Effects of diets for three growing stages by rumen inocula donors on in vitro rumen fermentation and microbiome
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Hanwoo and Jeju Black cattle (Jeju Black) are native breeds of Korean cattle. Jeju Black cattle are recognized as natural monuments and are known to exhibit slower growth rates compared to Hanwoo. While several studies have analyzed the genetic characteristics of these cattle, there has been limited research on the differences in their microbiome. In this study, rumen fluid was obtained from three Hanwoo steers and three Jeju Black steers, and three different diets (total mixed rations [TMRs] for growing, early fattening, and late fattening periods) were used as substrates for in vitro fermentation. The in vitro incubation was conducted for 3 h and 24 h following a 2 × 3 factorial arrangement. After both incubation periods, fermentation characteristics were analyzed, and ruminal microbiome analysis was performed using 16S rRNA gene sequencing, employing both QIIME2 and PICRUSt2. The results revealed significant differences in the ruminal microbiota due to the inoculum effect. At the phylum level, Patescibacteria and Synergistota were found to be enriched in the Jeju Black inoculum-treated group. Additionally, using different inocula also affected the relative abundance of major taxa, including Ruminococcus, Pseudoramibacter, Ruminococcaceae CAG-352, and the [Eubacterium] ruminantium group. These microbial differences induced by the inoculum may have originated from varying levels of domestication between the two subspecies of donor animals, which mainly influenced the fermentation and microbiome features in the early incubation stages, although this was only partially offset afterward. Furthermore, predicted commission numbers of microbial enzymes, some of which are involved in the biosynthesis of secondary metabolites, fatty acids, and alpha amylase, differed based on the inoculum effect. However, these differences may account for only a small proportion of the overall metabolic pathway. Conversely, diets were found to affect protein biosynthesis and its related metabolism, which showed differential abundance in the growing diet and were potentially linked to the growth-promoting effects in beef cattle during the growing period. In conclusion, this study demonstrated that using different inocula significantly affected in vitro fermentation characteristics and microbiome features, mainly in the early stages of incubation, with some effects persisting up to 24 h of incubation.
Abstract
Hanwoo and Jeju Black cattle (Jeju Black) are native breeds of Korean cattle. Jeju Black cattle are recognized as natural monuments and are known to exhibit slower growth rates compared to Hanwoo. While several studies have analyzed the genetic characteristics of these cattle, there has been limited research on the differences in their microbiome. In this study, rumen fluid was obtained from three Hanwoo steers and three Jeju Black steers, and three different diets (total mixed rations [TMRs] for growing, early fattening, and late fattening periods) were used as substrates for in vitro fermentation. The in vitro incubation was conducted for 3 h and 24 h following a 2 × 3 factorial arrangement. After both incubation periods, fermentation characteristics were analyzed, and ruminal microbiome analysis was performed using 16S rRNA gene sequencing, employing both QIIME2 and PICRUSt2. The results revealed significant differences in the ruminal microbiota due to the inoculum effect. At the phylum level, Patescibacteria and Synergistota were found to be enriched in the Jeju Black inoculum-treated group. Additionally, using different inocula also affected the relative abundance of major taxa, including Ruminococcus, Pseudoramibacter, Ruminococcaceae CAG-352, and the [Eubacterium] ruminantium group. These microbial differences induced by the inoculum may have originated from varying levels of domestication between the two subspecies of donor animals, which mainly influenced the fermentation and microbiome features in the early incubation stages, although this was only partially offset afterward. Furthermore, predicted commission numbers of microbial enzymes, some of which are involved in the biosynthesis of secondary metabolites, fatty acids, and alpha amylase, differed based on the inoculum effect. However, these differences may account for only a small proportion of the overall metabolic pathway. Conversely, diets were found to affect protein biosynthesis and its related metabolism, which showed differential abundance in the growing diet and were potentially linked to the growth-promoting effects in beef cattle during the growing period. In conclusion, this study demonstrated that using different inocula significantly affected in vitro fermentation characteristics and microbiome features, mainly in the early stages of incubation, with some effects persisting up to 24 h of incubation.
