본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Smear layer removal by passive ultrasonic irrigation and 2 new mechanical methods for activation of the chelating solution

Machado Ricardo|da Silva Isadora|Comparin Daniel|de Mattos Bianca Araujo Marques|Alberton Luiz Rômulo|da Silva Neto Ulisses Xavier
대한치과보존학회 (Korean Academy Of Conservative Dentistry)|2021.02|Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics|제46권 제1호|pp. 1-11|DOI 10.5395/rde.2021.46.e11

2

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

IrrigationCleaningRoot canal
주제분류치의학

초록

Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare smear layer removal by conventional application (CA), passive ultrasonic irrigation (PUI), EasyClean (EC), and XP-Endo Finisher (XPF), using 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) after chemomechanical preparation, as evaluated with scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Materials and Methods: Forty-five single-rooted human mandibular premolars were selected for this study. After chemomechanical preparation, the teeth were randomly divided into 5 groups according to the protocol for smear layer removal, as follows: G1 (control): CA of distilled water; G2 (CA): CA of 17% EDTA; G3 (PUI): 17% EDTA activated by PUI; G4 (EC): 17% EDTA activated by EC; and G5 (XPF): 17% EDTA activated by XPF. SEM images (×1,000) were obtained from each root third and scored by 3 examiners. Data were evaluated using the Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn tests (p < 0.05). Results: In the apical third, there were no statistically significant differences among the groups (p > 0.05). In the cervical and middle thirds, the experimental groups performed better than the control group (p < 0.05); however, G2 presented better results than G3, G4, and G5 (p < 0.05), which showed no differences among one another (p > 0.05). Conclusions: No irrigation method was able to completely remove the smear layer, especially in the apical third. Using CA for the chelating solution performed better than any form of activation.

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare smear layer removal by conventional application (CA), passive ultrasonic irrigation (PUI), EasyClean (EC), and XP-Endo Finisher (XPF), using 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) after chemomechanical preparation, as evaluated with scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Materials and Methods: Forty-five single-rooted human mandibular premolars were selected for this study. After chemomechanical preparation, the teeth were randomly divided into 5 groups according to the protocol for smear layer removal, as follows: G1 (control): CA of distilled water; G2 (CA): CA of 17% EDTA; G3 (PUI): 17% EDTA activated by PUI; G4 (EC): 17% EDTA activated by EC; and G5 (XPF): 17% EDTA activated by XPF. SEM images (×1,000) were obtained from each root third and scored by 3 examiners. Data were evaluated using the Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn tests (p < 0.05). Results: In the apical third, there were no statistically significant differences among the groups (p > 0.05). In the cervical and middle thirds, the experimental groups performed better than the control group (p < 0.05); however, G2 presented better results than G3, G4, and G5 (p < 0.05), which showed no differences among one another (p > 0.05). Conclusions: No irrigation method was able to completely remove the smear layer, especially in the apical third. Using CA for the chelating solution performed better than any form of activation.

참고문헌 (37)

