본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

ARID1A Mutation from Targeted NGS Predicts Primary Resistance to Gemcitabine and Cisplatin Chemotherapy in Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer

2

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류의학일반

초록

Purpose There are clinical unmet needs in predicting therapeutic response and precise strategy for the patient with advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC). We aimed to identify genomic alterations predicting therapeutic response and resistance to gemcitabine and cisplatin (Gem/Cis)-based chemotherapy in advanced BTC. Materials and Methods Genomic analysis of advanced BTC multi-institutional cohorts was performed using targeted panel sequencing. Genomic alterations were analyzed integrating patients’ clinicopathologic data, including clinical outcomes of Gem/Cis-based therapy. Significance of genetic alterations was validated using clinical next-generation sequencing (NGS) cohorts from public repositories and drug sensitivity data from cancer cell lines. Results 193 BTC patients from three cancer centers were analyzed. Most frequent genomic alterations were TP53 (55.5%), KRAS (22.8%), ARID1A (10.4%) alterations, and ERBB2 amplification (9.8%). Among 177 patients with BTC receiving Gem/Cis-based chemotherapy, ARID1A alteration was the only independent predictive molecular marker of primary resistance showing disease progression for 1st-line chemotherapy in the multivariate regression model (odds ratio, 3.12; p=0.046). In addition, ARID1A alteration was significantly correlated with inferior progression-free survival on Gem/Cis-based chemotherapy in the overall patient population (p=0.033) and in patients with extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) (p=0.041). External validation using public repository NGS revealed that ARID1A mutation was a significant predictor for poor survival in BTC patients. Investigation of multi-OMICs drug sensitivity data from cancer cell lines revealed that cisplatin-resistance was exclusively observed in ARID1A mutant bile duct cancer cells. Conclusion Integrative analysis with genomic alterations and clinical outcomes of the first-line Gem/Cis-based chemotherapy in advanced BTC revealed that patients with ARID1A alterations showed a significant worse clinical outcome, especially in extrahepatic CCA. Well-designed prospective studies are mandatory to validate the predictive role of ARID1A mutation.

Abstract

Purpose There are clinical unmet needs in predicting therapeutic response and precise strategy for the patient with advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC). We aimed to identify genomic alterations predicting therapeutic response and resistance to gemcitabine and cisplatin (Gem/Cis)-based chemotherapy in advanced BTC. Materials and Methods Genomic analysis of advanced BTC multi-institutional cohorts was performed using targeted panel sequencing. Genomic alterations were analyzed integrating patients’ clinicopathologic data, including clinical outcomes of Gem/Cis-based therapy. Significance of genetic alterations was validated using clinical next-generation sequencing (NGS) cohorts from public repositories and drug sensitivity data from cancer cell lines. Results 193 BTC patients from three cancer centers were analyzed. Most frequent genomic alterations were TP53 (55.5%), KRAS (22.8%), ARID1A (10.4%) alterations, and ERBB2 amplification (9.8%). Among 177 patients with BTC receiving Gem/Cis-based chemotherapy, ARID1A alteration was the only independent predictive molecular marker of primary resistance showing disease progression for 1st-line chemotherapy in the multivariate regression model (odds ratio, 3.12; p=0.046). In addition, ARID1A alteration was significantly correlated with inferior progression-free survival on Gem/Cis-based chemotherapy in the overall patient population (p=0.033) and in patients with extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) (p=0.041). External validation using public repository NGS revealed that ARID1A mutation was a significant predictor for poor survival in BTC patients. Investigation of multi-OMICs drug sensitivity data from cancer cell lines revealed that cisplatin-resistance was exclusively observed in ARID1A mutant bile duct cancer cells. Conclusion Integrative analysis with genomic alterations and clinical outcomes of the first-line Gem/Cis-based chemotherapy in advanced BTC revealed that patients with ARID1A alterations showed a significant worse clinical outcome, especially in extrahepatic CCA. Well-designed prospective studies are mandatory to validate the predictive role of ARID1A mutation.

