본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

“Over-inlay” block graft and differential morphometry: a novel block graft model to study bone regeneration and host-to-graft interfaces in rats

1

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류치의학

초록

Purpose: The aim of this study was to present new a model that allows the study of the bone healing process, with an emphasis on the biological behavior of different graft-tohost interfaces. A standardized “over-inlay” surgical technique combined with a differential histomorphometric analysis is presented in order to optimize the use of critical-size calvarial defects in pre-clinical testing. Methods: Critical-size defects were created into the parietal bone of 8 male Wistar rats. Deproteinized bovine bone (DBBM) blocks were inserted into the defects, so that part of the block was included within the calvarial thickness and part exceeded the calvarial height (an “over-inlay” graft). All animals were sacrificed at 1 or 3 months. Histomorphometric and immunohistochemical evaluation was carried out within distinct regions of interest (ROIs): the areas adjacent to the native bone (BA), the periosteal area (PA) and the central area (CA). Results: The animals healed without complications. Differential morphometry allowed the examination of the tissue composition within distinct regions: the BA presented consistent amounts of new bone formation (NB), which increased over time (24.53%±1.26% at 1 month; 37.73%±0.39% at 3 months), thus suggesting that this area makes a substantial contribution toward NB. The PA was mainly composed of fibrous tissue (71.16%±8.06% and 78.30%±2.67%, respectively), while the CA showed high amounts of DBBM at both time points (78.30%±2.67% and 74.68%±1.07%, respectively), demonstrating a slow remodeling process. Blood vessels revealed a progressive migration from the interface with native bone toward the central area of the graft. Osterix-positive cells observed at 1 month within the PA suggested that the periosteum was a source of osteoprogenitor elements. Alkaline phosphatase data on matrix deposition confirmed this observation. Conclusions: The present model allowed for a standardized investigation of distinct graft-to-host interfaces both at vertically augmented and inlay-augmented sites, thus possibly limiting the number of animals required for pre-clinical investigations.

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study was to present new a model that allows the study of the bone healing process, with an emphasis on the biological behavior of different graft-tohost interfaces. A standardized “over-inlay” surgical technique combined with a differential histomorphometric analysis is presented in order to optimize the use of critical-size calvarial defects in pre-clinical testing. Methods: Critical-size defects were created into the parietal bone of 8 male Wistar rats. Deproteinized bovine bone (DBBM) blocks were inserted into the defects, so that part of the block was included within the calvarial thickness and part exceeded the calvarial height (an “over-inlay” graft). All animals were sacrificed at 1 or 3 months. Histomorphometric and immunohistochemical evaluation was carried out within distinct regions of interest (ROIs): the areas adjacent to the native bone (BA), the periosteal area (PA) and the central area (CA). Results: The animals healed without complications. Differential morphometry allowed the examination of the tissue composition within distinct regions: the BA presented consistent amounts of new bone formation (NB), which increased over time (24.53%±1.26% at 1 month; 37.73%±0.39% at 3 months), thus suggesting that this area makes a substantial contribution toward NB. The PA was mainly composed of fibrous tissue (71.16%±8.06% and 78.30%±2.67%, respectively), while the CA showed high amounts of DBBM at both time points (78.30%±2.67% and 74.68%±1.07%, respectively), demonstrating a slow remodeling process. Blood vessels revealed a progressive migration from the interface with native bone toward the central area of the graft. Osterix-positive cells observed at 1 month within the PA suggested that the periosteum was a source of osteoprogenitor elements. Alkaline phosphatase data on matrix deposition confirmed this observation. Conclusions: The present model allowed for a standardized investigation of distinct graft-to-host interfaces both at vertically augmented and inlay-augmented sites, thus possibly limiting the number of animals required for pre-clinical investigations.

