본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Treatment of multiple gingival recessions with xenogeneic acellular dermal matrix compared to connective tissue graft: a randomized split-mouth clinical trial

2

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류치의학

초록

Purpose: The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of the tunnel technique for root coverage using a new xenogeneic acellular dermal matrix vs. connective tissue grafting (CTG) for the treatment of multiple maxillary adjacent recessions (recession type 1) at 12 months postoperatively. Methods: This study enrolled 12 patients with at least 3 contiguous, bilateral, symmetrical maxillary gingival recessions (i.e., at least 6 recessions per patient). In total, 74 recessions were treated using the modified coronally advanced tunnel (MCAT) technique combined with a novel porcine-derived acellular dermal matrix (PADM) at 37 test sites or CTG at 37 control sites. The following clinical parameters were measured: recession height, clinical attachment level, width of keratinized tissue, probing depth, recession width, gingival thickness, mean root coverage (MRC), and complete root coverage (CRC). Comparisons between test and control groups were made for pain visual analog scale scores at 14 days. Results: At 12 months, the MCAT with PADM (test) yielded a statistically significant improvement in all clinical parameters studied. MRC was significantly higher on the control sides (80.6%±23.7%) than on the test sides (68.8%±23.4%). Similarly, CRC was 48.7%±6.8% on the control sides (CTG), in contrast to 24.3%±8.2% on the test sides (PADM). Statistically significant differences were observed in favor of the control sides for all clinical parameters studied. Nevertheless, the MCAT in adjunction with PADM was clearly superior at reducing mean and maximum patient-reported postoperative pain intensity and pain duration in the first week after surgery. Conclusions: The use of PADM to treat multiple recessions improved clinical parameters at 12 months, but these outcomes were nevertheless poorer than those observed for CTG. However, PADM reduced morbidity, particularly the pain experienced by patients. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03162016

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of the tunnel technique for root coverage using a new xenogeneic acellular dermal matrix vs. connective tissue grafting (CTG) for the treatment of multiple maxillary adjacent recessions (recession type 1) at 12 months postoperatively. Methods: This study enrolled 12 patients with at least 3 contiguous, bilateral, symmetrical maxillary gingival recessions (i.e., at least 6 recessions per patient). In total, 74 recessions were treated using the modified coronally advanced tunnel (MCAT) technique combined with a novel porcine-derived acellular dermal matrix (PADM) at 37 test sites or CTG at 37 control sites. The following clinical parameters were measured: recession height, clinical attachment level, width of keratinized tissue, probing depth, recession width, gingival thickness, mean root coverage (MRC), and complete root coverage (CRC). Comparisons between test and control groups were made for pain visual analog scale scores at 14 days. Results: At 12 months, the MCAT with PADM (test) yielded a statistically significant improvement in all clinical parameters studied. MRC was significantly higher on the control sides (80.6%±23.7%) than on the test sides (68.8%±23.4%). Similarly, CRC was 48.7%±6.8% on the control sides (CTG), in contrast to 24.3%±8.2% on the test sides (PADM). Statistically significant differences were observed in favor of the control sides for all clinical parameters studied. Nevertheless, the MCAT in adjunction with PADM was clearly superior at reducing mean and maximum patient-reported postoperative pain intensity and pain duration in the first week after surgery. Conclusions: The use of PADM to treat multiple recessions improved clinical parameters at 12 months, but these outcomes were nevertheless poorer than those observed for CTG. However, PADM reduced morbidity, particularly the pain experienced by patients. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03162016

참고문헌 (30)

