Effects of dentin surface preparations on bonding of self-etching adhesives under simulated pulpal pressure
2
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Objectives: This study evaluated the effects of different smear layer preparations on the dentin permeability and microtensile bond strength (µTBS) of 2 self-etching adhesives (Clearfil SE Bond [CSE] and Clearfil Tri-S Bond Universal [CTS]) under dynamic pulpal pressure. Materials and methods: Human third molars were cut into crown segments. The dentin surfaces were prepared using 4 armamentaria: 600-grit SiC paper, coarse diamond burs, superfine diamond burs, and carbide burs. The pulp chamber of each crown segment was connected to a dynamic intra-pulpal pressure simulation apparatus, and the permeability test was done under a pressure of 15 cmH2O. The relative permeability (%P) was evaluated on the smear layer-covered and bonded dentin surfaces. The teeth were bonded to either of the adhesives under pulpal pressure simulation, and cut into sticks after 24 hours water storage for the µTBS test. The resin-dentin interface and nanoleakage observations were performed using a scanning electron microscope. Statistical comparisons were done using analysis of variance and post hoc tests. Results: Only the method of surface preparation had a significant effect on permeability (p < 0.05). The smear layers created by the carbide and superfine diamond burs yielded the lowest permeability. CSE demonstrated a higher µTBS, with these values in the superfine diamond and carbide bur groups being the highest. Microscopic evaluation of the resin-dentin interface revealed nanoleakage in the coarse diamond bur and SiC paper groups for both adhesives. Conclusions: Superfine diamond and carbide burs can be recommended for dentin preparation with the use of 2-step CSE.
Abstract
Objectives: This study evaluated the effects of different smear layer preparations on the dentin permeability and microtensile bond strength (µTBS) of 2 self-etching adhesives (Clearfil SE Bond [CSE] and Clearfil Tri-S Bond Universal [CTS]) under dynamic pulpal pressure. Materials and methods: Human third molars were cut into crown segments. The dentin surfaces were prepared using 4 armamentaria: 600-grit SiC paper, coarse diamond burs, superfine diamond burs, and carbide burs. The pulp chamber of each crown segment was connected to a dynamic intra-pulpal pressure simulation apparatus, and the permeability test was done under a pressure of 15 cmH2O. The relative permeability (%P) was evaluated on the smear layer-covered and bonded dentin surfaces. The teeth were bonded to either of the adhesives under pulpal pressure simulation, and cut into sticks after 24 hours water storage for the µTBS test. The resin-dentin interface and nanoleakage observations were performed using a scanning electron microscope. Statistical comparisons were done using analysis of variance and post hoc tests. Results: Only the method of surface preparation had a significant effect on permeability (p < 0.05). The smear layers created by the carbide and superfine diamond burs yielded the lowest permeability. CSE demonstrated a higher µTBS, with these values in the superfine diamond and carbide bur groups being the highest. Microscopic evaluation of the resin-dentin interface revealed nanoleakage in the coarse diamond bur and SiC paper groups for both adhesives. Conclusions: Superfine diamond and carbide burs can be recommended for dentin preparation with the use of 2-step CSE.
참고문헌 (40)
- Van Meerbeek B, "State of the art of selfetch adhesives", Dent Mater, 27, pp.17~28 (2011)
- Van Landuyt KL, "Systematic review of the chemical composition of contemporary dental adhesives", Biomaterials, 28, pp.3757~3785 (2007)
- Tay FR, "Single-step, self-etch adhesives behave as permeable membranes after polymerization. Part I. Bond strength and morphologic evidence", Am J Dent, 17, pp.271~278 (2004)
- Wagner A, "Bonding performance of universal adhesives in different etching modes", J Dent, 42, pp.800~807 (2014)
- Marchesi G, "Adhesive performance of a multi-mode adhesive system: 1-year in vitro study", J Dent, 42, pp.603~612 (2014)
- Nagarkar S, "Universal dental adhesives: current status, laboratory testing, and clinical performance", J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater, 107, pp.2121~2131 (2019)
- Rosa WL, "Bond strength of universal adhesives: a systematic review and meta-analysis", J Dent, 43, pp.765~776 (2015)