참고문헌 (40)

  1. Khan SN, "The biology of bone grafting", J Am Acad Orthop Surg, 13, pp.77~86 (2005)
  2. Giuliani N, "New insights into osteogenic and chondrogenic differentiation of human bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells and their potential clinical applications for bone regeneration in pediatric orthopaedics", Stem Cells Int, 2013, pp.312501~ (2013)
  3. Wang P, "Bone tissue engineering via human induced pluripotent, umbilical cord and bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells in rat cranium", Acta Biomater, 18, pp.236~248 (2015)
  4. Liu W, "Canonical Wnt signaling differently modulates osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells derived from bone marrow and from periodontal ligament under inflammatory conditions", Biochim Biophys Acta, 1840, pp.1125~1134 (2014)
  5. Colnot C, "Current insights on the regenerative potential of the periosteum: molecular, cellular, and endogenous engineering approaches", J Orthop Res, 30, pp.1869~1878 (2012)
  6. Zhang X, "Periosteal progenitor cell fate in segmental cortical bone graft transplantations: implications for functional tissue engineering", J Bone Miner Res, 20, pp.2124~2137 (2005)
  7. Nagata M, "A clinical study of alveolar bone tissue engineering with cultured autogenous periosteal cells: coordinated activation of bone formation and resorption", Bone, 50, pp.1123~1129 (2012)
  8. Gomes PS, "Rodent models in bone-related research: the relevance of calvarial defects in the assessment of bone regeneration strategies", Lab Anim, 45, pp.14~24 (2011)
  9. Stavropoulos A, "Pre-clinical in vivo models for the screening of bone biomaterials for oral", craniofacial indications: focus on small-animal models, 2015, pp.68, 55~65
  10. Bosch C, "Importance of the critical-size bone defect in testing bone-regenerating materials", J Craniofac Surg, 9, pp.310~316 (1998)
  11. Donos N, "Effect of GBR in combination with deproteinized bovine bone mineral and", or enamel matrix proteins on the healing of critical-size defects, 2004, pp.15, 101~111
  12. Zigdon-Giladi H, "Peripheral blood-derived endothelial progenitor cells enhance vertical bone formation", Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 17, pp.83~92 (2015)
  13. Hopper RA, "Effect of isolation of periosteum and dura on the healing of rabbit calvarial inlay bone grafts", Plast Reconstr Surg, 107, pp.454~462 (2001)
  14. Guskuma MH, "Bone regeneration in surgically created defects filled with autogenous bone: an epifluorescence microscopy analysis in rats", J Appl Oral Sci, 18, pp.346~353 (2010)
  15. Russell WM, "The principles of humane experimental technique" (1959), Methuen
  16. Faul F, "G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences", Behav Res Methods, 39, pp.175~191 (2007)
  17. Cacchioli A, "Preliminary study on the mineral apposition rate in distal femoral epiphysis of New Zealand white rabbit at skeletal maturity", Anat Histol Embryol, 41, pp.163~169 (2012)
  18. Fontana F, "Biocompatibility and manageability of a new fixable bone graft for the treatment of localized bone defects: preliminary study in a dog model", Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 28, pp.601~607 (2008)
  19. Zecha PJ, "Applicability of equine hydroxyapatite collagen (eHAC) bone blocks for lateral augmentation of the alveolar crest. A histological and histomorphometric analysis in rats", Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 40, pp.533~542 (2011)
  20. Xuan F, "Vertical ridge augmentation using xenogenous bone blocks: a comparison between the flap and tunneling procedures", J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 72, pp.1660~1670 (2014)
  21. Li J, "Minimally invasive ridge augmentation using xenogenous bone blocks in an atrophied posterior mandible: a clinical and histological study", Implant Dent, 22, pp.112~116 (2013)
  22. Rothamel D, "Vertical ridge augmentation using xenogenous bone blocks: a histomorphometric study in dogs", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 24, pp.243~250 (2009)
  23. De Santis E, "Healing at mandibular block-grafted sites. An experimental study in dogs", Clin Oral Implants Res, 26, pp.516~522 (2015)
  24. Araújo MG, "Lateral ridge augmentation by the use of grafts comprised of autologous bone or a biomaterial. An experiment in the dog", J Clin Periodontol, 29, pp.1122~1131 (2002)
  25. Hoffman MD, "Emulating native periosteum cell population and subsequent paracrine factor production to promote tissue engineered periosteum-mediated allograft healing", Biomaterials, 52, pp.426~440 (2015)
  26. Adeyemo WL, "Influence of host periosteum and recipient bed perforation on the healing of onlay mandibular bone graft: an experimental pilot study in the sheep", Oral Maxillofac Surg, 12, pp.19~28 (2008)
  27. Vajgel A, "A systematic review on the critical size defect model", Clin Oral Implants Res, 25, pp.879~893 (2014)
  28. Fuegl A, "The impact of ovariectomy and hyperglycemia on graft consolidation in rat calvaria", Clin Oral Implants Res, 22, pp.524~529 (2011)
  29. Milani S, "Deproteinized bovine bone remodeling pattern in alveolar socket: a clinical immunohistological evaluation", Clin Oral Implants Res, 27, pp.295~302 (2016)
  30. Steigmann M, "A bovine-bone mineral block for the treatment of severe ridge deficiencies in the anterior region: a clinical case report", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 23, pp.123~128 (2008)
  31. Hämmerle CH, "Ridge augmentation by applying bioresorbable membranes and deproteinized bovine bone mineral: a report of twelve consecutive cases", Clin Oral Implants Res, 19, pp.19~25 (2008)
  32. Felice P, "Vertical ridge augmentation of the atrophic posterior mandible with interpositional block grafts: bone from the iliac crest versus bovine anorganic bone", Eur J Oral Implantology, 1, pp.183~198 (2008)
  33. Felice P, "Reconstruction of an atrophied posterior mandible with the inlay technique and inorganic bovine bone block : a case report", Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 30, pp.583~591 (2010)
  34. Veis A, "Evaluation of vertical bone regeneration using block and particulate forms of bio-oss bone graft: a histologic study in the rabbit mandible", J Oral Implantol, 41, pp.e66~e72 (2015)
  35. Antunes AA, "Treatment of circumferential defects with osseoconductive xenografts of different porosities: a histological, histometric, resonance frequency analysis, and micro-CT study in dogs", Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 17(Suppl 1), pp.e202~e220 (2015)
  36. Alberius P, "Onlay bone graft behaviour after marrow exposure of the recipient rat skull bone", Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg, 30, pp.257~266 (1996)
  37. Marins LV, "Radiographic and histological study of perennial bone defect repair in rat calvaria after treatment with blocks of porous bovine organic graft material", J Appl Oral Sci, 12, pp.62~69 (2004)
  38. Park JC, "Induction of bone formation by Escherichia coli-expressed recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 using block-type macroporous biphasic calcium phosphate in orthotopic and ectopic rat models", J Periodontal Res, 46, pp.682~690 (2011)
  39. Alberius P, "Osteopontin and bone sialoprotein distribution at the bone graft recipient site", Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 124, pp.1382~1386 (1998)
  40. Murata M, "Bone augmentation by recombinant human BMP-2 and collagen on adult rat parietal bone", Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 28, pp.232~237 (1999)

