Comparative volumetric and clinical evaluation of peri-implant sulcular fluid and gingival crevicular fluid
1
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose: Peri-implant sulcular fluid (PISF) has a production mechanism similar to gingival crevicular fluid (GCF). However,limited research has been performed comparing their behavior in response to inflammation. Hence, the aim of the present study was to comparatively evaluate PISF and GCF volume with varying degrees of clinical inflammatory parameters. Methods: Screening of patients was conducted. Based on the perimucosal inflammatory status, 39 loaded implant sites were selected from 24 patients, with equal numbers of sites in healthy, peri-implant mucositis, and peri-implantitis subgroups. GCF collection was done from age- and sex-matched dentate patients, selected with gingival inflammatory status corresponding to the implant sites. Assessment of the inflammatory status for dental/implant sites was performed using probing depth (PD),plaque index/modified plaque index (PI/mPI), gingival index/simplified gingival index (GI/sGI), and modified sulcular bleeding index (BI). Sample collection was done using standardized absorbent paper strips with volumetric evaluation performed via an electronic volume quantification device. Results: Positive correlation of the PISF and GCF volume was seen with increasing PD and clinical inflammatory parameters. A higher correlation of GCF with PD (0.843) was found when compared to PISF (0.771). PISF expressed a higher covariation with increasing grades of sGI (0.885), BI (0.841), and mPI (0.734), while GCF established a moderately positive correlation with GI (0.694), BI (0.696), and PI (0.729). Conclusions: Within the limitations of this study, except for minor fluctuations, GCF and PISF volumes demonstrated a similar nature and volumetric pattern through increasing grades of inflammation, with PISF showing better correlation with the clinical parameters.
Abstract
Purpose: Peri-implant sulcular fluid (PISF) has a production mechanism similar to gingival crevicular fluid (GCF). However,limited research has been performed comparing their behavior in response to inflammation. Hence, the aim of the present study was to comparatively evaluate PISF and GCF volume with varying degrees of clinical inflammatory parameters. Methods: Screening of patients was conducted. Based on the perimucosal inflammatory status, 39 loaded implant sites were selected from 24 patients, with equal numbers of sites in healthy, peri-implant mucositis, and peri-implantitis subgroups. GCF collection was done from age- and sex-matched dentate patients, selected with gingival inflammatory status corresponding to the implant sites. Assessment of the inflammatory status for dental/implant sites was performed using probing depth (PD),plaque index/modified plaque index (PI/mPI), gingival index/simplified gingival index (GI/sGI), and modified sulcular bleeding index (BI). Sample collection was done using standardized absorbent paper strips with volumetric evaluation performed via an electronic volume quantification device. Results: Positive correlation of the PISF and GCF volume was seen with increasing PD and clinical inflammatory parameters. A higher correlation of GCF with PD (0.843) was found when compared to PISF (0.771). PISF expressed a higher covariation with increasing grades of sGI (0.885), BI (0.841), and mPI (0.734), while GCF established a moderately positive correlation with GI (0.694), BI (0.696), and PI (0.729). Conclusions: Within the limitations of this study, except for minor fluctuations, GCF and PISF volumes demonstrated a similar nature and volumetric pattern through increasing grades of inflammation, with PISF showing better correlation with the clinical parameters.
참고문헌 (40)
- American Academy of Periodontology, "Glossary of periodontal terms" (2001), American Academy of Periodontology
- Loe H, "Prevalence and severity", Acta Odontol Scand, 21, pp.533~551 (1963)
- Loe H., "The gingival index, the plaque index and the retention index systems", J Periodontol, 38(6), pp.610~616 (1967)
- Mombelli A, "The microbiota associated with successful or failing osseointegrated titanium implants", Oral Microbiol Immunol, 2, pp.145~151 (1987)
- Lindquist LW, "Bone resorption around fixtures in edentulous patients treated with mandibular fixed tissue-integrated prostheses", J Prosthet Dent, 59, pp.59~63 (1988)
- Apse P, "The Toronto Study : peri-implant mucosal response", Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 11, pp.94~111 (1991)
- Gargiulo AW, "Dimensions and relations of dentogingival junctions in humans", J Periodontol, 32, pp.261~267 (1961)
- Karbach J, "Comparison of five parameters as risk factors for peri-mucositis", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 24, pp.491~496 (2009)
- Black GV, "The fibers and glands of the peridental membrane", Dent Cosmos, 41, pp.101~122 (1899)
- Brill N, "Influence of capillary permeability on flow of tissue fluid into gingival pockets", Acta Odontol Scand, 17, pp.23~33 (1959)
