Influencing factor on the prognosis of arthrocentesis
2
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Objectives: The purpose of this article is to evaluate factors influencing prognosis of arthrocentesis in patients with temporomandibular joint (TMJ) disorder. Materials and Methods: The subjects included 145 patients treated with arthrocentesis at the Dental Center of Ajou University Hospital from 2011 to 2013 for the purpose of recovering mouth opening limitation (MOL) and pain relief. Prognosis of arthrocentesis was evaluated 1 month after the operation. Improvement on MOL was defined as an increase from below 30 mm (MOL ≤30 mm) to above 40 mm (MOL ≥40 mm), and pain relief was defined as when a group with TMJ pain with a visual analog scale (VAS) score of 4 or more (VAS ≥4) decreased to a score of 3 or more. The success of arthrocentesis was determined when either mouth opening improved or pain relief was fulfilled. To determine the factors influencing the success of arthrocentesis, the patients were classified by age, gender, diagnosis group (the anterior disc displacement without reduction group, the anterior disc displacement with reduction group, or other TMJ disorders group), time of onset and oral habits (clenching, bruxism) to investigate the correlations between these factors and prognosis. Results: One hundred twenty out of 145 patients who underwent arthrocentesis (83.4%) were found to be successful. Among the influencing factorsmentioned above, age, diagnosis and time of onset had no statistically significant correlation with the success of arthrocentesis. However, a group of patients in their fifties showed a lower success rate (ANOVA P=0.053) and the success rate of the group with oral habits was 71% (Pearson’s chi-square test P=0.035). Conclusion: From this study, we find that factors influencing the success of arthrocentesis include age and oral habits. We also conclude that arthrocentesisis effective in treating mouth opening symptoms and for pain relief.
Abstract
Objectives: The purpose of this article is to evaluate factors influencing prognosis of arthrocentesis in patients with temporomandibular joint (TMJ) disorder. Materials and Methods: The subjects included 145 patients treated with arthrocentesis at the Dental Center of Ajou University Hospital from 2011 to 2013 for the purpose of recovering mouth opening limitation (MOL) and pain relief. Prognosis of arthrocentesis was evaluated 1 month after the operation. Improvement on MOL was defined as an increase from below 30 mm (MOL ≤30 mm) to above 40 mm (MOL ≥40 mm), and pain relief was defined as when a group with TMJ pain with a visual analog scale (VAS) score of 4 or more (VAS ≥4) decreased to a score of 3 or more. The success of arthrocentesis was determined when either mouth opening improved or pain relief was fulfilled. To determine the factors influencing the success of arthrocentesis, the patients were classified by age, gender, diagnosis group (the anterior disc displacement without reduction group, the anterior disc displacement with reduction group, or other TMJ disorders group), time of onset and oral habits (clenching, bruxism) to investigate the correlations between these factors and prognosis. Results: One hundred twenty out of 145 patients who underwent arthrocentesis (83.4%) were found to be successful. Among the influencing factorsmentioned above, age, diagnosis and time of onset had no statistically significant correlation with the success of arthrocentesis. However, a group of patients in their fifties showed a lower success rate (ANOVA P=0.053) and the success rate of the group with oral habits was 71% (Pearson’s chi-square test P=0.035). Conclusion: From this study, we find that factors influencing the success of arthrocentesis include age and oral habits. We also conclude that arthrocentesisis effective in treating mouth opening symptoms and for pain relief.
참고문헌 (22)
- Nitzan DW, "Temporomandibular joint arthrocentesis: a simplified treatment for severe, limited mouth opening", J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 49, pp.1163~1167 (1991)
- Brennan PA, "Arthrocentesis for temporomandibular joint pain dysfunction syndrome", J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 64, pp.949~951 (2006)
- Lee SH, "MRI findings of patients with temporomandibular joint internal derangement: before and after performance of arthrocentesis and stabilization splint", J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 67, pp.314~317 (2009)
- Al-Belasy FA, "Arthrocentesis for the treatment of temporomandibular joint closed lock: a review article", Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 36, pp.773~782 (2007)
- Shah K, "Trismus: a bizarre finding", Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 38, pp.397~398 (2000)
- Nelson SJ, "Consideration of linear and angular values of maximum mandibular opening", Compendium, 13, pp.362~ (1992)
- Dworkin SF, "Epidemiology of signs and symptoms in temporomandibular disorders: clinical signs in cases and controls", J Am Dent Assoc, 120, pp.273~281 (1990)
- Yi AN, "Clinical aspect of arthrocentesis", J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg, 26, pp.97~104 (2000)
- Alpaslan GH, "Efficacy of temporomandibular joint arthrocentesis with and without injection of sodium hyaluronate in treatment of internal derangements", J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 59, pp.613~618 (2001)
- Fraser JR, "Patterns of induced variation in the morphology, hyaluronic acid secretion, and lysosomal enzyme activity of cultured human synovial cells", Ann Rheum Dis, 38, pp.287~294 (1979)
- Balazs EA, "Disorders of the Knee", pp.61~64 (1974), Lippincott
- Rydell N, "Effect of intra-articular injection of hyaluronic acid on the clinical symptoms of osteoarthritis and on granulation tissue formation", Clin Orthop Relat Res, 80, pp.25~32 (1971)
- 김재진, "악관절 내장증 치료를 위한 악관절 세정술 후 관절강내 Hyaluronic Acid 주입 효과", 대한구강악안면외과학회지, 32(5), pp.453~ (2006), 대한구강악안면외과학회
- Murakami K, "Short-term treatment outcome study for the management of temporomandibular joint closed lock. A comparison of arthrocentesis to nonsurgical therapy and arthroscopic lysis and lavage", Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 80, pp.253~257 (1995)
- Hosaka H, "Outcome of arthrocentesis for temporomandibular joint with closed lock at 3 years follow-up", Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 82, pp.501~504 (1996)
- Nitzan DW, "Long-term outcome of arthrocentesis for sudden-onset, persistent, severe closed lock of the temporomandibular joint", J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 55, pp.151~157 (1997)
- Guarda-Nardini L, "Treatment effectiveness of arthrocentesis plus hyaluronic acid injections in different age groups of patients with temporomandibular joint osteoarthritis", J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 70, pp.2048~2056 (2012)
- Nishimura M, "Prognostic factors in arthrocentesis of the temporomandibular joint: evaluation of 100 patients with internal derangement", J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 59, pp.874~877 (2001)
- Sakamoto I, "Clinical studies of arthrocentesis of the temporomandibular joint: analysis of clinical findings in patients with a good outcome", Jpn J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 42, pp.808~814 (1996)
- Alpaslan C, "Five-year retrospective evaluation of temporomandibular joint arthrocentesis", Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 32, pp.263~267 (2003)
- 박용희, "측두하악장애 환자에서 악관절 세정술과 교합안정장치를 동반한 치료의 효과", Maxillofacial Plastic Reconstructive Surgery, 32(1), pp.32~36 (2010), 대한악안면성형재건외과학회
- Ghanem WA, "Arthrocentesis and stabilizing splint are the treatment of choice for acute intermittent closed lock in patients with bruxism", J Craniomaxillofac Surg, 39, pp.256~260 (2011)