The effects of hard and soft tissue grafting and individualization of healing abutments at immediate implants: an experimental study in dogs
1
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose: To evaluate the effects of intra-alveolar socket grafting, subepithelial connective tissue grafts, and individualized abutments on peri-implant hard and soft tissue outcomes following immediate implant placement. Methods: This randomized experimental study employed 5 mongrel dogs, with 4 sites per dog (total of 20 sites). The mesial roots of P3 and P4 were extracted in each hemimandible and immediate dental implants were placed. Each site was randomly assigned to 1 of 4 different treatment groups: standardized healing abutment (control group), alloplastic bone substitute material (BSS) + standardized healing abutment (SA group), BSS + individualized healing abutment (IA group), and BSS + individualized healing abutment + a subepithelial connective tissue graft (IAG group). Clinical, histological, and profilometric analyses were performed. The intergroup differences were calculated using the Bonferroni test, setting statistical significance at P<0.05. Results: Clinically, the control and SA groups demonstrated a coronal shift in the buccal height of the mucosa (0.88±0.48 mm and 0.37±1.1 mm, respectively). The IA and IAG groups exhibited an apical shift of the mucosa (−0.7±1.15 mm and −1.1±0.96 mm, respectively). Histologically, the SA and control groups demonstrated marginal mucosa heights of 4.1±0.28 mm and 4.0±0.53 mm relative to the implant shoulder, respectively. The IA and IAG groups, in contrast, only showed a height of 2.6 mm. In addition, the height of the mucosa in relation to the most coronal buccal bone crest or bone substitute particles was not significantly different among the groups. Volumetrically, the IA group (−0.73±0.46 mm) lost less volume on the buccal side than the control (−0.93±0.44 mm), SA (−0.97±0.73 mm), and IAG (−0.88±0.45 mm) groups. Conclusions: The control group demonstrated the most favorable change of height of the margo mucosae and the largest dimensions of the peri-implant soft tissues. However, the addition of a bone substitute material and an individualized healing abutment resulted in slightly better preservation of the peri-implant soft tissue contour.
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the effects of intra-alveolar socket grafting, subepithelial connective tissue grafts, and individualized abutments on peri-implant hard and soft tissue outcomes following immediate implant placement. Methods: This randomized experimental study employed 5 mongrel dogs, with 4 sites per dog (total of 20 sites). The mesial roots of P3 and P4 were extracted in each hemimandible and immediate dental implants were placed. Each site was randomly assigned to 1 of 4 different treatment groups: standardized healing abutment (control group), alloplastic bone substitute material (BSS) + standardized healing abutment (SA group), BSS + individualized healing abutment (IA group), and BSS + individualized healing abutment + a subepithelial connective tissue graft (IAG group). Clinical, histological, and profilometric analyses were performed. The intergroup differences were calculated using the Bonferroni test, setting statistical significance at P<0.05. Results: Clinically, the control and SA groups demonstrated a coronal shift in the buccal height of the mucosa (0.88±0.48 mm and 0.37±1.1 mm, respectively). The IA and IAG groups exhibited an apical shift of the mucosa (−0.7±1.15 mm and −1.1±0.96 mm, respectively). Histologically, the SA and control groups demonstrated marginal mucosa heights of 4.1±0.28 mm and 4.0±0.53 mm relative to the implant shoulder, respectively. The IA and IAG groups, in contrast, only showed a height of 2.6 mm. In addition, the height of the mucosa in relation to the most coronal buccal bone crest or bone substitute particles was not significantly different among the groups. Volumetrically, the IA group (−0.73±0.46 mm) lost less volume on the buccal side than the control (−0.93±0.44 mm), SA (−0.97±0.73 mm), and IAG (−0.88±0.45 mm) groups. Conclusions: The control group demonstrated the most favorable change of height of the margo mucosae and the largest dimensions of the peri-implant soft tissues. However, the addition of a bone substitute material and an individualized healing abutment resulted in slightly better preservation of the peri-implant soft tissue contour.