- Egelberg J., "Permeability of the dento-gingival blood vessels. 1. Application of the vascular labelling method and gingival fluid measurements", J Periodontal Res, 1, pp.180~191 (1966)
- Egelberg J., "Permeability of the dento-gingival blood vessels. III. Chronically inflamed gingivae", J Periodontal Res, 1, pp.287~296 (1966)
- Alfano MC, "The origin of gingival fluid", J Theor Biol, 47, pp.127~136 (1974)
- Pashley DH, "A mechanistic analysis of gingival fluid production", J Periodontal Res, 11, pp.121~134 (1976)
- Griffiths GS, "Associations between volume and flow rate of gingival crevicular fluid and clinical assessments of gingival inflammation in a population of British male adolescents", J Clin Periodontol, 19, pp.464~470 (1992)
- Ozkavaf A, "Relationship between the quantity of gingival crevicular fluid and clinical periodontal status", J Oral Sci, 42, pp.231~238 (2000)
- Lindhe J, "Experimental periodontitis in the beagle dog", Int Dent J, 23, pp.432~437 (1973)
- Stewart JE, "Reliability of filter-strip sampling of gingival crevicular fluid for volume determination using the Periotron", J Periodontal Res, 28, pp.227~230 (1993)
- Apse P, "Microbiota and crevicular fluid collagenase activity in the osseointegrated dental implant sulcus : a comparison of sites in edentulous and partially edentulous patients", J Periodontal Res, 24, pp.96~105 (1989)
- Lang NP, "Working Group 4 of Seventh European Workshop on Periodontology. Periimplant diseases: where are we now? Consensus of the Seventh European Workshop on Periodontology", J Clin Periodontol, 38(11), pp.178~181 (2011)
- Hatipoglu H, "Impact of the distinct sampling area on volumetric features of gingival crevicular fluid", J Periodontol, 78, pp.705~715 (2007)
- Tozum TF, "Critical steps in electronic volume quantification of gingival crevicular fluid: the potential impact of evaporation, fluid retention, local conditions and repeated measurements", J Periodontal Res, 39, pp.344~357 (2004)
- Ciantar M, "Periotron 8000 : calibration characteristics and reliability", J Periodontal Res, 33, pp.259~264 (1998)
- Lindhe J, "Group D of European Workshop on Periodontology. Peri-implant diseases: Consensus Report of the Sixth European Workshop on Periodontology", J Clin Periodontol, 35(8), pp.282~285 (2008)
- Lang NP, "Do mucositis lesions around implants differ from gingivitis lesions around teeth?", J Clin Periodontol, 38(11), pp.182~187 (2011)
- Froum SJ, "A proposed classification for peri-implantitis", Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 32, pp.533~540 (2012)
- Mombelli A, "Depth-force-patterns in periodontal probing", J Clin Periodontol, 13, pp.126~130 (1986)
- Strbac GD, "Cathepsin K levels in the crevicular fluid of dental implants : a pilot study", J Clin Periodontol, 33, pp.302~308 (2006)
- Salvi GE, "Diagnostic parameters for monitoring peri-implant conditions", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 19, pp.116~127 (2004)
- 2Luterbacher S, "Diagnostic characteristics of clinical and microbiological tests for monitoring periodontal and peri-implant mucosal tissue conditions during supportive periodontal therapy(SPT)", Clin Oral Implants Res, 11, pp.521~529 (2000)
- Listgarten MA, "Periodontal tissues and their counterparts around endosseous implants", Clin Oral Implants Res, 2, pp.1~19 (1991)
- Chaytor DV, "The longitudinal effectiveness of osseointegrated dental implants. The Toronto Study: bone level changes", Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 11, pp.112~125 (1991)
- Schierano G, "TNF-alpha TGF-beta2 and IL-1beta levels in gingival and peri-implant crevicular fluid before and after de novo plaque accumulation", J Clin Periodontol, 35, pp.532~538 (2008)
- Gunday S, "Analysis of potential factors affecting peri implant sulcus fluid volume", Clinical Dent Res, 35, pp.12~24 (2011)
- Tozum TF, "Analysis of thte possible impact of inflammation severity and early and delayed loading on nitric oxide metabolism around dental implants", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 20, pp.547~556 (2005)
- Guncu GN, "Myeloperoxidase as a measure of polymorphonuclear leukocyte response in inflammatory status around immediately and delayed loaded dental implants : a randomized controlled clinical trial", Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 10, pp.30~39 (2008)
- Tozum TF, "The impact of prosthetic design on the stability, marginal bone loss, peri-implant sulcus fluid volume, and nitric oxide metabolism of conventionally loaded endosseous dental implants: a 12-month clinical study", J Periodontol, 79, pp.55~63 (2008)
- Mann WV, "The correlation of gingivitis pocket depth and exudate from the gingival crevice", J Periodontol, 34, pp.379~387 (1963)
- Oliver RC, "The correlation between clinical scoring, exudate measurements and microscopic evaluation of inflammation in the gingiva", J Periodontol, 40, pp.201~209 (1969)
- Niimi A, "Crevicular fluid in the osseointegrated implant sulcus : a pilot study", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 10, pp.434~436 (1995)