임플란트 주위 골 결손부의 이식재 크기에 따른 재생 효과 비교 연구
The comparative study - the regenerative effect depends on size of bone graft material in bone loss site around dental implant
1
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
초록
Purpose: The purpose of this study is to investigate on the regenerative capacity by using different size of graft materials around bony defect around implant. Material and Methods: Dental implant fixtures(Bio-TIS, Korea) were placed into the tibia of 8 rabbits. After placement of implant, artificial defects were created for each group, and the size of bone graft materials were used according to each designated group. 4 weeks after surgery, 8 rabbits were sacrificed. The histologic and histomorphometrical study were done for comparison of the regenerative capacity using 80-90㎛ and 200∼1000㎛ size of grafting materials of OCS-BⓇ. Result: Matured bone formation was significantly increased more in Group E1(80-90㎛) than in Group E2(200∼1000㎛). Group E1(80-90㎛) showed more significant augmentation in marginal length of graft material per unit area than Group E2(200∼1000㎛). Group E1(80-90㎛) showed more interspace in graft material than Group E2(200∼1000㎛). Control group showed no new bone formation around and inside of implanted fixture. Conclusion: Small grafting material size has great influence on bone regeneration. (J Korean Acad Periodontol 2008;38:493-502)
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study is to investigate on the regenerative capacity by using different size of graft materials around bony defect around implant. Material and Methods: Dental implant fixtures(Bio-TIS, Korea) were placed into the tibia of 8 rabbits. After placement of implant, artificial defects were created for each group, and the size of bone graft materials were used according to each designated group. 4 weeks after surgery, 8 rabbits were sacrificed. The histologic and histomorphometrical study were done for comparison of the regenerative capacity using 80-90㎛ and 200∼1000㎛ size of grafting materials of OCS-BⓇ. Result: Matured bone formation was significantly increased more in Group E1(80-90㎛) than in Group E2(200∼1000㎛). Group E1(80-90㎛) showed more significant augmentation in marginal length of graft material per unit area than Group E2(200∼1000㎛). Group E1(80-90㎛) showed more interspace in graft material than Group E2(200∼1000㎛). Control group showed no new bone formation around and inside of implanted fixture. Conclusion: Small grafting material size has great influence on bone regeneration. (J Korean Acad Periodontol 2008;38:493-502)
참고문헌 (33)
- Vincente JC, "Tissue regeneration in bone defects adjacent to endosseous implants: An experimental pilot study", Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 20, pp.41~49 (2000)
- Buser D, "Localized ridge augmentation using guided bone regeneration. I. Surgical procedure in the maxilla", Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 13, pp.29~45 (1993)
- Buser D, "Lateral ridge augmentation using autografts and barrier membranes: A clinical study with 40 partially edentulous patients", J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 54, pp.420~422 (1996)
- Nevins M, "The advantages of localized ridge augmentation prior to implant placement: A staged event", Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 14, pp.97~111 (1994)
- Fugazzotto PA, "Guided Bone regeneration around titanium implants: Report of the treatment of 1,503 sites with clinical reentries", Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 17, pp.292~299 (1997)
- Melcher AH, "Osteogenic capacity of periosteal and osteo-periosteal flaps elevated from parietal bone of the rat", Arch Oral Biol, 16, pp.573~580 (1971)
- Gottlow J, "New attachment formation as the result of controlled tissue regeneration", J Clin Periodontol, 11, pp.494~503 (1984)
- Dahlin C, "Osteopromotion for cranioplasty. An experimental study in rats using a membrane technique", J Neurosurg, 74, pp.487~491 (1991)
- Dahlin C, "Bone augmentation at fenestrated implants by an osteopromotive membranetechnique. A controlled clinical study", Clin Oral Implants Res, 2, pp.159~165 (1991)
- Dahlin C, "Generation of new bone around titanium implants usinga membrane technique: An experimental study in rabbits", Int J Oral Maxillofac implants, 4, pp.19~25 (1989)
