본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Gemcitabine versus Gemcitabine Combined with Cisplatin Treatment Locally Advanced or Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer: A Retrospective Analysis

2

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류의학일반

초록

Purpose: Gemcitabine is the most active agent to treat unresectable pancreatic cancer. The superiority of combining other drugs with cisplatin is still controversial; therefore, we performed a retrospective analysis of gemcitabine versus gemcitabine combined with cisplatin to determine the treatment outcomes for patients with locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer. Materials and Methods: From 2001 to 2007, we enrolled 60 patients who were treated with gemcitabine or gemcitabine combined with cisplatin for locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer. Gemcitabine 1, 000 mg/m2 (G) was administrated at day 1 and day 8 every 3 weeks. Cisplatin 60 mg/m2 was added at day 1 every 3 weeks to the gemcitabine schedule (GP). Results: Number of G: GP was 34: 26, locally advanced to metastatic ratio was 35% to 65% in group G and 46% to 54% in group GP. Median follow up duration was 29 months. The median number of chemotherapy cycles was 4 (range: 2∼11) for the G group, and 4 (range: 1∼ 11) for the GP group. The response rate of the G and GP groups was 17% and 11%, respectively. The progression free survival (PFS) was 4.5 months and 2.8 months, respectively, for the G and GP groups. The overall survival (OS) was 10.7 and 8.7 months respectively, for the G and GP groups, but there is no statistically significant difference of the PFS (p=0.2396) and OS (p=0.4643) between the 2 groups. The hematological toxicity profile was similar (the grade III neutropenia and thrombocytopenia was 4.4% and 3.1%, respectively, in G group, and 7.5% and 2.8%, respectively, in the GP group). But non-hematological toxicities such as skin rash, abnormal liver function and nausea/vomiting were observed in 3 patients of the GP group. On the prognostic factor analysis, no factors predicted a longer PFS and OS for both the G and GP groups. Conclusions: Gemcitabine single treatment might be more tolerable and it had the same efficacy compared to cisplatin combination treatment in this retrospective study. (Cancer Res Treat. 2008;40:22-26)

Abstract

Purpose: Gemcitabine is the most active agent to treat unresectable pancreatic cancer. The superiority of combining other drugs with cisplatin is still controversial; therefore, we performed a retrospective analysis of gemcitabine versus gemcitabine combined with cisplatin to determine the treatment outcomes for patients with locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer. Materials and Methods: From 2001 to 2007, we enrolled 60 patients who were treated with gemcitabine or gemcitabine combined with cisplatin for locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer. Gemcitabine 1, 000 mg/m2 (G) was administrated at day 1 and day 8 every 3 weeks. Cisplatin 60 mg/m2 was added at day 1 every 3 weeks to the gemcitabine schedule (GP). Results: Number of G: GP was 34: 26, locally advanced to metastatic ratio was 35% to 65% in group G and 46% to 54% in group GP. Median follow up duration was 29 months. The median number of chemotherapy cycles was 4 (range: 2∼11) for the G group, and 4 (range: 1∼ 11) for the GP group. The response rate of the G and GP groups was 17% and 11%, respectively. The progression free survival (PFS) was 4.5 months and 2.8 months, respectively, for the G and GP groups. The overall survival (OS) was 10.7 and 8.7 months respectively, for the G and GP groups, but there is no statistically significant difference of the PFS (p=0.2396) and OS (p=0.4643) between the 2 groups. The hematological toxicity profile was similar (the grade III neutropenia and thrombocytopenia was 4.4% and 3.1%, respectively, in G group, and 7.5% and 2.8%, respectively, in the GP group). But non-hematological toxicities such as skin rash, abnormal liver function and nausea/vomiting were observed in 3 patients of the GP group. On the prognostic factor analysis, no factors predicted a longer PFS and OS for both the G and GP groups. Conclusions: Gemcitabine single treatment might be more tolerable and it had the same efficacy compared to cisplatin combination treatment in this retrospective study. (Cancer Res Treat. 2008;40:22-26)

참고문헌 (15)

