Clinical and patient-reported outcomes after recession coverage using modified vestibular incision subperiosteal tunnel access with a volume-stable collagen matrix as compared to a coronally advanced flap with a subepithelial connective tissue graft
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose: Coronally advanced split-or full-thickness (CAST or CAFT) flaps in combination with subepithelial connective tissue grafts (SCTGs) are commonly used in root-coverage procedures despite postoperative pain and bleeding from the graft donor site. Therefore, the modified vestibular incision subperiosteal tunnel access procedure (VISTAX) uses a novel collagen matrix (VCMX) instead of autogenous tissue to address the limitations associated with autogenous tissue grafting. This retrospective study compared the clinical outcomes of VISTAX to the results obtained after using a CAST or CAFT flap in combination with SCTG for root coverage. Methods: Patients with single or multiple adjacent recession I/II defects were included, with 10 subjects each in the VISTAX, CAFT, and CAST groups. Defect coverage, keratinized tissue width, esthetic scores, and patients’ perceived pain and dentinal hypersensitivity (visual analogue scale [VAS]) were assessed at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months. Results: All surgical techniques significantly reduced gingival recession (P<0.0001). Defect coverage, esthetic appearance, and the reduction in dentinal hypersensitivity were comparable. However, the VAS scores for pain were significantly lower in the VISTAX group than in the CAFT and CAST groups, which had similar scores (P<0.05). Furthermore, the clinical results of VISTAX and CAFT/CAST generally remained stable at 6 months. Conclusions: The clinical outcomes of VISTAX, CAFT, and CAST were comparable. However, patients perceived significantly less pain after VISTAX, indicating a potentially higher patient acceptance of the procedure. A prospective trial with a longer follow-up period and a larger sample size should therefore evaluate VISTAX further.
Abstract
Purpose: Coronally advanced split-or full-thickness (CAST or CAFT) flaps in combination with subepithelial connective tissue grafts (SCTGs) are commonly used in root-coverage procedures despite postoperative pain and bleeding from the graft donor site. Therefore, the modified vestibular incision subperiosteal tunnel access procedure (VISTAX) uses a novel collagen matrix (VCMX) instead of autogenous tissue to address the limitations associated with autogenous tissue grafting. This retrospective study compared the clinical outcomes of VISTAX to the results obtained after using a CAST or CAFT flap in combination with SCTG for root coverage. Methods: Patients with single or multiple adjacent recession I/II defects were included, with 10 subjects each in the VISTAX, CAFT, and CAST groups. Defect coverage, keratinized tissue width, esthetic scores, and patients’ perceived pain and dentinal hypersensitivity (visual analogue scale [VAS]) were assessed at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months. Results: All surgical techniques significantly reduced gingival recession (P<0.0001). Defect coverage, esthetic appearance, and the reduction in dentinal hypersensitivity were comparable. However, the VAS scores for pain were significantly lower in the VISTAX group than in the CAFT and CAST groups, which had similar scores (P<0.05). Furthermore, the clinical results of VISTAX and CAFT/CAST generally remained stable at 6 months. Conclusions: The clinical outcomes of VISTAX, CAFT, and CAST were comparable. However, patients perceived significantly less pain after VISTAX, indicating a potentially higher patient acceptance of the procedure. A prospective trial with a longer follow-up period and a larger sample size should therefore evaluate VISTAX further.
