Clinical Benefit of Maintenance Therapy for Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer Patients Showing No Progression after First-Line Gemcitabine Plus Cisplatin
2
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose Gemcitabine plus cisplatin (GemCis) is the standard first-line chemotherapy for patients with advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC). In ABC-02 study, the BTC patients received up to 6-8 cycles of 3-weekly GemCis; however, those without progression often receive more than 6-8 cycles. The clinical benefit of maintenance treatment in patients without progression is uncertain. Materials and Methods Advanced BTC patients treated with GemCis between April 2010 and February 2015 at Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea, were retrospectively analysed. The patients without progression after 6-8 cycles were stratified according to further treatment i.e., with or without further cycles of GemCis (maintenance vs. observation groups). The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Results Among the 740 BTC patients in the initial screen, 231 cases (31.2%) were eligible for analysis (111 in the observation group, 120 in the maintenance group). The median OS from the GemCis initiation was 20.5 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 15.4 to 25.6) and 22.4 months (95% CI, 17.0 to 27.8) in the observation and maintenance groups, respectively (p=0.162). The median PFS was 10.4 months (95% CI, 7.0 to 13.8) and 13.2 months (95% CI, 11.3 to 15.2), respectively (p=0.320). Conclusion GemCis maintenance is not associated with an improved survival outcome.
Abstract
Purpose Gemcitabine plus cisplatin (GemCis) is the standard first-line chemotherapy for patients with advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC). In ABC-02 study, the BTC patients received up to 6-8 cycles of 3-weekly GemCis; however, those without progression often receive more than 6-8 cycles. The clinical benefit of maintenance treatment in patients without progression is uncertain. Materials and Methods Advanced BTC patients treated with GemCis between April 2010 and February 2015 at Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea, were retrospectively analysed. The patients without progression after 6-8 cycles were stratified according to further treatment i.e., with or without further cycles of GemCis (maintenance vs. observation groups). The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Results Among the 740 BTC patients in the initial screen, 231 cases (31.2%) were eligible for analysis (111 in the observation group, 120 in the maintenance group). The median OS from the GemCis initiation was 20.5 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 15.4 to 25.6) and 22.4 months (95% CI, 17.0 to 27.8) in the observation and maintenance groups, respectively (p=0.162). The median PFS was 10.4 months (95% CI, 7.0 to 13.8) and 13.2 months (95% CI, 11.3 to 15.2), respectively (p=0.320). Conclusion GemCis maintenance is not associated with an improved survival outcome.
참고문헌 (14)
- Patel T, "Increasing incidence and mortality of primary intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma in the United States", Hepatology, 33, pp.1353~1357 (2001)
- Siegel RL, "Cancer statistics, 2017", CA Cancer J Clin, 67, pp.7~30 (2017)
- SEER cancer statistics review, 1975-2013, "Howlader N", National Cancer Institute, ~ (1975)
- Edge SB, "The American Joint Committee on Cancer: the 7th edition of the AJCC cancer staging manual and the future of TNM", Ann Surg Oncol, 17, pp.1471~1474 (2010)
- Valle J, "Cisplatin plus gemcitabine versus gemcitabine for biliary tract cancer", N Engl J Med, 362, pp.1273~1281 (2010)
- Kim BJ, "Efficacy of fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer after failure of gemcitabine plus cisplatin: retrospective analysis of 321 patients", Br J Cancer, 116, pp.561~567 (2017)
- Ostwal V, "Treatment of advanced Gall bladder cancer in the real world-can continuation chemotherapy improve outcomes?", J Gastrointest Oncol, 8, pp.368~376 (2017)
- Maughan TS, "Comparison of intermittent and continuous palliative chemotherapy for advanced colorectal cancer : a multicentre randomised trial", Lancet, 361, pp.457~464 (2003)
- Tonini G, "Rechallenge therapy and treatment holiday : different strategies in management of metastatic colorectal cancer", J Exp Clin Cancer Res, 32, pp.92~ (2013)
- Tournigand C, "OPTIMOX1 : a randomized study of FOLFOX4 or FOLFOX7 with oxaliplatin in a stop-and-Go fashion in advanced colorectal cancer--a GERCOR study", J Clin Oncol, 24, pp.394~400 (2006)
- Labianca R, "Intermittent versus continuous chemotherapy in advanced colorectal cancer : a randomised 'GISCAD' trial", Ann Oncol, 22, pp.1236~1242 (2011)
- Park JO, "Phase III trial of two versus four additional cycles in patients who are nonprogressive after two cycles of platinum-based chemotherapy in non small-cell lung cancer", J Clin Oncol, 25, pp.5233~5239 (2007)
- Paz-Ares LG, "PARAMOUNT : Final overall survival results of the phase III study of maintenance pemetrexed versus placebo immediately after induction treatment with pemetrexed plus cisplatin for advanced nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer", J Clin Oncol, 31, pp.2895~2902 (2013)
- Park YH, "Phase III, multicenter, randomized trial of maintenance chemotherapy versus observation in patients with metastatic breast cancer after achieving disease control with six cycles of gemcitabine plus paclitaxel as first-line chemotherapy : KCSG-BR07-02", J Clin Oncol, 31, pp.1732~1739 (2013)