Comparison of cleaning efficacy of various irrigation methods
2
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the cleaning efficacy of two irrigation activation systems. Materials and Methods: Sixty single-rooted human teeth were mechanically prepared and randomly divided into three groups: group 1 (control)-manual needle irrigation; group 2 (EA, EndoActivator; Dentsply, Tulsa, OK, USA)-irrigation activation with sonic device; group 3 (CK, CK file; B&L Biotech, Ansan, Korea)-irrigation activation with ultrasonic device. After irrigation, longitudinal grooves were made with a diamond disk on buccal and lingual surfaces of all teeth, after which horizontal grooves were made on 3 mm from the apex of all roots. Then, all teeth were split by a chisel to obtain 3 mm-sized cross-sectioned samples of the apex area, and the remnants were discarded. Each cross-sectioned sample was dehydrated and evaluated by scanning electron microscope. Data were analyzed by means of the Kruskal-Wallis test and Mann-Whitney U test (p<0.05). Results: Groups treated with EndoActivator (group 2) and CK file (group 3) showed significantly higher removal of the smear layer than the group treated with manual needle irrigation (group 1) (Kruskal-Wallis test, p<0.05). However, there was no significant difference between group 2 and group 3 (Mann-Whitney U test, p<0.05). Conclusion: Both irrigation activation systems, EndoActivator and CK file, were more effective in removing smear layer from the apical 3 mm region of the root canal than the manual needle irrigation method.
Abstract
Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the cleaning efficacy of two irrigation activation systems. Materials and Methods: Sixty single-rooted human teeth were mechanically prepared and randomly divided into three groups: group 1 (control)-manual needle irrigation; group 2 (EA, EndoActivator; Dentsply, Tulsa, OK, USA)-irrigation activation with sonic device; group 3 (CK, CK file; B&L Biotech, Ansan, Korea)-irrigation activation with ultrasonic device. After irrigation, longitudinal grooves were made with a diamond disk on buccal and lingual surfaces of all teeth, after which horizontal grooves were made on 3 mm from the apex of all roots. Then, all teeth were split by a chisel to obtain 3 mm-sized cross-sectioned samples of the apex area, and the remnants were discarded. Each cross-sectioned sample was dehydrated and evaluated by scanning electron microscope. Data were analyzed by means of the Kruskal-Wallis test and Mann-Whitney U test (p<0.05). Results: Groups treated with EndoActivator (group 2) and CK file (group 3) showed significantly higher removal of the smear layer than the group treated with manual needle irrigation (group 1) (Kruskal-Wallis test, p<0.05). However, there was no significant difference between group 2 and group 3 (Mann-Whitney U test, p<0.05). Conclusion: Both irrigation activation systems, EndoActivator and CK file, were more effective in removing smear layer from the apical 3 mm region of the root canal than the manual needle irrigation method.
참고문헌 (27)
- Bolles JA, "Comparison of Vibringe, EndoActivator, and needle irrigation on sealer penetration in extracted human teeth", J Endod, 39, pp.708~711 (2013)
- Caron G, "Effectiveness of different final irrigant activation protocols on smear layer removal in curved canals", J Endod, 36, pp.1361~1366 (2010)
- de Gregorio C, "Efficacy of different irrigation and activation systems on the penetration of sodium hypochlorite into simulated lateral canals and up to working length : an in vitro study", J Endod, 36, pp.1216~1221 (2010)
- Bürklein S, "Shaping ability and cleaning e ectiveness of two single- le systems in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth : Reciproc and WaveOne versus Mtwo and ProTaper", Int Endod J, 45, pp.449~461 (2012)
- Violich DR, "The smear layer in endodontics-a review", Int Endod J, 43, pp.2~15 (2010)
- Pereira ES, "Braz Dent J", Cleaning the apical third of curved canals after different irrigation protocols, 23, pp.351~356 (2012)
- Hülsmann M, "Chelating agents in root canal treatment : mode of action and indications for their use", Int Endod J, 36, pp.810~830 (2003)
- Ribeiro RG, "Dentin permeability of the apical third in di erent groups of teeth", Braz Dent J, 21, pp.216~219 (2010)
- Ruddle C, "Hydrodynamic disinfection: tsunami endodontics", Dent Today, 26, pp.114~117 (2007)
- Jiang LM, "Evaluation of a sonic device designed to activate irrigant in the root canal", J Endod, 36, pp.143~146 (2010)
- 이소영, "IN VITRO EVALUATION OF CLEANING EFFICACY OF VARIOUS IRRIGATION METHODS IN MANDIBULAR MOLARS", Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics, 34(3), pp.215~222 (2009), 대한치과보존학회
- Al-Jadaa A, "Necrotic pulp tissue dissolution by passive ultrasonic irrigation in simulated accessory canals : impact of canal location and angulation", Int Endod J, 42, pp.59~65 (2009)
- 은재승, "근관세정 방법에 따른 수산화칼슘 제재의 제거 효율 비교", Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics, 34(6), pp.508~514 (2009), 대한치과보존학회
- Chopra S, "A scanning electron microscopic evaluation of the e ectiveness of the F- le versus ultrasonic activation of a K- le to remove smear layer", J Endod, 34, pp.1243~1245 (2008)
- Tay FR, "E ect of vapor lock on root canal debridement by using a side-vented needle for positive-pressure irrigant delivery", J Endod, 36, pp.745~750 (2010)
- Schoeffel GJ, "The EndoVac method of endodontic irrigation : safety rst", Dent Today, 26, pp.92~96 (2007)
- Murray PE, "Evaluation of Morinda citrifolia as an endodontic irrigant", J Endod, 34, pp.66~70 (2008)
- Hülsmann M, "Root canal cleanliness after preparation with different endodontic handpieces and hand instruments : a comparative SEM investigation", J Endod, 23, pp.301~306 (1997)
- Nguy D, "The influence of canal curvature on the mechanical ecacy of root canal irrigation in vitro using real-time imaging of bioluminescent bacteria", J Endod, 32, pp.1077~1080 (2006)
- Ram Z, "Effectiveness of root canal irrigation", Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol, 44, pp.306~312 (1977)
- Chow TW, "Mechanical e ectiveness of root canal irrigation", J Endod, 9, pp.475~479 (1983)
- Blank-Gonçalves LM, "Qualitative analysis of the removal of the smear layer in the apical third of curved roots: conventional irrigation versus activation systems", J Endod, 37, pp.1268~1271 (2011)
- 유연지, "최신 근관 세척 방법과 기구에 대한 고찰", Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics, 36(3), pp.180~187 (2011), 대한치과보존학회
- Rödig T, "Effectiveness of different irrigant agitation techniques on debris and smear layer removal in curved root canals: a scanning electron microscopy study", J Endod, 36, pp.1983~1987 (2010)
- Jensen SA, "Comparison of the cleaning efficacy of passive sonic activation and passive ultrasonic activation a er hand instrumentation in molar root canals", J Endod, 25, pp.735~738 (1999)
- Sabins RA, "A comparison of the cleaning efficacy of short-term sonic and ultrasonic passive irrigation after hand instrumentation in molar root canals", J Endod, 29, pp.674~678 (2003)
- Stamos DE, "An in vitro comparison study to quantitate the debridement ability of hand, sonic, and ultrasonic instrumentation", J Endod, 13, pp.434~440 (1987)