tourism Management, 32(5), pp.987~994 (2011)[DOI]
  57. S. W. Yoon, "The Effect of Personalization Level of OTT Recommendation Service on Intention to Use : Focusing on the Perceived Usefulness and Privacy Concerns of Users", Journal of Business Convengence, 8(1), pp.21~30 (2023)[DOI]
  58. S. Y. X. Komiak, "The Effect of Personalization and Familiarity on Trust and Adoption of Recommendation Agents", MIS Quarterly, 30(4), pp.941~960 (2006)[DOI]
  59. T. M. Lee, "A Study on the Effects of Ubiquitous Connectivity and Contextual Offer on the Mobile-Commerce Adoption : An extension of the Technology Acceptance Model", Korean Management Review, 33(4), pp.1043~1071 (2004)
  60. D. Jeong, "Effects of the Personalization Level of Advertising on Ad Acceptance : Focusing on the Privacy Calculus Model", Information Society & Media, 23(2), pp.220~257 (2022)[DOI]
  61. The Changing Patterns of AI Multi-Curation and the Utilization Behavior of OTT Service Content, "H. J. Sim", Kisdi, 1~16, pp.Kisdi Perspective, No.2 (2021)
  62. C. H. An, "The Impact of Privacy Concern about Professional Sports Team’s Mobile Application on Continuance Intention to Use : Moderating Effects of Monetary Incentive and Service Benefits", The Korean Journal of Physical Education, 56(5), pp.387~402 (2017)[DOI]
  63. T. Lim, "Factors Affecting Intention to Disclose Personal Information Continuous Usage Intention in Social Network Service", The Journal of Internet Electronic Commerce Resarch, 19(1), pp.17~38 (2019)[DOI]
  64. H. S. Lee, "Principle of Research Paper for Social Science" (2010), Hankyungsa
  65. J. C. Nunnally, "Psychometric Theory" (1978), McGraw-Hill
  66. C. Fornell, "Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error", Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), pp.39~50 (1981)[DOI]
  67. J. C. Anderson, "Structural Equation Modeling in Practice : A Review and Recommended Two-Step Approach", Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), pp.411~423 (1988)[DOI]
  68. R. P. Bagozzi, "On the Evaluation of Structural Equation Models", Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16(1), pp.74~94 (1988)[DOI]
  69. J. F. Hair, "Multivariate Data Analysis" (1998), Prentice-Hall
  70. M. Tenenhaus, "PLS Path Modeling", Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 48(1), pp.159~205 (2005)[DOI]
  71. "Cop Warns Against OTT Stealing Your Personal Data"[URL]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (19건)