Esthetic outcome for maxillary anterior single implants assessed by different dental specialists
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
PURPOSE. The aim of this study was to assess the esthetic outcome of maxillary anterior single implants by comparing the esthetic perception of dental professionals and patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Twentythree patients with single implants in the esthetic zone were enrolled in this study. Dentists of four different dental specialties (Three orthodontists, three oral surgeons, three prosthodontists, and three periodontists) evaluated the pink esthetic score (PES)/white esthetic score (WES) for 23 implant-supported single restorations. The satisfactions of the patients on the esthetic outcome of the treatment have been evaluated according to the visual analog scale (VAS). RESULTS. The mean total PES/WES was 12.26 ± 4.76. The mean PES was 6.45 ± 2.78 and mean WES was 5.80 ± 2.82. There was a statistically significant difference among the different specialties for WES (P<.01) and Total PES/WES (P<.01). Prosthodontists were found to have assigned poorer ratings among the other specialties, while oral surgeons gave the higher ratings than periodontists, orthodontists, and prosthodontists. CONCLUSION. Prosthodontists seemed to be stricter when assessing aesthetic outcome among other specialties. Moreover, a clear correlation existed between dentists’ and patients’ esthetic perception, thereby providing rationales for involving patients in the treatment plan to achieve higher levels of patient satisfaction.
Abstract
PURPOSE. The aim of this study was to assess the esthetic outcome of maxillary anterior single implants by comparing the esthetic perception of dental professionals and patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Twentythree patients with single implants in the esthetic zone were enrolled in this study. Dentists of four different dental specialties (Three orthodontists, three oral surgeons, three prosthodontists, and three periodontists) evaluated the pink esthetic score (PES)/white esthetic score (WES) for 23 implant-supported single restorations. The satisfactions of the patients on the esthetic outcome of the treatment have been evaluated according to the visual analog scale (VAS). RESULTS. The mean total PES/WES was 12.26 ± 4.76. The mean PES was 6.45 ± 2.78 and mean WES was 5.80 ± 2.82. There was a statistically significant difference among the different specialties for WES (P<.01) and Total PES/WES (P<.01). Prosthodontists were found to have assigned poorer ratings among the other specialties, while oral surgeons gave the higher ratings than periodontists, orthodontists, and prosthodontists. CONCLUSION. Prosthodontists seemed to be stricter when assessing aesthetic outcome among other specialties. Moreover, a clear correlation existed between dentists’ and patients’ esthetic perception, thereby providing rationales for involving patients in the treatment plan to achieve higher levels of patient satisfaction.
참고문헌 (36)
- Albrektsson T, "Osseointegrated titanium implants. Requirements for ensuring a long-lasting, direct bone-to-implant anchorage in man", Acta Orthop Scand, 52, pp.155~170 (1981)
- Stellingsma K, "Satisfaction and psychosocial aspects of patients with an extremely resorbed mandible treated with implant-retained overdentures. A prospective, comparative study", Clin Oral Implants Res, 14, pp.166~172 (2003)
- Mombelli A, "The diagnosis and treatment of periimplantitis", Periodontol 2000, 17, pp.63~76 (1998)
- Papaspyridakos P, "Success criteria in implant dentistry: a systematic review", J Dent Res, 91, pp.242~248 (2012)
- Cosyn J, "Single implant treatment in healing versus healed sites of the anterior maxilla: an aesthetic evaluation", Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 14, pp.517~526 (2012)
- Hof M, "Esthetic evaluation of single-tooth implants in the anterior maxilla following autologous bone augmentation", Clin Oral Implants Res, 24, pp.88~93 (2013)
- Buser D, "Optimizing esthetics for implant restorations in the anterior maxilla: anatomic and surgical considerations", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 19, pp.43~61 (2004)
- Luo Z, "Single implants in the esthetic zone: analysis of recent peri-implant soft tissue alterations and patient satisfaction. A photographic study", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 26, pp.578~586 (2011)
- Baracat LF, "Marchini L. Patients’ expectations before and evaluation after dental implant therapy", Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 13, pp.141~145 (2011)
- Cosyn J, "Single implant treatment in healing versus healed sites of the anterior maxilla: an aesthetic evaluation", Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 14, pp.517~526 (2012)
