The implementation of the integrated design process in the hole-plan system
2
조회
0
다운로드
5
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
All current shipyards are using the customized CAD/CAM programs in order to improve the design quality and increase the design efficiency. Even though the data structures for ship design and construction are almost completed, the implementation related to the ship design processes are still in progress so that it has been the main causes of the bottleneck and delay during the middle of design process. In this study, we thought that the hole-plan system would be a good example which is remained to be improved. The people of outfitting division who don’t have direct authority to edit the structural panels, should request the hull design division to install the holes for the outfitting equipment. For acceptance, they should calculate the hole position, determine the hole type, and find the intersected contour of panel. After consideration of the hull people, the requested holes are manually installed on the hull structure. As the above, many processes are needed such as communication and discussion between the divisions, drawings for hole-plan, and the consideration for the structural or production compatibility. However this iterative process takes a lot of working time and requires mental pressure to the related people and cross-division conflict. This paper will handle the hole-plan system in detail to automate the series of process and minimize the human efforts and time-consumption.
Abstract
All current shipyards are using the customized CAD/CAM programs in order to improve the design quality and increase the design efficiency. Even though the data structures for ship design and construction are almost completed, the implementation related to the ship design processes are still in progress so that it has been the main causes of the bottleneck and delay during the middle of design process. In this study, we thought that the hole-plan system would be a good example which is remained to be improved. The people of outfitting division who don’t have direct authority to edit the structural panels, should request the hull design division to install the holes for the outfitting equipment. For acceptance, they should calculate the hole position, determine the hole type, and find the intersected contour of panel. After consideration of the hull people, the requested holes are manually installed on the hull structure. As the above, many processes are needed such as communication and discussion between the divisions, drawings for hole-plan, and the consideration for the structural or production compatibility. However this iterative process takes a lot of working time and requires mental pressure to the related people and cross-division conflict. This paper will handle the hole-plan system in detail to automate the series of process and minimize the human efforts and time-consumption.
참고문헌 (9)
- Andritsos, F., "The automation and integration of production processes in shipbuilding", European Commission Joint Research Centre Institute for Systems, Informatics & Safety, ~ (2000)
- Lee, J.K., "The construction of ship outfitting design system based on the CAD system", Bulletin of the Society of Naval Architects of Korea, 29(3), pp.28~35 (1992)
- Lee, J.J., "Data association between design stages for the BOM management of piping in ship design", 석사, pp.2010
- Lee, J.H., "An implementation enterprise BOM for marine vessel’s pipe equipment", Korea CAD, 2010, 632~643
- Mistree, F., "Decision-based design: A contemporary paradigm for ship design", Transactions, Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineers, 98, pp.565~597 (1990)
- Suh, H.W., "Integrated CAD system for ship and offshore projects", International Journal of CAD, 2006, pp.6(1), 41~48
- 신성철, "FPSO의 선행의장률 향상을 위한 생산관리 및 공법개선 사례연구", 대한조선학회 논문집, 46(3), pp.325~334 (2009), 대한조선학회
- Wijnolst, N., "Ship innovation" (2008), IOS Press BV under the imprint Delft University Press
- Ye, K.H., "The implementation of the Hole Plan", Coaming System on the ship customized CAD, 1992, pp.31, 61~71
