본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging as a Surrogate Biomarker for Bevacizumab in Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastasis: A Single-Arm, Exploratory Trial

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류의학일반

초록

Purpose The purpose of this study is to investigate dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) and plasma cytokines and angiogenic factors (CAFs) as pharmacodynamic and prognostic biomarkers of bevacizumab monotherapy in colorectal cancer with liver metastasis (CRCLM). Materials and Methods From July 2011 to March 2012, 28 patients with histologically confirmed CRCLM received bevacizumab monotherapy followed by combined FOLFOX therapy. The mean age of the patients was 57 years (range, 30 to 77 years). DCE-MRI (Ktrans and IAUC60) was performed at baseline, first follow-up (3 days after bevacizumab monotherapy), and second follow-up (3 days after combined therapy). CAF levels (vascular endothelial growth factor [VEGF], placental growth factor [PlGF], and interleukin-8) were assessed on the same days. Progression- free survival (PFS) time distributions were summarized using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using log-rank tests. Results The median PFS period was 11.2 months. Ktrans, IAUC60, VEGF, and PlGF values on the first follow-up day were significantly different compared with baseline values. No differences were observed on the second follow-up day. A > 40% decrease in Ktrans from baseline to first follow-up was associated with a longer PFS (hazard ratio, 0.349; 95% confidence interval, 0.133 to 0.912; p=0.032). Changes in CAFs did not show correlation with PFS time. Conclusion DCE-MRI parameters and CAFs are pharmacodynamic biomarkers of bevacizumab for CRCLM. In our study, change in Ktrans at 3 days after bevacizumab monotherapy was a favorable prognostic factor; however, the value of CAFs as a prognostic biomarker was not found.

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this study is to investigate dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) and plasma cytokines and angiogenic factors (CAFs) as pharmacodynamic and prognostic biomarkers of bevacizumab monotherapy in colorectal cancer with liver metastasis (CRCLM). Materials and Methods From July 2011 to March 2012, 28 patients with histologically confirmed CRCLM received bevacizumab monotherapy followed by combined FOLFOX therapy. The mean age of the patients was 57 years (range, 30 to 77 years). DCE-MRI (Ktrans and IAUC60) was performed at baseline, first follow-up (3 days after bevacizumab monotherapy), and second follow-up (3 days after combined therapy). CAF levels (vascular endothelial growth factor [VEGF], placental growth factor [PlGF], and interleukin-8) were assessed on the same days. Progression- free survival (PFS) time distributions were summarized using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using log-rank tests. Results The median PFS period was 11.2 months. Ktrans, IAUC60, VEGF, and PlGF values on the first follow-up day were significantly different compared with baseline values. No differences were observed on the second follow-up day. A > 40% decrease in Ktrans from baseline to first follow-up was associated with a longer PFS (hazard ratio, 0.349; 95% confidence interval, 0.133 to 0.912; p=0.032). Changes in CAFs did not show correlation with PFS time. Conclusion DCE-MRI parameters and CAFs are pharmacodynamic biomarkers of bevacizumab for CRCLM. In our study, change in Ktrans at 3 days after bevacizumab monotherapy was a favorable prognostic factor; however, the value of CAFs as a prognostic biomarker was not found.

참고문헌 (25)

