본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Evaluation of Direct Anterior Approach for Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review

1

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

The direct anterior approach (DAA) is an established approach for total hip arthroplasty (THA) but has been sparingly tried for revisions. The purpose of this study was to examine the available literature in order to consolidate information available on revision THA using the DAA. A PubMed, Embase, and Scopus search was performed using relevant keywords. Studies reporting on patients undergoing revision THA using DAA were included for analysis. In a review of the literature, nine studies matched the pre-decided inclusion criteria with 319 hip joints undergoing revision THA. Mean follow-up of all included studies was 34 months. The indications of revision after primary THA in decreasing order were aseptic loosening (53%), prosthetic joint infection (20.7%), peri-prosthetic fracture (16.9%), dislocation (7.2%), psoas impingement (1.9%), polyethylene wear (1.2%), pain (0.6%), and instability (0.3%). Of the 319 revisions evaluated, 107 underwent a stem revision, 142 underwent cup revision, 49 underwent a combined revision, and 21 underwent isolated liner/head change. A statistically significant improvement in functional score (P<0.05) was observed for all studies reporting on functional outcomes. A low complication rate (51/319, 16.0%), which includes dislocation (12), infection (12), loosening of the acetabular shell (5), peri-prosthetic fractures (6), haematoma (4), and transient nerve palsy (6), was reported. Based on available level III-IV evidence, DAA appears to be a reliable alternative for revision of the failed hip arthroplasty with acceptable complication rates. Evidence of a higher quality is needed to further characterize its role in revision scenarios.

Abstract

The direct anterior approach (DAA) is an established approach for total hip arthroplasty (THA) but has been sparingly tried for revisions. The purpose of this study was to examine the available literature in order to consolidate information available on revision THA using the DAA. A PubMed, Embase, and Scopus search was performed using relevant keywords. Studies reporting on patients undergoing revision THA using DAA were included for analysis. In a review of the literature, nine studies matched the pre-decided inclusion criteria with 319 hip joints undergoing revision THA. Mean follow-up of all included studies was 34 months. The indications of revision after primary THA in decreasing order were aseptic loosening (53%), prosthetic joint infection (20.7%), peri-prosthetic fracture (16.9%), dislocation (7.2%), psoas impingement (1.9%), polyethylene wear (1.2%), pain (0.6%), and instability (0.3%). Of the 319 revisions evaluated, 107 underwent a stem revision, 142 underwent cup revision, 49 underwent a combined revision, and 21 underwent isolated liner/head change. A statistically significant improvement in functional score (P<0.05) was observed for all studies reporting on functional outcomes. A low complication rate (51/319, 16.0%), which includes dislocation (12), infection (12), loosening of the acetabular shell (5), peri-prosthetic fractures (6), haematoma (4), and transient nerve palsy (6), was reported. Based on available level III-IV evidence, DAA appears to be a reliable alternative for revision of the failed hip arthroplasty with acceptable complication rates. Evidence of a higher quality is needed to further characterize its role in revision scenarios.

참고문헌 (49)

