Clinical Evidence of Chemotherapy or Endocrine Therapy Maintenance in Patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer: Meta-analysis from Randomized Clinical Trials and Propensity Score Matching of Multicentre Cohort Study
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose: This study aims to comprehensively evaluate the clinical efficacy of chemotherapy or endocrine therapy maintenance in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients. Materials and methods: The meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and propensity score matching of multicenter cohort study evaluated MBC patients who underwent first-line chemotherapy or endocrine therapy maintenance. This study is registered with PROSPERO: CRD42017071858 and ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04258163. Results: A total of 2,867 patients from 15 RCTs and 760 patients from multicenter cohort were included. The results from meta-analysis showed that chemotherapy maintenance improved progression-free survival (PFS) (hazard ratio [HR], 0.63; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.54 to 0.73; p < 0.001; moderate-quality evidence) and overall survival (OS) (HR, 0.87; 95% CI 0.78 to 0.97; p=0.016; high-quality evidence) than observation. In the cohort study, for hormone receptor-positive MBC patients, chemotherapy maintenance improved PFS (HR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.52 to 0.85; p < 0.001) and OS (HR, 0.55; 95% CI 0.42 to 0.73; p < 0.001) compared with observation, and endocrine therapy maintenance also improved PFS (HR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.53 to 0.80; p < 0.001) and OS (HR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.44 to 0.69; p < 0.001). There were no differences between chemotherapy and endocrine therapy maintenance in PFS and OS (all p > 0.05). Regardless of the continuum or switch maintenance therapy, showed prolonged survival in MBC patients who were response to first-line treatment. Conclusion: This study provided evidences for survival benefits of chemotherapy and endocrine therapy maintenance in MBC patients, and there was no difference efficacy between chemotherapy and endocrine therapy maintenance for hormone receptor-positive patients.
Abstract
Purpose: This study aims to comprehensively evaluate the clinical efficacy of chemotherapy or endocrine therapy maintenance in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients. Materials and methods: The meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and propensity score matching of multicenter cohort study evaluated MBC patients who underwent first-line chemotherapy or endocrine therapy maintenance. This study is registered with PROSPERO: CRD42017071858 and ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04258163. Results: A total of 2,867 patients from 15 RCTs and 760 patients from multicenter cohort were included. The results from meta-analysis showed that chemotherapy maintenance improved progression-free survival (PFS) (hazard ratio [HR], 0.63; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.54 to 0.73; p < 0.001; moderate-quality evidence) and overall survival (OS) (HR, 0.87; 95% CI 0.78 to 0.97; p=0.016; high-quality evidence) than observation. In the cohort study, for hormone receptor-positive MBC patients, chemotherapy maintenance improved PFS (HR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.52 to 0.85; p < 0.001) and OS (HR, 0.55; 95% CI 0.42 to 0.73; p < 0.001) compared with observation, and endocrine therapy maintenance also improved PFS (HR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.53 to 0.80; p < 0.001) and OS (HR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.44 to 0.69; p < 0.001). There were no differences between chemotherapy and endocrine therapy maintenance in PFS and OS (all p > 0.05). Regardless of the continuum or switch maintenance therapy, showed prolonged survival in MBC patients who were response to first-line treatment. Conclusion: This study provided evidences for survival benefits of chemotherapy and endocrine therapy maintenance in MBC patients, and there was no difference efficacy between chemotherapy and endocrine therapy maintenance for hormone receptor-positive patients.
