Endocrown restorations for extensively damaged posterior teeth: clinical performance of three cases
2
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The restoration of endodontically treated teeth (ETT) with more than one cusp missing and thin remaining walls is challenging for the general practitioner. The use of posts combined with full coverage restorations is a well-established approach, yet not following the minimal invasive principles of adhesive dentistry. Endocrowns are indirect monoblock restorations that use the pulp chamber of the ETT for retention. In this study the fabrication of 4 endocrowns and their clinical performance will be discussed. Two clinical cases include computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing manufactured molar endocrowns (one feldspathic ceramic and one hybrid composite-ceramic restoration) and the other two are dental laboratory manufactured resin composite premolar endocrown restorations. The modified United States Public Health Service criteria were used to assess the clinical behavior of the restorations at different follow up periods. Endocrown restorations present a satisfactory clinical alternative, either by the use of resin composite or glass ceramic and hybrid materials. Specific guidelines with minimal alterations should be followed for an endocrown restoration to be successful. Due to limited evidence regarding the long term evaluation of this restorative technique, a careful selection of cases should be applied.
Abstract
The restoration of endodontically treated teeth (ETT) with more than one cusp missing and thin remaining walls is challenging for the general practitioner. The use of posts combined with full coverage restorations is a well-established approach, yet not following the minimal invasive principles of adhesive dentistry. Endocrowns are indirect monoblock restorations that use the pulp chamber of the ETT for retention. In this study the fabrication of 4 endocrowns and their clinical performance will be discussed. Two clinical cases include computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing manufactured molar endocrowns (one feldspathic ceramic and one hybrid composite-ceramic restoration) and the other two are dental laboratory manufactured resin composite premolar endocrown restorations. The modified United States Public Health Service criteria were used to assess the clinical behavior of the restorations at different follow up periods. Endocrown restorations present a satisfactory clinical alternative, either by the use of resin composite or glass ceramic and hybrid materials. Specific guidelines with minimal alterations should be followed for an endocrown restoration to be successful. Due to limited evidence regarding the long term evaluation of this restorative technique, a careful selection of cases should be applied.
참고문헌 (31)
- Dietschi D, "Biomechanical considerations for the restoration of endodontically treated teeth: a systematic review of the literature, part II (evaluation of fatigue behavior, interfaces, and in vivo studies)", Quintessence Int, 39, pp.117~129 (2008)
- Rocca GT, "Crown and post-free adhesive restorations for endodontically treated posterior teeth : from direct composite to endocrowns", Eur J Esthet Dent, 8, pp.156~179 (2013)
- Pissis P, "Fabrication of a metal-free ceramic restoration utilizing the monobloc technique", Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent, 7, pp.83~94 (1995)
- Bindl A, "Clinical evaluation of adhesively placed Cerec endo-crowns after 2 years--preliminary results", J Adhes Dent, 1, pp.255~265 (1999)
- Otto T, "Computer-aided direct all-ceramic crowns: preliminary 1-year results of a prospective clinical study", Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 24, pp.446~455 (2004)
- Biacchi GR, "Comparison of fracture strength of endocrowns and glass fiber post-retained conventional crowns", Oper Dent, 37, pp.130~136 (2012)
- Bindl A, "Survival of ceramic computer-aided design", manufacturing crowns bonded to preparations with reduced macroretention geometry, 2005, pp.18, 219~224
- Zhu J, "Influence of remaining tooth structure and restorative material type on stress distribution in endodontically treated maxillary premolars : a finite element analysis", J Prosthet Dent, 117, pp.646~655 (2017)
- Ramírez-Sebastià A, "Composite vs ceramic computer-aided design", computer-assisted manufacturing crowns in endodontically treated teeth : analysis of marginal adaptation, 2013, pp.38, 663~673
- Fages M, "The endocrown: a different type of all-ceramic reconstruction for molars", J Can Dent Assoc, 79, pp.d140~ (2013)
- Belleflamme MM, "No post-no core approach to restore severely damaged posterior teeth: an up to 10-year retrospective study of documented endocrown cases", J Dent, 63, pp.1~7 (2017)
- Michael Einhorn, "Preparation Ferrule Design Effect on Endocrown Failure Resistance", Journal of Prosthodontics, 28(1), pp.e237~e242 (2019), Wiley[DOI]
- Jotkowitz A, "Rethinking ferrule--a new approach to an old dilemma", Br Dent J, 209, pp.25~33 (2010)
- Ma PS, "Load fatigue of teeth with different ferrule lengths, restored with fiber posts, composite resin cores, and all-ceramic crowns", J Prosthet Dent, 102, pp.229~234 (2009)
- Litzenburger AP, "Fully automatic CAD design of the occlusal morphology of partial crowns compared to dental technicians' design", Clin Oral Investig, 17, pp.491~496 (2013)
- Maria Carlos Real Dias, "Prognosis of Indirect Composite Resin Cuspal Coverage on Endodontically Treated Premolars and Molars: An In Vivo Prospective Study", Journal of Prosthodontics, 27(7), pp.598~604 (2018), Wiley[DOI]
- da Cunha LF, "Lithium silicate endocrown fabricated with a CAD-CAM system : a functional and esthetic protocol", J Prosthet Dent, 118, pp.131~134 (2017)
- Mahesh B, "Endocrown : conservative treatment modality for restoration of endodontically treated teeth – a case report", Endodontology, 27, pp.188~191 (2015)
- Chen C, "The fracture resistance of a CAD", CAM Resin Nano Ceramic(RNC)and a CAD ceramic at different thicknesses, 2014, pp.30, 954~962
- Gaintantzopoulou MD, "Effect of preparation depth on the marginal and internal adaptation of computer-aided design", computer-assisted manufacture endocrowns, 2016, pp.41, 607~616
- Awada A, "Mechanical properties of resin-ceramic CAD", CAM restorative materials, 2015, pp.114, 587~593
- El-Damanhoury HM, "Fracture resistance and microleakage of endocrowns utilizing three CAD-CAM blocks", Oper Dent, 40, pp.201~210 (2015)
- Gresnigt MM, "Fracture strength, failure type and Weibull characteristics of lithium disilicate and multiphase resin composite endocrowns under axial and lateral forces", Dent Mater, 32, pp.607~614 (2016)
- Shin Y, "Evaluation of the marginal and internal discrepancies of CAD-CAM endocrowns with different cavity depths : an in vitro study", J Prosthet Dent, 117, pp.109~115 (2017)
- Bernhart J, "Cerec3D endocrowns--two-year clinical examination of CAD", CAM crowns for restoring endodontically treated molars, 2010, pp.13, 141~154
- Lin CL, "Finite element and Weibull analyses to estimate failure risks in the ceramic endocrown and classical crown for endodontically treated maxillary premolar", Eur J Oral Sci, 118, pp.87~93 (2010)
- Trivedi S, "Finite element analysis : a boon to dentistry", J Oral Biol Craniofac Res, 4, pp.200~203 (2014)
- Magne P, "Simulated fatigue resistance of composite resin versus porcelain CAD", CAM overlay restorations on endodontically treated molars, 2009, pp.40, 125~133
- Magne P, "Influence of overlay restorative materials and load cusps on the fatigue resistance of endodontically treated molars", Quintessence Int, 40, pp.729~737 (2009)
- Sedrez-Porto JA, "Endocrown restorations : a systematic review and meta-analysis", J Dent, 52, pp.8~14 (2016)
- Otto T, "Clinical performance of chairside CAD", CAM feldspathic ceramic posterior shoulder crowns and endocrowns up to 12 years, 2015, pp.18, 147~161