- Ciucchi B, "Dentinal fluid dynamics in human teeth, in vivo", J Endod, 21, pp.191~194 (1995)
- Hosaka K, "Effect of simulated pulpal pressure on all-in-one adhesive bond strengths to dentine", J Dent, 35, pp.207~213 (2007)
- Mahdan MH, "Combined effect of smear layer characteristics and hydrostatic pulpal pressure on dentine bond strength of HEMA-free and HEMA-containing adhesives", J Dent, 41, pp.861~871 (2013)
- Moll K, "Effect of intrinsic and extrinsic moisture on bond strength to dentine", J Oral Rehabil, 27, pp.150~165 (2000)
- Mitchem JC, "Adhesion to dentin with and without smear layer under varying degrees of wetness", J Prosthet Dent, 66, pp.619~622 (1991)
- Prati C, "Hydrostatic intrapulpal pressure and bond strength of bonding systems", Dent Mater, 7, pp.54~58 (1991)
- Ermis RB, "Bond strength of self-etch adhesives to dentin prepared with three different diamond burs", Dent Mater, 24, pp.978~985 (2008)
- Saikaew P, "The effect of dentine surface preparation and reduced application time of adhesive on bonding strength", J Dent, 47, pp.63~70 (2016)
- Semeraro S, "Effect of different bur grinding on the bond strength of self-etching adhesives", Oper Dent, 31, pp.317~323 (2006)
- Tani C, "Effect of smear layer thickness on bond strength mediated by three all-in-one selfetching priming adhesives", J Adhes Dent, 4, pp.283~289 (2002)
- Sattabanasuk V, "Resin-dentin bond strength as related to different surface preparation methods", J Dent, 35, pp.467~475 (2007)
- Saikaew P, "Effect of smear layer and surface roughness on resin-dentin bond strength of self-etching adhesives", Dent Mater J, 37, pp.973~980 (2018)
- Pashley DH, "Dentin bonding: overview of the substrate with respect to adhesive material", J Esthet Dent, 3, pp.46~50 (1991)
- Oliveira SS, "The influence of the dentin smear layer on adhesion: a self-etching primer vs. a total-etch system", Dent Mater, 19, pp.758~767 (2003)
- Tay FR, "Effect of smear layers on the bonding of a self-etching primer to dentin", J Adhes Dent, 2, pp.99~116 (2000)
- Reis A, "Effect of smear layer thickness and acidity of self-etching solutions on early and long-term bond strength to dentin", J Dent, 33, pp.549~559 (2005)
- Armstrong S, "Academy of Dental Materials guidance on in vitro testing of dental composite bonding effectiveness to dentin", enamel using microtensile bond strength (μTBS) approach, 2017, pp.33, 133~143
- Carvalho AO, "Effect of adhesive system and application strategy on reduction of dentin permeability", Braz Oral Res, 26, pp.397~403 (2012)
- Pashley DH, "Effects of the smear layer, Copalite, and oxalate on microleakage", Oper Dent, 11, pp.95~102 (1986)
- Sauro S, "Effect of simulated pulpal pressure on dentin permeability and adhesion of self-etch adhesives", Dent Mater, 23, pp.705~713 (2007)
- Siegel SC, "Dental cutting with diamond burs: heavy-handed or light-touch?", J Prosthodont, 8, pp.3~9 (1999)
- Tay FR, "Two modes of nanoleakage expression in single-step adhesives", J Dent Res, 81, pp.472~476 (2002)
- Pashley DH, "The effects of acid etching on the in-vivo permeability of dentine in the dog", Arch Oral Biol, 28, pp.555~559 (1983)
- Prati C, "Dentin morphology and permeability after brushing with different toothpastes in the presence and absence of smear layer", J Periodontol, 73, pp.183~190 (2002)
- Saikaew P, "Ultra-morphological characteristics of dentin surfaces after different preparations and treatments", Eur J Oral Sci, 128, pp.246~254 (2020)
- Czonstkowsky M, "The smear layer in endodontics", Dent Clin North Am, 34, pp.13~25 (1990)
- Pashley DH, "Smear layer: overview of structure and function", Proc Finn Dent Soc, 88(Supplement 1), pp.215~224 (1992)
- Masic A, "Osmotic pressure induced tensile forces in tendon collagen", Nat Commun, 6, pp.5942~ (2015)
- Sherman VR, "The materials science of collagen", J Mech Behav Biomed Mater, 52, pp.22~50 (2015)
- Sahin C, "In vitro permeability of etch-and-rinse and self-etch adhesives used for immediate dentin sealing", Dent Mater J, 31, pp.401~408 (2012)
- Yoshida Y, "Comparative study on adhesive performance of functional monomers", J Dent Res, 83, pp.454~458 (2004)
- do Amaral RC, "Active application improves the bonding performance of self-etch adhesives to dentin", J Dent, 37, pp.82~90 (2009)
- Perdigão J, "Dentin bonding-variables related to the clinical situation and the substrate treatment", Dent Mater, 26, pp.e24~e37 (2010)
