연마시스템에 따른 복합레진의 표면거칠기와 연마시간에 대한 평가
The evaluation of surface roughness and polishing time between polishing systems
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
연구목적: 본 실험은 현재 임상에서 사용되고 있는 4가지 복합레진 연마 시스템의 연마 능력과 연마에 걸리는 시간을 평가하여 그 효율성을 알아보고자 하였다. 연구 재료 및 방법: 직경 4 mm, 높이 2 mm 의 테플론 몰드에 Z-250 (3M ESPE) 복합레진을 충전하고 양면을 슬라이드글라스로 압접한 후 Optilux 501을 이용하여 각 면을 40초씩 중합하였다. 중합된 복합레진 디스크를 분리하고 #320 사포로연마하여 동일한 거친면을 형성한 후 다음의 4가지 연마시스템을 이용하여 표면을 연마하였다: Sof-Lex (3M ESPE),Jiffy (Ultradent), Enhance (Dentsply/Caulk), and Pogo (Dentsply/Caulk). 연마된 면을 표면조도측정기를 이용하여거칠기를 측정하고 연마에 소요된 시간을 측정하여 연마도와 효율성을 비교 평가하였다. 통계는 one-way ANOVA후Duncan’s multiple range test를 이용하여 군간의 비교를 하였다. 결과: 연마 후 표면조도는 Pogo에서 가장 낮게 나타났으며 Sof-Lex에서 가장 높게 나타났다. 연마에 소요된 시간은 Pogo에서 가장 짧게 걸렸으며 Sof-Lex, Enhance, Jiffy의 순으로 나타났다. 결론: One-step 연마 시스템인 Pogo는 복합레진의 연마에 있어 매우 짧은 시간에 매우 매끈한 면을 얻을 수 있는 것으로 나타나 수복물의 최종 연마에 매우 효율적으로 사용할 수 있는 것으로 평가되었다.
Abstract
Objectives: The evaluation of surface roughness and polishing time between polishing systems Ye-Mi Kim1, Su-Jung Shin2, Min-Ju Song2, Jeong-Won Park2*1Department of Dentistry, Ewha Woman’s University Mokdong Hospital,2Department of Conservative Dentistry, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Dentistry, Seoul, Korea Objectives: The purpose of this experiment was to evaluate four different polishing systems of their polishability and polishing time. Materials and Methods: 4 mm diameter and 2 mm thickness Teflon mold was made. Z-250 (3M ESPE)hybrid composite resin was slightly overfilled and pressed with slide glass and cured with Optilux 501 for sec each side. Then the surface roughness (glass pressed: control group) was measured with profilometer. One surface of the specimen was roughened by #320 grit sand paper and polished with one of the following polishing systems; Sof-Lex (3M ESPE), Jiffy (Ultradent), Enhance (Dentsply/Caulk), or Pogo Dentsply/Caulk). The surface roughness and the total polishing time were measured. The results were analyzed with one-way ANOVA and Duncan’s multiple range test. Results: The surface roughness was lowest in Pogo, and highest in Sof-Lex. Polishing times were shortest with Pogo, and followed by the Sof-Lex, Enhance and Jiffy. Conclusions: One-step polishing system (Pogo) is very effective to get the smooth surface in a short time,therefore it can be recommended for final polishing system of the restoration. [J Kor Acad Cons Dent 2011;36(2):119-124.]
참고문헌 (21)
- Yap AU, "Finishing", polishing of composite and compomer restoratives: effectiveness of one-step systems, 2004, pp.29, 275~279
- Aykent F, "Effect of different finishing techniques for restorative materials on surface roughness and bacterial adhesion", J Prosthet Dent, 103, pp.221~227 (2010)
- Bollen CM, "Comparison of surface roughness of oral hard materials to the threshold surface roughness for bacterial plaque retention: a review of the literature", Dent Mater, 13, pp.258~269 (1997)
- Choi MS, "Changes in surface characteristics of dental resin composites after polishing", J Mater Sci Mater Med, 16, pp.347~353 (2005)
- Neme AL, "Effect ofprophylactic polishing protocols on the surface roughness of esthetic restorative materials", Oper Dent, 27, pp.50~58 (2002)
- Stoddard JW, "An evaluation of polishing agents for composite resins", J Prosthet Dent, 65, pp.491~495 (1991)
- Chung KH, "Effects of finishing and polishing procedures on the surface texture of resin composites", Dent Mater, 10, pp.325~330 (1994)
- Korkmaz Y, "The influence of one-step polishing systems on the surface roughness and microhardness of nanocomposites", Oper Dent, 33, pp.44~50 (2008)
- Chen MH, "Update on dental nanocomposites", J Dent Res, 89, pp.549~560 (2010)
- Tu¨rku¨n LS, "The effect of one-step polishing system on the surface roughness of three esthetic resin composite materials", Oper Dent, 29, pp.203~211 (2004)
- 이재용, "전？구치 겸용 혼합형 복합레진의 두 가지 연마법에 따른 표면조도", Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics, 28(5), pp.369~377 (2003), 대한치과보존학회
- van Noort R, "The surface finish of composite resin restorative materials", Br Dent J, 157, pp.360~364 (1984)
- Da Costa J, "The effect of different polishing systems on surface roughness and gloss of various resin composites", J Esthet Restor Dent, 19, pp.214~224 (2007)
- Quirynen M, "The influence of titanium abutment surface roughness on plaque accumulation and gingivitis: short-term observations", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 11, pp.169~178 (1996)
- Jones CS, "The in vivo perception of roughness of restorations", Br Dent J, 196, pp.42~45 (2004)
- Fruits TJ, "Effects of equivalent abrasive grit sizes utilizing differing polishing motions on selected restorative materials", Quintessence Int, 27, pp.279~285 (1996)
- St-Georges AJ, "Surface finish produced on three resin composites by new polishing systems", Oper Dent, 30, pp.593~597 (2005)
- Almeida GS, "The effect of mouthrinses on salivary sorption, solubility and surface degradation of a nanofilled and a hybrid resin composite", Oper Dent, 35, pp.105~111 (2010)
- Heintze SD, "Surface deterioration of dental materials after simulated toothbrushing in relation to brushing time and load", Dent Mater, 26, pp.306~319 (2010)
- Khalichi P, "The influence of triethylene glycol derived from dental composite resins on the regulation of Streptococcus mutans gene expression", Biomaterials, 30, pp.452~459 (2009)
- Senawongse P, "Surface roughness of nanofill and nanohybrid resin composites after polishing and brushing", J Esthet Restor Dent, 19, pp.265~273 (2007)