Effects of supplemental bacteriophage on the gut microbiota and nutrient digestibility of ileal-cannulated pigs
1
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study measured the potential changes of the microbiota in the gastrointestinal tract and energy and nutrient digestibility by supplemental bacteriophages in pigs. Twelve castrated male pigs (initial mean body weight = 29.5 ± 2.3 kg) were surgically cannulated using T-cannula. The animals were housed individually in pens equipped with a feeder and a nipple waterer. The pigs were allotted to 1 of 3 experimental diets in a quadruplicated 3 × 2 Latin square design with 3 experimental diets, 2 periods, and 12 pigs resulting in 8 replicates per diet. The 3 diets were a control mainly based on corn and soybean meal with no antibiotics or bacteriophages, a diet containing 0.1% antibiotics, and a diet containing 0.2% bacteriophages. On day 5 of the experimental period, feces were collected and on days 6 and 7, ileal digesta were collected. Genomic DNA for bacteria were extracted from the ileal digesta and feces and the V4 region of the 16S rRNA gene was amplified. The ileal and fecal digestibility of energy, dry matter, organic matter, crude protein, and fiber was unaffected by dietary antibiotics or bacteriophages. At the phylum level, the supplemental antibiotic or bacteriophage tended to result in a higher proportion of Firmicutes (p = 0.059) and a lower proportion of Bacteroidetes (p = 0.099) in the ileal digesta samples compared with the control group with no difference between the antibiotic and bacteriophage groups. At the genus level, the supplemental antibiotic or bacteriophage tended to result in a higher proportion of Lactobacillus (p = 0.062) and a lower proportion of Bacteroides (p = 0.074) and Streptococcus (p = 0.088) in the ileal digesta compared with the control group with no difference between the antibiotic and bacteriophage groups. In the feces, supplemental antibiotics or bacteriophages reduced the proportion of Bifidobacterium compared with the control group (p = 0.029) with no difference between the antibiotic and bacteriophage groups. Overall, supplemental antibiotics and bacteriophages showed positive effect on the microbiota of in the ileal digesta without largely affecting energy or nutrient digestibility, with no differences between the antibiotic and bacteriophage groups in growing pigs.
Abstract
This study measured the potential changes of the microbiota in the gastrointestinal tract and energy and nutrient digestibility by supplemental bacteriophages in pigs. Twelve castrated male pigs (initial mean body weight = 29.5 ± 2.3 kg) were surgically cannulated using T-cannula. The animals were housed individually in pens equipped with a feeder and a nipple waterer. The pigs were allotted to 1 of 3 experimental diets in a quadruplicated 3 × 2 Latin square design with 3 experimental diets, 2 periods, and 12 pigs resulting in 8 replicates per diet. The 3 diets were a control mainly based on corn and soybean meal with no antibiotics or bacteriophages, a diet containing 0.1% antibiotics, and a diet containing 0.2% bacteriophages. On day 5 of the experimental period, feces were collected and on days 6 and 7, ileal digesta were collected. Genomic DNA for bacteria were extracted from the ileal digesta and feces and the V4 region of the 16S rRNA gene was amplified. The ileal and fecal digestibility of energy, dry matter, organic matter, crude protein, and fiber was unaffected by dietary antibiotics or bacteriophages. At the phylum level, the supplemental antibiotic or bacteriophage tended to result in a higher proportion of Firmicutes (p = 0.059) and a lower proportion of Bacteroidetes (p = 0.099) in the ileal digesta samples compared with the control group with no difference between the antibiotic and bacteriophage groups. At the genus level, the supplemental antibiotic or bacteriophage tended to result in a higher proportion of Lactobacillus (p = 0.062) and a lower proportion of Bacteroides (p = 0.074) and Streptococcus (p = 0.088) in the ileal digesta compared with the control group with no difference between the antibiotic and bacteriophage groups. In the feces, supplemental antibiotics or bacteriophages reduced the proportion of Bifidobacterium compared with the control group (p = 0.029) with no difference between the antibiotic and bacteriophage groups. Overall, supplemental antibiotics and bacteriophages showed positive effect on the microbiota of in the ileal digesta without largely affecting energy or nutrient digestibility, with no differences between the antibiotic and bacteriophage groups in growing pigs.
