A new procedure for load-shortening and -elongation data for progressive collapse method
1
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Progressive Collapse Method (PCM) has been broadly applied to predict moment-carrying capacity of a hull girder, however accuracy of PCM has not been much studied. Accuracy of PCM is known to be dependent on how Load-Shortening and -Elongation (LSE) curve of a structural units are well predicted. This paper presents a new procedure to determine LSE datum based on box girder Finite Element Analyses (FEAs) instead of using finite element model of stiffened panels. To verify reliability of FEA results, the simple box girder collapse test results are compared with FEA results of same box girders. It reveals one frame-based box girder model is sufficiently accurate in terms of ultimate strengths of the box girders. After extracting LSE data from the box girders, PCM-based moment-carrying capacities are compared with those from FEAs of the box girders. PCM results are found to be equivalent to FEAs in terms of moment-carrying capacity if accurate LSE data are secured. The new procedure is applied to well-known 1/3 scaled frigate full section. Very excellent moment-carrying capacity of frigate hull section is obtained from PCM with LSE data from box girder FEAs.
Abstract
Progressive Collapse Method (PCM) has been broadly applied to predict moment-carrying capacity of a hull girder, however accuracy of PCM has not been much studied. Accuracy of PCM is known to be dependent on how Load-Shortening and -Elongation (LSE) curve of a structural units are well predicted. This paper presents a new procedure to determine LSE datum based on box girder Finite Element Analyses (FEAs) instead of using finite element model of stiffened panels. To verify reliability of FEA results, the simple box girder collapse test results are compared with FEA results of same box girders. It reveals one frame-based box girder model is sufficiently accurate in terms of ultimate strengths of the box girders. After extracting LSE data from the box girders, PCM-based moment-carrying capacities are compared with those from FEAs of the box girders. PCM results are found to be equivalent to FEAs in terms of moment-carrying capacity if accurate LSE data are secured. The new procedure is applied to well-known 1/3 scaled frigate full section. Very excellent moment-carrying capacity of frigate hull section is obtained from PCM with LSE data from box girder FEAs.
참고문헌 (25)
- Amlashi, H. K. K., "Ultimate strength analysis of a bulk carrier hull girder under alternate hold loading condition e a case study Part 1:nonlinear finite element modelling and ultimate hull girder capacity", Mar. Struct, 21(4), pp.327~352 (2008)
- Benson, S., "Compartment level progressive collapse analysis of lightweight ship structures", Mar. Struct, 31, pp.44~62 (2013)
- Caldwell, J. B., "Ultimate longitudinal strength", Trans. RINA, 107, pp.411~430 (1965)
- Choung, J., "Assessment of residual ultimate strength of an asymmetrically damaged tanker considering rotational and translational shifts of neutral axis plane", Mar. Struct, 25, pp.71~84 (2012)
- 정준모, "Residual ultimate strength of a very large crude carrier considering probabilistic damage extents", International Journal of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering, 6(1), pp.14~26 (2014), 대한조선학회
- Dow R.S., "Testing and analysis of a 1", 3-scale welded steel frigate model, 1991, 749~773
- Gordo, J. M., "Approximate method to evaluate the hull girder collapse strength", Mar. Struct, 9, pp.449~470 (1996)
- Gordo, J. M., "Interaction equation for the collapse of tankers and container ships under combined bending moments", J. Ship Res, 41(3), pp.230~240 (1997)
- Gordo, J. M., "Approximate assessment of the ultimate longitudinal strength of the hull girder", J Ship Res, 4(1), pp.60~69 (1996)
- Hughes, O. F., "Ship Structural Analysis and Design" (2010), Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineers
- International Association of Classification Societies, "Common Structural Rules for Bulk Carriers and Oil Tankers", IACS, ~ (2015)
- International Ship and Offshore Structures Congress, "Special Task Committee VI.2 Ultimate Hull Girder Strength", 14th ISSC, pp.2000~ (2000)
- Investigation Report on Structural Safety of Large Container Ships, "Nippon Kaiji Kyokai", NKK, ~ (2014)
- Nishihara, S., "Ultimate longitudinal strength of mid-ship cross section", Nav. Archit. Ocean Eng, 22, pp.200~214 (1984)
- Nam, J. M., "Assessment of residual ultimate strength of vlcc according to damage extents and average compressive strength of stiffened panel", Proceedings of the ASME 2014 33rd International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering (OMAE2014) (2014)
- Paik, J. K., "Modified Paik-Mansour formula for ultimate strength calculations of ship hulls", Ships Offshore Struct, 8(3-4), pp.246~260 (2013)
- Paik, J. K., "A simple formulation for predicting the ultimate strength of ships", J. Mar. Sci. Technol, 1(1), pp.52~62 (1995)
- Paik, J. K., "Methods for ultimate limit state assessment of ships and ship-shaped offshore structures: part III hull girders", Ocean Eng, 35, pp.281~286 (2008)
- Paik, J. K., "Ultimate strength of ship hulls under combined vertical bending, horizontal bending and shearing forces", Trans. SNAME, 104, pp.31~59 (1996)
- Qi, E., "Comparative study of ultimate hull girder strength of large double hull tankers", Mar. Struct, 18, pp.227~249 (2005)
- Smith, C. S., "Influence of local compression failure on ultimate longitudinal strength of a ship hull", Proceeding of International Symposium on Practical Design in Shipbuilding (PRADS), pp.73~79 (1977)
- Smith, C. S., "Strength and stiffness of ships' plating under in-plane compression and tension", Trans. RINA, 130, pp.277~296 (1988)
- Tayyar, G. T., "Prediction of hull girder momentcarrying capacity using kinematic displacement theory", Mar. Struct, 39, pp.157~173 (2014)
- Wang, G., "Longitudinal strength of ships with accidental damages", Mar. Struct, 15, pp.119~138 (2002)
- Xu, M., "Ultimate strength assessment of a tanker hull based on experimentally developed master curves", J. Mar. Sci. Appl, 12, pp.127~139 (2013)