참고문헌 (47)
- Albandar JM, "Gingival recession, gingival bleeding, and dental calculus in adults 30 years of age and older in the United States, 1988-1994", J Periodontol, 70, pp.30~43 (1999)
- Sarfati A, "Risk assessment for buccal gingival recession defects in an adult population", J Periodontol, 81, pp.1419~1425 (2010)
- Serino G, "The prevalence and distribution of gingival recession in subjects with a high standard of oral hygiene", J Clin Periodontol, 21, pp.57~63 (1994)
- Chambrone L, "Long-term outcomes of untreated buccal gingival recessions : a systematic review and meta-analysis", J Periodontol, 87, pp.796~808 (2016)
- Jepsen S, "Periodontal manifestations of systemic diseases and developmental and acquired conditions: consensus report of workgroup 3 of the 2017 World Workshop on the Classification of Periodontal and Peri-Implant Diseases and Conditions", J Periodontol, 89(Suppl 1), pp.S237~S248 (2018)[DOI]
- Ker AJ, "Esthetics and smile characteristics from the layperson’s perspective : a computer-based survey study", J Am Dent Assoc, 139, pp.1318~1327 (2008)
- McLeod C, "Esthetics and smile characteristics evaluated by laypersons", Angle Orthod, 81, pp.198~205 (2011)
- Cairo F, "Efficacy of periodontal plastic surgery procedures in the treatment of localized facial gingival recessions. A systematic review", J Clin Periodontol, 41(Suppl 15), pp.S44~S62 (2014)
- Chambrone L, "Periodontal soft tissue root coverage procedures : a systematic review from the AAP Regeneration Workshop", J Periodontol, 86(Suppl), pp.S8~S51 (2015)
- Harris RJ, "Complications with surgical procedures utilizing connective tissue grafts : a follow-up of 500 consecutively treated cases", Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 25, pp.449~459 (2005)
- Harris RJ, "A comparative study of root coverage obtained with an acellular dermal matrix versus a connective tissue graft: results of 107 recession defects in 50 consecutively treated patients", Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 20, pp.51~59 (2000)
- McGuire MK, "Long-term results comparing xenogeneic collagen matrix and autogenous connective tissue grafts with coronally advanced flaps for treatment of dehiscence-type recession defects", J Periodontol, 87, pp.221~227 (2016)
- Allen AL, "Use of the supraperiosteal envelope in soft tissue grafting for root coverage. I. Rationale and technique", Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 14, pp.216~227 (1994)
- Zadeh HH, "Minimally invasive treatment of maxillary anterior gingival recession defects by vestibular incision subperiosteal tunnel access and platelet-derived growth factor BB", Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 31, pp.653~660 (2011)
- Chao JC, "A novel approach to root coverage : the pinhole surgical technique", Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 32, pp.521~531 (2012)
- Mathes SH, "A bioreactor test system to mimic the biological and mechanical environment of oral soft tissues and to evaluate substitutes for connective tissue grafts", Biotechnol Bioeng, 107, pp.1029~1039 (2010)
- Caballé-Serrano J, "Tissue integration and degradation of a porous collagen-based scaffold used for soft tissue augmentation", Materials (Basel), 13, pp.E2420~ (2020)
- Thoma DS, "Soft tissue volume augmentation by the use of collagen-based matrices in the dog mandible--a histological analysis", J Clin Periodontol, 38, pp.1063~1070 (2011)
- Thoma DS, "Soft tissue volume augmentation by the use of collagen-based matrices : a volumetric analysis", J Clin Periodontol, 37, pp.659~666 (2010)
- Stefanini M, "An exploratory clinical study evaluating safety and performance of a volume-stable collagen matrix with coronally advanced flap for single gingival recession treatment", Clin Oral Investig, 24, pp.3181~3191 (2020)
- Schulze-Späte U, "Modified vestibular incision subperiosteal tunnel access procedure with volume-stable collagen matrix for root coverage : report of three cases", Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 39, pp.e181~e187 (2019)
- Nelson SW, "The subpedicle connective tissue graft. A bilaminar reconstructive procedure for the coverage of denuded root surfaces", J Periodontol, 58, pp.95~102 (1987)
