하악 우각부 골절 시 2개의 miniplate를 이용한 관혈적 정복술에 대한 전향적 예비 임상연구
The prospective preliminary clinical study of open reduction and internal fixation of mandibular angle fractures using 2 miniplates
2
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Introduction: The placement of a single miniplate is not sufficient to achieve rigid fixation in mandibular angle fractures. It often causes difficulties in reducing the intermaxillary fixation (IMF) period. Consequently, the placement of 2 miniplates is preferable. The intraoral approach in an open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of a mandibular angle fracture with 2 miniplates is often challenging. Accordingly, an alternative of transbuccal approach is performed. However, this method leaves a scar on the face and can result in facial nerve injury. This clinical study suggests a protocol that can maintain rigid fixation without a transbuccal approach in mandibular angle fractures. Materials and Methods: The subjects were 7 patients who sustained fractures of the mandibular angle and treated at Department of Oral and maxillofacial surgery, Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University. ORIF under general anesthesia was done using the intraoral approach. One miniplate was inserted on external oblique ridge of the mandible, and the other was placed on lateral surface of the mandibular body with contra-angle drill and driver. A radiographic assessment and occlusal contact point examination was carried out before surgery, and 2, 4 and 6 weeks after surgery. Results: The mean operation time was 80 minutes. Regarding the occlusion state, the number of contact points increased after surgery. Paresthesia and infection were reported to be complications before surgery. Conclusion: The placement of 2 miniplates using contra-angle drill for ORIF of mandibular angle fractures allows early movement of the mandible without IMF. We propose this approach to reduce the patients’discomfort and simplify the surgical procedure.
Abstract
Introduction: The placement of a single miniplate is not sufficient to achieve rigid fixation in mandibular angle fractures. It often causes difficulties in reducing the intermaxillary fixation (IMF) period. Consequently, the placement of 2 miniplates is preferable. The intraoral approach in an open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of a mandibular angle fracture with 2 miniplates is often challenging. Accordingly, an alternative of transbuccal approach is performed. However, this method leaves a scar on the face and can result in facial nerve injury. This clinical study suggests a protocol that can maintain rigid fixation without a transbuccal approach in mandibular angle fractures. Materials and Methods: The subjects were 7 patients who sustained fractures of the mandibular angle and treated at Department of Oral and maxillofacial surgery, Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University. ORIF under general anesthesia was done using the intraoral approach. One miniplate was inserted on external oblique ridge of the mandible, and the other was placed on lateral surface of the mandibular body with contra-angle drill and driver. A radiographic assessment and occlusal contact point examination was carried out before surgery, and 2, 4 and 6 weeks after surgery. Results: The mean operation time was 80 minutes. Regarding the occlusion state, the number of contact points increased after surgery. Paresthesia and infection were reported to be complications before surgery. Conclusion: The placement of 2 miniplates using contra-angle drill for ORIF of mandibular angle fractures allows early movement of the mandible without IMF. We propose this approach to reduce the patients’discomfort and simplify the surgical procedure.
참고문헌 (15)
- Kreutziger KL, "Comprehensive surgical management of mandibular fractures", South Med J, 85, pp.506~518 (1992)
- Stacey DH, "Management of mandible fractures", Plast Reconstr Surg, 117, pp.48~60 (2006)
- Murr AH, "Mandibular angle fractures and noncompression plating techniques", Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 131, pp.166~168 (2005)
- Ellis E 3rd, "Treatment methods for fractures of the mandibular angle", Int J Oral Maxillfac Surg, 28, pp.243~252 (1999)
- Lazow SK, "Mandible fracture: transoral 2.0-mm locking miniplate plus 1 week maxillomandibular fixation", Atlas Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am, 17, pp.27~34 (2009)
- Fox AJ, "Mandibular angle fractures: two-miniplate fixation and complications", Arch Facial Plast Surg, 5, pp.464~469 (2003)
- Sugar AW, "A randomised controlled trial comparing fixation of mandibular angle fractures with a single miniplate placed either transbuccally and intra-orally, or intra-orally alone", Int J Oral Maxillfac Surg, 38, pp.241~245 (2009)
- Michelet FX, "Osteosynthesis with miniaturized screwed plates in maxillo-facial surgery", J Maxillofac Surg, 1, pp.79~84 (1973)
- Champy M, "Mandibular osteosynthesis by miniature screwed plates via a buccal approach", J Maxillofac Surg, 6, pp.14~21 (1978)
- Mehra P, "Internal fixation of mandibular angle fractures: a comparison of 2 techniques", J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 66, pp.2254~2260 (2008)
- Barry CP, "Superior border plating technique in the management of isolated mandibular angle fractures: a retrospective study of 50 consecutive patients", J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 65, pp.1544~1549 (2007)
- Schierle HP, "One- or twoplate fixation of mandibular angle fractures?", J Craniomaxillofac Surg, 25, pp.162~168 (1997)
- Seeman R, "Krennmair G, et al. Complication rates in the operative treatment of mandibular angle fractures: a 10-year retrospective", J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 68, pp.647~650 (2010)
- Levy FE, "Monocortical miniplate fixation of mandibular angle fractures", Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 117, pp.149~154 (1991)
- Choi BH, "Stability testing of a two miniplate fixation technique for mandibular angle fractures. An in vitro study", J Craniomaxillofac surg, 23, pp.123~125 (1995)