악골 골절에서 술 후 교합압 및 근전도 변화
Occlusal force and EMG change of mandibular fracture
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Bite force is created by the force of adjacent teeth accompanied with tension of masticatory muscle. The bite force value is greater in male than in female and ha maximum value at first molar. Masseter muscle is associated with bite force and during muscle contraction the electric signal is expressed in EMG form. The aim of the study is to assess recovery time for masseter muscle activity and according to each part of bite force after open reduction with internal fixation when mandibular angle fracture and subcondyle fracture occurred. And to determine the appropriate period for mandibular fracture patients to have normal masticatory activity. 30 patients with normal bite condition was selected for control group and from April, 2007 to September, 2007, 20 patients who visited our department of oral and maxillofacial surgery of Dankook University, were selected for the study and were diagnosed as mandibular angle fracture and subcondyle fracture. For control group, the bite force for incisors, canine, premolars and molars and activity of the masseter muscle was measured and compared for 1, 2, 3, 4, 6 and 8 weeks. That was divided as fracture side and normal side. Mann-Whitney U test was performed for significant difference and the following result was obtained. 1. The maximum voluntary bite force for incisors, canine, premolars and molars portion were 0.113 kN, 0.182kN, 0.295kN and 0.486kN and the masseter muscle activity was 0.192 volts in the control group. 2. The maximum bite force at fracture side was recovered by 4th weeks for incisors, 6th weeks for canine and premolars and 8th weeks for molars and the masseter muscle activity was recovered by 6th weeks in the experimental group. 2. The maximum bite force at normal side was recovered by 4th weeks for incisors, 6th weeks for canine, premolars and molars and the masseter muscle activity was recovered by 3rd weeks in the experimental group. 3. The method for internal fixation by 2.0mm miniplates at both superior and inferior border had no complications according for twenty patients and had a satisfactory recovery. According to the result, patient with mandibular angle fracture and subcondyle fracture, 8 weeks was required for bite force recovery. Therefore, patients with open reduction and internal fixation under general anesthesis, it can be assumed that 8 weeks was needed after operation in order to have normal bite force and masseter muscle recovery.
Abstract
Bite force is created by the force of adjacent teeth accompanied with tension of masticatory muscle. The bite force value is greater in male than in female and ha maximum value at first molar. Masseter muscle is associated with bite force and during muscle contraction the electric signal is expressed in EMG form. The aim of the study is to assess recovery time for masseter muscle activity and according to each part of bite force after open reduction with internal fixation when mandibular angle fracture and subcondyle fracture occurred. And to determine the appropriate period for mandibular fracture patients to have normal masticatory activity. 30 patients with normal bite condition was selected for control group and from April, 2007 to September, 2007, 20 patients who visited our department of oral and maxillofacial surgery of Dankook University, were selected for the study and were diagnosed as mandibular angle fracture and subcondyle fracture. For control group, the bite force for incisors, canine, premolars and molars and activity of the masseter muscle was measured and compared for 1, 2, 3, 4, 6 and 8 weeks. That was divided as fracture side and normal side. Mann-Whitney U test was performed for significant difference and the following result was obtained. 1. The maximum voluntary bite force for incisors, canine, premolars and molars portion were 0.113 kN, 0.182kN, 0.295kN and 0.486kN and the masseter muscle activity was 0.192 volts in the control group. 2. The maximum bite force at fracture side was recovered by 4th weeks for incisors, 6th weeks for canine and premolars and 8th weeks for molars and the masseter muscle activity was recovered by 6th weeks in the experimental group. 2. The maximum bite force at normal side was recovered by 4th weeks for incisors, 6th weeks for canine, premolars and molars and the masseter muscle activity was recovered by 3rd weeks in the experimental group. 3. The method for internal fixation by 2.0mm miniplates at both superior and inferior border had no complications according for twenty patients and had a satisfactory recovery. According to the result, patient with mandibular angle fracture and subcondyle fracture, 8 weeks was required for bite force recovery. Therefore, patients with open reduction and internal fixation under general anesthesis, it can be assumed that 8 weeks was needed after operation in order to have normal bite force and masseter muscle recovery.
