본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Clinical factors affecting the outcome of arthocentesis

Syed Wakeel Andrabi|Altaf H. Malik|Ajaz A. Shah
대한구강악안면외과학회 (Korean Association Of Oral And Maxillofacial Surgeons)|2019.02|대한구강악안면외과학회지 (Journal of the Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons)|제45권 제1호|pp. 9-14|DOI https://doi.org/10.5125/jkaoms.2019.45.1.9

2

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

Temporomandibular jointArthrocentesisInternal derangement
주제분류치의학

초록

Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the effect of clinical factors on the outcome of arthrocentesis in the treatment of temporomandibular joint (TMJ) internal derangement. Materials and Methods: Fifty patients with TMJ internal derangement underwent arthrocentesis using ringer’s lactate. The present study evaluated the contribution of the clinical variables of age, time since onset, visual analogue scale (VAS) pain level, and range of motion (ROM) on the outcomes of TMJ arthrocentesis: age (≤25 years, >25 and ≤40 years, >40 and ≤60 years), VAS pain level (≤5, >5 and ≤7, >7 and ≤10), and ROM (<25 and ≥25 mm). Odds ratios (ORs) were used to describe the proportional benefit of each variable the on successful outcome of arthrocentesis. For the OR to be clinically relevant or even clinically noticeable, we assumed that the OR would need to be larger than 2. Results: Mean preoperative pain score was 6.49±1.560 and at 6 months postoperative was 0.46±1.147 with an average decrease of pain score 6 (P<0.001). The mean preoperactive maximum mouth opening was 26.14±4.969 mm and mean maximum mouth opening at 6-month inerval was 38.92±3.392 mm. The mean increase in the mouth opening was a mean difference of 12.78 mm (P<0.001). Logistic regression showed that the maximum benefit occurred in patients aged <25 years (OR, 12.01; P=0.012), a VAS pain level of >7 (OR, 11.25; P=0.039), and a maximum vertical opening of <25 mm (OR, 7.70; P=0.038). Conclusion: Lavage of the superior joint space with ringer’s lactate resulted in significant reduction in pain and improvement in mouth opening. Patients with a greater inflammatory component and younger patients benefitted more from arthrocentesis. Evaluation of these clinical variables helped in predictive modelling, which may provide clinicians with the opportunity to identify “at-benefit” patients early and initiate specific treatment.

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the effect of clinical factors on the outcome of arthrocentesis in the treatment of temporomandibular joint (TMJ) internal derangement. Materials and Methods: Fifty patients with TMJ internal derangement underwent arthrocentesis using ringer’s lactate. The present study evaluated the contribution of the clinical variables of age, time since onset, visual analogue scale (VAS) pain level, and range of motion (ROM) on the outcomes of TMJ arthrocentesis: age (≤25 years, >25 and ≤40 years, >40 and ≤60 years), VAS pain level (≤5, >5 and ≤7, >7 and ≤10), and ROM (<25 and ≥25 mm). Odds ratios (ORs) were used to describe the proportional benefit of each variable the on successful outcome of arthrocentesis. For the OR to be clinically relevant or even clinically noticeable, we assumed that the OR would need to be larger than 2. Results: Mean preoperative pain score was 6.49±1.560 and at 6 months postoperative was 0.46±1.147 with an average decrease of pain score 6 (P<0.001). The mean preoperactive maximum mouth opening was 26.14±4.969 mm and mean maximum mouth opening at 6-month inerval was 38.92±3.392 mm. The mean increase in the mouth opening was a mean difference of 12.78 mm (P<0.001). Logistic regression showed that the maximum benefit occurred in patients aged <25 years (OR, 12.01; P=0.012), a VAS pain level of >7 (OR, 11.25; P=0.039), and a maximum vertical opening of <25 mm (OR, 7.70; P=0.038). Conclusion: Lavage of the superior joint space with ringer’s lactate resulted in significant reduction in pain and improvement in mouth opening. Patients with a greater inflammatory component and younger patients benefitted more from arthrocentesis. Evaluation of these clinical variables helped in predictive modelling, which may provide clinicians with the opportunity to identify “at-benefit” patients early and initiate specific treatment.

참고문헌 (21)