- Harris RJ, "The connective tissue and partial thickness double pedicle graft : a predictable method of obtaining root coverage", J Periodontol, 63, pp.477~486 (1992)
- Chambrone L, "Root coverage procedures for treating single and multiple recession-type defects : an updated Cochrane systematic review", J Periodontol, 90, pp.1399~1422 (2019)
- Tavelli L, "Efficacy of tunnel technique in the treatment of localized and multiple gingival recessions : a systematic review and meta-analysis", J Periodontol, 89, pp.1075~1090 (2018)
- Dai A, "Long-term stability of root coverage procedures for single gingival recessions : a systematic review and meta-analysis", J Clin Periodontol, 46, pp.572~585 (2019)
- Thombre V, "Comparative evaluation of the effectiveness of coronally positioned flap with or without acellular dermal matrix allograft in the treatment of multiple marginal gingival recession defects", Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 33, pp.e88~e94 (2013)
- Cairo F, "The interproximal clinical attachment level to classify gingival recessions and predict root coverage outcomes : an explorative and reliability study", J Clin Periodontol, 38, pp.661~666 (2011)
- Miller PD Jr, "A classification of marginal tissue recession", Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 5, pp.8~13 (1985)
- Loe H, "Periodontal disease in pregnancy. I. Prevalence and severity", Acta Odontol Scand, 21, pp.533~551 (1963)
- O’Leary TJ, "The plaque control record", J Periodontol, 43, pp.38~ (1972)
- Bruno JF, "Connective tissue graft technique assuring wide root coverage", Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 14, pp.126~137 (1994)
- Lorenzana ER, "The single-incision palatal harvest technique : a strategy for esthetics and patient comfort", Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 20, pp.297~305 (2000)
- Kan JY, "Gingival biotype assessment in the esthetic zone : visual versus direct measurement", Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 30, pp.237~243 (2010)
- Cairo F, "Root coverage esthetic score : a system to evaluate the esthetic outcome of the treatment of gingival recession through evaluation of clinical cases", J Periodontol, 80, pp.705~710 (2009)
- Jensen MP, "Handbook of pain assessment", pp.19~44 (2011), The Guilford Press
- Griffin TJ, "Postoperative complications following gingival augmentation procedures", J Periodontol, 77, pp.2070~2079 (2006)
- Gargallo-Albiol J, "Efficacy of xenogeneic collagen matrix to augment peri-implant soft tissue thickness compared to autogenous connective tissue graft : a systematic review and meta-analysis", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 34, pp.1059~1069 (2019)
- Langer B, "Subepithelial connective tissue graft technique for root coverage", J Periodontol, 56, pp.715~720 (1985)
- Mazzocco F, "Coronally advanced flap combined with a subepithelial connective tissue graft using full-or partial-thickness flap reflection", J Periodontol, 82, pp.1524~1529 (2011)
- Tavelli L, "Patient experience of autogenous soft tissue grafting has an implication for future treatment : a 10-to 15-year cross-sectional study", J Periodontol, 92, pp.637~647 (2021)
- Douglas de Oliveira DW, "Is surgical root coverage effective for the treatment of cervical dentin hypersensitivity? A systematic review", J Periodontol, 84, pp.295~306 (2013)
- Zeltner M, "Randomized controlled clinical study comparing a volume-stable collagen matrix to autogenous connective tissue grafts for soft tissue augmentation at implant sites : linear volumetric soft tissue changes up to 3 months", J Clin Periodontol, 44, pp.446~453 (2017)
- Roman A, "Patient-centered outcomes after subepithelial connective tissue grafts and coronally advanced flaps", Quintessence Int, 43, pp.841~851 (2012)
- Zucchelli G, "Predetermination of root coverage", J Periodontol, 81, pp.1019~1026 (2010)
- Cortellini P, "Does placement of a connective tissue graft improve the outcomes of coronally advanced flap for coverage of single gingival recessions in upper anterior teeth? A multi-centre, randomized, double-blind, clinical trial", J Clin Periodontol, 36, pp.68~79 (2009)
- Pini Prato GP, "Coronally advanced flap : the post-surgical position of the gingival margin is an important factor for achieving complete root coverage", J Periodontol, 76, pp.713~722 (2005)