  1. Saltz LB, "Bevacizumab in combination with oxaliplatinbased chemotherapy as first-line therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer : a randomized phase III study", J Clin Oncol, 26, pp.2013~2019 (2008)
  2. Meyerhardt JA, "Effectiveness of bevacizumab with first-line combination chemotherapy for Medicare patients with stage IV colorectal cancer", J Clin Oncol, 30, pp.608~615 (2012)
  3. Ducreux M, "Efficacy and safety of bevacizumab-based combination regimens in patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer : final results from a randomised phase II study of bevacizumab plus 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin plus irinotecan versus bevacizumab plus capecitabine plus irinotecan(FNCLCC ACCORD 13", 0503 study), 2013, pp.49, 1236~1245
  4. Jain RK, "Normalization of tumor vasculature : an emerging concept in antiangiogenic therapy", Science, 307, pp.58~62 (2005)
  5. Hegde PS, "Predictive impact of circulating vascular endothelial growth factor in four phase III trials evaluating bevacizumab", Clin Cancer Res, 19, pp.929~937 (2013)
  6. Jain RK, "Biomarkers of response and resistance to antiangiogenic therapy", Nat Rev Clin Oncol, 6, pp.327~338 (2009)
  7. Kopetz S, "Phase II trial of infusional fluorouracil, irinotecan, and bevacizumab for metastatic colorectal cancer : efficacy and circulating angiogenic biomarkers associated with therapeutic resistance", J Clin Oncol, 28, pp.453~459 (2010)
  8. O'Connor JP, "Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in clinical trials of antivascular therapies", Nat Rev Clin Oncol, 9, pp.167~177 (2012)
  9. Wedam SB, "Antiangiogenic and antitumor effects of bevacizumab in patients with inflammatory and locally advanced breast cancer", J Clin Oncol, 24, pp.769~777 (2006)
  10. O'Connor JP, "DCE-MRI biomarkers of tumour heterogeneity predict CRC liver metastasis shrinkage following bevacizumab and FOLFOX-6", Br J Cancer, 105, pp.139~145 (2011)
  11. De Bruyne S, "Value of DCE-MRI and FDG-PET", CT in the prediction of response to preoperative chemotherapy with bevacizumab for colorectal liver metastases, 2012, pp.106, 1926~1933
  12. Drevs J, "Phase I clinical study of AZD2171, an oral vascular endothelial growth factor signaling inhibitor, in patients with advanced solid tumors", J Clin Oncol, 25, pp.3045~3054 (2007)
  13. Morgan B, "Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging as a biomarker for the pharmacological response of PTK787", ZK 222584, an inhibitor of the vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinases, in patients with advanced colorectal cancer and liver metastases : results from two phase I studies, 2003, pp.21, 3955~3964
  14. Flaherty KT, "Pilot study of DCE-MRI to predict progression-free survival with sorafenib therapy in renal cell carcinoma", Cancer Biol Ther, 7, pp.496~501 (2008)
  15. Hsu CY, "Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging biomarkers predict survival and response in hepatocellular carcinoma patients treated with sorafenib and metronomic tegafur", uracil, 2011, pp.55, 858~865
  16. Hahn OM, "Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging pharmacodynamic biomarker study of sorafenib in metastatic renal carcinoma", J Clin Oncol, 26, pp.4572~4578 (2008)
  17. Eisenhauer EA, "New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1)", Eur J Cancer, 45, pp.228~247 (2009)
  18. Chefd'Hotel C, "Flows of diffeomorphisms for multimodal image registration", Proceedings of the 2002 IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging, pp.753~756 (2002)
  19. Evelhoch JL, "Key factors in the acquisition of contrast kinetic data for oncology", J Magn Reson Imaging, 10, pp.254~259 (1999)
  20. Zhu AX, "Efficacy, safety, and potential biomarkers of sunitinib monotherapy in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma : a phase II study", J Clin Oncol, 27, pp.3027~3035 (2009)
  21. Port RE, "Noncompartmental kinetic analysis of DCE-MRI data from malignant tumors : Application to glioblastoma treated with bevacizumab", Magn Reson Med, 64, pp.408~417 (2010)
  22. Willett CG, "Direct evidence that the VEGF-specific antibody bevacizumab has antivascular effects in human rectal cancer", Nat Med, 10, pp.145~147 (2004)
  23. Ferrara N, "The biology of VEGF and its receptors", Nat Med, 9, pp.669~676 (2003)
  24. Ellis LM, "Pathways mediating resistance to vascular endothelial growth factor-targeted therapy", Clin Cancer Res, 14, pp.6371~6375 (2008)
  25. Loupakis F, "Pharmacodynamic and pharmacogenetic angiogenesis-related markers of first-line FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab schedule in metastatic colorectal cancer", Br J Cancer, 104, pp.1262~1269 (2011)

관련 논문AI추천

Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor receptor in colorectal cancer: A reviewAlfredo Colombo, Concetta Maria Porretto소화기인터벤션의학회 · International Journal of Gastrointestinal Intervention2023 · 제12권 제3호Dose KRAS Mutation Status Affect on the Effect of VEGF Therapy in Metastatic Colon Cancer Patients?김승태, 김열홍, 박경화, 신상원대한암학회 · Cancer Research and Treatment2014 · 제46권 제1호Clinical and Radiologic Predictors of Response to Atezolizumab-Bevacizumab in Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma김강모, 김형돈, 류백열, 유창훈, 이승수, 정성원, 최상현, 최세진, 최원묵, 최종기대한암학회 · Cancer Research and Treatment2024 · 제56권 제4호Surrogate Endpoints in Second-Line Trials of Targeted Agents in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Literature-Based Systematic Review and Meta-AnalysisAlfredo Falcone, Beatrice Borelli, Carlotta Antoniotti, Chiara Baratelli, Chiara Cremolini, Cristina Sonetto, Federica Marmorino, Federico Nichetti, Filippo de Braud, Filippo Pietrantonio, Fotios Loupakis, Lisa Salvatore, Marco Tampellini, Maria Di Bartolomeo, Massimo Di Maio, Paolo Bironzo, Rosa Berenato대한암학회 · Cancer Research and Treatment2017 · 제49권 제3호Noninvasive Biomarker for Predicting Treatment Response to Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma김명진, 박미숙, 박준용, 성진실, 정용은, 최진영대한자기공명의과학회 · Investigative Magnetic Resonance Imaging2019 · 제23권 제4호Clinical Significance of Discordance between Carcinoembryonic Antigen Levels and RECIST in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer김인호, 김준기, 양지현, 오승택, 이명아, 이지은, 정준원, 최문형, Sangmi Ro대한암학회 · Cancer Research and Treatment2018 · 제50권 제1호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (29건)