CBCT assessment of alveolar bone wall morphology and its correlation with tooth angulation in the anterior mandible: a new classification for immediate implant placement
2
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose: This study aimed to quantify alveolar bone morphology, demonstrate the relationship between tooth angulation and alveolar bone thickness, and introduce a new classification for anterior mandibular teeth related to immediate implant placement (IIP). Methods: Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images of 211 anterior mandibular teeth were analyzed in sagittal slices to measure the thickness of the facial alveolar bone crest (FAB1) and apex (FAB2), and the lingual alveolar bone crest (LAB1) and apex (LAB2). Tooth angulation was classified as 1°–10°, 11°–20°, and >20° according to the tooth’s long axis and alveolar bone wall. Spearman correlation coefficients were used to evaluate correlations between the variables. Results: FAB1 and LAB1 were predominantly thin (<1 mm) (84.4% and 73.4%, respectively), with the lateral incisors being thinnest. At the apical level, FAB2 and LAB2 were thick in 99.5% and 99.1% of cases, respectively. Significant differences were documented in FAB2 (P=0.004), LAB1 (P=0.001), and LAB2 (P=0.001) of all mandibular teeth. At all apical levels of the inspected teeth, a significant negative correlation existed between TA and FAB2. Meanwhile, TA showed a significant positive correlation with LAB2 of the lateral incisors and canines. These patterns were then divided into class I (thick facial and lingual alveolar bone), class II (facially inclined teeth) with subtype A (1°–10°) and subtype B (11°–20°), and class III (lingually inclined teeth) with subtype A (1°–10°) and subtype B (11°–20°). Conclusions: Mandibular anterior teeth have predominantly thin facial and lingual crests, making the lingual bone apical thickness crucial for IIP. Although anchorage can be obtained from lingual bone, tooth angulation and tooth types had an impact on IIP planning. Hence, the new classification based on TA and alveolar bone wall may enable rational clinical planning for IIP treatment.
Abstract
Purpose: This study aimed to quantify alveolar bone morphology, demonstrate the relationship between tooth angulation and alveolar bone thickness, and introduce a new classification for anterior mandibular teeth related to immediate implant placement (IIP). Methods: Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images of 211 anterior mandibular teeth were analyzed in sagittal slices to measure the thickness of the facial alveolar bone crest (FAB1) and apex (FAB2), and the lingual alveolar bone crest (LAB1) and apex (LAB2). Tooth angulation was classified as 1°–10°, 11°–20°, and >20° according to the tooth’s long axis and alveolar bone wall. Spearman correlation coefficients were used to evaluate correlations between the variables. Results: FAB1 and LAB1 were predominantly thin (<1 mm) (84.4% and 73.4%, respectively), with the lateral incisors being thinnest. At the apical level, FAB2 and LAB2 were thick in 99.5% and 99.1% of cases, respectively. Significant differences were documented in FAB2 (P=0.004), LAB1 (P=0.001), and LAB2 (P=0.001) of all mandibular teeth. At all apical levels of the inspected teeth, a significant negative correlation existed between TA and FAB2. Meanwhile, TA showed a significant positive correlation with LAB2 of the lateral incisors and canines. These patterns were then divided into class I (thick facial and lingual alveolar bone), class II (facially inclined teeth) with subtype A (1°–10°) and subtype B (11°–20°), and class III (lingually inclined teeth) with subtype A (1°–10°) and subtype B (11°–20°). Conclusions: Mandibular anterior teeth have predominantly thin facial and lingual crests, making the lingual bone apical thickness crucial for IIP. Although anchorage can be obtained from lingual bone, tooth angulation and tooth types had an impact on IIP planning. Hence, the new classification based on TA and alveolar bone wall may enable rational clinical planning for IIP treatment.