참고문헌 (30)
- Gregory RK, "A randomised trial of six versus twelve courses of chemotherapy in metastatic carcinoma of the breast", Eur J Cancer, 33, pp.2194~2197 (1997)
- Muss HB, "Interrupted versus continuous chemotherapy in patients with metastatic breast cancer. The Piedmont Oncology Association", N Engl J Med, 325, pp.1342~1348 (1991)
- Park YH, "Phase III, multicenter, randomized trial of maintenance chemothe-rapy versus observation in patients with metastatic breast cancer after achieving disease control with six cycles of gemcitabine plus paclitaxel as first-line chemotherapy : KCSG-BR07-02", J Clin Oncol, 31, pp.1732~1739 (2013)
- Ejlertsen B, "Decreased efficacy of cyclophosphamide, epirubicin and 5-fluorouracil in metastatic breast cancer when reducing treatment duration from 18 to 6 months", Eur J Cancer, 29A, pp.527~531 (1993)
- Tredan O, "A phase III trial of exemestane plus bevacizumab maintenance therapy in patients with metastatic breast cancer after first-line taxane and bevacizumab : a GINECO group study", Ann Oncol, 27, pp.1020~1029 (2016)
- Liberati A, "The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions : explanation and elaboration", Ann Intern Med, 151, pp.W65~W94 (2009)
- Higgins JP, "Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of iterventions, version 5.1.0" (2011), John Wiley & Sons Ltd
- Eisenhauer EA, "New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1)", Eur J Cancer, 45, pp.228~247 (2009)
- DerSimonian R, "Meta-analysis in clinical trials", Control Clin Trials, 7, pp.177~188 (1986)
- Higgins JP, "Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses", BMJ, 327, pp.557~560 (2003)
- Guyatt GH, "GRADE : an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations", BMJ, 336, pp.924~926 (2008)
- Westreich D, "Propensity score estimation : neural networks, support vector machines, decision trees(CART), and meta-classifiers as alternatives to logistic regression", J Clin Epidemiol, 63, pp.826~833 (2010)
- Alba E, "Maintenance treatment with pegylated liposomal doxorubicin versus observation following induction chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer : GEICAM 2001-01 study", Breast Cancer Res Treat, 122, pp.169~176 (2010)
- Coates A, "Improving the quality of life during chemotherapy for advanced breast cancer : a comparison of intermittent and continuous treatment strategies", N Engl J Med, 317, pp.1490~1495 (1987)
- Falkson G, "Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group randomized trials of observation versus maintenance therapy for patients with metastatic breast cancer in complete remission following induction treatment", J Clin Oncol, 16, pp.1669~1676 (1998)
- French Epirubicin Study Group, "Epirubicin-based chemotherapy in metastatic breast cancer patients : role of dose-intensity and duration of treatment", J Clin Oncol, 18, pp.3115~3124 (2000)
- Gennari A, "Lack of benefit of maintenance paclitaxel in first-line chemotherapy in metastatic breast cancer", J Clin Oncol, 24, pp.3912~3918 (2006)
- Gligorov J, "Maintenance capecitabine and bevacizumab versus bevacizumab alone after initial first-line bevacizumab and docetaxel for patients with HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer(IMELDA) : a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial", Lancet Oncol, 15, pp.1351~1360 (2014)
- Harris AL, "Comparison of short-term and continuous chemotherapy(mitozantrone)for advanced breast cancer", Lancet, 335, pp.186~190 (1990)
- Mayordomo JI, "Final results of a randomized trial on the role of maintenance chemotherapy with weekly paclitaxel for patients with metastatic breast cancer", J Clin Oncol, 15(Suppl), pp.1001~ (2009)
- Kloke O, "Essen Breast Cancer Study Group", Breast Cancer Res Treat, 55, pp.51~59 (1999)
- Nooij MA, "Continuing chemotherapy or not after the induction treatment in advanced breast cancer patients. clinical outcomes and oncologists’ preferences", Eur J Cancer, 39, pp.614~621 (2003)
- Gennari A, "Duration of chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer : a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials", J Clin Oncol, 29, pp.2144~2149 (2011)
- Yu YF, "Trastuzumab combined with doublet or single-agent chemotherapy as first-line therapy for HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer", Breast Cancer Res Treat, 168, pp.337~348 (2018)
- Xie N, "Efficacy and safety of cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6 inhibitors in HR+", HER2-advanced breast cancer, 2020, pp.12, 4241~4250
- Jacquet E, "Endocrine therapy or chemotherapy as first-line therapy in hormone receptor-positive HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer patients", Eur J Cancer, 95, pp.93~101 (2018)
- Sutherland S, "Use of maintenance endocrine therapy after chemotherapy in metastatic breast cancer", Eur J Cancer, 69, pp.216~222 (2016)
- Kwan TT, "A digital RNA signature of circulating tumor cells predicting early therapeutic response in localized and metastatic breast cancer", Cancer Discov, 8, pp.1286~1299 (2018)
- Yu Y, "Association of long noncoding RNA biomarkers with clinical immune subtype and prediction of immunotherapy response in patients with cancer", JAMA Netw Open, 3, pp.e202149~ (2020)
- Zhao J, "Prognostic immune-related gene models for breast cancer : a pooled analysis", Onco Targets Ther, 10, pp.4423~4433 (2017)