참고문헌 (77)
- Lee SH, "Hanwoo cattle : origin, domestication, breeding strategies and genomic selection", J Anim Sci Technol, 56, pp.2~ (2014)[DOI]
- Suh S, "Assessment of genetic diversity, relationships and structure among korean native cattle breeds using microsatellite markers", Asian-Australas J Anim Sci, 27, pp.1548~1553 (2014)[DOI]
- Sharma A, "A genome-wide assessment of genetic diversity and population structure of Korean native cattle breeds", BMC Genet, 17, pp.139~ (2016)[DOI]
- Alam MZ, "Genetic characteristics of Korean Jeju Black cattle with high density single nucleotide polymorphisms", Anim Biosci, 34, pp.789~800 (2021)[DOI]
- Strucken EM, "Towards breed formation by island model divergence in Korean cattle", BMC Evol Biol, 15, pp.284~ (2015)[DOI]
- Jo C, "Keys to production and processing of Hanwoo beef : a perspective of tradition and science", Anim Front, 2, pp.32~38 (2012)[DOI]
- Shriver BJ, "Fermentation of a high concentrate diet as affected by ruminal ph and digesta flow", J Dairy Sci, 69, pp.413~419 (1986)[DOI]
- Russell JB, "The importance of pH in the regulation of ruminal acetate to propionate ratio and methane production in vitro", J Dairy Sci, 81, pp.3222~3230 (1998)[DOI]
- Calsamiglia S, "Changes in rumen microbial fermentation are due to a combined effect of type of diet and pH", J Anim Sci, 86, pp.702~711 (2008)[DOI]
- Baldwin RL, "Effects of diet forage : concentrate ratio and metabolizable energy intake on isolated rumen epithelial cell metabolism in vitro", J Anim Sci, 78, pp.771~783 (2000)[DOI]
- Feeding strategies to reduce methane loss in cattle, "Tamminga S", Animal Sciences Group, ~, pp.Report No.: 34 (2007)
- Cantalapiedra-Hijar G, "Effects of forage : concentrate ratio and forage type on apparent digestibility, ruminal fermentation, and microbial growth in goats", J Anim Sci, 87, pp.622~631 (2009)[DOI]
- Yáñez-Ruiz DR, "Design, implementation and interpretation of in vitro batch culture experiments to assess enteric methane mitigation in ruminants—a review", Anim Feed Sci Technol, 216, pp.1~18 (2016)[DOI]
- Kittelmann S, "Two different bacterial community types are linked with the low-methane emission trait in sheep", PLOS ONE, 9, pp.e103171~ (2014)[DOI]
- Boguhn J, "Effect of donor animals and their diet on in vitro nutrient degradation and microbial protein synthesis using grass and corn silages", J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr, 97, pp.547~557 (2013)[DOI]
- Waghorn GC, "Inconsistencies in rumen methane production—effects of forage composition and animal genotype", Int Congr Ser, 1293, pp.115~118 (2006)[DOI]
- Yan T, "Prediction of methane energy output in dairy and beef cattle offered grass silage-based diets", Livest Prod Sci, 64, pp.253~263 (2000)[DOI]
- Martínez ME, "The effect of the diet fed to donor sheep on in vitro methane production and ruminal fermentation of diets of variable composition", Anim Feed Sci Technol, 158, pp.126~135 (2010)[DOI]
- Troelsen JE, "Ruminant digestion in vitro as affected by inoculum donor, collection day, and fermentation time", Can J Anim Sci, 46, pp.149~156 (1966)[DOI]
- National Research Council, "Nutrient requirements of domestic animals: nutrient requirements of beef cattle" (1958), National Academy of Sciences, National Research Council
- McDougall EI, "Studies on ruminant saliva. 1. The composition and output of sheep’s saliva", Biochem J, 43, pp.99~109 (1948)[DOI]
- AOAC International, "International", 2012
- Van Soest PJ, "Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition", J Dairy Sci, 74, pp.3583~3597 (1991)[DOI]
- Van Soest PJ, "Collaborative study of acid-detergent fiber and lignin", J AOAC Int, 56, pp.781~784 (1973)[DOI]
- Chaney AL, "Modified reagents for determination of urea and ammonia", Clin Chem, 8, pp.130~132 (1962)[DOI]