  1. Zucchelli G, "Autogenous soft tissue grafting for periodontal and peri-implant plastic surgical reconstruction", J Periodontol, 91, pp.9~16 (2020)
  2. Chambrone L, "Root coverage procedures for treating localised and multiple recession-type defects", Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 10, pp.CD007161~ (2018)
  3. Tonetti MS, "Xenogenic collagen matrix or autologous connective tissue graft as adjunct to coronally advanced flaps for coverage of multiple adjacent gingival recession : randomized trial assessing non-inferiority in root coverage and superiority in oral health-related quality of life", J Clin Periodontol, 45, pp.78~88 (2018)
  4. Aguirre-Zorzano LA, "Complications of harvesting a connective tissue graft from the palate. A retrospective study and description of a new technique", J Clin Exp Dent, 9, pp.e1439~45 (2017)
  5. Griffin TJ, "Postoperative complications following gingival augmentation procedures", J Periodontol, 77, pp.2070~2079 (2006)
  6. Cairo F, "Periodontal plastic surgery of gingival recessions at single and multiple teeth", Periodontol 2000, 75, pp.296~316 (2017)
  7. Chambrone L, "Root coverage procedures for treating single and multiple recession-type defects : an updated Cochrane systematic review", J Periodontol, 90, pp.1399~1422 (2019)
  8. Cairo F, "Xenogeneic collagen matrix versus connective tissue graft for buccal soft tissue augmentation at implant site. A randomized, controlled clinical trial", J Clin Periodontol, 44, pp.769~776 (2017)
  9. Thoma DS, "Randomized controlled clinical study evaluating effectiveness and safety of a volume-stable collagen matrix compared to autogenous connective tissue grafts for soft tissue augmentation at implant sites", J Clin Periodontol, 43, pp.874~885 (2016)
  10. Thoma DS, "Soft tissue volume augmentation at dental implant sites using a volume stable three-dimensional collagen matrix-histological outcomes of a preclinical study", J Clin Periodontol, 44, pp.185~194 (2017)
  11. Zeltner M, "Randomized controlled clinical study comparing a volume-stable collagen matrix to autogenous connective tissue grafts for soft tissue augmentation at implant sites : linear volumetric soft tissue changes up to 3 months", J Clin Periodontol, 44, pp.446~453 (2017)
  12. Cosgarea R, "Clinical evaluation of a porcine acellular dermal matrix for the treatment of multiple adjacent class I, II, and III gingival recessions using the modified coronally advanced tunnel technique", Quintessence Int, 47, pp.739~747 (2016)
  13. Vincent-Bugnas S, "Treatment of multiple maxillary adjacent class I and II gingival recessions with modified coronally advanced tunnel and a new xenogeneic acellular dermal matrix", J Esthet Restor Dent, 30, pp.89~95 (2018)
  14. Cieślik-Wegemund M, "Tunnel technique with collagen matrix compared with connective tissue graft for treatment of periodontal recession : a randomized clinical trial", J Periodontol, 87, pp.1436~1443 (2016)
  15. Pietruska M, "Clinical evaluation of Miller class I and II recessions treatment with the use of modified coronally advanced tunnel technique with either collagen matrix or subepithelial connective tissue graft : a randomized clinical study", J Clin Periodontol, 46, pp.86~95 (2019)
  16. Hofmänner P, "Predictability of surgical techniques used for coverage of multiple adjacent gingival recessions--a systematic review", Quintessence Int, 43, pp.545~554 (2012)
  17. Graziani F, "Efficacy of periodontal plastic procedures in the treatment of multiple gingival recessions", J Clin Periodontol, 41(Suppl 15), pp.S63~76 (2014)
  18. Cairo F, "The interproximal clinical attachment level to classify gingival recessions and predict root coverage outcomes : an explorative and reliability study", J Clin Periodontol, 38, pp.661~666 (2011)
  19. Cortellini P, "Mucogingival conditions in the natural dentition: Narrative review, case definitions, and diagnostic considerations", J Periodontol, 89(Suppl 1), pp.S204~213 (2018)
  20. Azzi R, "Recouvrement radiculaire et reconstruction papillaire par greffon conjonctif enfoui sous un lambeau vestibulaire tunnélisé et tracté coronairement", J Parodontol Implant Orale, 17, pp.71~77 (1998)
  21. Aroca S, "Treatment of class III multiple gingival recessions : a randomized-clinical trial", J Clin Periodontol, 37, pp.88~97 (2010)
  22. Hürzeler MB, "A single-incision technique to harvest subepithelial connective tissue grafts from the palate", Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 19, pp.279~287 (1999)
  23. Miller PD, "A classification of marginal tissue recession", Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 5, pp.8~13 (1985)
  24. Clauser C, "Evidence-based mucogingival therapy. Part 2:ordinary and individual patient data meta-analyses of surgical treatment of recession using complete root coverage as the outcome variable", J Periodontol, 74, pp.741~756 (2003)
  25. Zuhr O, "The addition of soft tissue replacement grafts in plastic periodontal and implant surgery : critical elements in design and execution", J Clin Periodontol, 41(Suppl 15), pp.S123~142 (2014)
  26. Zuhr O, "Tunnel technique with connective tissue graft versus coronally advanced flap with enamel matrix derivative for root coverage: a RCT using 3D digital measuring methods. Part I. Clinical and patient-centred outcomes", J Clin Periodontol, 41, pp.582~592 (2014)
  27. Tavelli L, "Acellular dermal matrix and coronally advanced flap or tunnel technique in the treatment of multiple adjacent gingival recessions. A 12-year follow-up from a randomized clinical trial", J Clin Periodontol, 46, pp.937~948 (2019)
  28. Rotundo R, "Adjunctive benefit of a xenogenic collagen matrix associated with coronally advanced flap for the treatment of multiple gingival recessions: a superiority, assessor-blind, randomized clinical trial", J Clin Periodontol, 46, pp.1013~1023 (2019)
  29. Cieślik-Wegemund M, "Coverage of multiple recessions using the tunnel technique and a collagen matrix in the maxilla or mandible : a 6-month study", J Biol Regul Homeost Agents, 32, pp.1~10 (2018)
  30. Tavelli L, "Extracellular matrixbased scaffolding technologies for periodontal and peri-implant soft tissue regeneration", J Periodontol, 91, pp.17~25 (2020)

