An in vitro comparison between two different designs of sagittal split ramus osteotomy
3
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Objectives: To evaluate the influence of the type of osteotomy in the inferir aspect of the mandible on the mechanical performance. Materials and Methods: The study was performed on 20 polyurethane hemimandibles. A sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO) was designed in 10 hemimandibles (group 1) with a vertical osteotomy in the buccal side (second molar level) and finalosteotomy was performed horizontally on the lingual aspect, while the mandible body osteotomy was finalizedas a straight osteotomy in the basilar area, perpendicular to the body. For group 2, the same osteotomy technique was used, but an oblique osteotomy was done in the basilar aspect of the mandibular body, forming continuity with the sagittal cut in the basilar area. Using a surgical guide, osteosynthesis was performed with bicortical screws using an inverted L scheme. In both groups vertical compression tests were performed with a linear load of 1 mm/min on the central fossa of the firstmolar and tests were done with models made from photoelastic resin. Data were analyzed using Student’s t-test, establishing a statistical significance whenP<0.05. Results: A statistical difference was not observed in the maximum displacements obtained in the two osteotomies (P<0.05). In the extensiometric analysis, statistically significantdifferences were identifiedonly in the middle screw of the fixation.The photoelastic resin models showed force dis-sipation towards the inferior aspect of the mandible in both SSRO models. Conclusion: We found that osteotomy of the inferior aspect did not influencethe mechanical performance for osteosynthesis with an inverted L sys-tem.
Abstract
Objectives: To evaluate the influence of the type of osteotomy in the inferir aspect of the mandible on the mechanical performance. Materials and Methods: The study was performed on 20 polyurethane hemimandibles. A sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO) was designed in 10 hemimandibles (group 1) with a vertical osteotomy in the buccal side (second molar level) and finalosteotomy was performed horizontally on the lingual aspect, while the mandible body osteotomy was finalizedas a straight osteotomy in the basilar area, perpendicular to the body. For group 2, the same osteotomy technique was used, but an oblique osteotomy was done in the basilar aspect of the mandibular body, forming continuity with the sagittal cut in the basilar area. Using a surgical guide, osteosynthesis was performed with bicortical screws using an inverted L scheme. In both groups vertical compression tests were performed with a linear load of 1 mm/min on the central fossa of the firstmolar and tests were done with models made from photoelastic resin. Data were analyzed using Student’s t-test, establishing a statistical significance whenP<0.05. Results: A statistical difference was not observed in the maximum displacements obtained in the two osteotomies (P<0.05). In the extensiometric analysis, statistically significantdifferences were identifiedonly in the middle screw of the fixation.The photoelastic resin models showed force dis-sipation towards the inferior aspect of the mandible in both SSRO models. Conclusion: We found that osteotomy of the inferior aspect did not influencethe mechanical performance for osteosynthesis with an inverted L sys-tem.
참고문헌 (24)
- Obwegeser HL, "Orthognathic surgery and a tale of how three procedures came to be: a letter to the next generations of surgeons", Clin Plast Surg, 34, pp.331~355 (2007)
- Trauner R, "The surgical correction of mandibular prognathism and retrognathia with consideration of genioplasty. I. Surgical procedures to correct mandibular prognathism and reshaping of the chin", Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol, 10, pp.677~689 (1957)
- Dal Pont G, "Retromolar osteotomy for the correction of prognathism", J Oral Surg Anesth Hosp Dent Serv, 19, pp.42~47 (1961)
- Epker BN, "Modifications in the sagittal osteotomy of the mandible", J Oral Surg, 35, pp.157~159 (1977)
- Ellis E 3rd, "A method to passively align the sagittal ramus osteresearchotomy segments", J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 65, pp.2125~2130 (2007)
- Wolford LM, "The mandibular inferior border split: a modification in the sagittal split osteotomy", J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 48, pp.92~94 (1990)
- Brasileiro BF, "An in vitro evaluation of rigid internal fixation techniques for sagittal split ramus osteotomies: advancement surgery", J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 67, pp.809~817 (2009)
- Sato FR, "A comparative evaluation of the hybrid technique for fixation of the sagittal split ramus osteotomy in mandibular advancement by mechanical, photoelastic, and finite element analysis", Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol, 114(5 Suppl), pp.S60~S68 (2012)
- Sato FR, "Comparison of five different fixation techniques of sagittal split ramus osteotomy using three-dimensional finite elements analysis", Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 41, pp.934~941 (2012)
- Wyatt WM, "Sagittal ramus split osteotomy: literature review and suggested modification of technique", Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 35, pp.137~141 (1997)
- Vinicius de Oliveira M, "Morphometric study of mandibular ramus related to sagittal ramus split osteotomy and osteosynthesis", J Craniofac Surg, 23, pp.1484~1487 (2012)
- Gallia L, "Modification of the sagittal ramus osteotomy to produce a more accurate inferior border split", J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 50, pp.1136~1137 (1992)
- Ochs MW, "Bicortical screw stabilization of sagittal split osteotomies", J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 61, pp.1477~1484 (2003)
- Haug RH, "Mandibular angle fractures: a clinical and biomechanical comparison--the works of Ellis and Haug", Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr, 1, pp.31~38 (2008)
- Chuong CJ, "Mechanical characteristics of the mandible after bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy: comparing 2 different fixation techniques", J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 63, pp.68~76 (2005)
- Kim HC, "Photoelastic analysis of internal screw fixation after sagittal split ramus osteotomy", J Craniomaxillofac Surg, 21, pp.266~270 (1993)
- Grellmann W, "Determination of strength and deformation behavior of human cartilage for the definition of significant parameters", J Biomed Mater Res A, 78, pp.168~174 (2006)
- Anucul B, "In vitro strength analysis of sagittal split osteotomy fixation: noncompression monocortical plates versus bicortical position screws", J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 50, pp.1295~1299 (1992)
- Hammer B, "Stabilization of the short sagittal split osteotomy: in vitro testing of different plate and screw configurations", J Craniomaxillofac Surg, 23, pp.321~324 (1995)
- Peterson GP, "A biomechanical evaluation of bilateral sagittal ramus osteotomy fixation techniques", J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 63, pp.1317~1324 (2005)
- Borstlap WA, "Stabilisation of sagittal split advancement osteotomies with miniplates:a prospective, multicentre study with two-year follow-up. Part I. Clinical parameters", Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 33, pp.433~441 (2004)
- Sato FR, "Comparison of postoperative stability of three rigid internal fixation techniques after sagittal split ramus osteotomy for mandibular advancement", J Craniomaxillofac Surg, 42, pp.e224~e229 (2014)
- Champy M, "Mandibular synthesis. Placement of the synthesis as a function of mandibular stress", Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac, 77, pp.971~976 (1976)
- Obeid G, "Optimal placement of bicortical screws in sagittal split-ramus osteotomy of mandible", Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol, 71, pp.665~669 (1991)