본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Experimental study on pressure characteristics and flow coefficient of butterfly valve

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류조선공학

초록

Air entrainment and self-aeration flow are phenomena that can generate fluctuation in pressure and induce disadvantages in piping systems. In this study, the mechanism of air bubble formation in Partially Filled Pipe Flow (PFPF) is investigated through a series of experiments on a butterfly valve with flow visualization and pressure measurement. This paper provides a description of the formation of bubbles induced by a butterfly valve and analyzes the characteristics of the pressure and flow coefficient of the valve. The pressures at various locations on the pipeline adjacent to the valve were measured to compare with the positions recommended by the International Society of Automation standard. The results indicated that in PFPF, the differences in the pressure between measured points downstream are noticeable, notably at valve openings less than 50. The bubbles created at the valve, which lead to the highly-disordered aerated flow downstream, might induce the differences. The pressure drop and the flow rate across the butterfly valve in 100% water fraction flow are respectively 3e7.5 and 2e9 times higher than those in 90% WF. The flow coefficient of the 3-inch butterfly valve was found to increase linearly with the Reynolds number before leveling off when the Reynolds number exceeds 6 104. Besides, the flow coefficients in 100% water fraction flow are double those in 90% water fraction flow.

Abstract

Air entrainment and self-aeration flow are phenomena that can generate fluctuation in pressure and induce disadvantages in piping systems. In this study, the mechanism of air bubble formation in Partially Filled Pipe Flow (PFPF) is investigated through a series of experiments on a butterfly valve with flow visualization and pressure measurement. This paper provides a description of the formation of bubbles induced by a butterfly valve and analyzes the characteristics of the pressure and flow coefficient of the valve. The pressures at various locations on the pipeline adjacent to the valve were measured to compare with the positions recommended by the International Society of Automation standard. The results indicated that in PFPF, the differences in the pressure between measured points downstream are noticeable, notably at valve openings less than 50. The bubbles created at the valve, which lead to the highly-disordered aerated flow downstream, might induce the differences. The pressure drop and the flow rate across the butterfly valve in 100% water fraction flow are respectively 3e7.5 and 2e9 times higher than those in 90% WF. The flow coefficient of the 3-inch butterfly valve was found to increase linearly with the Reynolds number before leveling off when the Reynolds number exceeds 6 104. Besides, the flow coefficients in 100% water fraction flow are double those in 90% water fraction flow.

참고문헌 (28)

  1. S. Corbera Caraballo, "Optimization of a butterfly valve disc using 3D topology and genetic algorithms", Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 56(4), pp.941~957 (2017), Springer Science and Business Media LLC[DOI]
  2. "CRV37 Butterfly Valves Catalog. Orchard Park Road e Unit 18" (2021)[URL]
  3. F. Danbon, "Aerodynamic Torque of a Butterfly Valve—Influence of an Elbow on the Time-Mean and Instantaneous Aerodynamic Torque", Journal of Fluids Engineering, 122(2), pp.337~344 (2000), ASME International[DOI]
  4. James A. Davis, "Predicting Globe Control Valve Performance—Part I: CFD Modeling", Journal of Fluids Engineering, 124(3), pp.772~777 (2002), ASME International[DOI]
  5. James A. Davis, "Predicting Globe Control Valve Performance—Part II: Experimental Verification", Journal of Fluids Engineering, 124(3), pp.778~783 (2002), ASME International[DOI]
  6. Andrew Grace, "Experimental parametric equation for the prediction of valve coefficient (Cv) for choke valve trims", International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping, 88(2-3), pp.109~118 (2011), Elsevier BV[DOI]
  7. Junke Guo, "Theoretical solution for laminar flow in partially-filled pipes", Journal of Hydraulic Research, 51(4), pp.408~416 (2013), Informa UK Limited[DOI]
  8. Hedayat, A. S., "Orthogonal Arrays: Theory and Applications" (1999), Springer
  9. Henry C.-H. Ng, "Partially filled pipes: experiments in laminar and turbulent flow", Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 848, pp.467~507 (2018), Cambridge University Press (CUP)[DOI]
  10. Chendong Huang, "Three-Dimensional Analysis of Partially Open Butterfly Valve Flows", Journal of Fluids Engineering, 118(3), pp.562~568 (1996), ASME International[DOI]
  11. Instrument Society of America, "Control Valve Sizing Equations for Incompressible Flow. ISA-S39.1", ~ (1972)
  12. Instrument Society of America, "Control Valve Sizing Equations. ASNI", ISAS75.01 Standard, 1981
  13. ISA-75.01.01-2012 standard, "Flow Capacity e Sizing Equations for Fluid Flow under Installed Conditions. ANSI", pp.2012, International Society of Automation
  14. Chul Kyu Kim, "Experimental study for flow characteristics of eccentric butterfly valves", Proc IMechE Part E: J Process Mechanical Engineering, 229(4), pp.309~314 (2014), SAGE Publications
  15. Takeyoshi Kimura, "Hydrodynamic characteristics of a butterfly valve — Prediction of pressure loss characteristics", ISA Transactions, 34(4), pp.319~326 (1995), Elsevier BV[DOI]
  16. "Effect of CuO-distilled water based nanofluids on heat transfer characteristics and pressure drop characteristics" (2014)[URL]
  17. Liu, F. S., "Experimental research on the flow resistance characteristics of the trieccentric butterfly", Fluid Mach, 48(3), pp.12~16 (2020)[DOI]
  18. Quang Khai Nguyen, "Experimental Study on Pressure Distribution and Flow Coefficient of Globe Valve", Processes, 8(7), pp.875~ (2020), MDPI AG[DOI]
  19. Nguyen Quang Khai, "Bubble formation in globe valve and flow characteristics of partially filled pipe water flow", International Journal of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering, 13, pp.554~565 (2021), 대한조선학회[DOI]
  20. Jun Sung Park, "Evaluation of Water Hammer for Seawater Treatment System in Offshore Floating Production Unit", Processes, 8(9), pp.1041~ (2020), MDPI AG[DOI]
  21. Chang Qiu, "Pressure Drop and Cavitation Analysis on Sleeve Regulating Valve", Processes, 7(11), pp.829~ (2019), MDPI AG[DOI]
  22. Ying Yan Qu, "Measuring flows in partially-filled pipes in siphonic roof drainage systems", MAPAN, 26(4), pp.315~327 (2011), Springer Science and Business Media LLC[DOI]
  23. Rahmeyer, W., "Control valve flow coefficients", J. Transport. Eng, 111, pp.358~364 (1985)[DOI]
  24. Ramani, B.M., "Performance evaluation of double pass solar air collector with & without porous absorber", 19th National & 8th ISHMT-ASME, Heat and Mass Transfer Conference (2008)
  25. Simpson, T.Q., "Comparison of response surface and kriging models for multidisciplinary design optimization", Conference: AIAA, USAF, pp.ISSMO Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization, 1998
  26. Xue Guan Song, "Multidisciplinary optimization of a butterfly valve", ISA Transactions, 48(3), pp.370~377 (2009), Elsevier BV[DOI]
  27. "CL Series: Center Lined Butterfly Valve" (2020)[URL]
  28. Ling Zhou, "Experimental investigation of entrapped air pocket in a partially full water pipe", Journal of Hydraulic Research, 51(4), pp.469~474 (2013), Informa UK Limited[DOI]

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (56건)