- Hartlev J, "Patient satisfaction and esthetic outcome after immediate placement and provisionalization of single-tooth implants involving a definitive individual abutment", Clin Oral Implants Res, 25, pp.1245~1250 (2014)
- Traini T, "Esthetic outcome of an immediately placed maxillary anterior single-tooth implant restored with a custom-made zirconia-ceramic abutment and crown: a staged treatment", Quintessence Int, 42, pp.103~108 (2011)
- Belser U, "Consensus statements and recommended clinical procedures regarding esthetics in implant dentistry", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 19, pp.73~74 (2004)
- Meijer HJ, "A new index for rating aesthetics of implant-supported single crowns and adjacent soft tissues-the Implant Crown Aesthetic Index", Clin Oral Implants Res, 16, pp.645~649 (2005)
- Fürhauser R, "Evaluation of soft tissue around single-tooth implant crowns: the pink esthetic score", Clin Oral Implants Res, 16, pp.639~644 (2005)
- Belser UC, "Outcome evaluation of early placed maxillary anterior single-tooth implants using objective esthetic criteria: a cross-sectional, retrospective study in 45 patients with a 2- to 4-year follow-up using pink and white esthetic scores", J Periodontol, 80, pp.140~151 (2009)
- Tettamanti S, "Esthetic evaluation of implant crowns and peri-implant soft tissue in the anterior maxilla: Comparison and reproducibility of three different indices", Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 18, pp.517~526 (2016)
- Kokich VO Jr, "Comparing the perception of dentists and lay people to altered dental esthetics", J Esthet Dent, 11, pp.311~324 (1999)
- Gehrke P, "Reproducibility of the implant crown aesthetic index-rating aesthetics of single-implant crowns and adjacent soft tissues with regard to observer dental specialization", Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 11, pp.201~213 (2009)
- 조혜령, "Esthetic evaluation of maxillary single-tooth implants in the esthetic zone", Journal of Periodontal & Implant Science, 40(4), pp.188~193 (2010), 대한치주과학회
- Andersson B, "Long-term function of single-implant restorations: a 17- to 19-year follow-up study on implant infraposition related to the shape of the face and patients’ satisfaction", Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 15, pp.471~480 (2013)
- Buser D, "Early implant placement with simultaneous guided bone regeneration following single-tooth extraction in the esthetic zone: a cross-sectional, retrospective study in 45 subjects with a 2- to 4-year follow-up", J Periodontol, 79, pp.1773~1781 (2008)
- Weber HP, "Radiographic evaluation of crestal bone levels adjacent to nonsubmerged titanium implants", Clin Oral Implants Res, 3, pp.181~188 (1992)
- Lavigne SE, "Effects of subgingival irrigation with chlorhexidine on the periodontal status of patients with HA-coated integral dental implants", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 9, pp.156~162 (1994)
- Wolfart S, "Assessment of dental appearance following changes in incisor proportions", Eur J Oral Sci, 113, pp.159~165 (2005)
- Mombelli A, "parameters for the evaluation of dental implants", Periodontol 2000, 4, pp.81~86 (1994)
- den Hartog L, "Treatment outcome of immediate, early and conventional single-tooth implants in the aesthetic zone: a systematic review to survival, bone level, soft-tissue, aesthetics and patient satisfaction", J Clin Periodontol, 35, pp.1073~1086 (2008)
- Pjetursson BE, "Prosthetic treatment planning on the basis of scientific evidence", J Oral Rehabil, 35, pp.72~79 (2008)
- Hartog L, "Patient satisfaction with single-tooth implant therapy in the esthetic zone", Int J Prosthodont, 27, pp.226~228 (2014)
- Palmqvist S, "Subjective need for implant dentistry in a Swedish population aged 45-69 years", Clin Oral Implants Res, 2, pp.99~102 (1991)
- Lai HC, "Evaluation of soft-tissue alteration around implant-supported single-tooth restoration in the anterior maxilla: the pink esthetic score", Clin Oral Implants Res, 19, pp.560~564 (2008)
- Adell R, "A 15-year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw", Int J Oral Surg, 10, pp.387~416 (1981)
- Jemt T, "Regeneration of gingival papillae after single-implant treatment", Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 17, pp.326~333 (1997)
- Chang M, "Implant supported single-tooth replacements compared to contralateral natural teeth. Crown and soft tissue dimensions", Clin Oral Implants Res, 10, pp.185~194 (1999)
- Priest G, "Predictability of soft tissue form around single tooth implant restorations", Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 23, pp.19~27 (2003)
- Gehrke P, "Reproducibility of the pink esthetic score-rating soft tissue esthetics around single-implant restorations with regard to dental observer specialization", J Esthet Restor Dent, 20, pp.375~384 (2008)