참고문헌 (55)
- Cromwell GL, "Why and how antibiotics are used in swine production", Anim Biotechnol, 13, pp.7~27 (2002)[DOI]
- Monger XC, "Antibiotic resistance : from pig to meat", Antibiotics, 10, pp.1209~ (2021)[DOI]
- Mitchaothai J, "Antimicrobial resistance in fecal Escherichia coli from different pig production systems", Anim Biosci, 35, pp.138~146 (2022)[DOI]
- Costa LB, "Review article: herbal extracts and organic acids as natural feed additives in pig diets", S Afr J Anim Sci, 43, pp.181~193 (2013)[DOI]
- Liu Y, "Non-antibiotic feed additives in diets for pigs : a review", Anim Nutr, 4, pp.113~125 (2018)[DOI]
- Wang H, "Dietary acidifiers as an alternative to antibiotics for promoting pig growth performance : a systematic review and meta-analysis", Anim Feed Sci Technol, 289, pp.115320~ (2022)[DOI]
- Kim YJ, "Effects of different Bacillus licheniformis and Bacillus subtilis ratios on nutrient digestibility, fecal microflora, and gas emissions of growing pigs", J Anim Sci Technol, 64, pp.291~301 (2022)[DOI]
- Lee S, "Effects of dietary supplementation of bacteriophage with or without zinc oxide on the performance and gut development of weanling pigs", Ital J Anim Sci, 15, pp.412~418 (2016)[DOI]
- Desiree K, "Efficacy of phage therapy in pigs: systematic review and meta-analysis", J Anim Sci, 99, pp.skab157~ (2021)[DOI]
- Zeng Y, "Bacteriophage as an alternative to antibiotics promotes growth performance by regulating intestinal inflammation, intestinal barrier function and gut microbiota in weaned piglets", Front Vet Sci, 8, pp.623899~ (2021)[DOI]
- Huff WE, "Alternatives to antibiotics : utilization of bacteriophage to treat colibacillosis and prevent foodborne pathogens", Poult Sci, 84, pp.655~659 (2005)[DOI]
- Kim KH, "Bacteriophage and probiotics both enhance the performance of growing pigs but bacteriophage are more effective", Anim Feed Sci Technol, 196, pp.88~95 (2014)[DOI]
- Yan L, "Effect of bacteriophage supplementation on the growth performance, nutrient digestibility, blood characteristics, and fecal microbial shedding in growing pigs", Asian-Australas J Anim Sci, 25, pp.1451~1456 (2012)[DOI]
- Stein HH, "Technical note : a technique for inserting a T-cannula into the distal ileum of pregnant sows", J Anim Sci, 76, pp.1433~1436 (1998)[DOI]
- Kim BG, "A program for making completely balanced Latin Square designs employing a systemic method", Rev Colomb Cienc Pecu, 23, pp.277~282 (2010)
- NRC, "Nutrient requirements of swine" (2012), National Academies Press
- Han GG, "Relationship between the microbiota in different sections of the gastrointestinal tract, and the body weight of broiler chickens", SpringerPlus, 5, pp.911~ (2016)[DOI]
- AOAC International, "International", 2005
- Kong C, "Evaluation of amino acid and energy utilization in feedstuff for swine and poultry diets", Asian-Australas J Anim Sci, 27, pp.917~925 (2014)[DOI]
- Weinbauer MG, "Ecology of prokaryotic viruses", FEMS Microbiol Rev, 28, pp.127~181 (2004)[DOI]
- Sime-Ngando T, "Environmental bacteriophages : viruses of microbes in aquatic ecosystems", Front Microbiol, 5, pp.355~ (2014)[DOI]
- Bhargava K, "Phage therapeutics: from promises to practices and prospectives", Appl Microbiol Biotechnol, 105, pp.9047~9067 (2021)[DOI]
- Sulakvelidze A, "Bacteriophage therapy", Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 45, pp.649~659 (2001)[DOI]
- Kim JS, "Bacteriophage cocktail and multi-strain probiotics in the feed for weanling pigs: effects on intestine morphology and targeted intestinal coliforms and Clostridium", Animal, 11, pp.45~53 (2017)[DOI]
- Gebru E, "Effect of probiotic-, bacteriophage-, or organic acid-supplemented feeds or fermented soybean meal on the growth performance, acute-phase response, and bacterial shedding of grower pigs challenged with Salmonella enterica serotype Typhimurium", J Anim Sci, 88, pp.3880~3886 (2010)[DOI]
- Wolf H, "Avilamycin, an inhibitor of the 30 S ribosomal subunits function", FEBS Lett, 36, pp.181~186 (1973)[DOI]
- Sadeghi A, "A comparison of the effects of dietary ginger powder and avilamycin on growth performance and intestinal salmonella count of challenged broiler chickens", Iran J Appl Anim Sci, 3, pp.769~775 (2013)
- Lamendella R, "Comparative fecal metagenomics unveils unique functional capacity of the swine gut", BMC Microbiol, 11, pp.103~ (2011)[DOI]