참고문헌 (30)

  1. Bridgewater JA, "Biliary tract cancer : epidemiology, radiotherapy, and molecular profiling", Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book, 35, pp.e194~203 (2016)
  2. Valle J, "Cisplatin plus gemcitabine versus gemcitabine for biliary tract cancer", N Engl J Med, 362, pp.1273~1281 (2010)
  3. Valle JW, "New hori-zons for precision medicine in biliary tract cancers", Cancer Discov, 7, pp.943~962 (2017)
  4. Abou-Alfa GK, "Pemigatinib for previously treated, locally advanced or metastatic cholangiocarcinoma : a multicentre, open-label, phase 2 study", Lancet Oncol, 21, pp.671~684 (2020)
  5. Zhu AX, "Final overall survival efficacy results of ivosidenib for patients with advanced cholangiocarcinoma with IDH1mutation : the phase 3 randomized clinical ClarIDHy trial", JAMA Oncol, 7, pp.1669~1677 (2021)
  6. Mosele F, "Recommendations for the use of next-generation sequencing(NGS)for patients with metastatic cancers : a report from the ESMO Precision Medicine Working Group", Ann Oncol, 31, pp.1491~1505 (2020)
  7. Benson AB, "Hepatobiliary cancers, version 2. 2021, NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology", J Natl Compr Canc Netw, 19, pp.541~565 (2021)
  8. Li MM, "Standards and guidelines for the interpretation and reporting of sequence variants in cancer : a joint consensus recommendation of the Association for Molecular Pathology, American Society of Clinical Oncology, and College of American Pathologists", J Mol Diagn, 19, pp.4~23 (2017)
  9. Lowery MA, "Comprehensive molecular profiling of intrahepatic and extrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas : potential targets for intervention", Clin Cancer Res, 24, pp.4154~4161 (2018)
  10. Chae H, "Therapeutic relevance of targeted sequencing in management of patients with advanced biliary tract cancer : DNA damage repair gene mutations as a predictive biomarker", Eur J Cancer, 120, pp.31~39 (2019)
  11. Nakamura H, "Genomic spectra of biliary tract cancer", Nat Genet, 47, pp.1003~1010 (2015)
  12. Boscoe AN, "Frequency and prognostic significance of isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 mutations in cholangiocarcinoma : a systematic literature review", J Gastrointest Oncol, 10, pp.751~765 (2019)
  13. Zhu AX, "Genomic profiling of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma : refining prognosis and identifying therapeutic targets", Ann Surg Oncol, 21, pp.3827~3834 (2014)
  14. Graham RP, "Fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 translocations in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma", Hum Pathol, 45, pp.1630~1638 (2014)
  15. Ross JS, "New routes to targeted therapy of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas revealed by next-generation sequencing", Oncologist, 19, pp.235~242 (2014)
  16. Farshidfar F, "Integrative genomic analysis of cholangiocarcinoma identifies distinct IDH-mutant molecular profiles", Cell Rep, 19, pp.2878~2880 (2017)
  17. Bruno R, "Next generation sequencing for gene fusion analysis in lung cancer : a literature review", Diagnostics(Basel), 10, pp.521~ (2020)
  18. Yoon JG, "Molecular characterization of biliary tract cancer predicts chemotherapy and programmed death 1", programmed death-ligand 1 blockade responses, 2021, pp.74, 1914~1931
  19. Montal R, "Molecular classification and therapeutic targets in extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma", J Hepatol, 73, pp.315~327 (2020)
  20. Pavlidou EN, "Diagnostic significance and prognostic role of the ARID1A gene in cancer outcomes(review)", World Acad Sci J, 2, pp.49~64 (2020)
  21. Wang K, "Exome sequencing identifies frequent mutation of ARID1A in molecular subtypes of gastric cancer", Nat Genet, 43, pp.1219~1223 (2011)
  22. Wiegand KC, "ARID1A mutations in endometriosis-associated ovarian carcinomas", N Engl J Med, 363, pp.1532~1543 (2010)
  23. Shain AH, "Convergent structural alterations define SWItch", Sucrose NonFermentable(SWI, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, pp.2012, 109[DOI]
  24. Luchini C, "Prognostic role and implications of mutation status of tumor suppressor gene ARID1A in cancer : a systematic review and meta-analysis", Oncotarget, 6, pp.39088~39097 (2015)
  25. Berns K, "Loss of ARID1A activates ANXA1, which serves as a predictive biomarker for trastuzumab resistance", Clin Cancer Res, 22, pp.5238~5248 (2016)
  26. Javle M, "Biliary cancer : Utility of next-generation sequencing for clinical management", Cancer, 122, pp.3838~3847 (2016)
  27. Conci S, "Multigene mutational profiling of biliary tract cancer is related to the pattern of recurrence in surgically resected patients", Updates Surg, 72, pp.119~128 (2020)
  28. Xu SF, "Somatic mutation profiling of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma : comparison between primary and metastasis tumor tissues", J Oncol, 2020, pp.5675020~ (2020)
  29. McGregor GH, "Targeting the metabolic response to statin-mediated oxidative stress produces a synergistic antitumor response", Cancer Res, 80, pp.175~188 (2020)
  30. Wu S, "Targeting glutamine dependence through GLS1 inhibition suppresses ARID1A-inactivated clear cell ovarian carcinoma", Nat Cancer, 2, pp.189~200 (2021)

