본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Influence of size and insertion depth of irrigation needle on debris extrusion and sealer penetration

2

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류치의학

초록

Objectives To determine the effect of size and insertion depth of irrigation needle on the amount of apical extruded debris and the amount of penetration depth of sealer using a confocal laser scanning microscope (CLSM). Materials and Methods Twenty maxillary premolars were assigned to 2 groups (n = 10), according to the size of needle tip, 28 G or 30 G. Buccal roots of samples were irrigated with respective needle type inserted 1 mm short of the working length (WL), while palatal roots were irrigated with respective needle type inserted 3 mm short of the WL. Prepared teeth were removed from the pre-weighed Eppendorf tubes. Canals were filled with F3 gutta-percha cone and rhodamine B dye-labeled AH 26 sealer. Teeth were transversally sectioned at 1 and 3 mm levels from the apex and observed under a CLSM. Eppendorf tubes were incubated to evaporate the irrigant and were weighed again. The difference between pre- and post-weights was calculated, and statistical evaluation was performed. Results Inserting needles closer to the apex and using needles with wider diameters were associated with significantly more debris extrusion (p < 0.05). The position of needles and level of sections had statistically significant effects on sealer penetration depth (p < 0.05 for both). Conclusions Following preparation, inserting narrower needles compatible with the final apical diameter of the prepared root canal at 3 mm short of WL during final irrigation might prevent debris extrusion and improve sealer penetration in the apical third.

Abstract

Objectives To determine the effect of size and insertion depth of irrigation needle on the amount of apical extruded debris and the amount of penetration depth of sealer using a confocal laser scanning microscope (CLSM). Materials and Methods Twenty maxillary premolars were assigned to 2 groups (n = 10), according to the size of needle tip, 28 G or 30 G. Buccal roots of samples were irrigated with respective needle type inserted 1 mm short of the working length (WL), while palatal roots were irrigated with respective needle type inserted 3 mm short of the WL. Prepared teeth were removed from the pre-weighed Eppendorf tubes. Canals were filled with F3 gutta-percha cone and rhodamine B dye-labeled AH 26 sealer. Teeth were transversally sectioned at 1 and 3 mm levels from the apex and observed under a CLSM. Eppendorf tubes were incubated to evaporate the irrigant and were weighed again. The difference between pre- and post-weights was calculated, and statistical evaluation was performed. Results Inserting needles closer to the apex and using needles with wider diameters were associated with significantly more debris extrusion (p < 0.05). The position of needles and level of sections had statistically significant effects on sealer penetration depth (p < 0.05 for both). Conclusions Following preparation, inserting narrower needles compatible with the final apical diameter of the prepared root canal at 3 mm short of WL during final irrigation might prevent debris extrusion and improve sealer penetration in the apical third.

참고문헌 (37)

