본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

문학번역에서의 충실성의 문제 - Les Piquets de ma mère를 중심으로

Issue of Faithfulness in Literature Translation: Based on Les Piquets de ma mère

0

조회

0

다운로드

6

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류통역번역학

초록

‘Faithfulness’ and ‘readibility’ are the two main criteria by which we evaluate a translated work. This paper aims to show that these two conditions are a necessary and sufficient condition, not a choice translators can choose depending upon their translation strategies. It seems, however, that some French translations of Korean literature do not even satisfy ‘faithfulness’ condition. This paper has examined Les Piquets de ma mère in terms of faithfulness in form and meaning. As far as faithfulness in form is concerned, it is suggested that there should be corrections in the deletion of question markers in rhetorical questions and the phonetic translations of onomatopoeic and mimetic words. In terms of faithfulness in meaning, it is found that there are some mistranslations and lack of consistency stemming from the misunderstanding of the original work and the culture behind it. It is also shown that the three volumes of the book, each of which was translated in different situations, have similar problems in terms of ‘faithfulness’. This paper shows that the only way to achieve ‘faithfulness’ in translation is the complete understanding of the original work and the constant effort to maintain consistency.

Abstract

‘Faithfulness’ and ‘readibility’ are the two main criteria by which we evaluate a translated work. This paper aims to show that these two conditions are a necessary and sufficient condition, not a choice translators can choose depending upon their translation strategies. It seems, however, that some French translations of Korean literature do not even satisfy ‘faithfulness’ condition. This paper has examined Les Piquets de ma mère in terms of faithfulness in form and meaning. As far as faithfulness in form is concerned, it is suggested that there should be corrections in the deletion of question markers in rhetorical questions and the phonetic translations of onomatopoeic and mimetic words. In terms of faithfulness in meaning, it is found that there are some mistranslations and lack of consistency stemming from the misunderstanding of the original work and the culture behind it. It is also shown that the three volumes of the book, each of which was translated in different situations, have similar problems in terms of ‘faithfulness’. This paper shows that the only way to achieve ‘faithfulness’ in translation is the complete understanding of the original work and the constant effort to maintain consistency.

참고문헌 (27)

  1. 김경희, "한국 특유 어휘의 번역문제", 프랑스학연구, 17 (1999), 프랑스학회
  2. 김경희, "한국 소설 번역의 문제점 고찰 - 불어 번역을 중심으로", 불어불문학연구, 41 (2000), 한국불어불문학회
  3. 김경희, "한국속담 프랑스어 번역에 관한 고찰", 불어불문학연구, 45 (2001), 한국불어불문학회
  4. 김경희, "문화차이의 번역에 관한 고찰", 불어불문학연구, 50(50), pp.625~652 (2002), 한국불어불문학회
  5. 김경희, "한국 소설의 오역에 관한 고찰 - 프랑스어 번역을 중심으로 -", 프랑스학연구, (30), pp.19~37 (2004), 프랑스학회
  6. 김경희, "문학번역에서의 번역자 주에 관한 고찰", 프랑스학연구, (34), pp.5~34 (2005), 프랑스학회
  7. 김경희, "≪삼포 가는 길≫의 프랑스어 번역본 간의 차이에 관한 연구", 한국언어문화, (31), pp.159~184 (2006), 한국언어문화학회
  8. 김경희, "번역자에 따른 번역의 차이 - 『서울1964년 겨울』의 프랑스어 번역본을 중심으로", 불어불문학연구, (72), pp.145~171 (2007), 한국불어불문학회
  9. 김윤진, "문학번역 평가에서의 관점의 문제. 번역과 통역에서의 평가", pp.2005
  10. 김효중, "번역학" (1998), 민음사
  11. 손지봉, "문학번역 평가기준에 관하여", 통역과 번역, 8(1), pp.67~106 (2006), 한국통역번역학회
  12. 유영난, "번역이란 무엇인가" (1991), 태학사
  13. 이상원, "출판 번역 비평과 번역 규범", 통역과 번역, 6(2), pp.39~58 (2004), 한국통역번역학회
  14. 이상원, "최근의 번역 비평 서적에서 나타난 번역 평가 규범 분석", 통역과 번역, 8(1), pp.123~141 (2006), 한국통역번역학회
  15. 이상원, "문학번역 평가 어떻게 할 것인가?", 번역학연구, 9(2), pp.149~166 (2008), 한국번역학회
  16. 전성기, "번역비평과 해석", 불어불문학연구, (72), pp.281~310 (2007), 한국불어불문학회
  17. 전현주, "번역 텍스트의 용인성:번역 비평가의 관점을 중심으로", 번역학연구, 7(2), pp.179~205 (2006), 한국번역학회
  18. 정호정, "번역 텍스트의 양적 확장 효과*", 통역과 번역, 4(1), pp.167~189 (2002), 한국통역번역학회
  19. 조재룡, "번역과 비평의 상관성- 조세희 『난장이가 쏘아올린 작은 공』 영?불 번역본 비교를 중심으로", 불어불문학연구, (71), pp.401~429 (2007), 한국불어불문학회
  20. Henry, J., "De l'érudition à l'échec:La note du traducteur", META, 45(2) (2000)
  21. Hutardo Albir, A., "La notion de fidélité en traduction" (1990), Didier Erudition
  22. Israel,F., "Traduction littéraire : Quels paramètres pour quelle évaluation. 번역과 통역에서의 평가", pp.2005
  23. Juhel,D., "Le rôle sociolinguistique du traducteur. in: Traduction et qualité de langue" (1990), officiel du Québec
  24. Lederer, M., "La traduction aujourd'hui" (1976), Hachette
  25. Mounin, G., "Les problèmes théoriques de la traduction" (1963), Gallimard
  26. Mounin, G., "Les belles infidèles" (1994), Universitaires de Lille
  27. Newmark, P., "A Textbook of Translation" (1988), Prentice Hall

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (10건)