- Looft T, "Bacteria, phages and pigs : the effects of in-feed antibiotics on the microbiome at different gut locations", ISME J, 8, pp.1566~1576 (2014)[DOI]
- Holman DB, "Meta-analysis to define a core microbiota in the swine gut", mSystems, 2, pp.e00004-17~ (2017)[DOI]
- Mann E, "Mucosaassociated bacterial microbiome of the gastrointestinal tract of weaned pigs and dynamics linked to dietary calcium-phosphorus", PLOS ONE, 9, pp.e86950~ (2014)[DOI]
- Luo Y, "Responses in ileal and cecal bacteria to low and high amylose", amylopectin ratio diets in growing pigs, 2015, pp.99, 10627~10638
- Hedegaard CJ, "Natural pig plasma immunoglobulins have anti-bacterial effects : potential for use as feed supplement for treatment of intestinal infections in pigs", PLOS ONE, 11, pp.e0147373~ (2016)[DOI]
- Darwish N, "Choice of 16S ribosomal RNA primers affects the microbiome analysis in chicken ceca", Sci Rep, 11, pp.11848~ (2021)[DOI]
- Lee YK, "Has the microbiota played a critical role in the evolution of the adaptive immune system?", Science, 330, pp.1768~1773 (2010)[DOI]
- Brestoff JR, "Commensal bacteria at the interface of host metabolism and the immune system", Nat Immunol, 14, pp.676~684 (2013)[DOI]
- Mazmanian SK, "A microbial symbiosis factor prevents intestinal inflammatory disease", Nature, 453, pp.620~625 (2008)[DOI]
- Handelsman J, "Microbial symbiosis : in sickness and in health", DNA Cell Biol, 28, pp.359~360 (2009)[DOI]
- Chow J, "Host–bacterial symbiosis in health and disease", Adv Immunol, 107, pp.243~274 (2010)[DOI]
- Rinninella E, "What is the healthy gut microbiota composition? A changing ecosystem across age, environment, diet, and diseases", Microorganisms, 7, pp.14~ (2019)[DOI]
- Abenavoli L, "Gut microbiota and obesity : a role for probiotics", Nutrients, 11, pp.2690~ (2019)[DOI]
- Shen ZH, "Relationship between intestinal microbiota and ulcerative colitis : mechanisms and clinical application of probiotics and fecal microbiota transplantation", World J Gastroenterol, 24, pp.5~14 (2018)[DOI]
- Aizawa E, "Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus counts in the gut microbiota of patients with bipolar disorder and healthy controls", Front Psychiatry, 9, pp.730~ (2019)[DOI]
- Gomes AMP, "Bifidobacterium spp. and Lactobacillus acidophilus : biological, biochemical, technological and therapeutical properties relevant for use as probiotics", Trends Food Sci Technol, 10, pp.139~157 (1999)[DOI]
- Kang J, "Effects of dietary inactivated probiotics on growth performance and immune responses of weaned pigs", J Anim Sci Technol, 63, pp.520~530 (2021)[DOI]
- Li D, "Effect of feed antibiotics on the performance and intestinal microflora of weanling pigs in China", Asian-Australas J Anim Sci, 13, pp.1554~1560 (2000)[DOI]
- Castillo M, "The response of gastrointestinal microbiota to avilamycin, butyrate, and plant extracts in early-weaned pigs", J Anim Sci, 84, pp.2725~2734 (2006)[DOI]
- Pi Y, "Antibiotic-induced alterations of the gut microbiota and microbial fermentation in protein parallel the changes in host nitrogen metabolism of growing pigs", Animal, 13, pp.262~272 (2019)[DOI]
- Ji F, "Effects of dietary supplementation of an enzyme blend on the ileal and fecal digestibility of nutrients in growing pigs", J Anim Sci, 86, pp.1533~1543 (2008)[DOI]
- Liu JB, "Effects of feed intake and dietary nutrient density on apparent ileal and total tract digestibility of nutrients and gross energy for growing pigs", J Anim Sci, 94, pp.4251~4258 (2016)[DOI]
- Choi H, "A low-fiber diet requires a longer adaptation period before collecting feces of pigs compared with a high-fiber diet in digestibility experiments using the inert marker method", Anim Feed Sci Technol, 256, pp.114254~ (2019)[DOI]
- Zoetendal EG, "Molecular microbial ecology of the gastrointestinal tract : from phylogeny to function", Curr Issues Intest Microbiol, 5, pp.31~48 (2004)
- Niu Q, "Dynamic distribution of the gut microbiota and the relationship with apparent crude fiber digestibility and growth stages in pigs", Sci Rep, 5, pp.9938~ (2015)[DOI]
- Jin Z, "Use of refined potato(Solanum tuberosum L. cv. Gogu valley)protein as an alternative to antibiotics in weanling pigs", Livest Sci, 124, pp.26~32 (2009)[DOI]
- Choi Y, "Effects of Ecklonia cava as fucoidan-rich algae on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, intestinal morphology and caecal microflora in weanling pigs", Asian-Australas J Anim Sci, 30, pp.64~70 (2017)[DOI]