  1. Hai-Rim Shin, "2002 Annual Report of the Korea Central Cancer Registry: Based on Registered Data from 139 Hospitals", Cancer Research and Treatment, 36(2), pp.103~114 (2004), 대한암학회
  2. Burris HA 3rd, "Improvements in survival and clinical benefit with gemcitabine as first-line therapy for patients with advanced pancreas cancer: a randomized trial", J Clin Oncol, 15, pp.2403~13 (1997)
  3. Palmer KR, "Chemotherapy prolongs survival in inoperable pancreatic carcinoma", Br J Surg, 81, pp.882~5 (1994)
  4. Glimelius B., "Chemotherapy improves survival and quality of life in advanced pancreatic and biliary cancer", Ann Oncol, 7, pp.593~600 (1996)
  5. Rothenberg ML, "A phase II trial of gemcitabine in patients with 5-FU-refractory pancreas cancer", Ann Oncol, 7, pp.347~53 (1996)
  6. Wils JA, "Activity of cisplatin in adenocarcinoma of the pancreas", Eur J Cancer, 29A, pp.203~4 (1993)
  7. Kanzawa F., "In vitro interaction between gemcitabine and other anticancer drugs using a novel three-dimensional model", Semin Oncol, 24, pp.8~16 (1997)
  8. Bergman AM, "Synergistic interaction between cisplatin and gemcitabine in vitro", Clin Cancer Res, 2, pp.521~30 (1996)
  9. Colucci G., "Gemcitabine alone or with cisplatin for the treatment of patients with locally advanced and", or metastatic pancreatic carcinoma: a prospective, randomized phase III study of the Gruppo Oncologia dell'Italia Meridionale, 2002, pp.94, 902~10
  10. Xie DR, "Meta-analysis on inoperable pancreatic cancer: a comparison between gemcitabine-based combination therapy and gemcitabine alone", World J Gastroenterol, 12, pp.6973~81 (2006)
  11. Therasse P., "New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada", J Natl Cancer Inst, 92, pp.205~16 (2000)
  12. Storniolo AM, "An investigational new drug treatment program for patients with gemcitabine: results for over 3000 patients with pancreatic carcinoma", Cancer, 85, pp.1261~8 (1999)
  13. Gansauge F., "NSC-631570 (Ukrain) in the palliative treatment of pancreatic cancer. Results of a phase II trial", Langenbecks Arch Surg, 386, pp.570~4 (2002)
  14. Moore MJ, "Erlotinib plus gemcitabine compared with gemcitabine alone in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer: a phase III trial of the National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group", J Clin Oncol, 25, pp.1960~6 (2007)
  15. Herrmann R., "Gemcitabine plus capecitabine compared with gemcitabine alone in advanced pancreatic cancer: a randomized, multicenter, phase III trial of the Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research and the Central European Cooperative Oncology Group", J Clin Oncol, 25, pp.2212~7 (2007)

관련 논문AI추천

A Phase II Trial of Gemcitabine plus Capecitabine for Patients with Advanced Pancreatic Cancer김준석, 서재홍, 오상철, 최종권, 최철원대한암학회 · Cancer Research and Treatment2012 · 제44권 제2호Gemcitabine Combined with Capecitabine Compared to Gemcitabine with or without Erlotinib as First-Line Chemotherapy in Patients with Advanced Pancreatic Cancer윤동섭, 이동기, 이세준, 임재윤, 조장호, 조재용대한암학회 · Cancer Research and Treatment2015 · 제47권 제2호Comparison of the Efficacy between Gemcitabine-Cisplatin and Capecitabine-Cisplatin Combination Chemotherapy for Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer유영경, 이명아, 이인석, 이지은, 홍태호대한암학회 · Cancer Research and Treatment2015 · 제47권 제2호Efficacy of Capecitabine Plus Oxaliplatin Combination Chemotherapy for Advanced Pancreatic Cancer after Failure of First-Line Gemcitabine-Based Therapy김용태, 류지곤, 손준혁, 이상협, 이재우, 장동기, 청광현거트앤리버 소화기연관학회협의회 · Gut and Liver2017 · 제11권 제2호Phase II Trial of Postoperative Adjuvant Gemcitabine and Cisplatin Chemotherapy Followed by Chemoradiotherapy with Gemcitabine in Patients with Resected Pancreatic Cancer권지현, 김선회, 김재성, 김지현, 김태유, 방영주, 오도연, 이경훈, 임석아, 장진영, 지의규, 한세원, Sung W. Ha대한암학회 · Cancer Research and Treatment2021 · 제53권 제4호Gemcitabine Plus Cisplatin for Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer: A Systematic Review김종석, 박준오, 오도연, 임호영, Chiun Hsu, Jen-Shi Chen, Li-Tzong Chen, Mauro Orlando대한암학회 · Cancer Research and Treatment2015 · 제47권 제3호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)