Perioperative Comparison of Hip Arthroplasty Using the Direct Anterior Approach with the Posterolateral Approach
2
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose: The aim of the current study is to report the advantage and disadvantage of total hip arthroplasty performed in direct anterior approach (DAA) by comparing it to the posterolateral approach (PLA). Materials and Methods: Twenty-five hip arthroplasty done in DAA (12 total hip arthroplasty [THA] and 13 bipolar hemiarthroplasty [BHA]) were compared with the same number done in PLA (13 THA and 12 BHA). Intraoperative assessments including operation time, anesthetic time, bleeding amount were recorded with intraoperative complications. Immediate postoperatively, position of the prosthesis and leg length discrepancy were measured and were compared between the two approaches. Results: The operation time was 22 minutes and 19 minutes longer in DAA for THA and BHA respectively while the anesthetic time difference was 26 and 10 respectively. However, these parameters showed no statistical difference. No significance was found when bleeding amount was compared. For DAA, cup alignment was within safe zone in 100% both for inclination and for anteversion while this was 83.3% and 75.0% respectively in PLA. Leg length difference was 3 mm in DAA and 5 mm in PLA but had no significant difference. Tensor fascia lata tear was the most common complication occurring in 9 patients. Conclusion: Although significant was not reached there was trend toward more operation time and anesthetic time when DAA was used. However, the trend also showed that cup and stem were likely to be in more accurate position and in adequate size which is likely due to the accurate use of fluoroscopy
Abstract
Purpose: The aim of the current study is to report the advantage and disadvantage of total hip arthroplasty performed in direct anterior approach (DAA) by comparing it to the posterolateral approach (PLA). Materials and Methods: Twenty-five hip arthroplasty done in DAA (12 total hip arthroplasty [THA] and 13 bipolar hemiarthroplasty [BHA]) were compared with the same number done in PLA (13 THA and 12 BHA). Intraoperative assessments including operation time, anesthetic time, bleeding amount were recorded with intraoperative complications. Immediate postoperatively, position of the prosthesis and leg length discrepancy were measured and were compared between the two approaches. Results: The operation time was 22 minutes and 19 minutes longer in DAA for THA and BHA respectively while the anesthetic time difference was 26 and 10 respectively. However, these parameters showed no statistical difference. No significance was found when bleeding amount was compared. For DAA, cup alignment was within safe zone in 100% both for inclination and for anteversion while this was 83.3% and 75.0% respectively in PLA. Leg length difference was 3 mm in DAA and 5 mm in PLA but had no significant difference. Tensor fascia lata tear was the most common complication occurring in 9 patients. Conclusion: Although significant was not reached there was trend toward more operation time and anesthetic time when DAA was used. However, the trend also showed that cup and stem were likely to be in more accurate position and in adequate size which is likely due to the accurate use of fluoroscopy
참고문헌 (26)
- Kehlet H, "Effect of postoperative analgesia on surgical outcome", Br J Anaesth, 87, pp.62~72 (2001)
- Eckel R, "Supramolecular chemistry at the single-molecule level", Angew Chem Int Ed Engl, 44, pp.484~488 (2005)
- Mayr E, "A prospective randomized assessment of earlier functional recovery in THA patients treated by minimally invasive direct anterior approach: a gait analysis study", Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon), 24, pp.812~818 (2009)
- Meermans G, "The direct anterior approach in total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review of the literature", Bone Joint J, 99-B, pp.732~740 (2017)
- Connolly KP, "Direct anterior total hip arthroplasty:Comparative outcomes and contemporary results", World J Orthop, 7, pp.94~101 (2016)
- Matta JM, "Single-incision anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty on an orthopaedic table", Clin Orthop Relat Res, 441, pp.115~124 (2005)
- Pradhan R, "Planar anteversion of the acetabular cup as determined from plain anteroposterior radiographs", J Bone Joint Surg Br, 81, pp.431~435 (1999)
- Woo RY, "Dislocations after total hip arthroplasty", J Bone Joint Surg Am, 64, pp.1295~1306 (1982)
- Chang RW, "A cost-effectiveness analysis of total hip arthroplasty for osteoarthritis of the hip", JAMA, 275, pp.858~865 (1996)
- Sutherland R, "Simplified surgical approach to the hip", Arch Surg, 48, pp.144~145 (1944)
- Higgins BT, "Anterior vs. posterior approach for total hip arthroplasty, a systematic review and meta-analysis", J Arthroplasty, 30, pp.419~434 (2015)
- Alecci V, "Comparison of primary total hip replacements performed with a direct anterior approach versus the standard lateral approach: perioperative findings", J Orthop Traumatol, 12, pp.123~129 (2011)
- Barrett WP, "Prospective randomized study of direct anterior vs postero-lateral approach for total hip arthroplasty", J Arthroplasty, 28, pp.1634~1638 (2013)
- Berend KR, "Enhanced early outcomes with the anterior supine intermuscular approach in primary total hip arthroplasty", J Bone Joint Surg Am, 91(Suppl 6), pp.107~120 (2009)
- Goebel S, "Reduced postoperative pain in total hip arthroplasty after minimal-invasive anterior approach", Int Orthop, 36, pp.491~498 (2012)
- Zawadsky MW, "Early outcome comparison between the direct anterior approach and the mini-incision posterior approach for primary total hip arthroplasty: 150 consecutive cases", J Arthroplasty, 29, pp.1256~1260 (2014)
- Poehling-Monaghan KL, "Direct anterior versus miniposterior THA with the same advanced perioperative protocols: surprising early clinical results", Clin Orthop Relat Res, 473, pp.623~631 (2015)
- D’Arrigo C, "Learning curve in tissue sparing total hip replacement:comparison between different approaches", J Orthop Traumatol, 10, pp.47~54 (2009)
- Rodriguez JA, "Does the direct anterior approach in THA offer faster rehabilitation and comparable safety to the posterior approach?", Clin Orthop Relat Res, 472, pp.455~463 (2014)
- Martin CT, "A comparison of hospital length of stay and short-term morbidity between the anterior and the posterior approaches to total hip arthroplasty", J Arthroplasty, 28, pp.849~854 (2013)
- Spaans AJ, "High complication rate in the early experience of minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty by the direct anterior approach", Acta Orthop, 83, pp.342~346 (2012)
- de Steiger RN, "What is the learning curve for the anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty?", Clin Orthop Relat Res, 473, pp.3860~3866 (2015)
- Barton C, "Complications of the direct anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty", Orthop Clin North Am, 40, pp.371~375 (2009)
- Rathod PA, "Does fluoroscopy with anterior hip arthroplasty decrease acetabular cup variability compared with a nonguided posterior approach?", Clin Orthop Relat Res, 472, pp.1877~1885 (2014)
- Abe H, "Difference in stem alignment between the direct anterior approach and the posterolateral approach in total hip arthroplasty", J Arthroplasty, 30, pp.1761~1766 (2015)
- Mohan R, "Evaluating online information regarding the direct anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty", J Arthroplasty, 30, pp.803~807 (2015)