  1. Haapasalo M, "Eradication of endodontic infection by instrumentation and irrigation solutions", Endod Topics, 10, pp.77~102 (2005)[DOI]
  2. Gulabivala K, "Efects of mechanical and chemical procedures on root canal surfaces", Endod Topics, 10, pp.103~122 (2005)[DOI]
  3. Zehnder M, "Root canal irrigants", J Endod, 32, pp.389~398 (2006)[DOI]
  4. Paque F, "Preparation of oval-shaped root canals in mandibular molars using nickel-titanium rotary instruments: a micro-computed tomography study", J Endod, 36, pp.703~707 (2010)[DOI]
  5. Paque F, "Microtomography-based comparison of reciprocating single-fle F2 ProTaper technique versus rotary full sequence", J Endod, 37, pp.1394~1397 (2011)[DOI]
  6. Abou-Rass M, "The efectiveness of four clinical irrigation methods on the removal of root canal debris", Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol, 54, pp.323~328 (1982)[DOI]
  7. Carrigan PJ, "A scanning electron microscopic evaluation of human dentinal tubules according to age and location", J Endod, 10, pp.359~363 (1984)[DOI]
  8. Gu Y, "Efect of diferent agitation techniques on the penetration of irrigant and sealer into dentinal tubules", Photomed Laser Surg, 35, pp.71~77 (2017)[DOI]
  9. Orstavik D, "Endodontic flling materials", Endod Topics, 31, pp.53~67 (2014)[DOI]
  10. Mamootil K, "Penetration of dentinal tubules by endodontic sealer cements in extracted teeth and in vivo", Int Endod J, 40, pp.873~881 (2007)[DOI]
  11. Sadr S, "Microleakage of single-cone gutta-percha obturation technique in combination with diferent types of sealers", Iran Endod J, 10, pp.199~203 (2015)
  12. Bolles JA, "Comparison of Vibringe, EndoActivator, and needle irrigation on sealer penetration in extracted human teeth", J Endod, 39, pp.708~711 (2013)[DOI]
  13. Kara Tuncer A, "Comparison of sealer penetration using the EndoVac irrigation system and conventional needle root canal irrigation", J Endod, 40, pp.613~617 (2014)[DOI]
  14. Generali L, "Efect of diferent irrigation systems on sealer penetration into dentinal tubules", J Endod, 43, pp.652~656 (2017)[DOI]
  15. Peters OA, "Current challenges and concepts in the preparation of root canal systems: a review", J Endod, 30, pp.559~567 (2004)[DOI]
  16. Dutner J, "Irrigation trends among American Association of Endodontists members: a web-based survey", J Endod, 38, pp.37~40 (2012)[DOI]
  17. Chow TW, "Mechanical efectiveness of root canal irrigation", J Endod, 9, pp.475~479 (1983)[DOI]
  18. Usman N, "Infuence of instrument size on root canal debridement", J Endod, 30, pp.110~112 (2004)
  19. Falk KW, "The infuence of preparation size on the mechanical efcacy of root canal irrigation in vitro", J Endod, 31, pp.742~745 (2005)[DOI]
  20. Sedgley CM, "Infuence of irrigant needle depth in removing bioluminescent bacteria inoculated into instrumented root canals using real-time imaging in vitro", Int Endod J, 38, pp.97~104 (2005)[DOI]
  21. Khademi A, "Determination of the minimum instrumentation size for penetration of irrigants to the apical third of root canal systems", J Endod, 32, pp.417~420 (2006)[DOI]
  22. van der Sluis LW, "The infuence of volume, type of irrigant and fushing method on removing artifcially placed dentine debris from the apical root canal during passive ultrasonic irrigation", Int Endod J, 39, pp.472~476 (2006)[DOI]
  23. Perez R, "Impact of needle insertion depth on the removal of hard-tissue debris", Int Endod J, 50, pp.560~568 (2017)[DOI]
  24. Boutsioukis C, "Irrigant fow within a prepared root canal using various fow rates: a Computational Fluid Dynamics study", Int Endod J, 42, pp.144~155 (2009)[DOI]
  25. Munoz HR, "In vivo efcacy of three diferent endodontic irrigation systems for irrigant delivery to working length of mesial canals of mandibular molars", J Endod, 38, pp.445~448 (2012)[DOI]
  26. Aksel H, "Efect of needle insertion depth and apical diameter on irrigant extrusion in simulated immature permanent teeth", Braz Oral Res, 28, pp.1~6 (2014)
  27. Boutsioukis C, "The efect of needle-insertion depth on the irrigant fow in the root canal: evaluation using an unsteady computational fuid dynamics model", J Endod, 36, pp.1664~1668 (2010)[DOI]
  28. Malentacca A, "Efcacy and safety of various active irrigation devices when used with either positive or negative pressure: an in vitro study", J Endod, 38, pp.1622~1626 (2012)[DOI]
  29. Psimma Z, "Efect of needle insertion depth and root canal curvature on irrigant extrusion ex vivo", J Endod, 39, pp.521~524 (2013)[DOI]
  30. Myers GL, "A comparison of weights of debris extruded apically by conventional fling and Canal Master techniques", J Endod, 17, pp.275~279 (1991)[DOI]
  31. Boutsioukis C, "The efect of root canal taper on the irrigant fow: evaluation using an unsteady Computational Fluid Dynamics model", Int Endod J, 43, pp.909~916 (2010)[DOI]
  32. Silva PB, "Apical extrusion of debris and irrigants using diferent irrigation needles", Braz Dent J, 27, pp.192~195 (2016)[DOI]
  33. Tanalp J, "Apical extrusion of debris: a literature review of an inherent occurrence during root canal treatment", Int Endod J, 47, pp.211~221 (2014)[DOI]
  34. Farook SA, "Guidelines for management of sodium hypochlorite extrusion injuries", Br Dent J, 217, pp.679~684 (2014)[DOI]
  35. Boutsioukis C, "Factors afecting irrigant extrusion during root canal irrigation: a systematic review", Int Endod J, 46, pp.599~618 (2013)[DOI]
  36. Mandorah A, "Efect of irrigation needle depth in smear layer removal: scanning electron microscope study", Saudi Endod J, 3, pp.114~119 (2013)[DOI]
  37. Tay FR, "Efect of vapor lock on root canal debridement by using a side-vented needle for positive-pressure irrigant delivery", J Endod, 36, pp.745~750 (2010)[DOI]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (12건)