참고문헌 (35)
- Lang NP, "A systematic review on survival and success rates of implants placed immediately into fresh extraction sockets after at least 1 year", Clin Oral Implants Res, 23(Suppl 5), pp.39~66 (2012)
- Covani U, "A 10-year evaluation of implants placed in fresh extraction sockets: a prospective cohort study", J Periodontol, 83, pp.1226~1234 (2012)
- Hämmerle CH, "Consensus statements and recommended clinical procedures regarding the placement of implants in extraction sockets", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 19(Suppl), pp.26~28 (2004)
- Esposito M, "Timing of implant placement after tooth extraction: immediate, immediate-delayed or delayed implants? A Cochrane systematic review", Eur J Oral Implantology, 3, pp.189~205 (2010)
- Belser UC, "Outcome evaluation of early placed maxillary anterior single-tooth implants using objective esthetic criteria: a cross-sectional, retrospective study in 45 patients with a 2- to 4-year follow-up using pink and white esthetic scores", J Periodontol, 80, pp.140~151 (2009)
- Merheb J, "Critical buccal bone dimensions along implants", Periodontol 2000, 66, pp.97~105 (2014)
- Vignoletti F, "Surgical protocols for ridge preservation after tooth extraction. A systematic review", Clin Oral Implants Res, 23(Suppl 5), pp.22~38 (2012)
- Chen ST, "Esthetic outcomes following immediate and early implant placement in the anterior maxilla--a systematic review", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 29(Suppl), pp.186~215 (2014)
- Tarnow DP, "Flapless postextraction socket implant placement in the esthetic zone: part 1. The effect of bone grafting and", or provisional restoration on facial-palatal ridge dimensional change-a retrospective cohort study, 2014, pp.34, 323~331
- Caneva M, "Deproteinized bovine bone mineral in marginal defects at implants installed immediately into extraction sockets: an experimental study in dogs", Clin Oral Implants Res, 23, pp.106~112 (2012)
- Araújo MG, "Socket grafting with the use of autologous bone: an experimental study in the dog", Clin Oral Implants Res, 22, pp.9~13 (2011)
- Migliorati M, "Clinical and aesthetic outcome with post-extractive implants with or without soft tissue augmentation: a 2-year randomized clinical trial", Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 17, pp.983~995 (2015)
- Yoshino S, "Effects of connective tissue grafting on the facial gingival level following single immediate implant placement and provisionalization in the esthetic zone: a 1-year randomized controlled prospective study", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 29, pp.432~440 (2014)
- Zuiderveld EG, "Effect of connective tissue grafting on peri-implant tissue in single immediate implant sites: A RCT", J Clin Periodontol, 45, pp.253~264 (2018)
- De Bruyn H, "Three-years clinical outcome of immediate provisionalization of single Osseospeed(™) implants in extraction sockets and healed ridges", Clin Oral Implants Res, 24, pp.217~223 (2013)
- Chu SJ, "Flapless postextraction socket implant placement, part 2: the effects of bone grafting and provisional restoration on peri-implant soft tissue height and thickness- a retrospective study", Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 35, pp.803~809 (2015)
- Cooper LF, "Immediate provisionalization of dental implants placed in healed alveolar ridges and extraction sockets: a 5-year prospective evaluation", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 29, pp.709~717 (2014)
- Kilkenny C, "Animal research: reporting in vivo experiments--the ARRIVE guidelines", J Cereb Blood Flow Metab, 31, pp.991~993 (2011)
- De Rouck T, "Instant provisionalization of immediate single-tooth implants is essential to optimize esthetic treatment outcome", Clin Oral Implants Res, 20, pp.566~570 (2009)
- Cooper LF, "Comparison of radiographic and clinical outcomes following immediate provisionalization of single-tooth dental implants placed in healed alveolar ridges and extraction sockets", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 25, pp.1222~1232 (2010)
- Quirynen M, "The influence of titanium abutment surface roughness on plaque accumulation and gingivitis: short-term observations", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 11, pp.169~178 (1996)
- Quirynen M, "An in vivo study of the influence of the surface roughness of implants on the microbiology of supra- and subgingival plaque", J Dent Res, 72, pp.1304~1309 (1993)
- Welander M, "The mucosal barrier at implant abutments of different materials", Clin Oral Implants Res, 19, pp.635~641 (2008)
- Abrahamsson I, "The mucosal attachment at different abutments. An experimental study in dogs", J Clin Periodontol, 25, pp.721~727 (1998)
- Dahlin C, "Bone tissue modelling and remodelling following guided bone regeneration in combination with biphasic calcium phosphate materials presenting different microporosity", Clin Oral Implants Res, 26, pp.814~822 (2015)
- Schmidlin PR, "Evaluation of moldable, in situ hardening calcium phosphate bone graft substitutes", Clin Oral Implants Res, 24, pp.149~157 (2013)
- Yip I, "Defect healing with various bone substitutes", Clin Oral Implants Res, 26, pp.606~614 (2015)
- Kakar A, "Ridge preservation using an in situ hardening biphasic calcium phosphate (β-TCP", HA) bone graft substitute-a clinical, radiological, and histological study, 2017, pp.3, 25~
- Lückerath W, "The effect of primary stabilization of the graft in a combined surgical and prosthodontic ridge preservation protocol: a prospective controlled clinical pilot study", Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 38, pp.e49~e58 (2018)
- Favero V, "Sinus floor elevation outcomes following perforation of the Schneiderian membrane. An experimental study in sheep", Clin Oral Implants Res, 27, pp.233~240 (2016)
- Naenni N, "Histologic analyses of flapless ridge preservation in sockets with buccal dehiscence defects using two alloplastic bone graft substitutes", Clin Oral Investig (2019)
- Raes F, "Immediate and conventional single implant treatment in the anterior maxilla: 1-year results of a case series on hard and soft tissue response and aesthetics", J Clin Periodontol, 38, pp.385~394 (2011)
- Blanco J, "Ridge alterations following immediate implant placement in the dog: flap versus flapless surgery", J Clin Periodontol, 35, pp.640~648 (2008)
- Chen ST, "Immediate implant placement postextraction without flap elevation", J Periodontol, 80, pp.163~172 (2009)
- Fickl S, "Bone loss after full-thickness and partial-thickness flap elevation", J Clin Periodontol, 38, pp.157~162 (2011)