- Martínez I, "Resistant starches types 2 and 4 have differential effects on the composition of the fecal microbiota in human subjects", PLOS ONE, 5, pp.e15046~ (2010)[DOI]
- Bolyen E, "Reproducible, interactive, scalable and extensible microbiome data science using QIIME 2", Nat Biotechnol, 37, pp.852~857 (2019)[DOI]
- Martin M, "Cutadapt removes adapter sequences from high-throughput sequencing reads", EMBnet J, 17, pp.10~12 (2011)[DOI]
- Callahan BJ, "DADA2 : highresolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data", Nat Methods, 13, pp.581~583 (2016)[DOI]
- Pedregosa F, "Scikit-learn : machine learning in python", J Mach Learn Res, 12, pp.2825~2830 (2011)
- Kaehler BD, "Species abundance information improves sequence taxonomy classification accuracy", Nat Commun, 10, pp.4643~ (2019)[DOI]
- "q2-repeat-rarefy: QIIME2 plugin for generating the average rarefied table for library size normalization using repeated rarefaction" (2021)[URL]
- Lozupone C, "UniFrac : a new phylogenetic method for comparing microbial communities", Appl Environ Microbiol, 71, pp.8228~8235 (2005)[DOI]
- Douglas GM, "PICRUSt2 for prediction of metagenome functions", Nat Biotechnol, 38, pp.685~688 (2020)[DOI]
- Tang Y, "ggfortify : unified interface to visualize statistical results of popular R packages", R J, 8, pp.474~485 (2016)[DOI]
- Benjamini Y, "Controlling the false discovery rate : a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing", J R Stat Soc Series B Stat Methodol, 57, pp.289~300 (1995)[DOI]
- Mallick H, "Multivariable association discovery in population-scale meta-omics studies", PLOS Comput Biol, 17, pp.e1009442~ (2021)[DOI]
- Paz HA, "Rumen bacterial community composition in holstein and jersey cows is different under same dietary condition and is not affected by sampling method", Front Microbiol, 7, pp.1206~ (2016)[DOI]
- Latham EA, "Responses in the rumen microbiome of Bos taurus and indicus steers fed a low-quality rice straw diet and supplemented protein", J Anim Sci, 96, pp.1032~1044 (2018)[DOI]
- Hagey JV, "Rumen sampling methods bias bacterial communities observed", PLOS ONE, 17, pp.e0258176~ (2022)[DOI]
- Pinnell LJ, "Bacteroidetes and firmicutes drive differing microbial diversity and community composition among microenvironments in the bovine rumen", Front Vet Sci, 9, pp.897996~ (2022)[DOI]
- Szeligowska N, "Inter and intraspecies comparison of the level of selected bacterial phyla in in cattle and sheep based on feces", BMC Vet Res, 17, pp.224~ (2021)[DOI]
- Pang K, "Effects of high concentrate rations on ruminal fermentation and microbiota of yaks", Front Microbiol, 13, pp.957152~ (2022)[DOI]
- Pinares-Patiño CS, "Repeatability of methane emissions from sheep", Anim Feed Sci Technol, 166-167, pp.210~218 (2011)[DOI]
- Goopy JP, "Low-methane yield sheep have smaller rumens and shorter rumen retention time", Br J Nutr, 111, pp.578~585 (2014)[DOI]
- Sijpesteijn AK, "On Ruminococcus flavefaciens, a cellulose-decomposing : bacterium from the rumen of sheep and cattle", J Gen Microbiol, 5, pp.869~879 (1951)[DOI]
- Flint HJ, "Multiplicity and expression of xylanases in the rumen cellulolytic bacterium Ruminococcus flavefaciens", Curr Microbiol, 29, pp.139~143 (1994)[DOI]
- Morris EJ, "Characteristics of the adhesion of Ruminococcus albus to cellulose", FEMS Microbiol Lett, 51, pp.113~117 (1988)[DOI]
- Willems A, "Bergey’s manual of systematics of archaea and bacteria" (2015), John Wiley & Sons
- Ricci S, "Progressive microbial adaptation of the bovine rumen and hindgut in response to a stepwise increase in dietary starch and the influence of phytogenic supplementation", Front Microbiol, 13, pp.920427~ (2022)[DOI]
- Taguchi H, "Partial characterization of structure and function of a xylanase gene from the rumen hemicellulolytic bacterium Eubacterium ruminantium", Anim Sci J, 75, pp.325~332 (2004)[DOI]
