Bilateral Salpingo-oophorectomy Compared to Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Agonists in Premenopausal Hormone Receptor–Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients Treated with Aromatase Inhibitors
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose Although combining aromatase inhibitors (AI) with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists (GnRHa) is becoming more common, it is still not clear if GnRHa is as effective as bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (BSO). Materials and Methods We retrospectively analyzed data of 66 premenopausal patients with hormone receptor– positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–negative recurrent and metastatic breast cancer who had been treated with AIs in combination with GnRHa or BSO between 2002 and 2015. Results The median patient age was 44 years. Overall, 24 (36%) received BSO and 42 (64%) received GnRHa. The clinical benefit rate was higher in the BSO group than in the GnRHa group (88% vs. 69%, p=0.092). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was longer in the BSO group, although statistical significance was not reached (17.2 months vs. 13.3 months, p=0.245). When propensity score matching was performed, the median PFS was 17.2 months for the BSO group and 8.2 months for the GnRHa group (p=0.137). Multivariate analyses revealed that the luminal B subtype (hazard ratio, 1.67; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.08 to 2.60; p=0.022) and later-line treatment ( third line vs. first line; hazard ratio, 3.24; 95% CI, 1.59 to 6.59; p=0.001) were independent predictive factors for a shorter PFS. Incomplete ovarian suppression was observed in a subset of GnRHa-treated patients whose disease showed progression, with E2 levels higher than 21 pg/mL. Conclusion Both BSO and GnRHa were found to be effective in our AI-treated premenopausal metastatic breast cancer patient cohort. However, further studies in larger populations are needed to determine if BSO is superior to GnRHa.
Abstract
Purpose Although combining aromatase inhibitors (AI) with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists (GnRHa) is becoming more common, it is still not clear if GnRHa is as effective as bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (BSO). Materials and Methods We retrospectively analyzed data of 66 premenopausal patients with hormone receptor– positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–negative recurrent and metastatic breast cancer who had been treated with AIs in combination with GnRHa or BSO between 2002 and 2015. Results The median patient age was 44 years. Overall, 24 (36%) received BSO and 42 (64%) received GnRHa. The clinical benefit rate was higher in the BSO group than in the GnRHa group (88% vs. 69%, p=0.092). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was longer in the BSO group, although statistical significance was not reached (17.2 months vs. 13.3 months, p=0.245). When propensity score matching was performed, the median PFS was 17.2 months for the BSO group and 8.2 months for the GnRHa group (p=0.137). Multivariate analyses revealed that the luminal B subtype (hazard ratio, 1.67; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.08 to 2.60; p=0.022) and later-line treatment ( third line vs. first line; hazard ratio, 3.24; 95% CI, 1.59 to 6.59; p=0.001) were independent predictive factors for a shorter PFS. Incomplete ovarian suppression was observed in a subset of GnRHa-treated patients whose disease showed progression, with E2 levels higher than 21 pg/mL. Conclusion Both BSO and GnRHa were found to be effective in our AI-treated premenopausal metastatic breast cancer patient cohort. However, further studies in larger populations are needed to determine if BSO is superior to GnRHa.
참고문헌 (30)
- Rugo HS, "Endocrine therapy for hormone receptorpositive metastatic breast cancer : American Society of Clinical Oncology Guideline", J Clin Oncol, 34, pp.3069~3103 (2016)
- Taylor CW, "Multicenter randomized clinical trial of goserelin versus surgical ovariectomy in premenopausal patients with receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer : an intergroup study", J Clin Oncol, 16, pp.994~999 (1998)
- Forward DP, "Clinical and endocrine data for goserelin plus anastrozole as second-line endocrine therapy for premenopausal advanced breast cancer", Br J Cancer, 90, pp.590~594 (2004)
- Carlson RW, "Phase II trial of anastrozole plus goserelin in the treatment of hormone receptor-positive, metastatic carcinoma of the breast in premenopausal women", J Clin Oncol, 28, pp.3917~3921 (2010)
- Park IH, "Phase II parallel group study showing comparable efficacy between premenopausal metastatic breast cancer patients treated with letrozole plus goserelin and postmenopausal patients treated with letrozole alone as first-line hormone therapy", J Clin Oncol, 28, pp.2705~2711 (2010)
- Yao S, "Goserelin plus letrozole as first-or second-line hormonal treatment in premenopausal patients with advanced breast cancer", Endocr J, 58, pp.509~516 (2011)
