Survival of 352 titanium implants placed in 181 patients: a 4-year multicenter field study
2
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose: The aim of this retrospective chart review was to evaluate the four-year survival rate of a titanium implant system. Methods: A total of 352 sand-blasted, thermally acid-etched titanium implants were inserted into 181 partially or completely edentulous patients. Their cumulative survival rate was evaluated retrospectively. Associated factors, such as the implant distribution and treatment type were included in the evaluation. Results: The implants were equally distributed between the maxilla (52.3%) and the mandible (47.7%). 48 implants (13.6%) were placed in the anterior region and 304 implants (86.4%) in the posterior region. The majority of the implants were inserted into bone of type II and III quality (89.8%) and volume (quantity B and C, 87.2%). Most of the implants (70.7%) were restored as single crowns; 28.7% supported a bridge construction and 0.6% a full denture. Only one implant failed, resulting in a four-year cumulative survival rate of 99.7%. Conclusions: The implant system showed an excellent four-year survival rate. It proved to be a safe and predictable means for restoration of the dentition in partially or completely edentulous patients.
Abstract
Purpose: The aim of this retrospective chart review was to evaluate the four-year survival rate of a titanium implant system. Methods: A total of 352 sand-blasted, thermally acid-etched titanium implants were inserted into 181 partially or completely edentulous patients. Their cumulative survival rate was evaluated retrospectively. Associated factors, such as the implant distribution and treatment type were included in the evaluation. Results: The implants were equally distributed between the maxilla (52.3%) and the mandible (47.7%). 48 implants (13.6%) were placed in the anterior region and 304 implants (86.4%) in the posterior region. The majority of the implants were inserted into bone of type II and III quality (89.8%) and volume (quantity B and C, 87.2%). Most of the implants (70.7%) were restored as single crowns; 28.7% supported a bridge construction and 0.6% a full denture. Only one implant failed, resulting in a four-year cumulative survival rate of 99.7%. Conclusions: The implant system showed an excellent four-year survival rate. It proved to be a safe and predictable means for restoration of the dentition in partially or completely edentulous patients.
참고문헌 (20)
- Adell R, "A 15-year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw", Int J Oral Surg, 10, pp.387~416 (1981)
- Henry PJ, "Osseointegrated implants for single-tooth replacement: a prospective 5-year multicenter study", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 11, pp.450~455 (1996)
- Lekholm U, "Survival of the Brånemark implant in partially edentulous jaws: a 10-year prospective multicenter study", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 14, pp.639~645 (1999)
- Cochran D, "Implant therapy I", Ann Periodontol, 1, pp.707~791 (1996)
- Martinez H, "Optimal implant stabilization in low density bone", Clin Oral Implants Res, 12, pp.423~432 (2001)
- Meredith N, "Assessment of implant stability as a prognostic determinant", Int J Prosthodont, 11, pp.491~501 (1998)
- Barewal RM, "Resonance frequency measurement of implant stability in vivo on implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched surface", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 18, pp.641~651 (2003)
- Buser D, "Interface shear strength of titanium implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched surface: a biomechanical study in the maxilla of miniature pigs", J Biomed Mater Res, 45, pp.75~83 (1999)
- Cochran DL, "A comparison of endosseous dental implant surfaces", J Periodontol, 70, pp.1523~1539 (1999)
- Cutler SJ, "Maximum utilization of the life table method in analyzing survival", J Chronic Dis, 8, pp.699~712 (1958)
- Lekholm U, "Tissue-integrated prostheses: osseointegration in clinical dentistry", pp.199~209 (1985), Quintessence
- Albrektsson T, "Current interpretations of the osseointegrated response: clinical significance", Int J Prosthodont, 6, pp.95~105 (1993)
- Buser D, "Long-term evaluation of non-submerged ITI implants. Part 1: 8-year life table analysis of a prospective multi-center study with 2359 implants", Clin Oral Implants Res, 8, pp.161~172 (1997)
- Krennmair G, "Clinical outcome of root-shaped dental implants of various diameters:5-year results", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 25, pp.357~366 (2010)
- Cochran D, "Clinical field trial examining an implant with a sand-blasted, acid-etched surface", J Periodontol, 78, pp.974~982 (2007)
- Albrektsson T, "Oral implant surfaces: Part 1: review focusing on topographic and chemical properties of different surfaces and in vivo responses to them", Int J Prosthodont, 17, pp.536~543 (2004)
- Lossdorfer S, "Microrough implant surface topographies increase osteogenesis by reducing osteoclast formation and activity", J Biomed Mater Res A, 70, pp.361~369 (2004)
- Buser D, "Influence of surface characteristics on bone integration of titanium implants: a histomorphometric study in miniature pigs", J Biomed Mater Res, 25, pp.889~902 (1991)
- Wennerberg A, "A 1-year follow-up of implants of differing surface roughness placed in rabbit bone", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 12, pp.486~494 (1997)
- Lazzara RJ, "A human histologic analysis of osseotite and machined surfaces using implants with 2 opposing surfaces", Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 19, pp.117~129 (1999)