관련 논문AI추천

Regenerative capacity of augmented bone in rat calvarial guided bone augmentation modelAkira Hasuike, Katsuyoshi Tsunori, Shuichi Sato, Takanobu Yamamoto, Tatsuya Kubota, Yasumasa Ozawa, Yutaka Yamada대한치주과학회 · Journal of Periodontal & Implant Science2017 · 제47권 제2호Vertical bone augmentation using collagenated or non-collagenated bone substitute materials with or without recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 in a rabbit calvarial model임현창, 정의원, 팽경원, Goran I. Benic대한치주과학회 · Journal of Periodontal & Implant Science2023 · 제53권 제6호Evaluation of regeneration after the application of 2 types of deproteinized bovine bone mineral to alveolar bone defects in adult dogs김성태, 안진수, 이다정, 이윤섭, 이정태대한치주과학회 · Journal of Periodontal & Implant Science2022 · 제52권 제5호Tomographic and histometric analysis of autogenous bone block and synthetic hydroxyapatite block grafts without rigid fixation on rabbit calvaria박정철, 배수용, 신현승, 이용근, 정의원, 최성호대한치주과학회 · Journal of Periodontal & Implant Science2014 · 제44권 제5호Comparative analysis of the in vivo kinetic properties of various bone substitutes filled into a peri-implant canine defect modelEriko Marukawa, Jingyang Kang, Katsuya Hyodo, Masahiko Terauchi, Masaki Shibasaki, Narumi Oshibe대한치주과학회 · Journal of Periodontal & Implant Science2024 · 제54권 제2호The evaluation of the correlation between histomorphometric analysis and micro-computed tomography analysis in AdBMP-2 induced bone regeneration in rat calvarial defects구기태, 김경화, 박신영, 설양조, 이강운, 이용무, 정종평대한치주과학회 · Journal of Periodontal & Implant Science2011 · 제41권 제5호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (6건)