- Nishimura R, "Efficacy of goserelin plus anastrozole in premenopausal women with advanced or recurrent breast cancer refractory to an LH-RH analogue with tamoxifen : results of the JMTO BC08-01 phase II trial", Oncol Rep, 29, pp.1707~1713 (2013)
- Wang J, "Phase II trial of goserelin and exemestane combination therapy in premenopausal women with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer", Medicine (Baltimore), 94, pp.e1006~ (2015)
- Schmid P, "Leuprorelin acetate every-3-months depot versus cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil as adjuvant treatment in premenopausal patients with node-positive breast cancer : the TABLE study", J Clin Oncol, 25, pp.2509~2515 (2007)
- Bellet M, "Twelve-month estrogen levels in premenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer receiving adjuvant triptorelin plus exemestane or tamoxifen in the Suppression of Ovarian Function Trial(SOFT) : The SOFT-EST Substudy", J Clin Oncol, 34, pp.1584~1593 (2016)
- Hammond ME, "American Society of Clinical Oncology", College Of American Pathologists guideline recommendations for immunohistochemical testing of estrogen and progesterone receptors in breast cancer, 2010, pp.28, 2784~2795
- Wolff AC, "Recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in breast cancer : American Society of Clinical Oncology", College of American Pathologists clinical practice guideline update, 2013, pp.31, 3997~4013
- Goldhirsch A, "Strategies for subtypes: dealing with the diversity of breast cancer: highlights of the St. Gallen International Expert Consensus on the Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer 2011", Ann Oncol, 22, pp.1736~1747 (2011)
- Kaufmann M, "Goserelin, a depot gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist in the treatment of premenopausal patients with metastatic breast cancer. German Zoladex Trial Group", J Clin Oncol, 7, pp.1113~1119 (1989)
- Blamey RW, "Goserelin depot in the treatment of premenopausal advanced breast cancer", Eur J Cancer, 28A, pp.810~814 (1992)
- Boccardo F, "Ovarian ablation versus goserelin with or without tamoxifen in pre-perimenopausal patients with advanced breast cancer : results of a multicentric Italian study", Ann Oncol, 5, pp.337~342 (1994)
- Pagani O, "Adjuvant exemestane with ovarian suppression in premenopausal breast cancer", N Engl J Med, 371, pp.107~118 (2014)
- Francis PA, "Adjuvant ovarian suppression in premenopausal breast cancer", N Engl J Med, 372, pp.436~446 (2015)
- Gnant M, "Zoledronic acid combined with adjuvant endocrine therapy of tamoxifen versus anastrozol plus ovarian function suppression in premenopausal early breast cancer : final analysis of the Austrian Breast and Colorectal Cancer Study Group Trial 12", Ann Oncol, 26, pp.313~320 (2015)
- Papakonstantinou A, "Is estradiol monitoring necessary in women receiving ovarian suppression for breast cancer", J Clin Oncol, 34, pp.1573~1579 (2016)
- Ellis MJ, "Fulvestrant 500 mg versus anastrozole 1 mg for the first-line treatment of advanced breast cancer : overall survival analysis From the Phase II FIRST Study", J Clin Oncol, 33, pp.3781~3787 (2015)
- Baselga J, "Everolimus in postmenopausal hormonereceptor-positive advanced breast cancer", N Engl J Med, 366, pp.520~529 (2012)
- Cristofanilli M, "Fulvestrant plus palbociclib versus fulvestrant plus placebo for treatment of hormone-receptor-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer that progressed on previous endocrine therapy(PALOMA-3) : final analysis of the multicentre, double-blind, phase 3 randomised controlled trial", Lancet Oncol, 17, pp.425~439 (2016)
- Finn RS, "PALOMA-2: primary results from a phase III trial of palbociclib (P) with letrozole (L) compared with letrozole alone in postmenopausal women with ER+", HER2–advanced breast cancer (ABC), 2016, pp.34(Suppl), ~
- Cho YJ, "Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery(LESS)versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for adnexal preservation : a randomized controlled study", Int J Womens Health, 4, pp.85~91 (2012)
- Angioni S, "Single-port versus conventional multiport access prophylactic laparoscopic bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy in high-risk patients for ovarian cancer : a comparison of surgical outcomes", Onco Targets Ther, 8, pp.1575~1580 (2015)
- Hsieh AH, "Goserelin toxicities and preferences for ovarian suppression method in pre-menopausal women with breast cancer", Intern Med J, 46, pp.1153~1159 (2016)
- Hagemann AR, "Cost-benefit of laparoscopic versus medical ovarian suppression in premenopausal breast cancer", Breast J, 17, pp.103~105 (2011)
- Ellis MJ, "Randomized phase II neoadjuvant comparison between letrozole, anastrozole, and exemestane for postmenopausal women with estrogen receptor-rich stage 2 to 3 breast cancer : clinical and biomarker outcomes and predictive value of the baseline PAM50-based intrinsic subtype : ACOSOG Z1031", J Clin Oncol, 29, pp.2342~2349 (2011)
- Anderson H, "Relationship between estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, HER-2 and Ki67 expression and efficacy of aromatase inhibitors in advanced breast cancer", Ann Oncol, 22, pp.1770~1776 (2011)