구치부에 발치 후 지연 식립된 표준 직경의 임플란트에 대한 임상적, 방사선학적 평가
CLINICAL & RADIOGRAPHIC EVALUATION FOLLOWING DELAYED IMPLANTATION USING REGULAR DIAMETER IMPLANTS IN THE POSTERIOR REGION
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this study was to evaluate clinical and radiographic changes of regular diameter implants placed in the posterior region. A total of 47 standard diameter implants were consecutively placed in the posterior region of 20 partially edentulous patients. The diameters of the implants were 4.1mm (N=35, 74%) and 4.3mm (N=12, 26%), respectively. Peri-implant bone loss and clinical parameters such as mobility, suppuration, swelling, bleeding on probing (BOP) were evaluated at the baseline and?the final follow-up visit. The age of the patients ranged between 24~82 years (mean age: 54.7 years). The cumulative survival rate of the regular diameter implants loaded for a period of 3-24 months (Mean: 11.7±7.9 month) was 100%. The average bone loss over the follow-up was 0.36±0.67 mm. Success rate was 95.7%. Only two implants failed (bone loss exceeding 1mm after 1 year of placement). Some prosthetic complications occurred, such as screw loosening (N=1) and dissolution of cementation material (N=2). The present study describes successful outcome following the use of standard-diameter-implants placed in the posterior region, and further comprehensive maintenance practices and follow-up schedules are required.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to evaluate clinical and radiographic changes of regular diameter implants placed in the posterior region. A total of 47 standard diameter implants were consecutively placed in the posterior region of 20 partially edentulous patients. The diameters of the implants were 4.1mm (N=35, 74%) and 4.3mm (N=12, 26%), respectively. Peri-implant bone loss and clinical parameters such as mobility, suppuration, swelling, bleeding on probing (BOP) were evaluated at the baseline and?the final follow-up visit. The age of the patients ranged between 24~82 years (mean age: 54.7 years). The cumulative survival rate of the regular diameter implants loaded for a period of 3-24 months (Mean: 11.7±7.9 month) was 100%. The average bone loss over the follow-up was 0.36±0.67 mm. Success rate was 95.7%. Only two implants failed (bone loss exceeding 1mm after 1 year of placement). Some prosthetic complications occurred, such as screw loosening (N=1) and dissolution of cementation material (N=2). The present study describes successful outcome following the use of standard-diameter-implants placed in the posterior region, and further comprehensive maintenance practices and follow-up schedules are required.
참고문헌 (23)
- Adell R, "A 15-year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw", Int J Oral Surg, 10, pp.387~416 (1981)
- Tolstunov L, "Implant zones of the jaws : Implant location and related success rate", J Oral Implantol, 33, pp.211~220 (2007)
- Langer B, "The wide fixture : A solution for special bone situations and a rescue for the compromised implant. Part 1", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 8, pp.400~408 (1993)
- Ivanoff CJ, "Influence of implant diameters on the integration of screw implants. An experimental study in rabbits", Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 26, pp.141~148 (1997)
- Becker W, "Replacement of maxillary and mandibular molars with single endosseous implant restorations: a retrospective study", J Prosthet Dent, 74, pp.51~55 (1995)
- Himmlova、L, "Influence of implant length and diameter on stress distribution: a finite element analysis", J Prosthet Dent, 91, pp.20~25 (2004)
- Renouard F, "Impact of implant length and diameter on survival rates", Clin Oral Implants Res, 17(2), pp.35~51 (2006)
- Nordin T, "Early functional loading of sand-blasted and acid-etched (SLA) Straumann implants following immediate placement in maxillary extraction sockets", Clin Oral Implants Res, 18, pp.441~451 (2007)
- Albrektsson T, "The longterm efficacy of currently used dental implants: a review and proposed criteria of success", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 1, pp.11~25 (1986)
- Mombelli A, "Clinical parameters for the evaluation of dental implants", Periodontol, 1994(4), pp.81~6 (2000)
- Ivanoff CJ, "Influence of Variations in Implant Diameters: A 3- to 5-Year Retrospective Clinical Report", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 14, pp.173~180 (1999)
- Shin SW, "A retrospective study on the treatment outcome of wide-bodied implants", Int J Prosthodont, 17, pp.52~58 (2004)
- Degidi M, "Wide Diameter Implant: Analysis of Clinical Outcome of 304 Fixtures", J Periodontol, 78, pp.52~58 (2007)
- English C, "What are the clinical limitations of wide-diameter (4 mm or greater) root-form endosseous implants?", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 15, pp.293~296 (2000)
- Norton MR, "Marginal bone levels at single tooth implants with a conical fixture design. The influence of surface macro- and microstructure", Clin Oral Implants Res, 9, pp.91~99 (1998)
- Hansson S, "The implant neck: smooth or provided with retention elements. A biomechanical approach", Clin Oral Implants Res, 10, pp.394~405 (1999)
- Shin YK, "Radiographic evaluation of marginal bone level around implants with different neck designs after 1 year", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 21, pp.789~794 (2006)
- Grossmann Y, "Indications for splinting implant restorations", J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 63, pp.1642~1652 (2005)
- Naert I, "Biologic outcome of implant-supported restorations in the treatment of partial edentulism. part I: a longitudinal clinical evaluation", Clin Oral Implants Res, 13, pp.381~389 (2002)
- Isidor F, "Loss of osseointegration caused by occlusal load of oral implants", Clin Oral Implant Res, 7, pp.143~152 (1996)
- Guichet DL, "Effect of splinting and interproximal contact tightness on load transfer by implant restorations", J Prosthet Dent, 87, pp.528~535 (2002)
- Wang TM, "Effects of prosthesis materials and prosthesis splinting on peri-implant bone stress around implants in poor-quality bone: A numeric analysis", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 17, pp.231~237 (2002)
- Eckert SE, "Analysis of Incidence and Associated Factors with Fractured Implants: A Retrospective Study", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 15, pp.662~667 (2000)