- Becker W, "Guided tissue regeneration for implants placed into extraction sockets and for implant dehiscences: Surgical techniques and case reports", Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 10, pp.377~391 (1990)
- Becker W, "Bone formation at dehisced dental implant sites treated with implant augmentation material: A pilot study in dogs", Int J Periodont Rest Dent, 10, pp.93~101 (1990)
- Lazzara R, "Immediate implant placement into extraction sites: Surgical and restorative advantages", Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 9, pp.333~343 (1989)
- Becker W, "A comparison of three methods for promoting bone formation around implant placed into immediate extraction sockets: e-PTFE membrane alone or with either PDGF and IGF-1 or DFDB", J Periodontol, 63, pp.929~940 (1992)
- Schallhorn RG, "Iliac transplants in periodontal therapy", J Periodontol, 41(10), pp.566~580 (1970)
- Schallhorn RG, "Human allografts of iliac cancellous bone and marrow in periodontal osseous defects I. Rationale and methodology", J Periodontol, 42(10), pp.642~647 (1971)
- Uchida A, "The use of ceramics for bone replacement. A comparative study of three defferent porous ceramics", J Bone Joint Surg Br, 66, pp.269~275 (1984)
- Chang RC, "Biomechanical and histological studies of particulate hydroxyapatite implanted in femur bone defects of adult dogs", Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 29, pp.54~56 (2000)
- Strub JR, "Comparison of tricalcium phosphate and frozen allogenic bone implants in man", J Periodontol, 50, pp.624~629 (1979)
- Uchida A, "Growth of bone marrow cells on porous ceramics in vitro", J Biomed Mater Res, 21, pp.1~10 (1987)
- Vaccaro AR, "The role of the osteoconductive scaffold in synthetic bone graft", Orthopedics, 25, pp.571~578 (2002)
- Sculean A, "Healing of intra-bony defects following treatment with a composite bovine-derived xenograft(Bio-Oss Collagen) in combination with a collagen membrane (Bio-Gide PERIO)", J Clin Periodontal, 32, pp.720~724 (2005)
- Wenz B, "Analysis of the risk of transmitting bovine spongiform encephalopathy through bone grafts derived from bovine bone", Biomaterials, 22, pp.1599~1606 (2001)
- Clokie CML, "Bone. present and future. In: Dental implants: the art and science", pp.70~ (2001), W.B. Sanduers Company
- Froum SJ, "Sinus floor elevation using anorganic bovine bone matrix (OsteoGraf", N) with and without autogenous bone: a clinical, histologic, radiographic, and histomorphometric analysis- Part 2 of an ongoing prospective study, 1998, pp.18, 528~543
- John HD, "Histomorphometric analysis of natural bone mineral for maxillary sinus augmentation", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 19, pp.199~207 (2004)
- Landi L, "Maxillary sinus floor elevation using a combination of DFDBA and bovine-derived porous hydroxyapatite: a preliminary histologic and histomorphometric report", Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 20, pp.574~583 (2000)
- Aiorana C, "Treatment of maxillary ridge resorption by sinus augmentation with iliac cancellous bone, anorganic bovine bone, and endosseous implants: a clinical and histologic report", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 15, pp.873~878 (2000)
- Mellonig JT, "Human histologic evaluation of a bovine-derived bone xenograft in the treatment of periodontal osseous defects", Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 20, pp.19~29 (2000)
- Hallman M, "A 3-year prospective follow-up study of implant-supported fixed prostheses in patients subjected to maxillary sinus floor augmentation with a 80:20 mixture of deproteinized bovine bone and autogenous bone Clinical, radiographic and resonance frequency analysis", Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 34, pp.273~280 (2005)
- Norton MR, "Efficacy of bovine bone mineral for alveolar augmentation: a human histologic study", Clin Oral Implants Res, 14, pp.775~783 (2003)
- Piattelli M, "Bone reactions to anorganic bovine bone (Bio-Oss) used in sinus augmentation procedures: a histologic long-term report of 20 cases in humans", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 14, pp.835~840 (1999)
- Sartori S, "Ten-year follow-up in a maxillary sinus augmentation using anorganic bovine bone (Bio-Oss). A case report with histomorphometric evaluation", Clin Oral Implants Res, 14, pp.369~372 (2003)
