본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Sloshing design load prediction of a membrane type LNG cargo containment system with two-row tank arrangement in offshore applications

2

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류조선공학

초록

This paper addresses the safety of two-row tank design by performing the extensive sloshing model tests. Owing to the uncertainties entangled with the scale law transforming the measured impact pressure up to the full scale one, so called comparative approach was taken to derive the design sloshing load. The target design vessel was chosen as 230 K LNG-FPSO with tow-row tank arrangement and the reference vessel as 138 K conventional LNG carrier, which has past track record without any significant failure due to sloshing loads. Starting with the site-specific metocean data, ship motion analysis was carried out with 3D diffraction-radiation program, then the obtained ship motion data was used as 6DOF tank excitation for subsequent sloshing model test and analysis. The statistical analysis was carried out with obtained peak data and the long-term sloshing load was determined out of it. It was concluded that the normalized sloshing impact pressure on 230 K LNG-FPSO with two-row tank arrangement is higher than that of convectional LNG carrier, hence requires the use of reinforced cargo containment system for the sake of failure-free operation without filling limitation.

Abstract

This paper addresses the safety of two-row tank design by performing the extensive sloshing model tests. Owing to the uncertainties entangled with the scale law transforming the measured impact pressure up to the full scale one, so called comparative approach was taken to derive the design sloshing load. The target design vessel was chosen as 230 K LNG-FPSO with tow-row tank arrangement and the reference vessel as 138 K conventional LNG carrier, which has past track record without any significant failure due to sloshing loads. Starting with the site-specific metocean data, ship motion analysis was carried out with 3D diffraction-radiation program, then the obtained ship motion data was used as 6DOF tank excitation for subsequent sloshing model test and analysis. The statistical analysis was carried out with obtained peak data and the long-term sloshing load was determined out of it. It was concluded that the normalized sloshing impact pressure on 230 K LNG-FPSO with two-row tank arrangement is higher than that of convectional LNG carrier, hence requires the use of reinforced cargo containment system for the sake of failure-free operation without filling limitation.

참고문헌 (22)

  1. American Bureau of Shipping, "Strength Assessment of Membraneetype LNG Containment Systems Under Sloshing Loads", ABS Guidance Notes, ~ (2014)
  2. Bureau Veritas, "Strength Assessment of LNG Membrane Tanks Under Sloshing Loads", BV Guideline Note, ~ (2011)
  3. Sloshing Analysis of LNG Membrane Tanks, "Det Norske Veritas", DNV, ~, pp.DNV Classification Notes No.30.9 (2014)
  4. Faltinsen, O. M., "Sloshing" (2009), Cambridge University Press
  5. Gavory, T., "Sloshing in membrane LNG carriers and its consequences from a designer's perspective", 19th ISOPE Conference, pp.13~20 (2009)
  6. Gervaise, E., "Reliability-based methodology for sloshing assessment of membrane LNG vessels", 19th ISOPE Conference, pp.183~191 (2009)
  7. Hwang, Y. S., "An experimental study and numerical simulation on sloshing impact pressures with two identically shaped rectangular 2-Dimensional model tanks with different sizes", 13th ISOPE Conference, pp.184~190 (2008)
  8. Kim, Y., "A numerical study on sloshing flows coupled with ship motion e the anti-rolling tank problem", J. Ship Res, 46(1), pp.56~62 (2002)
  9. Kim, Y., "Artificial damping in water wave problems I : constant damping", Int. J. Offshore Polar Eng, 13(2), pp.88~93 (2003)
  10. Kim, Y., "Experimental and numerical analyses of sloshing flow", J. Eng. Math, 58, pp.191~210 (2007)
  11. Kim, Y., "Sensitivity study on computational parameters for prediction of slosh-induced impact pressure", Int. J. Offshore Polar Eng, 16(2), pp.04~111 (2006)
  12. Kim, Y., "Model-scale sloshing tests for an anti-sloshing blanket system", Int. J. Offshore Polar Eng, 23(4), pp.254~262 (2013)
  13. Kuo, J. F., "LNG tank sloshing assessment methodology e the new generation", 19th ISOPE Conference, pp.1~12 (2009)
  14. Lloyds Register, "Sloshing Assessment Guidance Document for Membrane Tank LNG Operations", LR Guidance Notes, ~ (2009)
  15. Maillard, S., "Influence of density ratios between liquid and gas on sloshing model test results", 19th Int. Offshore and Polar Eng. Conf. (2009), ISOPE
  16. Malenica, S., "Combined semi-analytical and finite element approach for hydro structure interactions during sloshing impacts - sloshel project", 19th ISOPE Conference, pp.143~152 (2009)
  17. Pastoor, W., "Sloshing load and response in LNG carriers for new designs, new operations and new trades", 21st GASTECH Conference (2005)
  18. Rognebakke, O., "Sloshing impact design load assessment", 19th ISOPE Conference, pp.252~260 (2009)
  19. Ryu, M.C., "Reference load for a conventional 138K cbm LNG carrier in a comparative approach", OMAE Conference (2009)
  20. Ryu, M. C., "Sloshing load assessment for LNG offshore units with a two-row tank arrangement", 19th Int. Offshore and Polar Eng. Conf, pp.284~294 (2009)
  21. Ryu, M. C., "Reference load for a 138K cbm LNG carrier in a comparative approach", ASME 28th Int. Conference on Ocean, pp.9~110 (2009), Offshore and Arctic Engineering
  22. Zhang, C., "Analysis of liquid sloshing in LNG carrier with wedgeshaped tanks", Ocean. Eng, 105, pp.304~317 (2015)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (8건)