『실낙원』의 남북한 번역 양상 연구 –사탄의 재현을 중심으로–
A Study of Satan’s representation in South and North Korean translations of Paradise Lost
2
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study examines the translations of Paradise Lost translated in South and North Korea. Using Mona Baker’s Narrative Theory and Framing Concept and Kathryn Batchelor’s Paratext Concept as the theoretical basis, this study explores the representation of Satan in the source text and analyzes how its aspects were reframed in the South and North Korean translations’ paratext and main body. It specifically reviews the paratext’s preface and the commentary on the work, and it analyzes Satan’s appearance, action, and speech in the main body. The analysis shows that reframing took place mainly through selective appropriation and labelling during the translation process. In the paratext, the South Korean translation frames Paradise Lost as a Christian poem. The North Korean translation however transforms the source text into a radical political poem and reframes it as a communist narrative. Whereas the South Korean translation tends to weaken the positive narrative of Satan, the North Korean translation strengthens the positive narrative of Satan and relates it to the North Korean political narrative. The transformed Satan in the North Korean translation shares similarities with the role model of an autonomous communist common in the North Korean literature.
Abstract
This study examines the translations of Paradise Lost translated in South and North Korea. Using Mona Baker’s Narrative Theory and Framing Concept and Kathryn Batchelor’s Paratext Concept as the theoretical basis, this study explores the representation of Satan in the source text and analyzes how its aspects were reframed in the South and North Korean translations’ paratext and main body. It specifically reviews the paratext’s preface and the commentary on the work, and it analyzes Satan’s appearance, action, and speech in the main body. The analysis shows that reframing took place mainly through selective appropriation and labelling during the translation process. In the paratext, the South Korean translation frames Paradise Lost as a Christian poem. The North Korean translation however transforms the source text into a radical political poem and reframes it as a communist narrative. Whereas the South Korean translation tends to weaken the positive narrative of Satan, the North Korean translation strengthens the positive narrative of Satan and relates it to the North Korean political narrative. The transformed Satan in the North Korean translation shares similarities with the role model of an autonomous communist common in the North Korean literature.
참고문헌 (48)
- 김영희, "북한 영문학 서설", 안과 밖, 11, pp.9~6 (2001)
- 김예진, "해방기 서울신문사의 Song of Ariran 번역과 중간파 민족주의의 발현", 번역학연구, 20(5), pp.7~34 (2019), 한국번역학회[DOI]
- 북한의 국영 출판 체계와 남북한 출판물 교류에 관한 연구, "김용범", 한국문화정책개발원, ~ (1999)
- 김정웅, "주체적 문예리론의 기본 2" (1992), 문예출판사
- 도해자, "북한에서 ‘근대’ 영문학을 보는 시각", 영미연구, 29, pp.45~70 (2013), 영미연구소
- 도해자, "셰익스피어 비극에 대한 북한의 인식", 영미연구, 38, pp.3~34 (2016), 영미연구소
- 도해자, "미국 소설에 대한 북한의 인식", 인문연구, (86), pp.89~114 (2019), 인문과학연구소[DOI]
- 리기도, "주체의 문예관과 외국 문학" (1996), 문학예술종합출판사
- 문상민, "서구라파 문학개관" (1958), 국립문학예술서적출판사
- 문희경, "고전 영문학의 흐름" (2000), 고려대학교 출판부
- 밀턴, 존, "실낙원" (1989), 범우사
- 밀톤, 죤, "실락원" (1992), 문예출판사
- 백과사전출판사, "광명백과사전 6: 문학예술" (2008), 김일성종합대학출판사
- 사회과학원 문학 연구소, "문학예술 사전" (1972), 사회과학출판사
- 송은지, "번역과 이데올로기 연구의 인지번역학적 접근", 통역과 번역, 21(3), pp.75~100 (2019), 한국통역번역학회[DOI]
- 신일철, "북한의 주체연구" (1993), 나남
- 영미문학 연구회 평가 사업단, "영미 명작, 좋은 번역을 찾아서" (2005), 창비
- 오기성, "북한 문학의 기본적 정향에 관한 연구", 북한, 3, pp.174~185 (1998)
- 오오무라, "윤동주와 한국문학" (2003), 소명출판
- 윤재근, "북한의 현대문학 II" (1990), 고려원
- 이강선, "남·북한의 『미국의 비극』 번역본에 나타난 차이 -종교 리터러시를 적용한 번역어-", 통역과 번역, 22(3), pp.83~116 (2020), 한국통역번역학회[DOI]
- 이은정, "북한 문학번역과 수용의 프레이밍 연구: Gone With the Wind 를 중심으로", 박사, pp.2019
- 이은정, "북한의 통치 담론에 따른 여성 인물의 리프레이밍 연구", 번역학연구, 21(2), pp.225~249 (2020), 한국번역학회[DOI]
- 이혜승, "내러티브 프레이밍의 관점에서 분석한 The Great Escape: Health, Wealth and the Origins of Inequality 한국어 번역", 번역학연구, 20(1), pp.201~237 (2019), 한국번역학회[DOI]
- 전영선, "북한의 문학예술 운영체계와 문예이론" (2002), 영락
- 최경희, "북한의 셰익스피어-셰익스피어 비평과 번역본 점검을 중심으로", 안과 밖, 11, pp.37~58 (2001)
- 한국영어영문학회, "영국문학사" (1959), 신구문화사
- 한중모, "주체의 인간학" (1987), 사회과학출판사
- 홍기삼, "북한의 문예이론" (1981), 평민사
- Bachelor, K, "Translation and Paratext" (2018), Routledge
- Baker, M, "Translation and Conflict : A Narrative Account" (2006), Routledge
- Baker, M., "Reframing conflict in translation", Social Semiotics, 17(2), pp.151~169 (2007)
- Blake, W., "Milton Criticism: Selections From Four Centuries", pp.352~353 (1956), Octagon Books
- Carey, J, "The Cambridge Companion to Milton", pp.131~146 (1989), Cambridge UP
- Empson, W, "Milton’s God" (1961), Chatto & Widus
- Genette, G, "Paratexts : Thresholds of Interpretation" (1987), Cambridge UP
- Goffman, E, "Frame Analysis : An Essay on the Organization of Experience" (1974), Northeastern UP
- Hamilton, R, "Hero or Fool : A Study of Milton’s Satan" (1944), George Allen & Unwin
- Kovala, U., "Translations, Paratextual Mediation, and Ideological Closure", Target, 8(1), pp.119~147 (1996)
- Lefevere, A, "The Translation Studies Reader", pp.233~249 (2000), Routledge
- Lewis, C, "A Preface to Paradise Lost" (1970), Oxford UP
- Milton, J, "Paradise Lost" (1971), Longman
- Potter, L, "A Preface to Milton" (1989), Longman
- Shelley, P., "Milton Criticism:Selections From Four Centuries", pp.358~359 (1956), Octagon Books
- Summers, C, "Text, Extratext, metatext, and Paratext in Translation", pp.9~13 (2013), Cambridge Scholars
- Tahir-Gűrҫağlar, Ş., "dCrosscultural Transgressions: Research Model in Translation Studies 2:Historical and ideological Issues", pp.44~60 (2002), St Jerome Publishing
- Venuti, L, "The Translation Studies Reader", pp.468~487 (1999), Routledge
- Williams, C, "Milton Criticism", pp.252~266 (1951), Routledge & Kegan Paul Ltd