참고문헌 (27)
- de Siqueira RA, "Effect of different implant placement depths on crestal bone levels and soft tissue behavior : a randomized clinical trial", Clin Oral Implants Res, 28, pp.1227~1233 (2017)
- Adler L, "Survival and complications : a 9-to 15-year retrospective follow-up of dental implant therapy", J Oral Rehabil, 47, pp.67~77 (2020)
- Kan JY, "Proximal socket shield for interimplant papilla preservation in the esthetic zone", Int J Periodont Restor Dent, 33, pp.e24~31 (2013)
- Grunder U, "Influence of the 3-D bone-to-implant relationship on esthetics", Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 25, pp.113~119 (2005)
- Gluckman H, "Partial extraction therapies(PET)part 1 : maintaining alveolar ridge contour at pontic and immediate implant sites", Int J Periodont Restor Dent, 36, pp.681~687 (2016)
- Bashutski JD, "Common implant esthetic complications", Implant Dent, 16, pp.340~348 (2007)
- Kan JY, "Interimplant papilla preservation in the esthetic zone : a report of six consecutive cases", Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 23, pp.249~259 (2003)
- Javed F, "The role of primary stability for successful immediate loading of dental implants. A literature review", J Dent, 38, pp.612~620 (2010)
- Chrcanovic BR, "Immediate implant placement in the posterior mandible : A cone beam computed tomography study", Quintessence Int, 47, pp.505~514 (2016)
- Kan JY, "Classification of sagittal root position in relation to the anterior maxillary osseous housing for immediate implant placement : a cone beam computed tomography study", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 26, pp.873~876 (2011)
- Dos Santos JG, "Analysis of the buccal bone plate, root inclination and alveolar bone dimensions in the jawbone. A descriptive study using cone-beam computed tomography", J Oral Maxillofac Res, 10, pp.e4~ (2019)
- Wang HM, "Analysis of facial bone wall dimensions and sagittal root position in the maxillary esthetic zone : a retrospective study using cone beam computed tomography", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 29, pp.1123~1129 (2014)
- Poletto-Neto V, "Influence of implant inclination and prosthetic abutment type on the biomechanics of implant-supported fixed partial dentures", J Oral Implantol, 45, pp.343~350 (2019)
- Babiker J, "Qualitative and quantitative assessments of alveolar bone dimension and its correlation with tooth angulation in the anterior maxilla for immediate implant placement", J Contemp Dent Pract, 22, pp.1237~1242 (2021)
- Gluckman H, "Radial plane tooth position and bone wall dimensions in the anterior maxilla : a CBCT classification for immediate implant placement", J Prosthet Dent, 120, pp.50~56 (2018)
- Braut V, "Thickness of the anterior maxillary facial bone wall-a retrospective radiographic study using cone beam computed tomography", Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 31, pp.125~131 (2011)
- Lau SL, "Classification of maxillary central incisors-implications for immediate implant in the esthetic zone", J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 69, pp.142~153 (2011)
- Srebrzyńska-Witek A, "Relationship between anterior mandibular bone thickness and the angulation of incisors and canines-a CBCT study", Clin Oral Investig, 22, pp.1567~1578 (2018)
- Porto OC, "CBCT assessment of bone thickness in maxillary and mandibular teeth : an anatomic study", J Appl Oral Sci, 28, pp.e20190148~ (2020)
- López-Jarana P, "Thickness of the buccal bone wall and root angulation in the maxilla and mandible : an approach to cone beam computed tomography", BMC Oral Health, 18, pp.194~ (2018)
- Moghaddas O, "A new classification of the sagittal root positioning of the mandibular anterior teeth in relation to their anterior buccal bone using cone-beam computed tomography(CBCT)", J Adv Periodontol Implant Dent, 12, pp.65~71 (2020)
- Cuschieri S, "The STROBE guidelines", Saudi J Anaesth, 13(Suppl 1), pp.S31~S34 (2019)
- Buser D, "Implant placement post extraction in esthetic single tooth sites : when immediate, when early, when late?", Periodontol 2000, 73, pp.84~102 (2017)
- Morad G, "Thickness of labial alveolar bone overlying healthy maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth", J Craniofac Surg, 25, pp.1985~1991 (2014)
- Zekry A, "Facial alveolar bone wall width-a cone-beam computed tomography study in Asians", Clin Oral Implants Res, 25, pp.194~206 (2014)
- Borges GJ, "Cone-beam computed tomography as a diagnostic method for determination of gingival thickness and distance between gingival margin and bone crest", Sci World J, 2015, pp.142108~ (2015)
- Tsai YC, "Risk assessment of labial bone perforation in the anterior mandibular region : a virtual immediate implant placement study", Int J Implant Dent, 7, pp.68~ (2021)