Esthetic evaluation of maxillary single-tooth implants in the esthetic zone
1
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose: The aim of this study is to assess the influence exerted by the observer’s dental specialization and compare patients’opinion with observers’ opinion of the esthetics of maxillary single-tooth implants in the esthetic zone. Methods: Forty-one adult patients, who were treated with a single implant in the esthetic zone, were enrolled in this study. Eight observers (2 periodontists, 2 prosthodontists, 2 orthodontists and 2 senior dental students) applied the pink esthetic score (PES)/white esthetic score (WES) to 41 implant-supported single restorations twice with an interval of 4 weeks. We used a visual analog scale (VAS) to assess the patient’s satisfaction with the treatment outcome from an esthetic point of view. Results: In the PES/WES, very good and moderate intraobserver agreements were noted between the first and second rating. The mean total PES/WES was 11.19 ± 3.59. The mean PES was 5.17 ± 2.29 and mean WES was 6.02 ± 1.96. In the total PES/WES,the difference between the groups was not significant. However, in the WES, the difference between the groups was significant and prosthodontists were found to have assigned poorer ratings than the other groups. Periodontists gave higher ratings than prosthodontists and senior dental students. Orthodontists were clearly more critical than the other observers. The statistical analysis revealed statistically significant correlation between patients’ esthetic perception and dentists’ perception of the anterior tooth. However, the correlation between the total PES/WES and the VAS score for the first premolar was not statistically significant. Conclusions: The PES/WES is an objective tool in rating the esthetics of implant supported single crowns and adjacent soft tissues. Orthodontists were the most critical observers, while periodontists were more generous than other observers. The statistical analysis revealed a statistically significant correlation between patients’ esthetic perception and dentists’ perception of the anterior tooth
Abstract
Purpose: The aim of this study is to assess the influence exerted by the observer’s dental specialization and compare patients’opinion with observers’ opinion of the esthetics of maxillary single-tooth implants in the esthetic zone. Methods: Forty-one adult patients, who were treated with a single implant in the esthetic zone, were enrolled in this study. Eight observers (2 periodontists, 2 prosthodontists, 2 orthodontists and 2 senior dental students) applied the pink esthetic score (PES)/white esthetic score (WES) to 41 implant-supported single restorations twice with an interval of 4 weeks. We used a visual analog scale (VAS) to assess the patient’s satisfaction with the treatment outcome from an esthetic point of view. Results: In the PES/WES, very good and moderate intraobserver agreements were noted between the first and second rating. The mean total PES/WES was 11.19 ± 3.59. The mean PES was 5.17 ± 2.29 and mean WES was 6.02 ± 1.96. In the total PES/WES,the difference between the groups was not significant. However, in the WES, the difference between the groups was significant and prosthodontists were found to have assigned poorer ratings than the other groups. Periodontists gave higher ratings than prosthodontists and senior dental students. Orthodontists were clearly more critical than the other observers. The statistical analysis revealed statistically significant correlation between patients’ esthetic perception and dentists’ perception of the anterior tooth. However, the correlation between the total PES/WES and the VAS score for the first premolar was not statistically significant. Conclusions: The PES/WES is an objective tool in rating the esthetics of implant supported single crowns and adjacent soft tissues. Orthodontists were the most critical observers, while periodontists were more generous than other observers. The statistical analysis revealed a statistically significant correlation between patients’ esthetic perception and dentists’ perception of the anterior tooth
참고문헌 (21)
- Lindh T, "A meta-analysis of implants in partial edentulism", Clin Oral Implants Res, 9, pp.80~90 (1998)
- Wyatt CC, "Treatment outcomes of patients with implant-supported fixed partial prostheses", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 13, pp.204~211 (1998)
- Noack N, "Long-term results after placement of dental implants: longitudinal study of 1,964 implants over 16 years", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 14, pp.748~755 (1999)
- Naert I, "Biologic outcome of implant-supported restorations in the treatment of partial edentulism. part I:a longitudinal clinical evaluation", Clin Oral Implants Res, 13, pp.381~389 (2002)
- Albrektsson T, "The long-term efficacy of currently used dental implants: a review and proposed criteria of success", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 1, pp.11~25 (1986)
- Buser D, "Optimizing esthetics for implant restorations in the anterior maxilla: anatomic and surgical considerations", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 19(Suppl), pp.43~61 (2004)
- Smith DE, "Criteria for success of osseointegrated endosseous implants", J Prosthet Dent, 62, pp.567~572 (1989)
- Furhauser R, "Evaluation of soft tissue around single-tooth implant crowns: the pink esthetic score", Clin Oral Implants Res, 16, pp.639~644 (2005)
- Belser UC, "Outcome evaluation of early placed maxillary anterior single-tooth implants using objective esthetic criteria:a cross-sectional, retrospective study in 45 patients with a 2- to 4-year follow-up using pink and white esthetic scores", J Periodontol, 80, pp.140~151 (2009)
- Gehrke P, "Reproducibility of the pink esthetic score--rating soft tissue esthetics around singleimplant restorations with regard to dental observer specialization", J Esthet Restor Dent, 20, pp.375~384 (2008)
- Fardal O, "Patient perceptions of periodontal therapy completed in a periodontal practice", J Periodontol, 73, pp.1060~1066 (2002)
- Czochrowska EM, "Outcome of tooth transplantation: survival and success rates 17-41 years posttreatment", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 121, pp.110~119 (2002)
- Wolfart S, "Assessment of dental appearance following changes in incisor proportions", Eur J Oral Sci, 113, pp.159~165 (2005)
- Belser U, "Consensus statements and recommended clinical procedures regarding esthetics in implant dentistry", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 19(Suppl), pp.73~74 (2004)
- An KY, "Perception of maxillary anterior esthetics by dental professionals and laypeople and survey of gingival topography in healthy young subjects", Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 29, pp.535~541 (2009)
- Flores-Mir C, "Lay person’s perception of smile aesthetics in dental and facial views", J Orthod, 31, pp.204~209 (2004)
- Miller CJ, "The smile line as a guide to anterior esthetics", Dent Clin North Am, 33, pp.157~164 (1989)
- Kokich VO Jr, "Comparing the perception of dentists and lay people to altered dental esthetics", J Esthet Dent, 11, pp.311~324 (1999)
- Brisman AS, "Esthetics: a comparison of dentists’ and patients’ concepts", J Am Dent Assoc, 100, pp.345~352 (1980)
- Choquet V, "Clinical and radiographic evaluation of the papilla level adjacent to single-tooth dental implants.A retrospective study in the maxillary anterior region", J Periodontol, 72, pp.1364~1371 (2001)
- Renouard F, "Risk factors in implant dentistry:simplified clinical analysis for predictable treatment" (2008), Quintessence International