- Wade WG, "The prokaryotes: a handbook on the biology of bacteria, Vol. 4", pp.823~835 (2006), Springer
- Korpela K, "Gut microbiota signatures predict host and microbiota responses to dietary interventions in obese individuals", PLOS ONE, 9, pp.e90702~ (2014)[DOI]
- Patel TR, "Catabolism of phloroglucinol by the rumen anaerobe coprococcus", Appl Environ Microbiol, 42, pp.1010~1017 (1981)[DOI]
- Shabat SKB, "Specific microbiome-dependent mechanisms underlie the energy harvest efficiency of ruminants", ISME J, 10, pp.2958~2972 (2016)[DOI]
- Holdeman LV, "New genus, Coprococcus, twelve new species, and emended descriptions of four previously described species of bacteria from human feces", Int J Syst Bacteriol, 24, pp.260~277 (1974)[DOI]
- Castelle CJ, "Biosynthetic capacity, metabolic variety and unusual biology in the CPR and DPANN radiations", Nat Rev Microbiol, 16, pp.629~645 (2018)[DOI]
- Zhu R, "Understanding the mechanisms behind microaeration to enhance anaerobic digestion of corn straw", Fuel, 318, pp.123604~ (2022)[DOI]
- Vartoukian SR, "The division"Synergistes"", Anaerobe, 13, pp.99~106 (2007)[DOI]
- Harper LA, "Direct measurements of methane emissions from grazing and feedlot cattle", J Anim Sci, 77, pp.1392~1401 (1999)[DOI]
- Liu X, "Blautia—a new functional genus with potential probiotic properties?", Gut Microbes, 13, pp.1875796~ (2021)[DOI]
- Domingo MC, "Ruminococcus gauvreauii sp. nov., a glycopeptide-resistant species isolated from a human faecal specimen", Int J Syst Evol Microbiol, 58, pp.1393~1397 (2008)[DOI]
- Yin X, "Age-related changes in the ruminal microbiota and their relationship with rumen fermentation in lambs", Front Microbiol, 12, pp.679135~ (2021)[DOI]
- Tong J, "Illumina sequencing analysis of the ruminal microbiota in high-yield and low-yield lactating dairy cows", PLOS ONE, 13, pp.e0198225~ (2018)[DOI]
- Mao S, "The diversity of the fecal bacterial community and its relationship with the concentration of volatile fatty acids in the feces during subacute rumen acidosis in dairy cows", BMC Vet Res, 8, pp.237~ (2012)[DOI]
- Sun Z, "Perilla frutescens leaf alters the rumen microbial community of lactating dairy cows", Microorganisms, 7, pp.562~ (2019)[DOI]
- Ludwig W, "Bergey’s manual of systematics of archaea and bacteria" (2015), John Wiley & Sons
- Creevey CJ, "Determining the culturability of the rumen bacterial microbiome", Microb Biotechnol, 7, pp.467~479 (2014)[DOI]
- Thoetkiattikul H, "Comparative analysis of microbial profiles in cow rumen fed with different dietary fiber by tagged 16S rRNA gene pyrosequencing", Curr Microbiol, 67, pp.130~137 (2013)[DOI]
- Liu C, "Dynamic alterations in yak rumen bacteria community and metabolome characteristics in response to feed type", Front Microbiol, 10, pp.1116~ (2019)[DOI]
- Zhang J, "Effect of limit-fed diets with different forage to concentrate ratios on fecal bacterial and archaeal community composition in Holstein heifers", Front Microbiol, 9, pp.976~ (2018)[DOI]
- Taxis TM, "The players may change but the game remains : network analyses of ruminal microbiomes suggest taxonomic differences mask functional similarity", Nucleic Acids Res, 43, pp.9600~9612 (2015)[DOI]
- Siddons RC, "Nitrogen digestion and metabolism in sheep consuming diets containing contrasting forms and levels of N", Br J Nutr, 54, pp.175~187 (1985)[DOI]
- Firkins JL, "Ruminal nitrogen metabolism in steers as affected by feed intake and dietary urea concentration", J Dairy Sci, 70, pp.2302~2311 (1987)[DOI]
- Ibrahim EA, "Microbial protein biosynthesis in the rumen", J Dairy Sci, 55, pp.971~978 (1972)[DOI]
- Storm E, "The nutritive value of rumen micro-organisms in ruminants : 2. the apparent digestibility and net utilization of microbial N for growing lambs", Br J Nutr, 50, pp.471~478 (1983)[DOI]
- Kung L Jr, "Amino acid metabolism in ruminants", Anim Feed Sci Technol, 59, pp.167~172 (1996)[DOI]