관련 논문AI추천

Comprehensive Cancer Panel Sequencing Defines Genetic Diversity and Changes in the Mutational Characteristics of Pancreatic Cancer Patients Receiving Neoadjuvant TreatmentKyong-Ah Yoon, Min Kyoung Lee, Sang-Jae Park, Sang Myung Woo, Sung-Sik Han, Sun-Young Kong, Tae Hyun Kim, Woo Jin Lee, Yun-Hee Kim거트앤리버 소화기연관학회협의회 · Gut and Liver2019 · 제13권 제6호Prognostic Significance of ARID1A Expression Patterns Varies with Molecular Subtype in Advanced Gastric CancerCheong Jae-Ho, Kim Hyunki, Kim Jun Yong, Noh Songmi, Noh Sung Hoon, Park Cheol Keun거트앤리버 소화기연관학회협의회 · Gut and Liver2023 · 제17권 제5호Multicenter Phase II Study of Oxaliplatin, Irinotecan, and S-1 as First-Line Treatment for Patients with Recurrent or Metastatic Biliary Tract Cancer김규표, 김덕훈, 김정한, 김태원, 김형수, 류백렬, 서진원, 유창훈, 이재련, 장대영, 장흥문, 정재호, 최대로, 하홍일, 한보람대한암학회 · Cancer Research and Treatment2018 · 제50권 제4호Analysis of Plasma Circulating Tumor DNA in Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Cancer Treated with Neoadjuvant Modified FOLFIRINOX: Clinical Relevance of DNA Damage Repair Gene Alteration Detection김규표, 김송철, 류백열, 박도현, 송기병, 송태준, 유창훈, 윤현석, 이상수, 이재훈, 임동훈, 형재원, 홍승모, 황대욱대한암학회 · Cancer Research and Treatment2023 · 제55권 제4호Genetic, Clinicopathological, and Radiological Features of Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma with Ductal Plate Malformation PatternChoi Gi Hong, Chung Taek, Kim Haeryoung, Park Young Nyun, Rhee Hyungjin, Shim Hyo Sup, Yoo Jeong Eun거트앤리버 소화기연관학회협의회 · Gut and Liver2022 · 제16권 제4호Clinical Benefit of Maintenance Therapy for Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer Patients Showing No Progression after First-Line Gemcitabine Plus Cisplatin김규표, 김범준, 류백렬, 유창훈, 장흥문, 정재호, 형재원대한암학회 · Cancer Research and Treatment2019 · 제51권 제3호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (30건)