New method of assessing the relationship between buccal bone thickness and gingival thickness
1
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose: The aim of this study was to determine the relationship between buccal bone thickness and gingival thickness by means of a noninvasive and relatively accurate digital registration method. Methods: In 20 periodontally healthy subjects, cone-beam computed tomographic images and intraoral scanned files were obtained. Measurements of buccal bone thickness and gingival thickness at the central incisors, lateral incisors, and canines were performed at points 0–5 mm from the alveolar crest on the superimposed images. The Friedman test was used to compare buccal bone and gingival thickness for each depth between the 3 tooth types. Spearman's correlation coefficient was calculated to assess the correlation between buccal bone thickness and gingival thickness. Results: Of the central incisors, 77% of all sites had a buccal thickness of 0.5–1.0 mm, and 23% had a thickness of 1.0–1.5 mm. Of the lateral incisors, 71% of sites demonstrated a buccal bone thickness <1.0 mm, as did 63% of the canine sites. For gingival thickness, the proportion of sites <1.0 mm was 88%, 82%, and 91% for the central incisors, lateral incisors, and canines, respectively. Significant differences were observed in gingival thickness at the alveolar crest level (G0) between the central incisors and canines (P=0.032) and between the central incisors and lateral incisors (P=0.013). At 1 mm inferior to the alveolar crest, a difference was found between the central incisors and canines (P=0.025). The lateral incisors and canines showed a significant difference for buccal bone thickness 5 mm under the alveolar crest (P=0.025). Conclusions: The gingiva and buccal bone of the anterior maxillary teeth were found to be relatively thin (<1 mm) overall. A tendency was found for gingival thickness to increase and bone thickness to decrease toward the root apex. Differences were found between teeth at some positions, although the correlation between buccal bone thickness and soft tissue thickness was generally not significant.
Abstract
Purpose: The aim of this study was to determine the relationship between buccal bone thickness and gingival thickness by means of a noninvasive and relatively accurate digital registration method. Methods: In 20 periodontally healthy subjects, cone-beam computed tomographic images and intraoral scanned files were obtained. Measurements of buccal bone thickness and gingival thickness at the central incisors, lateral incisors, and canines were performed at points 0–5 mm from the alveolar crest on the superimposed images. The Friedman test was used to compare buccal bone and gingival thickness for each depth between the 3 tooth types. Spearman's correlation coefficient was calculated to assess the correlation between buccal bone thickness and gingival thickness. Results: Of the central incisors, 77% of all sites had a buccal thickness of 0.5–1.0 mm, and 23% had a thickness of 1.0–1.5 mm. Of the lateral incisors, 71% of sites demonstrated a buccal bone thickness <1.0 mm, as did 63% of the canine sites. For gingival thickness, the proportion of sites <1.0 mm was 88%, 82%, and 91% for the central incisors, lateral incisors, and canines, respectively. Significant differences were observed in gingival thickness at the alveolar crest level (G0) between the central incisors and canines (P=0.032) and between the central incisors and lateral incisors (P=0.013). At 1 mm inferior to the alveolar crest, a difference was found between the central incisors and canines (P=0.025). The lateral incisors and canines showed a significant difference for buccal bone thickness 5 mm under the alveolar crest (P=0.025). Conclusions: The gingiva and buccal bone of the anterior maxillary teeth were found to be relatively thin (<1 mm) overall. A tendency was found for gingival thickness to increase and bone thickness to decrease toward the root apex. Differences were found between teeth at some positions, although the correlation between buccal bone thickness and soft tissue thickness was generally not significant.
참고문헌 (22)
- Olsson M, "Periodontal characteristics in individuals with varying form of the upper central incisors", J Clin Periodontol, 18, pp.78~82 (1991)
- Weisgold AS, "Contours of the full crown restoration", Alpha Omegan, 70, pp.77~89 (1977)
- Evans CD, "Esthetic outcomes of immediate implant placements", Clin Oral Implants Res, 19, pp.73~80 (2008)
- Kois JC, "Predictable single-tooth peri-implant esthetics: five diagnostic keys", Compend Contin Educ Dent, 25, pp.895~900 (2004)
- Hwang D, "Flap thickness as a predictor of root coverage: a systematic review", J Periodontol, 77, pp.1625~1634 (2006)
- Baldi C, "Coronally advanced flap procedure for root coverage. Is flap thickness a relevant predictor to achieve root coverage? A 19-case series", J Periodontol, 70, pp.1077~1084 (1999)
- Fu JH, "Tissue biotype and its relation to the underlying bone morphology", J Periodontol, 81, pp.569~574 (2010)
- Stein JM, "The gingival biotype: measurement of soft and hard tissue dimensions - a radiographic morphometric study", J Clin Periodontol, 40, pp.1132~1139 (2013)
- Botticelli D, "Hard-tissue alterations following immediate implant placement in extraction sites", J Clin Periodontol, 31, pp.820~828 (2004)
- 이승록, "Anthropometric analysis of maxillary anterior buccal bone of Korean adults using cone-beam CT", The Journal of Advanced of Prosthodontics, 2(3), pp.92~96 (2010), 대한치과보철학회
- Januário AL, "Dimension of the facial bone wall in the anterior maxilla: a cone-beam computed tomography study", Clin Oral Implants Res, 22, pp.1168~1171 (2011)
- Kan JY, "Dimensions of peri-implant mucosa: an evaluation of maxillary anterior single implants in humans", J Periodontol, 74, pp.557~562 (2003)
- De Rouck T, "The gingival biotype revisited: transparency of the periodontal probe through the gingival margin as a method to discriminate thin from thick gingiva", J Clin Periodontol, 36, pp.428~433 (2009)
- Kan JY, "Gingival biotype assessment in the esthetic zone: visual versus direct measurement", Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 30, pp.237~243 (2010)
- Claffey N, "Relationship of gingival thickness and bleeding to loss of probing attachment in shallow sites following nonsurgical periodontal therapy", J Clin Periodontol, 13, pp.654~657 (1986)
- La Rocca AP, "Anterior maxillary and mandibular biotype: relationship between gingival thickness and width with respect to underlying bone thickness", Implant Dent, 21, pp.507~515 (2012)
- Younes F, "Relationship between buccal bone and gingival thickness revisited using non-invasive registration methods", Clin Oral Implants Res, 27, pp.523~528 (2016)
- Sanz Martin I, "Prospective randomized controlled clinical study comparing two dental implant types: volumetric soft tissue changes at 1 year of loading", Clin Oral Implants Res, 27, pp.406~411 (2016)
- Windisch SI, "A new optical method to evaluate three-dimensional volume changes of alveolar contours: a methodological in vitro study", Clin Oral Implants Res, 18, pp.545~551 (2007)
- Nikiforidou M, "Classification of periodontal biotypes with the use of CBCT. A cross-sectional study", Clin Oral Investig, 20, pp.2061~2071 (2016)
- Nowzari H, "Cone beam computed tomographic measurement of maxillary central incisors to determine prevalence of facial alveolar bone width ≥2 mm", Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 14, pp.595~602 (2012)
- Müller HP, "Thickness of masticatory mucosa", J Clin Periodontol, 27, pp.431~436 (2000)