  1. Post ZD, "Direct anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty : indications, technique, and results", J Am Acad Orthop Surg, 22, pp.595~603 (2014)
  2. Moskal JT, "Anterior muscle sparing approach for total hip arthroplasty", World J Orthop, 4, pp.12~18 (2013)
  3. Meermans G, "The direct anterior approach in total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review of the literature", Bone Joint J, 99-B, pp.732~740 (2017)
  4. Wang Z, "A systematic review and metaanalysis of direct anterior approach versus posterior approach in total hip arthroplasty", J Orthop Surg Res, 13, pp.229~ (2018)
  5. Kennon R, "Anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty : beyond the minimally invasive technique", J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2, pp.91~97 (2004)
  6. Hasler J, "Is revision total hip arthroplasty through the direct anterior approach feasible", Arch Orthop Trauma Surg, 140, pp.1125~1132 (2020)
  7. Moretti VM, "Surgical approaches for total hip arthroplasty", Indian J Orthop, 51, pp.368~376 (2017)
  8. Lewinnek GE, "Dislocations after total hip-replacement arthroplasties", J Bone Joint Surg Am, 60, pp.217~220 (1978)
  9. Bozic KJ, "The epidemiology of revision total hip arthroplasty in the United States", J Bone Joint Surg Am, 91, pp.128~133 (2009)
  10. Blackburn J, "Posterior approach to optimise patientreported outcome from revision hip arthroplasty", Hip Int, 27, pp.175~179 (2017)
  11. Ghijselings SGM, "Distal extension of the anterior approach to the hip using the femoral interbundle technique : surgical technique and case series", J Arthroplasty, 32, pp.2186~2190 (2017)
  12. Mast NH, "Revision total hip arthroplasty performed through the Hueter interval", J Bone Joint Surg Am, 93(Suppl 2), pp.143~148 (2011)
  13. Manrique J, "Direct anterior approach for revision total hip arthroplasty", Ann Transl Med, 2, pp.100~ (2014)
  14. Nogler MM, "The direct anterior approach for hip revision : accessing the entire femoral diaphysis without endangering the nerve supply", J Arthroplasty, 32, pp.510~514 (2017)
  15. Baba T, "Posterior versus direct anterior approach in revision hip arthroplasty using Kerboulltype plate", SICOT, 6, pp.2~ (2020)
  16. Tamaki T, "Acetabular revision using a Kerboull-type reinforcement device through direct anterior approach", J Orthop Surg(Hong Kong), 26, pp.2309499018782553~ (2018)
  17. Horsthemke MD, "The minimalinvasive direct anterior approach in aseptic cup revision hip arthroplasty : a mid-term follow-up", Arch Orthop Trauma Surg, 139, pp.121~126 (2019)
  18. Bouveau V, "Outcomes after revision of metal on metal hip resurfacing to total arthroplasty using the direct anterior approach", Int Orthop, 42, pp.2543~2548 (2018)
  19. Thaler M, "Mid-term follow-up of the direct anterior approach in acetabular revision hip arthroplasty using a reconstruction cage with impaction grafting", J Arthroplasty, 35, pp.1339~1343 (2020)
  20. Thaler M, "The direct anterior approach : treating periprosthetic joint infection of the hip using two-stage revision arthroplasty", Arch Orthop Trauma Surg, 140, pp.255~262 (2020)
  21. Thaler M, "Extension of the direct anterior approach for the treatment of periprosthetic femoral fractures", J Arthroplasty, 34, pp.2449~2453 (2019)
  22. Kanda A, "Preservation of the articular capsule and short lateral rotator in direct anterior approach to total hip arthroplasty", Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol, 28, pp.1111~1116 (2018)
  23. Christensen CP, "Comparison of patient function during the first six weeks after direct anterior or posterior total hip arthroplasty(THA) : a randomized study", J Arthroplasty, 30(9 Suppl), pp.94~97 (2015)
  24. Meneghini RM, "Muscle damage during MIS total hip arthroplasty : Smith-Petersen versus posterior approach", Clin Orthop Relat Res, 453, pp.293~298 (2006)
  25. Müller M, "Evidence of reduced muscle trauma through a minimally invasive anterolateral approach by means of MRI", Clin Orthop Relat Res, 468, pp.3192~3200 (2010)