  1. Siqueira JF Jr, "Clinical implications and microbiology of bacterial persistence after treatment procedures", J Endod, 34, pp.1291~1301 (2008)
  2. Haapasalo M, "Irrigation in endodontics", Br Dent J, 216, pp.299~303 (2014)
  3. Violich DR, "The smear layer in endodontics - a review", Int Endod J, 43, pp.2~15 (2010)
  4. Machado R, "Evaluation of 17% EDTA and 10% citric acid in smear layer removal and tubular dentin sealer penetration", Microsc Res Tech, 81, pp.275~282 (2018)
  5. Shahravan A, "Effect of smear layer on sealing ability of canal obturation: a systematic review and meta-analysis", J Endod, 33, pp.96~105 (2007)
  6. Mozo S, "Review of ultrasonic irrigation in endodontics: increasing action of irrigating solutions", Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal, 17, pp.e512~e516 (2012)
  7. Weller RN, "Efficacy of ultrasonic cleaning", J Endod, 6, pp.740~743 (1980)
  8. Leoni GB, "Ex vivo evaluation of four final irrigation protocols on the removal of hard-tissue debris from the mesial root canal system of mandibular first molars", Int Endod J, 50, pp.398~406 (2017)
  9. Mancini M, "Smear layer removal and canal cleanliness using different irrigation systems (EndoActivator, EndoVac, and passive ultrasonic irrigation):field emission scanning electron microscopic evaluation in an in vitro study", J Endod, 39, pp.1456~1460 (2013)
  10. Schmidt TF, "Effect of ultrasonic activation of irrigants on smear layer removal", J Endod, 41, pp.1359~1363 (2015)
  11. Saber SD, "Efficacy of different final irrigation activation techniques on smear layer removal", J Endod, 37, pp.1272~1275 (2011)
  12. De-Deus G, "Micro-CT comparison of XP-endo Finisher and passive ultrasonic irrigation as final irrigation protocols on the removal of accumulated hard-tissue debris from oval shaped-canals", Clin Oral Investig, 23, pp.3087~3093 (2019)
  13. Kolli S, "Efficacy of XP-endo Finisher files in endodontics", Aust Endod J, 44, pp.71~72 (2018)
  14. Kato AS, "Investigation of the efficacy of passive ultrasonic irrigation versus irrigation with reciprocating activation: an environmental scanning electron microscopic study", J Endod, 42, pp.659~663 (2016)
  15. Silva EJ, "Micro-CT evaluation of different final irrigation protocols on the removal of hard-tissue debris from isthmus-containing mesial root of mandibular molars", Clin Oral Investig, 23, pp.681~687 (2019)
  16. Bueno CR, "Cleaning effectiveness of a nickel-titanium ultrasonic tip in ultrasonically activated irrigation: a SEM study", Braz Oral Res, 33, pp.e017~ (2019)
  17. Torabinejad M, "A new solution for the removal of the smear layer", J Endod, 29, pp.170~175 (2003)
  18. Xin Y, "In vitro evaluation of the effectiveness of XP-endo Finisher file on smear layer removal after root canal instrumentation", Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi, 37, pp.48~52 (2019)
  19. Haupt F, "Effectiveness of different activated irrigation techniques on debris and smear layer removal from curved root canals: a SEM evaluation", Aust Endod J, 46, pp.40~46 (2020)
  20. Ballal V, "Evaluation of smear layer removal using different irrigation methods in root canals", Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent, 27, pp.97~102 (2019)
  21. Mancini M, "FESEM evaluation of smear layer removal using different irrigant activation methods (EndoActivator, EndoVac, PUI and LAI). An in vitro study", Clin Oral Investig, 22, pp.993~999 (2018)
  22. Caron G, "Effectiveness of different final irrigant activation protocols on smear layer removal in curved canals", J Endod, 36, pp.1361~1366 (2010)
  23. Singh N, "A comparative evaluation of different irrigation activation systems on smear layer removal from root canal: an in-vitro scanning electron microscope study", J Conserv Dent, 17, pp.159~163 (2014)
  24. Kuah HG, "The effect of EDTA with and without ultrasonics on removal of the smear layer", J Endod, 35, pp.393~396 (2009)
  25. Perez F, "Effect of a low-concentration EDTA solution on root canal walls: a scanning electron microscopic study", Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 99, pp.383~387 (2005)
  26. Mancini M, "A comparative study of smear layer removal and erosion in apical intraradicular dentine with three irrigating solutions: a scanning electron microscopy evaluation", J Endod, 35, pp.900~903 (2009)
  27. Shahriari S, "Efficacy of sodium hypochlorite activated with laser in intracanal smear layer removal: an SEM study", J Lasers Med Sci, 8, pp.36~41 (2017)
  28. Machado R, "Residual smear layer after root canal instrumentation by using Niti, M-Wire and CM-Wire instruments: a scanning electron microscopy analysis", Eur J Dent, 12, pp.403~409 (2018)
  29. Susin L, "Canal and isthmus debridement efficacies of two irrigant agitation techniques in a closed system", Int Endod J, 43, pp.1077~1090 (2010)
  30. Marina Carvalho Prado, "The use of auxiliary devices during irrigation to increase the cleaning ability of a chelating agent", Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics, 42(2), pp.105~110 (2017), 대한치과보존학회
  31. Wu L, "Comparison of the effect of four decalcifying agents combined with 60°C 3% sodium hypochlorite on smear layer removal", J Endod, 38, pp.381~384 (2012)
  32. Goel S, "Smear layer removal with passive ultrasonic irrigation and the NaviTip FX: a scanning electron microscopic study", Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 108, pp.465~470 (2009)
  33. Gulabivala K, "The fluid mechanics of root canal irrigation", Physiol Meas, 31, pp.R49~R84 (2010)
  34. De-Deus G, "Accumulated hard tissue debris produced during reciprocating and rotary nickeltitanium canal preparation", J Endod, 41, pp.676~681 (2015)
  35. Marques AC, "Evaluation of influence of widening apical preparation of root canals on efficiency of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid agitation protocols: study by scanning electron microscopy", J Contemp Dent Pract, 19, pp.1087~1094 (2018)
  36. Simezo AP, "Comparative analysis of dentinal erosion after passive ultrasonic irrigation versus irrigation with reciprocating activation: an environmental scanning electron study", J Endod, 43, pp.141~146 (2017)
  37. Kanaan CG, "Can irrigant agitation lead to the formation of a smear layer?", J Endod, 46, pp.1120~1124 (2020)