  1. Carvajal WA, "Long-term evaluation of arthrocentesis for the treatment of internal derangements of the temporomandibular joint", J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 58, pp.852~855 (2000)
  2. Dolwick MF, "Intra-articular disc displacement. Part I: its questionable role in temporomandibular joint pathology", J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 53, pp.1069~1072 (1995)
  3. Frost DE, "Part II : the use of arthrocentesis for treatment of temporomandibular joint disorders", J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 57, pp.583~587 (1999)
  4. Truelove EL, "New classification permits multiple diagnoses", J Am Dent Assoc, 123, pp.47~54 (1992)
  5. McCain JP, "Atlas of operative oral and maxillofacial surgery", pp.271~280 (2015), Wiley Blackwell
  6. Alpaslan C, "Effect of arthrocentesis and sodium hyaluronate injection on nitrite, nitrate, and thiobarbituric acid-reactive substance levels in the synovial fluid", Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 89, pp.686~690 (2000)
  7. Nishimura M, "Comparison of cytokine level in synovial fluid between successful and unsuccessful cases in arthrocentesis of the temporomandibular joint", J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 62, pp.284~287 (2004)
  8. Nitzan DW, "Temporomandibular joint arthrocentesis : a simplified treatment for severe, limited mouth opening", J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 49, pp.1163~1167 (1991)
  9. Kaneyama K, "The ideal lavage volume for removing bradykinin, interleukin-6, and protein from the temporomandibular joint by arthrocentesis", J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 62, pp.657~661 (2004)
  10. Moses JJ, "The effect of arthroscopic surgical lysis and lavage of the superior joint space on TMJ disc position and mobility", J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 47, pp.674~678 (1989)
  11. Dimitroulis G, "Temporomandibular joint arthrocentesis and lavage for the treatment of closed lock : a followup study", Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 33, pp.23~26 (1995)
  12. Yura S, "Can arthrocentesis release intracapsular adhesions? Arthroscopic findings before and after irrigation under sufficient hydraulic pressure", J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 61, pp.1253~1256 (2003)
  13. Emshoff R, "Clinical factors affecting the outcome of arthrocentesis and hydraulic distension of the temporomandibular joint", Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 100, pp.409~414 (2005)
  14. Murakami K, "Short-term treatment outcome study for the management of temporomandibular joint closed lock. A comparison of arthrocentesis to nonsurgical therapy and arthroscopic lysis and lavage", Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 80, pp.253~257 (1995)
  15. Nishimura M, "Prognostic factors in arthrocentesis of the temporomandibular joint : evaluation of 100 patients with internal derangement", J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 59, pp.874~877 (2001)
  16. Israel HA, "Osteoarthritis and synovitis as major pathoses of the temporomandibular joint : comparison of clinical diagnosis with arthroscopic morphology", J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 56, pp.1023~1027 (1998)
  17. Israel HA, "Early diagnosis of osteoarthrosis of the temporomandibular joint : correlation between arthroscopic diagnosis and keratan sulfate levels in the synovial fluid", J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 49, pp.708~711 (1991)
  18. Murakami K, "Correlation between pain and synovitis in patients with internal derangement of the temporomandibular joint", J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 49, pp.1159~1161 (1991)
  19. Sakamoto I, "Comparison of the effectiveness of arthrocentesis in acute and chronic closed lock : analysis of clinical and arthroscopic findings", Cranio, 18, pp.264~271 (2000)
  20. Monje-Gil F, "Temporomandibular joint arthrocentesis. Review of the literature", Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal, 17, pp.e575~e581 (2012)
  21. 김윤호, "Influencing factor on the prognosis of arthrocentesis", 대한구강악안면외과학회지, 40(4), pp.155~159 (2014), 대한구강악안면외과학회

관련 논문AI추천

Influencing factor on the prognosis of arthrocentesis김윤호, 방강미, 송성일, 정태민대한구강악안면외과학회 · 대한구강악안면외과학회지2014 · 제40권 제4호Evaluation of success criteria for temporomandibular joint arthrocentesisCelal Candirli, Emre Balaban, Mehmet Demirkol, Onur Yilmaz대한구강악안면외과학회 · 대한구강악안면외과학회지2019 · 제45권 제1호Efficacy of arthrocentesis and lavage for treatment of post-traumatic arthritis in temporomandibular joints박주영, 이종호대한구강악안면외과학회 · 대한구강악안면외과학회지2020 · 제46권 제3호Effect of simultaneous therapy of arthrocentesis and occlusal splints on temporomandibular disorders: anterior disc displacement without reduction김명수, 김복주, 김철훈, 김효근, 김희철, 백현수, 송동석, 신상훈, 이혜성, 정성희대한구강악안면외과학회 · 대한구강악안면외과학회지2013 · 제39권 제1호Correlation between clinical symptoms and magnetic resonance imaging findings in patients with temporomandibular joint internal deragementSeung-Il Song, Sung-Hoon Park, Sung-Woon On, Young-Wook Jung대한구강악안면외과학회 · 대한구강악안면외과학회지2015 · 제41권 제3호난치성 턱관절장애 환자에서 원판후조직에 시행한 프롤로테라피의 효과강민성, 김복주, 김정한, 김철훈, 이정한대한치과의사협회 · 대한치과의사협회지2025 · 제63권 제10호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)

Journal of the Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons is continuously improving its quality levelYoung-Kyun Kimpp. 1-2Osteonecrosis of the jaw in the era of targeted therapy and immunotherapy in oncologyMariateresa Zuccarello, Antonio Fabrizio Nifosì, Lorenzo Nifosì, Gianfilippo Nifosì, Vanessa Hervas Sauspp. 3-8Evaluation of success criteria for temporomandibular joint arthrocentesisEmre Balaban, Mehmet Demirkol, Onur Yilmaz, Celal Candirlipp. 15-20Retrospective study of osteoradionecrosis in the jaws of patients with head and neck cancerNatália Garcia Santaella, Paulo Sérgio da Silva Santos, Brena Rodrigues Manzano, Marco Aurélio Oliveira, Cássia Maria Fischer Rubirapp. 21-28The evaluation of implant stability measured by resonance frequency analysis in different bone typesHamidreza Arab, Amin Khajavi, Leila Khodadadifard, Habibollah Ghanbari, Sarah Samizade, Naser Sargolzaiepp. 29-33
원문 보기