참고문헌 (30)
- Peterson LJ, "Principle of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery" (1992)
- Marisa Aparecida Cabrini Gabrielli, "Fixation of mandibular fractures with 2.0mm miniplates: review of 191 cases", J Oral Maxillofa Surg, 61, pp.430~436 (2003)
- Ellis E. III, "Treatment method for fractures of the mandibular angle", Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 28, pp.243~252 (1999)
- Ahlgren J, "Muscle activity in normal and positional occlusion", Am J Orthod, 64, pp.445~456 (1973)
- 김명국, "정상인 하악운동시에 있어서 저작근의 근전도 분석", 서울대학교 논문집, 19, pp.76~92 (1968)
- Georgiakaki I, "Ultrasonographic thickness and electromyographic activity of masseter muscle of human females", Journal of Oral Rehabilitation, 34, pp.121~128 (2007)
- Armijo-Olivo S, "Quality of reporting masticatory muscle electromyography in 2004: a systemic review", Journal of Oral Rehabilitation, 34, pp.397~405 (2007)
- Teenier TJ, "Effect of Local Anesthesia on Bite Force Generation and Electromyographic Activity", J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 49, pp.360~365 (1991)
- Miralles R., "Pattern of electromyographic activity in subjects with different skeletal facial types", Angle Orthod, 61(4), pp.277~284 (1991)
- Reena M, "Throckmorton: Adaptation of the Masticatory System After Bilateral Fractures of the Mandibular Condylar Process", J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 56, pp.430~439 (1998)
- Kuriakose MA, "A comparison review of 266 mandibular fractures with internal fixation using rigid(AO", AIF) plates or miniplates, 1996, pp.34, 315~321
- Spiessl B, "Rigid internal fixation of fractures of lower jaw", Reconstr Surg Traumatol, 13, pp.124~140 (1972)
- 양병은, "Mini-implant를 이용한 하악골 우각부 골절의 효과적인 정복; 증례보고", 대한구강악안면외과학회지, 33(4), pp.397~400 (2007), 대한구강악안면외과학회
- Michelet FX, "Osteosynthesis with miniaturised screw plates in maxillo-facial surgery", J Maxillofac Surg, 1, pp.79~ (1973)
- Champy M, "Mandibular osteosynthesis by miniature screwed plate via a buccal approach", J Maxillofac Surg, 1, pp.79~84 (1978)
- Siddiqui A, "One miniplate versus two in the management of mandibular angle fractures: A prospective rendomised study", Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 45, pp.22~225 (2007)
- Levy FE, "Marentette LJ: Monocortical miniplate fixation of mandibular angle fractures", Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 117, pp.149~154 (1991)
- Fox AJ, "Mandibular angle fractures: two-miniplate fixation and complications", Arch Facial Plast Surg, 5(6), pp.464~469 (2003)
- Edwards T, "A comparative study of miniplates used in the treatment of mandibular fractures", Plast Reconstr Surg, 97, pp.1150~1156 (1996)
- BH. Choi, "Stability testing of a two miniplate fixation technique for mandibular angle fracture. An in vitro study", J Craniomaxillofac Surg, 23, pp.122~125 (1995)
- Schierle HP, "One or Two plate fixation of mandibular angle fracture?", J Craniomaxillofac Surg, 25, pp.162~168 (1997)
- Gupta DS, "Mandibular angle fracture-a comparative study of one plate fixation versus two plates fixation", Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 36, pp.1075~1076 (2007)
- Ellis E, "Treatment of mandibular angle fractures using one noncompression miniplates", J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 54, pp.864~871 (1996)
- BH. Choi, "Clinical and in vitro evaluation of mandibular angle fracture fixation with two-miniplate system", Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathl Oral Radiol Endod, 79, pp.692~695 (1995)
- 서울대학교 치과대학편, "악안면 신경과학" (1995), 군자출판사
- Tate GS, "Throckmoton GT: Bite Force in Patients Treated for Mandibular Angle Fractures", J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 53, pp.734~736 (1994)
- Tate GS, "Bite forces in patients treated for mandibular angle fractures: Implications for fixation recommendations", J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 52, pp.734~736 (1994)
- Gerlach KL, "Bite force in patients after treatment of mandibular angle fractures with miniplate osteosynyhesis according to Champy", Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 31, pp.345~348 (2002)
- Durham JA, "Postoperative radiographs after open reduction and internal fixation of the mandible: Are they useful?", Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 44, pp.279~282 (2006)
- Kawai T, "Radiographic changes during bone healing after mandibular fractures", Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 35, pp.312~318 (1997)