관련 논문AI추천

Smear layer removal by different chemical solutions used with or without ultrasonic activation after post preparationAna Claudia Poletto, Andressa Cavalaro, Cássia Cilene Dezan Garbelini, Daniel Poletto, Leopoldo Cosme-Silva, Márcio Grama Hoeppner, Ricardo Machado대한치과보존학회 · Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics2017 · 제42권 제4호The effect of ultrasonic file sizes on smear layer removal in passive ultrasonic irrigation정세라, 조형훈, Ara Cho, Hye-Ju Kang, Mi-Gon Park대한치과의사협회 · 대한치과의사협회지2020 · 제58권 제5호Comparison of cleaning efficacy of various irrigation methods민정범, 조형훈, 황호길치의학연구원 · Oral Biology Research2015 · 제39권 제1호The use of auxiliary devices during irrigation to increase the cleaning ability of a chelating agentFernanda Leal, Heloisa Gusman, Maíra do Prado, Marina Carvalho Prado, Renata Antoun Simão대한치과보존학회 · Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics2017 · 제42권 제2호Impact of different agitation methods on smear layer cleaning of mesial canals with accentuated curvatureAlcalde Murilo Priori, Bonjardim Leonardo Rigoldi, Cordova Abel Teves, Duarte Marco Antonio Hungaro, Klymus Michel Espinosa, Vivan Rodrigo Ricci대한치과보존학회 · Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics2024 · 제49권 제2호Effect of passive ultrasonic agitation during final irrigation on cleaning capacity of hybrid instrumentationAndré Augusto Franco Marques,, Eduardo Hideki Suzuki, Emílio Carlos Sponchiado Júnior, Lucas da Fonseca Roberti Garcia, Maíra Sousa de Carvalho, Marcilene Coelho Vinhorte대한치과보존학회 · Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics2014 · 제39권 제2호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (14건)

Impact of root canal curvature and instrument type on the amount of extruded debris during retreatmentSerefoglu Burcu, Kandemir Demirci Gözde, Miçooğulları Kurt Seniha, Kaşıkçı Bilgi İlknur, Çalışkan Mehmet Kemalpp. 1-13In vitro apical pressure created by 2 irrigation needles and a multisonic system in mandibular molarsArias Ana, Ordinola-Zapata Ronald, Crepps Joseph T., Lin Feipp. 1-7Biocompatibility and bioactive potential of the NeoMTA Plus endodontic bioceramic-based sealerda Silva Guilherme Ferreira, Guerreiro-Tanomaru Juliane Maria, Tanomaru-Filho Mário, Hoshino Roberto Alameda, Delfino Mateus Machado, Sasso-Cerri Estela, Cerri Paulo Sérgiopp. 1-16The effect of different confluence confirmation strategies on the obturation of Vertucci type II canal: micro-CT analysis서민석, Do Seungjaepp. 1-9Clinical efficacy of activated irrigation in endodontics: a focused reviewCheung Amelia Wan Tin, Lee Angeline Hui Cheng, Cheung Gary Shun Panpp. 1-16
원문 보기