관련 논문AI추천

Clinical and patient-reported outcomes after recession coverage using modified vestibular incision subperiosteal tunnel access with a volume-stable collagen matrix as compared to a coronally advanced flap with a subepithelial connective tissue graftAlain Jureidini, Chun-Teh Lee, Marlena Lange, Nurit Bittner, Ulrike Schulze-Späte대한치주과학회 · Journal of Periodontal & Implant Science2022 · 제52권 제6호Root coverage using a coronally advanced flap with or without acellular dermal matrix: a meta-analysisChangning Wang, Haiqing Liao, Li Guo, Wei Guan, Zhengguo Cao대한치주과학회 · Journal of Periodontal & Implant Science2016 · 제46권 제1호Modified tunnel technique with and without enamel matrix derivative for deep and narrow gingival recession in the mandibular anterior region: a 3-year longitudinal and retrospective cohort population-based studyJae-Hong Lee, Yeon-Tae Kim대한치주과학회 · Journal of Periodontal & Implant Science2025 · 제55권 제4호Modified tunneling technique for root coverage of anterior mandible using minimal soft tissue harvesting and volume-stable collagen matrix: a retrospective study구영, 김성태, 류인철, 이다정, 이윤섭대한치주과학회 · Journal of Periodontal & Implant Science2021 · 제51권 제6호Long-term assessment of a modified tunneling technique for root coverage in lower anterior gingival recession: a retrospective studyHee-seung Han, Hyunjae Kim, Hyunkyung Kim, Sungtae Kim, Yang-Jo Seol, Young-Dan Cho대한치주과학회 · Journal of Periodontal & Implant Science2025 · 제55권 제2호Periodontal biotype modification using a volume-stable collagen matrix and autogenous subepithelial connective tissue graft for the treatment of gingival recession: a case series김성태, 김현주, Hyeong-Il Kim, Hyeyoon Chang, Yang-Jo Seol대한치주과학회 · Journal of Periodontal & Implant Science2018 · 제48권 제6호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (6건)