  26. Hoell S, "The minimal invasive direct anterior approach in combination with large heads in total hip arthroplasty-is dislocation still a major issue? A case control study", BMC Musculoskelet Disord, 15, pp.80~ (2014)
  27. Tsukada S, "Lower dislocation rate following total hip arthroplasty via direct anterior approach than via posterior approach : five-year-average follow-up results", Open Orthop J, 9, pp.157~162 (2015)
  28. Newman EA, "Incidence of heterotopic ossification in direct anterior vs posterior approach to total hip arthroplasty : a retrospective radiographic review", Int Orthop, 40, pp.1967~1973 (2016)
  29. Ziran NM, "Safe surgical technique : iliac osteotomy via the anterior approach for revision hip arthroplasty", Patient Saf Surg, 8, pp.32~ (2014)
  30. Grob K, "Distal extension of the direct anterior approach to the hip poses risk to neurovascular structures : an anatomical study", J Bone Joint Surg Am, 97, pp.126~132 (2015)
  31. Badarudeen S, "Complications after revision total hip arthroplasty in the medicare population", J Arthroplasty, 32, pp.1954~1958 (2017)
  32. Babis GC, "High complication rate in reconstruction of Paprosky type IIIa acetabular defects using an oblong implant with modular side plates and a hook", J Bone Joint Surg Br, 93, pp.1592~1596 (2011)
  33. Asayama I, "Reconstructed hip joint position and abductor muscle strength after total hip arthroplasty", J Arthroplasty, 20, pp.414~420 (2005)
  34. Kiyama T, "Effect of superior placement of the hip center on abductor muscle strength in total hip arthroplasty", J Arthroplasty, 24, pp.240~245 (2009)
  35. Siguier T, "Mini-incision anterior approach does not increase dislocation rate: a study of 1037total hip replacements", Clin Orthop Relat Res, (426), pp.164~173 (2004)[DOI]
  36. De Smet K, "Metal ion measurement as a diagnostic tool to identify problems with metal-onmetal hip resurfacing", J Bone Joint Surg Am, 90(Suppl 4), pp.202~208 (2008)
  37. Soderquist MC, "Acetabular placement accuracy with the direct anterior approach freehand technique", J Arthroplasty, 32, pp.2748~2754 (2017)
  38. Nogler M, "A double offset broach handle for preparation of the femoral cavity in minimally invasive direct anterior total hip arthroplasty", J Arthroplasty, 21, pp.1206~1208 (2006)
  39. Ghijselings SG, "Distal extension of the direct anterior approach to the hip : a cadaveric feasibility study", J Arthroplasty, 32, pp.300~303 (2017)
  40. Levine BR, "Extended trochanteric osteotomy for the treatment of vancouver B2", B3 periprosthetic fractures of the femur, 2008, pp.23, 527~533
  41. Drexler M, "The outcome of modified extended trochanteric osteotomy in revision THA for Vancouver B2", B3 periprosthetic fractures of the femur, 2014, pp.29, 1598~1604
  42. Farrell CM, "Motor nerve palsy following primary total hip arthroplasty", J Bone Joint Surg Am, 87, pp.2619~2625 (2005)
  43. Amstutz HC, "Revision of aseptic loose total hip arthroplasties", Clin Orthop Relat Res, (170), pp.21~33 (1982)
  44. Nercessian OA, "Postoperative sciatic and femoral nerve palsy with reference to leg lengthening and medialization", lateralization of the hip joint following total hip arthroplasty, 1994, pp.(304), 165~171
  45. Kerboull L, "Selecting the surgical approach for revision total hip arthroplasty", Orthop Traumatol Surg Res, 101(1Suppl), pp.S171~S178 (2015)
  46. Tanaka C, "Acetabular reconstruction using a Kerboull-type acetabular reinforcement device and hydroxyapatite granules : a 3-to 8-year follow-up study", J Arthroplasty, 18, pp.719~725 (2003)
  47. Akiyama H, "Long-term results of cemented total hip arthroplasty in developmental dysplasia with acetabular bulk bone grafts after improving operative techniques", J Arthroplasty, 25, pp.716~720 (2010)
  48. Kawasaki M, "Muscle damage after total hip arthroplasty through the direct anterior approach for developmental dysplasia of the hip", J Arthroplasty, 32, pp.2466~2473 (2017)
  49. Kong X, "Adopting the direct anterior approach : experience and learning curve in a Chinese patient population", J Orthop Surg Res, 14, pp.218~ (2019)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)